QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 2, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 993-1005 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.001990

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, S. G. Articles by Yack, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brown, S. G. Articles by Yack, J. E.

Clicking caterpillars: acoustic aposematism in Antheraea polyphemus and other Bombycoidea

Sarah G. Brown¹, George H. Boettner² and Jayne E. Yack^1,*

¹ Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada
² Plant Soil and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jyack{at}ccs.carleton.ca)

Accepted 21 November 2006

Acoustic signals produced by caterpillars have been documented for over 100 years, but in the majority of cases their significance is unknown. This study is the first to experimentally examine the phenomenon of audible sound production in larval Lepidoptera, focusing on a common silkmoth caterpillar, Antheraea polyphemus (Saturniidae). Larvae produce airborne sounds, resembling `clicks', with their mandibles. Larvae typically signal multiple times in quick succession, producing trains that last over 1 min and include 50–55 clicks. Individual clicks within a train are on average 24.7 ms in duration, often consisting of multiple components. Clicks are audible in a quiet room, measuring 58.1–78.8 dB peSPL at 10 cm. They exhibit a broadband frequency that extends into the ultrasound spectrum, with most energy between 8 and 18 kHz. Our hypothesis that clicks function as acoustic aposematic signals, was supported by several lines of evidence. Experiments with forceps and domestic chicks correlated sound production with attack, and an increase in attack rate was positively correlated with the number of signals produced. In addition, sound production typically preceded or accompanied defensive regurgitation. Bioassays with invertebrates (ants) and vertebrates (mice) revealed that the regurgitant is deterrent to would-be predators. Comparative evidence revealed that other Bombycoidea species, including Actias luna (Saturniidae) and Manduca sexta (Sphingidae), also produce airborne sounds upon attack, and that these sounds precede regurgitation. The prevalence and adaptive significance of warning sounds in caterpillars is discussed.

Key words: caterpillar, acoustic aposematism, sound production, regurgitation, Bombycoidea, Lepidoptera, Antheraea polyphemus

Related articles in JEB:

CLICKING CATERPILLARS

Laura Blackburn
JEB 2007 210: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Rashed, M.I. Khan, J.W. Dawson, J.E. Yack, and T.N. Sherratt Do hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) sound like the Hymenoptera they morphologically resemble? Behav. Ecol., November 27, 2008; (2008) arn148v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Blackburn CLICKING CATERPILLARS J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2007; 210(6): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]