Welcome to our new website

Specialized olfactory receptor neurons mediating intra- and interspecific chemical communication in leafminer moths Eriocrania spp. (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae)
Mattias C. Larsson, Eric Hallberg, Mikhail V. Kozlov, Wittko Francke, Bill S. Hansson, Christer Löfstedt


We performed a physiological and morphological characterization of sensilla auricillica in male Eriocrania semipurpurella moths. Each auricillic sensillum contained three olfactory receptor neurons. Responding neurons (87 of 139) could be grouped into five physiological types. Type 1 responded to (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and type 2 to its enantiomer (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol, both of which are pheromone components of E. semipurpurella. Type 3 responded to both (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol, which are pheromone components of the sympatric species E. cicatricella. Types 4 and 5 responded to the ketones (Z)-6-nonen-2-one and/or nonan-2-one, which are found in the pheromone glands of female E. semipurpurella.

Field-trapping showed that type 3 receptor neurons mediate strongly antagonistic effects of (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol on E. semipurpurella, while nonan-2-one should possibly be included as a synergist in the sex pheromone blend of this species. The attraction of E. cicatricella and E. sparrmannella to compounds mixed with the pheromone blend of E. semipurpurella shows that the pheromone components of E. semipurpurella have little or no antagonistic effects on these species.

The morphology and physiology of eriocraniid pheromone sensilla are very similar to those found in the order Trichoptera (caddisflies), suggesting a homology between pheromone detection systems in the two sister orders Lepidoptera and Trichoptera.


The use of long-range pheromones predates the phylogenetic separation of the Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) from its sister order Trichoptera (caddisflies). The basal lineages of Lepidoptera are similar to those of Trichoptera with regard to pheromone communication (symplesiomorphy), whereas advanced lepidopterans demonstrate significant apomorphic changes (Löfstedt and Kozlov, 1997). In caddisfly species in which pheromone components have been identified, these consist of short-chain (7-9 carbon atoms) secondary alcohols and ketones released from paired glands with their openings on abdominal sternite V (Löfstedt et al., 1994; Bjostad et al., 1996). Similar compounds have been identified as pheromone components in the lepidopteran families Eriocraniidae (Zhu et al., 1995; Kozlov et al., 1996) and Nepticulidae (Tóth et al., 1995). In the Eriocraniidae, which is the most primitive moth family in which pheromone communication has been confirmed, these pheromones are released from glands apparently homologous to those in the Trichoptera. Unlike most moth pheromones (Arn et al., 1992), eriocraniid pheromone components are usually chiral, and the enantiomeric composition has a profound influence on pheromone activity (Zhu et al., 1995; Kozlov et al., 1996).

In ditrysian moths, comprising the majority of moth species, the male pheromone detection apparatus has been thoroughly studied. These moths use specialized olfactory receptor neurons, housed in long sensilla trichodea, to detect pheromone components released by females. Each component of the female pheromone blend is typically detected by a corresponding type of receptor neuron on the male antenna (Boeckh, 1984). Except for electroantennographic recordings, no electrophysiological investigations of pheromone receptor neurons have been performed in the Eriocraniidae or other primitive moth families.

Some single-cell data on pheromone reception are available from the sister order Trichoptera. Males and females of the caddisfly Rhyacophila nubila have receptor neurons responding to heptan-2-one, heptan-2-ol, nonan-2-one and nonan-2-ol (Larsson and Hansson, 1998), which have been identified from the female sternal glands (Löfstedt et al., 1994). The behavioural significance of these compounds has not been established in R. nubila however. In the related species Rhyacophila fasciata, in which pheromonal activity has been confirmed (Löfstedt et al., 1994), both sexes also have receptor neurons with response properties similar to those found in R. nubila (M. C. Larsson and B. S. Hansson, unpublished results). In both species, the receptor neurons have a high ability for chiral discrimination, although the behavioural effects of the chirality of the compounds are unknown.

We have performed an electrophysiological and morphological investigation of pheromone sensilla in the eriocraniid moth Eriocrania semipurpurella. The purpose of our investigation was to study pheromone detection in a primitive moth and to make a comparison with what is known about the detection of structurally similar compounds in caddisflies. As olfactory stimuli, we used a set of ketones and secondary alcohols that function as semiochemicals in E. semipurpurella and the sympatric species E. cicatricella, E. sparrmannella and E. sangii. The results from the single-sensillum study prompted us to perform field-trapping experiments to elucidate the behavioural role that the electrophysiologically active compounds play in the chemical communication of Eriocrania spp.

Materials and methods

Experimental animal

Eriocrania semipurpurella Stph. is a tiny (wing span 11-14mm) diurnal moth abundant in the Northern boreal forest zone at the time of the birch leaf flush. Earlier studies have demonstrated that (R,Z)- and (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol are the principal components of the female pheromone in this species; however the most attractive ratio of these two enantiomers exhibited significant geographical variation (Kozlov et al., 1996). Analysis of the Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) variation between individual moths has led to the discovery of large population subdivisions in E. semipurpurella: three sympatric `pheromone races' were discovered in southwest Finland (P. Metcalfe, M. V. Kozlov, W. Francke and C. Löfstedt, unpublished results). Since these races also exhibit morphological differences, they should (most probably) be treated as different species (O. Karsholt, N. P. Kristensen and M. V. Kozlov, unpublished results). Only one race was found in Lund, whereas the material collected from Turku might include up to three races; this, however, seems unlikely because we used only one enantiomeric composition to collect moths for our study (see below). Since the taxonomic treatment of this species complex is not yet complete, we refer to our study object as E. semipurpurella (sensu lato).

Collection of experimental animals

For electrophysiological studies, we caught live E. semipurpurella males in hollow containers baited with a blend of 50μg of (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and 50μg of (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol. The animals were caught in 1995, 1996 and 1997 at two field sites with birch stands outside Lund, Sweden, and outside Turku, Finland. For morphological studies, we caught E. semipurpurella males in Lund by netting.


The nine compounds used in the electrophysiological and behavioural experiments are listed in Tables 1 and 2. (R)-heptan-2-ol and (S)-heptan-2-ol were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. The synthesis of all other compounds followed the procedures described previously, and chemical and enantiomeric purity were checked by chiral gas chromatography (Kozlov et al., 1996). The chemical purity of all compounds was at least 99%. The enantiomeric excess for all the chiral compounds was 98% or greater, i.e. no more than 1% of the antipode was present. The compounds were dissolved in hexane and then diluted in decadic steps.

View this table:
Table 1.

Eriocrania species for which semiochemicals have been identified in previous field-trapping studies

View this table:
Table 2.

Frequency and response spectra of different types of olfactory receptor neuron encountered on the antennae of male Eriocrania semipurpurella

Electron microscopy

For scanning electron microscopy, antennae from male E. semipurpurella were fixed in 70% ethanol, dehydrated and air-dried. The antennae were mounted on holders with white glue and sputter-coated with gold/palladium. The specimens were studied in a JEOL T330 scanning electron microscope operated at 10kV. For transmission electron microscopy, the antennae were excised, cut into smaller pieces and immersed in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.15 moll-1 cacodylate buffer for 8h. Postfixation was carried out in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2h. After dehydration, the specimens were embedded in Epon resin and polymerized. Sections cut on a diamond knife were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in an LKB ultrastainer. The sections were examined in a JEOL 1200 EX transmission electron microscope. Olfactory sensilla were classified according to morphological criteria, i.e. the structure of pores (Altner, 1977).


Odour stimuli for electrophysiological experiments were prepared by pipetting 10μl samples of hexane with dissolved compound onto small pieces of filter paper (approximately 10cm×15 mm) placed in Pasteur pipettes and letting the solvent evaporate. The amount of compound deposited in each pipette ranged from 10pg to 100ng in decadic steps for the dose/response trials. A blank cartridge containing only filter paper plus solvent was also prepared. For screening, we used 1μg in each pipette. The test stimuli were kept at -20 °C when they were not in use to minimize evaporation of the test compounds. Each test cartridge was replaced within 2 days.

For the single-sensillum recordings, moths were restrained in holders cut from small, plastic micropipette tips (Tamro MedLab, Mölndal, Sweden), and the head and antennae were fixed with dental wax. A thin silver wire, serving as a ground electrode, was inserted into the abdomen. Contact was established with receptor neurons by means of tungsten microelectrodes, sharpened electrolytically in KNO2-solution and inserted near the base of olfactory sensilla (Boeckh, 1962). A binocular microscope with up to 300× magnification and two Leitz micromanipulators were used to position the animals and the recording electrode.

A charcoal-filtered and humidified air stream was blown over the antenna at a constant velocity of 0.5 m s-1 through a glass tube with the outlet approximately 15 mm from the antenna. Stimulation was performed by inserting the tip of the test pipette into a hole, 15 cm from the outlet of the glass tube, and blowing air (2.5 ml over 0.5 s) through the pipette. The stimulus air puffs were generated by a Syntech SFC-1/b stimulus controller (Hilversum, the Netherlands).

Upon contact with a sensillum (or sensilla), distinguished by spontaneous or penetration-induced action potentials (`spikes') from receptor neurons, we stimulated the antenna with the blank plus all the test compounds at the screening dose. If a neuron responded to any of the test compounds with a change in spike frequency different from that to the blank, a dose/response trial was performed in which all active compounds were presented to the antenna at all doses. All stimuli were delivered by dose level, starting with the lowest dose. At each dose level, the stimuli were delivered at random with an interval of at least 20 s, except at the higher levels, where the stimuli showing the lowest response were delivered first. At these high levels, it was also necessary to allow longer intervals between stimuli to let the neurons recover their normal spontaneous activity. Some neurons were classified only according to their responses to the screening stimuli.

The signal was amplified using a low-pass/high-pass high-impedance amplifier constructed in our laboratory. During the experiments, the neural responses were visualised on an oscilloscope and stored on videotape for later processing. The filtering of the signal through the amplifier did not suffice to remove enough low-frequency noise from the recordings, resulting in low signal-to-noise ratios for action potentials with low amplitudes. The signal from the videotape was therefore filtered a second time through a Syntech UN-06 amplifier with better filtering capacity before being transferred to a Compaq ProLinea 4/66 computer for analysis with the program Syntech Auto Spike v.3.0. The identification of individual neurons was based on differences in the amplitudes of their action potentials. The action potentials were counted, and the net response to a stimulus was calculated as the number of spikes over 1 s after stimulation minus the number of spikes over 1 s before stimulation. The net response to the blank was subtracted to avoid any non-specific responses, for example to the air puff.


We conducted the field-trapping experiments in 1998, at a field site outside Lund, using Delta traps. Within each replicate, the traps were randomly placed at least 5 m apart, suspended 1-2 m above the ground from the branches of young birch trees. The traps were emptied each day, except at the end of the second trial (see below), when they were left for a whole week to catch the last stray moths at the end of the field season. After each sampling time, the position of each trap was changed to minimize the effects of habitat heterogeneities. Odour dispensers for field-trapping experiments were prepared from red rubber septa (Arthur H. Thomas Co.; Catalogue no. 1780-J07) by pipetting 100 μl samples of hexane containing blends of dissolved compounds onto each rubber septum.

During the first trial, conducted on 23-28 April, the effects of adding electrophysiologically active compounds to the previously reported pheromone blend of E. semipurpurella were tested. In each replicate, a reference bait containing 50 μg each of (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol was compared with six other baits containing the same blend plus 5 μg of another compound. The other compounds tested were (R)-heptan-2-ol, (S)-heptan-2-ol, (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol, (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol, (Z)-6-nonen-2-one and nonan-2-one. Treatments were compared with the reference bait using a Mann—Whitney U-test for pairwise comparisons.

In the second trial, conducted from 29 April to 7 May, the effects of adding different amounts of compounds to the pheromone blend of E. semipurpurella were tested. The same type of reference bait as in the first trial was used, while seven other baits containing the pheromone blend plus (R)-heptan-2-ol (0.5 and 5 μg), (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol (0.5, 5 and 50 μg), (Z)-6-nonen-2-one (0.5 μg) and nonan-2-one (0.5 μg) were tested. All treatments were compared using a Kruskal—Wallis analysis of variance followed by a Mann—Whitney U-test for pair-wise comparisons.


Electron microscopy

According to morphological criteria, there were two types of olfactory sensilla on the antennae of the males of E. semipurpurella: trichoid and auricillic sensilla. The antenna was covered with scales, forming a coat above the surface, but these scales were often dislodged from their sockets (Fig. 1A,B).

Fig. 1.

Electron micrographs of antennae of male Eriocrania semipurpurella. (A) Scanning electron micrograph showing two sensilla auricillica (arrows) and sockets from dislodged scales (arrowheads). The short hairs present on the antennal surface are non-innervated cuticular structures (compare C). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) In addition to the auricillic sensilla, trichoid sensilla (arrows) occur basally on the flagellomeres. Stout chaetic sensilla (arrowhead) are found on the distal parts of the flagellomeres. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Transmission electron micrograph showing a transverse section of sensilla above the antennal surface (bottom) of a male E. semipurpurella. The auricillic sensillum (au) contains numerous branches of the dendritic outer segments, whereas the trichoid sensilla (tr) have moderately branched dendritic outer segments. Non-innervated hairs (arrowheads) are present between the sensilla. Scale bar, 1 μm.

Auricillic sensilla were the most numerous, with their leaf-shaped cuticular hairs arranged along the whole antennal surface. Each auricillic sensillum was 7-10 μm long and 4-5 μm wide and had a short shaft connecting it to the antennal surface. Its surface was provided with longitudinal furrows in which the pores were found (Fig. 1A). The numerous pores were found on both sides of the flattened cuticular hair. The cuticular walls of the hair had a maximal thickness of approximately 100 nm, and the pores were marked by invaginated less-electron-dense areas of the hair cuticle. Each auricillic sensillum was innervated by three sensory cells (N=27), with branched dendritic outer segments within the hair structure. In cross sections of the hairs, there were approximately 100 branches with a diameter of approximately 50 nm (Fig. 1C).

The trichoid sensilla were found only on the ventral part of the antennae in groups of approximately 10 on the proximal part of each flagellomere. The slightly curved cuticular hairs were approximately 25 μm long, and their distal parts were bent towards the antennal surface (Fig. 1B). The cuticular walls (thickness approximately 120 nm) were provided with pores, but the density of pores was considerably lower than in the auricillic sensilla. Each trichoid sensillum was innervated by two sensory cells (N=10), which had branched dendritic outer segments. The branching of the dendritic outer segments was moderate compared with that of the auricillic sensilla: in cross sections, there were 4-5 branches in the middle part of the hair (Fig. 1C).


We obtained 83 recordings from 26 male moths that lasted long enough for a characterization with all screening stimuli. Contacts were obtained mainly from the ventral side of each antennae, in the medial parts of the flagellomeres. The sensilla from which we recorded could not be identified with certainty in the light microscope, but the location of the recording electrode showed that the recordings stemmed from auricillic sensilla. In each recording, we simultaneously registered spikes from 1-3 neurons with different spike amplitudes. The smaller spikes could not be clearly distinguished during the experiments, but after filtering through a second amplifier they were clearly distinguishable from the baseline noise (Fig. 2). All responses to test stimuli were characterized by an increase in spike frequency relative to the spontaneous level of activity. We recorded from 139 receptor neurons, of which 87 responded to one or several of our test stimuli with a higher spike frequency than to the blank. Blank stimuli generally elicited no spikes or very few spikes above the spontaneous level of activity. Responding neurons could all be grouped into five separate types depending on their response characteristics (Fig. 3; Table 2). We found all five types of receptor neuron in months from both Sweden and Finland.

Fig. 2.

Simultaneous recordings from three neurons with different spike amplitudes (marked with a, b and c; see Table 3) stimulated with four different compounds (source dose 1 ng). The a neuron (type 1) responded to (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol, the b neuron (type 2) to (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and the c neuron (type 3) to both (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol and (R)-heptan-2-ol. The horizontal bar shows the duration of the stimulus period (0.5 s).

Fig. 3.

Dose/response relationships of four types of olfactory receptor neuron. Values are the number of spikes over 1 s (means ± S.E.M.). (A) Type 1 neurons responded to the pheromone component (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol, with the (S)-enantiomer having a 100-fold higher response threshold (N=13). (B) The response pattern of the type 2 neurons is a mirror image of that of the type 1 neurons; they responded to the pheromone component (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol (N-11). (C) Type 3 neurons responded to two compounds, (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol, with the response threshold for the respective (S)-enantiomers being approximately 100 times higher (N=5). (D) Type 4 neurons responded to both nine-carbon ketones with a preference for (Z)-6-nonen-2-one over nonan-2-one (N=5). Dose/response curves are not shown for type 5 neurons because these neurons responded only to nonan-2-one and only at high concentrations.

The two most common types of receptor neuron, designated type 1 and type 2, responded to the two pheromone components of E. semipurpurella. Type 1 neurons responded selectively to (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol, while type 2 neurons responded selectively to (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol. Both types of receptor neuron had a high ability for chiral discrimination, with the sensitivity to the key compound being at least 100 times higher than to the respective enantiomer (Fig. 3; Table 2).

Another set of receptor neurons, designated type 3, responded identically to two different compounds, (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol, which have not been identified in extracts of E. semipurpurella. The type 3 neurons had an ability for chiral discrimination similar to that of the type 1 and type 2 neurons, i.e. a 100-fold difference in sensitivity between the two key compounds and their respective enantiomers (Fig. 3; Table 2).

Type 4 neurons responded to both nine-carbon ketones, with a preference for (Z)-6-nonen-2-one over nonan-2-one, while type 5 neurons responded slightly to nonan-2-one alone, but only at the highest doses (100 ng to 1μ g).

Specific combinations of 2-3 neurons were frequently encountered (Table 3). Presumably these neurons resided in the same sensillum, although some cases of recordings from more than one sensillum cannot be excluded. Neurons may also occasionally have been damaged by the penetrating electrode and therefore never recorded or not responded. When two or more neurons were found together, the relationship between their spike amplitudes was usually, but not always, similar between different recordings. Receptor neurons for the two pheromone components usually had the highest spike amplitudes, with type 1>type 2, while other physiological types had lower amplitudes. Non-responding neurons typically had the lowest spike amplitudes (Table 3).

View this table:
Table 3.

Combinations of different physiological types of receptor neuron found together


In the first series of field-trapping experiments, (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol dramatically suppressed the catch of E. semipurpurella males when added to the E. semipurpurella pheromone blend. Other compounds had no significant effects, although traps containing one of the two corresponding (S)-enantiomers or nonan-2-one caught high numbers of E. semipurpurella males compared with the reference traps (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Results from the first field-trapping experiment, 23-28 April. In each treatment, 5 μg of an electrophysiologically active compound was added to the pheromone blend of Eriocrania semipurpurella [reference blend (Ref.) 50 μg of (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and 50 μg of (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol]. The graph shows the number of males of the two species E. semipurpurella and E. cicatricella caught per trap. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=15). *Significantly different from the reference blend (Ref.) (P<0.001) (Mann—Whitney U-test); NS, no significant difference from the reference blend.

In the later series of field-trapping experiments, testing different doses of the potentially active compounds, (R)-heptan-2-ol turned out to be antagonistic to E. semipurpurella at the 5 μg dose (ratios 1:1:0.1) but not at the 0.5 μg dose (ratios 1:1:0.01). (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol had no significant effect at 0.5 μg or 5μ g, but significantly reduced the catch at the 50 μg dose. The ketone (Z)-6-nonen-2-one had no effect, while 0.5 μg of nonan-2-one significantly increased the trap catch when added to the blend (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Results from the second field-trapping experiment, 29 April to 7 May. Different amounts of potential semiochemicals were added to the pheromone blend of Eriocrania semipurpurella [50 μg of (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and 50 μg of (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol]. The graph shows the number of males of the three species E. semipurpurella, E. sparrmannella and E. cicatricella caught per trap. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=15). One E. cicatricella male was caught in a trap containing 5 μg of (R)-heptan-2-ol (indicated with an asterisk). Columns labelled with the same letters are not significantly different (a,b,c refer to E. semipurpurella; a′,b′,c′ refer to E. sparrmannella (Kruskal—Wallis analysis of variance followed by pairwise comparisons with a Mann—Whitney U-test; P<0.05).

In the first series of field-trapping tests, a large number of E. cicatricella Zett. males were caught in the traps with 5 μg of (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol (Fig. 4). In the second series, several males of this species were also caught in the traps with 50 μg of (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol (Fig. 5). During the second series of field trials, E. cicatricella were caught primarily at the beginning of this series. No E. cicatricella males were caught during May (data not shown).

The addition of (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol to the blend had a dramatic effect on the species E. sparrmannella Bosc., which had not been caught in traps containing this compound during the first series of trials (Figs 4, 5). Increasing the dose of (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol from 0.5 to 50 μg led to a steep increase in the catch of E. sparrmannella males. E. sparrmannella males were predominantly caught during the later part of the second series of field trials (data not shown).


Our study shows that antennal sensilla auricillica are the pheromone-detecting sensilla in E. semipurpurella. Sensilla auricillica are the only olfactory sensilla on the central part of the antennal flagellomeres, where most responding neurons were recorded. The presence of 1-3 receptor neurons in our recordings agrees with morphological data showing the presence of three neurons in each sensillum auricillicum. The function of the second type of olfactory sensillum, the trichoid sensillum, remains unclear. Neither coeloconic nor basiconic sensilla, two other sensillum types ubiquitous in moths (Keil, 1999), were found in E. semipurpurella. Sensilla auricillica are found exclusively in moths of the suborder Glossata, which comprises all moths from the family Eriocraniidae, as its most primitive member, to the higher moths (Kristensen, 1984) (see also Davis, 1978). In more advanced moths such as noctuids, sensilla auricillica apparently function as plant odour detectors (Anderson et al., 2000). They bear no resemblance to the trichoid sensilla typically containing pheromone-detecting receptor neurons in moths, but instead show striking similarities to sensilla placodea and other related sensilla found in several families of Trichoptera, including Rhyacophila species (Denis, 1985; Hallberg and Hansson, 1999). No attempts to link physiological types of receptor neuron to specific sensilla have been successful in the Trichoptera, however.

The olfactory receptor neurons found here explain the detection mechanisms behind electroantennographic responses to female extracts previously measured from male antennae (Kozlov et al., 1996). In E. semipurpurella, each of the two most common types of receptor neuron (type 1 and type 2) responded to one of the two identified pheromone components, (R,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol and (S,Z)-6-nonen-2-ol, respectively. These two types of neuron perform the chiral discrimination necessary to differentiate the pheromone blends of several `pheromone races' or sibling species within E. semipurpurella (sensu lato). Both types of pheromone receptor neuron had a high ability for chiral discrimination, with the key stimulus being at least 100 times more potent than its respective enantiomer. The dose/response characteristics of the pheromone receptor neurons in E. semipurpurella closely match those of receptor neurons in the two caddisfly species R. nubila and R. fasciata, in which the same or structurally related compounds were tested (Larsson and Hansson, 1998; M. C. Larsson and B. S. Hansson, unpublished results). The ability for chiral discrimination is high and appears to be of approximately the same magnitude in the Rhyacophila and Eriocrania species. However, responses to more than one enantiomer could be caused by enantiomeric impurities in the stimuli, thus reflecting the purity of the test compounds rather than the true discriminatory abilities of the receptor neurons, which in reality could be considerably higher. Studies of pheromone detection in scarab beetles, using enantiomers of exceptionally high purity, have indeed demonstrated chiral receptor neurons in which the corresponding enantiomers are almost completely inactive (Wojtasek et al., 1998; Larsson et al., 1999).

The type 3 receptor neurons identified in our study detect secondary alcohols not present in the pheromone blend of E. semipurpurella, but which are part of the pheromone blend of the sympatric species E. cicatricella. These neurons respond identically to the two compounds (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol. Nevertheless, they have the same ability for chiral discrimination as the type 1 and type 2 neurons, i.e. both key stimuli are 100 times more potent than their respective (S)-enantiomers (but see above). The field-trapping tests showed that both (R)-heptan-2-ol and (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol work as pheromone antagonists, strongly suppressing the attraction of E. semipurpurella to its pheromone blend when added at a dose of 5 μg (ratios 1:1:0.1) (Figs 4, 5).

Inhibition of pheromone attraction by compounds not present in the conspecific pheromone blend is a common phenomenon among insects, e.g. in the noctuid moths Trichoplusia ni and Pseudoplusia includens (Linn et al., 1988; Grant et al., 1988). These antagonist compounds have often been found in pheromone blends of sympatric species sharing some pheromone components. Pheromone antagonists are detected by specialized receptor neurons that apparently function as fail-safes to avoid attraction between heterospecifics in cases where mistakes could easily be made. Examples of specialized antagonist detectors can be found among noctuid moths (Grant et al., 1988; Almaas and Mustaparta, 1991; Cossé et al., 1998) and among beetles from several families (Mustaparta et al., 1977, 1980; Okada et al., 1992, Wojtasek et al., 1998), in which chirality often determines the difference between pheromone components and antagonists. It is worth noting that, in some cases, heterospecific pheromone components can be synergistic, as when bark beetles or longhorn beetles are attracted to heterospecific bark beetle semiochemicals that may indicate weakened tree hosts (Tømmerås et al., 1984; Allison et al., 2001).

The pheromone blends of E. semipurpurella and E. cicatricella are based on different compounds, and there seems to be no need for additional heterospecific antagonists to avoid cross-attraction. The specialized receptor neurons and the antagonistic effect on attraction may, however, have evolved primarily for the avoidance of other Eriocrania species whose pheromone blends are not yet known. Antagonistic effects of heterospecific pheromone components are not always reciprocal, as is apparent in the study of Grant et al. (1988) and the present study. Both E. cicatricella and E. sparrmannella presumably lack receptor neurons for E. semipurpurella pheromone components because they are highly attracted to synthetic blends in which their own specific attractants make up only a fraction of the total blend. Kozlov et al. (1996) showed that non-reciprocal inhibitory effects may exist between E. cicatricella and E. sparrmannella, however.

The antagonist neurons found in E. semipurpurella share some features with antagonist neurons in other insect species. These neurons often have broader response spectra than pheromone neurons, which could represent an economic way of detecting several compounds mediating the same stop signal (Wojtasek et al., 1998; Baker et al., 1998; Cossé et al., 1998). Antagonist neurons are often co-localized with pheromone neurons in the same sensilla. This may have an adaptive significance for the precise timing necessary to separate odour filaments of different origin in the air (Baker et al., 1998; Fadamiro et al., 1999). Conceivably, the type 3 neurons in our investigation may actually be two neurons with identical spike amplitudes but different key stimuli. At the time of the dose/response trials, we did not perform reciprocal adaptation experiments since the nature of the type 3 neurons became firmly established only through additional filtering during data analysis. However, the absence of double spikes and other interference in the spike pattern of the type 3 neurons (Fig. 2) and the fact that both physiological recordings and morphological studies of sensilla auricillica revealed a maximum of three neurons strongly suggest that these recordings stem from single neurons.

Eriocrania moths sometimes appear to make mistakes in chiral discrimination, in spite of their selective receptor neurons, although the concentrations applied here may have exceeded those that the moths would normally encounter in nature. E. cicatricella was somewhat attracted to 50 μg doses of (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol, the antipode of its pheromone component (Fig. 5). The same compound acted as an antagonist to E. semipurpurella when added to the pheromone blend at a dose of 50μg (Fig. 5). This matches the physiological response properties of the type 3 neurons, in that high doses of (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol have electrophysiological as well as behavioural effects. An alternative explanation for the electrophysiological and/or behavioural effects of (S,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol in these two moth species could be the presence of the enantiomer (R,Z)-4-hepten-2-ol as an impurity (see above).

Two types of receptor neuron (types 4 and 5) responded to ketones found in the pheromone glands of female E. semipurpurella. Type 4 receptor neurons responded to both (Z)-6-nonen-2-one and nonen-2-one (with lower sensitivity). Type 5 neurons responded to nonen-2-one, but only at high doses, which adds some doubt as to whether this compound is really the key stimulus for these neurons. The role of the two ketones in the pheromone communication of E. semipurpurella is unclear. The ketones are the most abundant compounds in the pheromone gland extracts of E. semipurpurella and E. sangii. When added to the blend according to the ratios found in the females, the ketones act as inhibitors to E. sangii and apparently to E. semipurpurella as well (Kozlov et al., 1996). Our field-trapping data indicate that nonan-2-one, but not (Z)-6-nonen-2-one, could actually be a synergist to E. semipurpurella at low doses, which is difficult to explain in the context of our electrophysiological results unless we postulate the existence of other, as yet unidentified, types of receptor neuron. A definite answer to whether any of the ketones is a true pheromone component requires a re-examination of the pheromone blend, including measurements of the amounts actually released from females.

Our study has revealed a complex interplay between various semiochemicals taking place within and among different Eriocrania species, and it has shown how this interplay may be mediated at the level of the antennal receptor neurons. The results of our field-trapping studies further suggest a temporal separation between different Eriocrania species, with E. sparrmannella appearing later in the season than E. semipurpurella and E. cicatricella. Different `pheromone races' of E. semipurpurella have also demonstrated slight temporal shifts during other experiments in Turku (P. Metcalfe, M. V. Kozlov, W. Francke and C. Löfstedt, unpublished data). The evidence obtained here suggests a close homology between Trichoptera and primitive Lepidoptera not only in their systems of pheromone release but also in the antennal systems responsible for pheromone detection. As new gland structures and pheromone components arose later in more advanced Lepidoptera, so the task of pheromone detection may have shifted to new types of sensilla housing different physiological types of receptor neuron. The possibility that these two shifts occurred in parallel is intriguing but not yet substantiated.


We would like to thank Rita Wallén for help with electron microscopy and Junwei Zhu, Fredrik Östrand, Glenn Svensson and Erling Jirle for help with field work. This work was supported by the Swedish Natural Science Research Council and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.


View Abstract