QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 26, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 155-162 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.019232

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scholz, I. Articles by Baumgartner, W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Scholz, I. Articles by Baumgartner, W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ultrastructure and physical properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea White

Ingo Scholz, W. Jon P. Barnes^*, Joanna M. Smith and Werner Baumgartner

Department of Cellular Neurobionics, Institute of Biology 2, RWTH-Aachen, Kopernikusstrasse 16, 52056 Aachen, Germany

^* Author for correspondence at present address: Centre for Cell Engineering, Joseph Black Building, Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK (e-mail: j.barnes{at}bio.gla.ac.uk)

Accepted 10 November 2008

	Summary

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Knowledge of both surface structure and physical properties such as stiffness and elasticity are essential to understanding any adhesive system. In this study of an adhesion surface in the tree frog, Litoria caerulea White, a variety of techniques including atomic force microscopy were used to investigate the microstructure and properties of an epithelium that adheres through wet adhesion. Litoria toe pads consist of a hexagonal array of flat-topped epithelial cells, separated by mucus-filled channels. Under an atomic force microscope, this `flat' surface is highly structured at the nanoscale, consisting of a tightly packed array of columnar nanopillars (described as hemidesmosomes by previous authors), 326±84 nm in diameter, each of which possesses a central dimple 8±4 nm in depth. In fixed tissue (transmission electron microscopy), the nanopillars are approximately as tall as they are broad. At the gross anatomical level, larger toe pads may be subdivided into medial and lateral parts by two large grooves. Although the whole toe pad is soft and easily deformable, the epithelium itself has an effective elastic modulus equivalent to silicon rubber (mean E_eff=14.4±20.9 MPa; median E_eff=5.7 MPa), as measured by the atomic force microscope in nanoindentation mode. The functions of these structures are discussed in terms of maximising adhesive and frictional forces by conforming closely to surface irregularities at different length scales and maintaining an extremely thin fluid layer between pad and substrate. The biomimetic implications of these findings are reviewed.

Key words: tree frog, adhesion, electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, effective elastic modulus, tribology

	INTRODUCTION

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
The study of animal adhesion, for many years a relatively neglected area of research, has recently undergone a resurgence of interest. This is partly because of the promise of practical applications arising from the research – animal adhesive devices have many properties that are the envy of materials scientists – and partly because the application of recent advances in both cell biology and engineering (tribology) has produced a quantum leap forward in our understanding of these systems (Scherge and Gorb, 2001; Barnes, 2006). The reversible adhesion of locomoting animals is of particular interest because of the need to combine good adhesion with easy detachment whenever the animal makes a step (Autumn and Peattie, 2002). Also, in tree frogs, adhesion must not interfere with jumping ability.

Although all tree frogs are not strictly arboreal, for some inhabit the shrub or even herb layer (for instance reeds surrounding ponds), they do all climb vegetation and, along with torrent frogs, are all characterised by possession of expanded digital pads on the tips of each toe. They do not belong to a single systematic group, being found in at least seven different frog families (Duellman and Trueb, 1997). Thus the extraordinary similarity of the epithelia of toe pads in different species is somewhat surprising. Since the main anuran families appeared before the first tree frogs evolved, tree frog toe pads are thus an exceptionally good example of convergent evolution (Green, 1979). There really does appear to be a best `design' for a toe pad, and this has implications for biomimetics (Barnes, 2007a).

Tree frogs adhere by wet adhesion (Green, 1981; Emerson and Diehl, 1980; Hanna and Barnes, 1991), in the same way as a wet tissue sticks to a flat, smooth surface or a damp coverslip sticks to a microscope slide. The underlying mechanisms are, however, rather more complicated than this simple description would suggest, and involve capillarity forces generated at the air–fluid interface around the edge of the toe pad and transient viscosity forces (Stefan adhesion) generated over the whole area of contact (Barnes et al., 2006b). Current research favours capillarity as the dominant adhesive force (Barnes et al., 2006a), but a role for Stefan adhesion cannot be ignored. Also, friction forces are much larger than would be expected of a fluid joint (Federle et al., 2006). Forces acting parallel to the surface such as friction are clearly the major forces that would prevent slippage while a tree frog was climbing a vertical surface, but recent work (Barnes et al., 2008) also suggests an important role for friction in clinging behaviour on overhanging surfaces. As has recently been hypothesised for geckos (Autumn et al., 2006), frictional forces appear to play a major role in preventing the toe pads from peeling off the surface.

Because adhesion ultimately occurs at the molecular level, its study requires an analysis of both the physical properties of the adhesive surface and its microstructure (Gorb and Scherge, 2000; Scherge and Gorb, 2001). As an example, as any tyre engineer knows, the physical properties of the rubber are just as important as the pattern of the tread. Using the toe pads of White's tree frog (Litoria caerulea) as our adhesive surface, this paper brings together a number of anatomical techniques to examine the structure and physical properties of an adhesive epithelium that adheres through wet adhesion. Of particular interest is the use of an atomic force microscope (AFM), the first time this has been used in the study of tree frog adhesion. In contact imaging mode, it illustrates the structure, in living rather than fixed tissue, of peg-like nanostructures (which we term `columnar nanopillars') on the `flat' surfaces of the toe pad epithelial cells. We have also used the AFM as a nanoindenter to measure the stiffness of the toe pad epithelium. What emerges from these studies is that the epithelium of tree frog toe pads is soft (low Young's modulus) and that it has an extremely complex structure, consisting of pillars surrounded by channels at both microscale and nanoscale levels.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Animals
White's tree frogs (Litoria caerulea White, family Hylidae) were purchased from commercial suppliers and maintained in glass vivaria at 20–24°C using heat mats. The vivaria contained foliage, dishes of Cu-free fresh water to maintain a high humidity, branches on which the frogs could climb and sphagnum moss for the frogs to burrow into, all on a gravel base. Frogs were fed on live house crickets dusted with a calcium balancer and multi-vitamin supplement (Nutrobal, purchased from Peregrine Live Foods, Ongar, Essex, UK) twice weekly.

Scanning and transmission electron microscopy
Frogs were killed via a lethal dose of benzocaine. Nine toes from each frog, four from the front and five from the back, were fixed in 0.1 mol l^–1 phosphate-buffered 2.5% glutaraldehyde at pH 7.4 for 24 h. Specimens were then rinsed in phosphate-buffered sucrose, post-fixed in buffered 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h and washed in distilled water.

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), specimens were then dehydrated in an acetone series and critical point dried. Samples were mounted and gold-coated before viewing with a Philips SEM 500 scanning electron microscope.

For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), specimens were dehydrated in an alcohol (rather than acetone) series. Samples were rinsed twice in propylene oxide to remove the alcohol, embedded in Spurr's resin and polymerised at 70°C. Ultra-thin sections (60–70 nm) were cut on a Reichert ultramicrotome. These were then mounted on copper grids, stained with uranyl acetate (2% aqueous solution) and lead citrate, and examined using a Philips TEM 301 transmission electron microscope.

Freeze fracture
Freeze fracture was used to examine the inner structure of toe pad epithelial cells, in particular the distribution of cytoskeletal elements. Fresh toes, removed from frogs killed as described above, were plunged into liquid nitrogen at –195°C. The frozen toes were then cracked into a number of pieces using a small piece of a razor blade held in a needle holder, with the aim of getting surfaces that were at right angles to the toe pad epithelial surface. Following freeze drying overnight at –40°C, the specimens were mounted on holders, sputter coated with gold and examined under the SEM.

Atomic force microscopy
To exclude the possibility of artefacts when analysing biological surfaces (such as shrinkage by drying samples for SEM) we made use of atomic force microscopy (AFM). This technique allows measurements to be made directly on the living animal without further treatment of the samples.

AFM was performed on three frogs, previously anaesthetised by immersion in a solution of 0.25 gl^–1 of benzocaine. This solution was prepared by dissolving 5 g of benzocaine in 100 ml of 95% ethanol, with 5 ml of the resulting solution being diluted in 1 l of distilled water. At this concentration of 0.25 gl^–1, prolonged anaesthesia was obtained in about 15 min.

All measurements were carried out in contact mode using a Veeco Dimension III scanning probe microscope (Veeco Digital Instruments, Woodbury, NY, USA) at room temperature. The AFM was equipped with a silicon nitride cantilever with a 4-sided pyramidal shape (Type MLCT, Veeco Instruments), a spring constant of 0.03 N m^–1 and a centreline-to-face tip angle of 35 deg. (Fig. 1). To avoid disturbance by vibration, the AFM was fixed on elastic bands in an acoustic isolated box.

View larger version (8K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Vertical section of a 4-sided pyramidal indenter of an atomic force microscope. Calculation of the cross-sectional area of the indenter tip at the indentation depth zi was as follows: where w is the width of the AFM indenter tip at the indentation depth and equals the tip angle of the indenter (centreline-to-face).

Two types of AFM measurements were carried out: surface imaging of the adhesive toe pads to obtain information on their structure in vivo, and indentation experiments to study the mechanical properties of the toe pads.

Imaging the surface of the pad was done by means of surface scans, recording the topography (`height' images) and the cantilever deflection data (`deflection' images). The topography images show the real scales and proportions of the surface parameters, while the deflection images show the bending of the cantilever when it makes contact with the surface during lateral movement. Therefore a deflection image shows the edges and borders of the structure more accurately as it corresponds to a high-pass filtered topography image. General setups and principles for AFM measurements of living biological samples are given in detail by Morris et al. (Morris et al., 1999). The toe pad was scanned under a mechanical impact in the range of 2 to 50 nN. To reduce the possibility of artefacts caused by the mechanical impact of the cantilever, the scanning direction was changed after each scan by 90 deg. Furthermore the angle of the toe was rotated 45 deg. from the axis of the cantilever to ensure that the impact on the cantilever stayed the same although the scanning direction was changed. The scan size was 10 µmx10 µm at a scan rate of 40 µms^–1 (2 Hz) for the overview images and 5 µm x 5 µm at a scan rate of 40 µm s^–1 (4 Hz) for the detailed images. To obtain further information on the surface profile parameters, `sections' within the images were analysed. These sections enabled us to measure the dimensions of the nanopillars.

Measurement of the elastic modulus of the adhesive toe pad was performed with a z-drive amplitude of 1600 nm. Multiple measurements were made on three individuals at positions on the pad that varied systematically over the pad surface. Elastic surface properties were investigated by employing force–distance cycles that were recorded at pulling rates of 1 Hz and 2 Hz (3200 nms^–1 and 6400 nms^–1). These force–distance cycles were analysed for the determination of the elastic modulus following the theory of Oliver and Pharr (Oliver and Pharr, 2004), who showed that the force–indentation relationship of a flat homogeneous material follows a power law, namely:

(1)

where F is the applied force, is a material parameter directly related to Young's modulus, z_i is the indentation depth and m is an exponent representing the geometry of the indenter. As explained in more detail in Scholz et al. (Scholz et al., 2008), m2 for a pyramidal indenter used to indent a soft material. Neither force F nor distance (the indentation depth z_i) is directly accessible. However, force is proportional to cantilever deflection d (F=kd), and indentation depth equals the vertical position of the piezo drive z minus the z position where the tip touches the surface z₀ minus the cantilever deflection (z_i=z–z₀–d). Eqn 1 thus transforms to:

(2)

Solving Eqn (2) with respect to d gives:

(3)

Force–distance curves were fitted using this equation, the parameters and z₀ being optimised by a Levenberg–Marquardt square fitting procedure. The fitted parameter relates both to the Young's modulus and to the shape of the indenter. As F/z_i=2z_i (see Eqn 1) and:

(4)

(Oliver and Pharr, 2004), where the correction factor β may be approximated to 1 and A is calculated as shown in Fig. 1, the effective elastic modulus E_eff can be calculated:

or

(5)

where is the tip angle of the indenter (35 deg. in our experiments). As described in Scholz et al. (Scholz et al., 2008), the Young's modulus may be calculated from E_eff if one knows the Poisson ratio of the sample. However, in the following, only the effective Young's modulus is calculated and depicted. The results of this calculation are given both as mean values with their standard deviations and as median values, as the data are not normally distributed.

The experiments were registered and approved by the local government (Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen) and performed according to the German law for animal care (AZ: 9.93.2.10.35.07.094).

View larger version (147K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. (a) Immature White's tree frog, Litoria caerulea (snout–vent length, approximately 40 mm). (b–d) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of toe pad epithelium. (b) Low-power micrograph of whole pad of a juvenile frog. (c) Medium-power micrograph showing a mucous pore and (largely) hexagonal epithelial cells separated from each other at their distal ends by channels. (d) Higher power micrograph indicating the presence of nanostructuring on the `flat' surface of the epithelial cells.

	RESULTS

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

Fig. 2d is the first to give any indication that the flat surface of the epithelial cells possesses its own nanostructures. In surface view (Fig. 3a) these appear as a tightly packed array of (mostly) hexagonal structures, each with a poorly defined central structure. At equivalent magnification, sections of the toe pad epithelium viewed under the TEM show both the deep channels that separate the epithelial cells at their apices and the closely packed columnar nanopillars (Fig. 3b). The latter are approximately as tall as they are broad, separated from one another by narrow clefts and filled with electron-dense material. In many species (the inset in Fig. 3b shows the hylid Scinax ruber) the nanopillars seem to form the ends of fibrils that run at right angles to the surface from deep in the cytoplasm, but this is not the case in immature Litoria caerulea.

View larger version (115K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. (a,b) Nanostructural features of the adhesive surface of toe pad epithelial cells. (a) High-power scanning electron micrograph showing a surface view of the (largely) hexagonal nanostructures that form a dense array on the external surface of a toe pad epithelial cell. (b) High-power transmission electron micrograph showing one of the channels that separate adjacent epithelial cells and a side view of the nanostructures, which are themselves separated from each other by narrow channels. The inset shows similar nanostructures on a toe pad of the hylid tree frog, Scinax ruber. Here the nanostructures are associated with filaments running at right angles to the cell surface.

Freeze fracturing the toe pad tissue before viewing it under the SEM provides a side-on view of cytoskeletal elements within the toe pad epithelium (Fig. 4). The figure shows parts of two epithelial cells, their outer surfaces being at the top of the electron micrograph, while the channels between them and their neighbours are the U- or V-shaped structures at the top left, top centre-right and top right of the image. Cytoskeletal elements appear as a loose lattice or sponge-like structure. Conspicuously, the diameters of the pores of this structure are smaller towards the outer surface of the cell. The pores directly underneath the surface have diameters less than 0.5µm and form the borders of the nanopillars. Within the underlying cytoplasm the diameters of the pores are larger (>1 µm), while in deeper layers there is just a loose lattice of cytoskeletal material. Therefore the concentration of cytoskeletal elements is higher at the outer surface of the epithelial cells in keeping with the TEM studies (Fig. 3b).

View larger version (176K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Freeze-fracture image of a toe pad showing a side view of parts of two epithelial cells. Note that cytoskeletal elements are concentrated in the outer `nanopillar' layer (top of picture), with only a loose lattice of cytoskeletal material beneath.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Material stiffness as measured by the AFM. (a,b) Blue lines show typical experimental curves for cantilever deflection plotted against distance in the z-axis for toe pad epithelium (a) and glass (b). Green lines are fits to the best theoretical curves using Eqn 3. The y-axes can be converted to force by multiplying by the spring constant of the cantilever (0.03 N m–1 in these experiments). The curve in a represents an effective elastic modulus Eeff of 250 kPa.

Typical AFM images and a 3D reconstruction of the surface topography are shown in Fig. 5. The AFM images broadly confirmed the morphological findings obtained by SEM and TEM. The images of the toe pad epithelial cells clearly show the rough surface of each cell and the deep channels that separate them. Furthermore, the deflection image (Fig. 5c) clearly shows the dense array of columnar nanopillars, referred to as peg-like hemidesmosomes by other authors (e.g. Ernst, 1973). However, the term hemidesmosomes is misleading as the structures observed clearly do not correspond to the cell organelles of that name that bind epithelial cells to the basement lamina (e.g. Alberts et al., 2002). The topography was consistent in all frogs observed and throughout the adhesive organ. Neither changing the scanning direction nor varying the scanning force significantly changed the principal structure. However, the width of the nanopillars was increased by increasing the scanning force from about 2 to 30 nN from a value of 313.8±78 to 409.9±76.7 nm (P<0.001; d.f.=188; t-test; measurements from four scans, all from the same toe pad). This indicates a rather soft material for these nanopillars. Interestingly, the AFM images illustrated a feature of the nanopillars not clearly visible in fixed tissue. This was the presence of a depression or `dimple' on the top of each nanopillar. Close examination of these dimples in deflection images indicated that the wall surrounding the dimple was not continuous but had one or two channels connecting the dimple with the surrounding space between the nanopillars. These are indicated by the arrows in Fig. 5d.

View larger version (87K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. (a) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the surfaces of parts of three toe pad epithelial cells, showing the rough surface of each cell and the deep channels that separate them. (b,c) AFM images (b, height and c, deflection) of part of one of these cells, indicated by the outline in a. The height image (of which b is a part) was used for the three-dimensional reconstruction (a), while the deflection image (c) clearly shows the dense array of peg-like nanopillars that constitutes the adhesive surface of the epithelial cells. (d) Enlargement of part of the deflection image showing more detail of the appearance of the nanopillars. The arrows indicate gaps connecting the dimples with the surrounding channels. For the height image (b), the colour gradient covers the range 0–500 nm, while for the deflection images (c and d) the range is 0–6.5 nm.

To analyse the nanopillars further, height profiles were calculated from the topography data. A typical example of such a profile is depicted in Fig. 6. Nanopillars with an average width of about 326 nm can be clearly seen to possess a central shallow depression (dimple), about 8 nm in depth. Making these measurements on 199 nanopillars (seven scans including the four described in the previous paragraph; scanning forces were 2 nN and 30 nN) yielded an average width for the nanopillars of 326±84 nm, which is comparable to the data obtained by SEM and TEM, and an average depth of the central dimple on the nanopillars of 7.7±4.2 nm. The heights of the nanopillars were also measured (21.4±8.4 nm), but are not included in the figure as they seriously underestimate the height of the structures as seen under TEM (Fig. 3b). Presumably the tip of the AFM cantilever was unable to penetrate the narrow channels between the nanopillars effectively. Indeed, given the dimensions of the AFM cantilever, it can be calculated that its tip would only be able to penetrate the channels to a depth of about 18 nm, assuming the channel width of 25 nm estimated by Federle and colleagues (Federle et al., 2006).

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. (a–c) Height profiling of toe pad epithelium. (a) Deflection image showing the line from which the height profile (b) was taken. The two crosses delineate a columnar nanopillar that lay precisely on the profile line, showing that these peg-like structures have a small dimple at their centres. (c) Average values (means ± s.d.) of the width of the nanopillars and the depth of the dimples based on 199 measurements from height profiles such as that shown in b.

	DISCUSSION

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Requirements for adhesion and friction
As tree frog toe pads have evolved as structures that can produce friction and adhesion forces sufficient to permit climbing and reduce the risk of falling, their micro- and ultra-structural features must be considered as adaptations for these functions.

All natural surfaces are to some degree rough, and this roughness occurs at many different length scales (Persson et al., 2005). Such materials do not adhere, because the interaction between neutral molecules is negligibly small at separations of the order of only a few atomic distances and the roughness prevents close enough contact between the surfaces (Kendall, 2001). To get over this problem, at least one of the surfaces must be extremely soft, so that the softer material conforming to the contours of the other can increase actual contact. Additionally, the presence of fluid in the contact zone can fill out any remaining cavities, thus further increasing adhesion (Federle, 2006).

Turning to friction, the presence of a continuous fluid film in the contact zone would normally be expected to act as a lubricant. The existence of significant friction forces in tree frog toe pads is thus somewhat surprising. Indeed, whole animal measurements of adhesion and friction indicate that friction forces are about 1.5 times greater than adhesive ones (Barnes et al., 2006b). Persson (Persson, 2007) calculates that areas separated by low viscosity fluid [as is the case in tree frogs (Federle et al., 2006)] with a thickness of more than a few nanometres will contribute a negligible friction force. It must therefore be presumed that there is actual contact between the two surfaces at many places. This is supported by the existence of static friction between pad and substrate and frictional forces remaining 2 min after movement has ceased (Federle et al., 2006). Indeed, Federle and colleagues (Federle et al., 2006) demonstrate, using interference reflection microscopy, that pad–substrate distances over the central regions of the hexagonal epithelial cells in living, adhering tree frogs range from 0 to 35 nm. Thus, combining wet adhesion and good friction requires the pad surface to be highly structured, so that both wet adhesion produced by fluid in the contact zone and friction through direct pad–substrate contact can occur simultaneously.

Roles for toe pad microstructures
In functional terms, having the cells separated at their tips reduces the bending modulus of the pad epithelium, which allows the pads to conform to the shape of large-scale irregularities (greater in area than the flat surfaces of individual epithelial cells) on the surface to which the frog is adhering (Barnes, 1999; Barnes et al., 2002; Persson, 2007). The mucous glands are required to produce the watery secretion that forms an essential part of the adhesive mechanism of the pad, while the hexagonal array of channels that surround each epithelial cell presumably functions to spread mucus evenly over the pad surface and, under wet conditions, remove surplus water (Barnes et al., 2002; Persson, 2007). Finally, the presence of grooves aids adhesion by reduction of crack propagation (peeling) (Persson, 2007). Pull-off stress is spread between a larger number of hexagons rather than being concentrated at the edge of the contact zone. Such features have been incorporated into bio-inspired artificially patterned surfaces to increase their adhesion (for a review, see Barnes, 2007b).

A common misconception is that the subdivision of the surface by the channels between the cells increases adhesion according to the principle of contact splitting. This theory states that adhesive force is proportional to the length of the contact; therefore, by splitting up the contact zone into many small areas of contact, the total adhesive force can be increased in direct proportion to the density of these small areas (Arzt et al., 2003). This principle clearly applies to wet adhesion (De Souza et al., 2008). However, as the major force component of wet adhesion is capillarity, it is necessary that an air–water interface (meniscus) should surround each small area of contact. This is true of the hairy pads of insects (Federle, 2006), but not of tree frogs, where the meniscus surrounds the whole toe pad, not the individual epithelial cells (Federle et al., 2006).

AFM and nanostructural features of toe pad epithelial cells
The AFM results provide further insights into the detailed characteristics of the nanoscale topography of the toe pad epithelial cells as well as demonstrating that their surface is soft (effective elastic modulus of 14.4±20.9 MPa, equivalent to silicon rubber).

The functions of the nanopillars that constitute the so-called `flat' surface of these cells remain a matter for speculation. The following is a list of obvious possibilities, none of which are mutually exclusive. (1) Like the epithelial cells and the channels that surround them, the nanopillar array may allow close conformation to surface irregularities, but on a much smaller length scale (nanometres rather than micrometres) than applies to whole epithelial cells; such close conformation is promoted both by the presence of the grooves surrounding each nanopillar and by the softness (low effective elastic modulus) of the surface material. Additionally, the nanopillars make the pad softer (than the pure material) due to their bending. (2) The narrow channels between them could serve to absorb excess water, much as sipes (fine-scale grooves) do on a wet-weather car tyre (see Persson, 2007). This would allow rapid optimisation of the thickness of the intervening fluid layer (as thin as possible, but without any air pockets). (3) The nanopillars could be very important in the generation of friction forces, in that their tips will be in actual contact with the surface. This would explain the presence of static friction and other phenomena that are seen when recording friction forces from single toe pads (Federle et al., 2006). Interestingly, interference reflection microscopy of tree frog toe pads during tilting experiments shows friction-induced reductions in the thickness of the fluid layer, the toe pads coming into closer contact with the substrate as the angle of tilt changes from 0 to 90 deg. As a result, more and more nanopillar tips come into contact with the glass coverslip (J.M.S., M. O. Riehle, W.J.P.B. and J. R. Downie, in preparation). Increased friction thus appears to be directly linked to increases in nanopillar–substrate contact. (4) It cannot be excluded that the dimples give rise to a suction effect, but the existence of channels in the dimple wall makes this unlikely. Indeed, it is more likely that the channels allow the escape of fluid from the dimples when the pad is pressed against a smooth surface, thus minimising fluid layer thickness and increasing close contact of nanopillars with the surface.

Significance of low effective elastic modulus (E_eff)
In an earlier study, Barnes and colleagues (Barnes et al., 2005) examined the physical properties of the toe pads of Litoria using a spherical indenter, with indentation depths in the range 50–350 µm. They came up with values for E_eff of between 4 kPa and 20 kPa, much lower than most of the values obtained here. E_eff is thus inversely dependent on the indentation depth. This is reflected by the TEM and freeze-fracture images, which indicate cytoskeletal strengthening of the plasmalemma. Having a higher concentration of cytoskeleton elements near the surface of the pad also seems to be one of the facts that influence the high variation of E_eff. Both variations in the thickness of the elements and especially their sponge-like arrangement result in significant changes in stiffness for different indentation positions. Overall, this construction leads to a thin but slightly harder `skin', with a Young's modulus equivalent to silicon rubber, covering a soft gel-like structure, the cytosol of the epithelial cells where there are relatively few ctyoskeletal elements. Blood sinuses lie more centrally (J.M.S. and W.J.P.B., unpublished observation). This might provide an abrasion-resistant surface layer that, due to the soft tissue and fluids lying beneath, would have enough flexibility to cope with surface roughness as discussed above. Such a `design' contrasts with smooth adhesive pads in stick insects, which have evolved an extremely soft outer layer (the epicuticle) overlying a much stiffer procuticle (Scholz et al., 2008).

Biomimetic relevance
Since adhesive tapes inspired by the dry adhesive mechanisms of gecko toe pad setae are now reaching a stage where commercialisation is imminent (e.g. Lee et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2008; Schubert et al., 2008), it is appropriate to consider whether the rather different wet adhesion mechanism of tree frogs might also have biomimetic relevance. An obvious possibility is the development of improved wet weather tyres (Barnes, 1999; Barnes et al., 2002; Persson, 2007). Tree frog toe pads have an effective elastic modulus akin to rubber that surrounds a much softer material. They also have three systems of grooves at different length scales. The similarities to wet weather tyres are uncanny, and their performance (easy detachment combined with high coefficient of friction) impressive. But whether tree frog adhesive mechanisms can operate effectively when scaled up by two orders of magnitude remains to be tested. Biomedical applications of these findings are also under consideration.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

A

area of AFM indenter tip at indentation depth (z_i)

AFM

atomic force microscope/microscopy

d

AFM cantilever deflection

E_eff

effective elastic modulus

F

applied force

m

exponent representing geometry of AFM indenter

SEM

scanning electron microscope/microscopy

TEM

transmission electron microscope/microscopy

w

width of AFM indenter tip at indentation depth (z_i)

z

vertical position of AFM piezo drive

z_i

indentation depth

z₀

zero position of AFM piezo drive (tip touching surface)

material parameter related to Young's modulus

β

correction factor (see Oliver and Pharr, 2004)

tip angle of AFM indenter

	Footnotes

 
W.J.P.B. and J.M.S. would like to thank The Wellcome Trust for their financial support of this project (Showcase Award; Grant No. 070924) and Dr Walter Federle for the opportunity to carry out the freeze-fracture studies in his laboratory in Würzburg. Deposited in PMC for release after 6 months.

Present address: Biology Teaching Centre, Boyd Orr Building, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

	References

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 

Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. and Walter, P. (2002). Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland Science.

Arzt, E., Gorb, S. and Spolenak, R. (2003). From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100,10603 -10606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Autumn, K. and Peattie, A. M. (2002). Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42,1081 -1090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Autumn, K., Dittmore, A., Santos, D., Spenko, M. and Cotkosky, M. (2006). Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment. J. Exp. Biol. 209,3569 -3579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barnes, W. J. P. (1999). Tree frogs and tire technology. Tire Technol. Int. March 1999,42 -47.

Barnes, W. J. P. (2006). Dynamic adhesion in animals: mechanisms and biomimetic implications. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192,1165 -1168.[CrossRef]

Barnes, W. J. P. (2007a). Functional morphology and design constraints of smooth adhesive pads. MRS Bull. 32,479 -485.[CrossRef]

Barnes, W. J. P. (2007b). Biomimetic solutions to sticky problems. Science 318,203 -204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barnes, W. J. P., Smith, J., Oines, C. and Mundl, R. (2002). Bionics and wet grip. Tire Technol. Int. December 2002,56 -60.

Barnes, W. J. P., Perez-Goodwyn, P. and Gorb, S. N. (2005). Mechanical properties of the toe pads of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 141, S145.

Barnes, W. J. P., Federle, W. and Drechsler, P. (2006a). Adhesion and friction forces generated by single toe pads of the frog Litoria caerulea. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 143,S94 .

Barnes, W. J. P., Oines, C. and Smith, J. M. (2006b). Whole animal measurements of shear and adhesive forces in adult tree frogs: insights into underlying mechanisms of adhesion obtained from studying the effects of size and shape. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192,1179 -1191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Barnes, W. J. P., Pearman, J. and Platter, J. (2008). Application of peeling theory to tree frog adhesion, a biological system with biomimetic implications. Eur. Acad. Sci. E Newsl. Sci. Technol. 2008, 1, 1-2.

Baumgartner, W., Hinterdorfer, P. and Schindler, H. (2000). Data analysis of interaction forces measured with the atomic force microscope. Ultramicroscopy 82, 85-95.[CrossRef][Medline]

De Souza, E. J., Brinkmann, M., Arzt, E. and Mohrdieck, C. (2008). Enhancement of capillary forces by multiple liquid bridges. Langmuir 24,8813 -8820.[CrossRef][Medline]

Duellman, W. and Trueb, L. (1997).Biology of Amphibians. 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Emerson, S. B. and Diehl, D. (1980). Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13,199 -216.[CrossRef]

Ernst, V. (1973). The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. 1. The epidermis. Tissue Cell 5,83 -96.[CrossRef][Medline]

Federle, W. (2006). Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Exp. Biol. 209,2611 -2621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Federle, W., Barnes, W. J. P., Baumgartner, W., Drechsler, P. and Smith, J. M. (2006). Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. J. R. Soc. Interface 3,589 -601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gorb, S. and Scherge, M. (2000). Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267,1239 -1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Green, D. M. (1979). Treefrog toe pads: comparative surface morphology using scanning electron microscopy. Can. J. Zool. 57,2033 -2046.[CrossRef]

Green, D. M. (1981). Adhesion and the toe-pads of tree frogs. Copeia 1981,790 -796.[CrossRef]

Green, D. M. and Simon, P. (1986). Digital microstructure in ecologically diverse microhylid frogs genera Cophixalus and Sphenophryne (Amphibia: Anura) from Papua New Guinea. Aust. J. Zool. 34,135 -145.[CrossRef]

Hanna, G. and Barnes, W. J. P. (1991). Adhesion and detachment of the toe pads of tree frogs. J. Exp. Biol. 155,103 -125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hertwig, I. and Sinsch, U. (1995). Comparative toe pad morphology in marsupial frogs (genus Gastrotheca): arboreal versus ground-dwelling species. Copeia 1995,38 -47.[CrossRef]

Kendall, K. (2001). Molecular Adhesion and its Applications. New York: Klewer.

Lee, H., Lee, B. P. and Messersmith, P. B. (2007). A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature 448,338 -341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee, J., Majidi, C., Schubert, B. and Fearing, R. S. (2008). Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 835-844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McAllister, A. and Channing, L. (1983). Comparisons of toe pads of some Southern African climbing frogs. S. Afr. J. Zool. 18,110 -114.

Mizuhira, V. (2004). The digital pads of rhacophorid tree-frogs. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo) 53, 63-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morris, V. J., Kirby, A. R. and Gunning, A. P. (1999). Atomic Force Microscopy for Biologists. London: Imperial College Press.

Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M. (2004). Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19,3 -20.[CrossRef]

Persson, B. N. J. (2007). Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19,376110 .[CrossRef]

Persson, B. N. J., Albohr, O., Tartaglino, U., Volokitin, A. I. and Tosatti, E. (2005). On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, R1-R62.[CrossRef]

Scherge, M. and Gorb, S. (2001). Biological Micro- and Nanotribilogy: Nature's Solutions. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Scholz, I., Baumgartner, W. and Federle, W. (2008). Micromechanics of smooth adhesive organs in stick insects: pads are mechanically anisotropic and softer towards the adhesive surface. J. Comp. Physiol. A 194,373 -384.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schubert, B., Lee, J., Majidi, C. and Fearing, R. S. (2008). Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Microscale behaviour. J. R. Soc. Interface 5,835 -844..[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Welsch, U., Storch, V. and Fuchs, W. (1974). The fine structure of the digital pads of Rhacophorid tree frogs. Cell Tissue Res. 148,407 -416.[Medline]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Bhushan Biomimetics: lessons from nature-an overview Phil Trans R Soc A, April 28, 2009; 367(1893): 1445 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scholz, I. Articles by Baumgartner, W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Scholz, I. Articles by Baumgartner, W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?