spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stensmyr, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hansson, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stensmyr, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hansson, B. S.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 715-724 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00143

Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones

Marcus C. Stensmyr1, Elena Giordano2, Annalisa Balloi2, Anna-Maria Angioy2 and Bill S. Hansson1,*

1 Division of Chemical Ecology, Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 44, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
2 Department of Experimental Biology, University of Cagliari, S.S. 554 Km, 4500 Monserrato, Italy

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: bill.hansson{at}vv.slu.se)

Accepted 13 November 2002

Due to its well-defined genome, the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster has become a very important model organism in olfactory research. Despite all the research invested, few natural odour ligands have been identified. By using a combined gas chromatographic—single receptor neurone recording technique (GC—SC), we set out to identify active odour molecules in head space-collected volatiles from preferred food sources, i.e. different overripe or rotting fruit. In total, we performed 101 GC—SC experiments on 85 contacted sensilla. Using GC—mass spectrometry, we identified 24 active compounds. Synthetic samples of these compounds were used to establish dose—response curves for several of the receptor neurone types encountered. The response patterns of individual neurones were repeatable, and neurones were found to reside in stereotyped pairs. In total, we identified eight distinct sensillum types based on response profiles of 12 olfactory receptor neurone types. In most recordings, a single GC peak would produce a strong response, whereas a few other, often chemically related, compounds would produce weaker responses. The GC—SC recordings revealed that the olfactory receptor neurones investigated were often selective and could be divided into distinct functional types with discrete characteristics. Dose—response investigations revealed very low response thresholds to the tested compounds. Six of the novel ligands were also tested for their behavioural effect in a T-maze set up. Of these, five elicited attraction and one elicited repulsion.

Key words: Drosophila, olfaction, insect, antenna, food odour, receptor neurone, ligand, odour coding


Related articles in JEB:

MATCHING SMELLS TO SENSORY CELLS
James Randerson
JEB 2003 206: 637-638. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Z. Karpati, T. Dekker, and B. S. Hansson
Reversed functional topology in the antennal lobe of the male European corn borer
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 211(17): 2841 - 2848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Schmuker and G. Schneider
Processing and classification of chemical data inspired by insect olfaction
PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20285 - 20289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
A. S. French and S. Meisner
A New Method for Wide Frequency Range Dynamic Olfactory Stimulation and Characterization
Chem Senses, September 1, 2007; 32(7): 681 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Syed, Y. Ishida, K. Taylor, D. A. Kimbrell, and W. S. Leal
Pheromone reception in fruit flies expressing a moth's odorant receptor
PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16538 - 16543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. Faucher, M. Forstreuter, M. Hilker, and M. de Bruyne
Behavioral responses of Drosophila to biogenic levels of carbon dioxide depend on life-stage, sex and olfactory context
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2006; 209(14): 2739 - 2748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. A. Yao, R. Ignell, and J. R. Carlson
Chemosensory Coding by Neurons in the Coeloconic Sensilla of the Drosophila Antenna
J. Neurosci., September 14, 2005; 25(37): 8359 - 8367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Frye and M. H. Dickinson
Motor output reflects the linear superposition of visual and olfactory inputs in Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. A. Carlsson and B. S. Hansson
Dose-Response Characteristics of Glomerular Activity in the Moth Antennal Lobe
Chem Senses, May 1, 2003; 28(4): 269 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Randerson
MATCHING SMELLS TO SENSORY CELLS
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2003; 206(4): 637 - 638.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003