|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online June 12, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1990-1994 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.028282
Spider silk as a novel high performance biomimetic muscle driven by humidity
1 Department of Biology, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
2 Department of Polymer Science, Integrated Bioscience Program, The University
of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
3 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00931,
USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: blackledge{at}uakron.edu)
Accepted 15 April 2009
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: supercontraction, major ampullate silk, biomaterial, Nephila clavipes
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5x greater than Kevlar®),
high strength to weight ratio (
5x greater than steel),
immunological compatibility with living tissue, and production under
environmentally benign conditions all make spider silk an important model for
biomimetic research (Gosline et al.,
1986
|
There are several other intriguing examples of materials in nature that
move in response to humidity and that could provide inspiration for biomimetic
muscle. The cellulose fibrils in wheat awns expand and contract in response to
humidity, driving the wheat grains into the soil
(Elbaum et al., 2007
). The
scales of seed-bearing pine cones open in response to humidity, helping to
expel seeds (Dawson et al.,
1997
). Some synthetic materials can also change size when exposed
to water or humidity (Beebe et al.,
2000
; Tanaka et al.,
1980
). These materials are all hydrophilic suggesting the
hypothesis that movement is caused simply by swelling during bulk uptake of
water. Here, for the first time, we show that spider dragline silk exhibits a
similar, cyclic response to humidity, and demonstrate how that response can be
harnessed to create precisely controlled biomimetic muscles for different
applications.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To measure the stress generated by spider silk under changing humidity,
individual fibers of major ampullate silk were first collected from restrained
Nephila clavipes (Linnaeus 1776) and adhered to cardboard mounts
across 21 mm gaps, as described previously
(Blackledge et al., 2005b
). The
diameters of fibers were then measured to the nearest 0.1µm using polarized
light microscopy (Blackledge et al.,
2005a
) before testing. Measurements of stress were performed using
an MTS Nano Bionix that measured force to ±10 µN. The Nano Bionix
was custom fit with an environmental chamber that controlled humidity to an
accuracy of 1% with a range of
1–95% RH. Humidity in the
environmental chamber was regulated by dividing the flow of dry gaseous
N2 into channels, one of which flowed through a 1 m high water
column and the other which remained dry. The controller then mixed the two
flows before they entered the chamber, to achieve the desired humidity. The
feedback between the hygrometer on the chamber and the controller was slow
enough that an initial switch from wetting to drying was usually accomplished
through a brief burst of completely dry N2 that was then rapidly
mixed with a small amount of moist gas. This resulted in a brief
`undershooting' of the targeted dryness that normally occurred too quickly to
register on the hygrometer, but did manifest itself in some tests (see below).
The opposite effect also occurred to a lesser degree during wetting.
|
90% RH to achieve a fully supercontracted
state in the fibers. Finally, each silk fiber (N=35) was exposed to
approximately eight cycles of humidity while stress was measured continuously.
Similar procedures were used to test fibers of polyethylene (N=6),
acrylic (N=7), cotton (N=5), keratin (hair, N=7)
and both native (N=9) and degummed silkworm (N=16) fibers.
For one series of tests, a bundle of 90 fibers of spider silk was used. Fibers
were then removed from the bundle and the test repeated until only a single
fiber remained.
To measure the capacity of spider silk to perform work, six progressively
heavier weights (2–100 mg) were suspended from 30–40 mm long
fibers of major ampullate silk that were mounted within the environmental
chamber. Weights were constructed from pipette tips and secured using
cyanoacrylate adhesive. Clear acetate was used to provide a window in the
chamber through which digital photographs were taken using an eight megapixel
Nikon D200 camera. For each test, photographs were taken immediately after the
chamber reached either high (
90%) or low (
5%) humidity through five
to nine cycles. The displacement of the weight was then determined in each
photograph using the image analysis software ImageJ
(http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/)
by measuring the length, in pixels, of the silk. Before testing, the diameters
of the fibers were measured as described above, the total volume of silk
calculated, and silk mass (m) estimated using a density of 1.3 g
cm–3 (Stauffer et al.,
1994
). Power (P) was calculated as:
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 MPa
(ranging from 10–140 MPa across 35 independent tests). The fiber then
relaxes back to its original tension when humidity is subsequently increased.
This cyclic response occurs independently of supercontraction, generating high
forces in the silk. Fig. 1C
shows eight repetitions with no evidence for fatigue in the silk, even after
approximately 100 min under tension. The magnitude of the stress generated is
directly proportional to the change in humidity
(Fig. 2A), providing a precise
mechanism to control the stress generated by the spider silk. The total force
generated increases as fibers are bundled together
(Fig. 2B,
Fig. 3).
The cyclic contraction of spider silk can produce work, sufficient for a
single
40 mm long, 5 µm diameter fiber to lift at least 100 mg.
Fig. 4 shows cyclic lifting of
a 9.5 mg weight in response to seven cycles of drying in an environmental
chamber. The work generated as a function of applied stress is shown in
Fig. 5. We estimate that the
lifting response occurs within 3 s, as indicated by video analysis of the much
larger amplitude changes during supercontraction. Also, the maximum change in
stress during the WS testing approached 20–30% of the total magnitude
per second. This time can probably be reduced further by increasing the rate
of change in humidity. Using a 3 s response time, a maximum power density of
130 W kg–1 is achieved at a stress of 50 MPa
(Table 1). This power density
is comparable to human muscles (Kornbluh
et al., 1998
; Madden et al.,
2004
). In addition, the maximum sustainable stress of 80 MPa,
which defines the upper limit at which silk can no longer perform work, is
much higher than the 0.1–0.4 MPa for typical biological muscles.
Furthermore, this stress can be maintained for long periods without additional
input of energy, in contrast to natural muscle. We also determine that the
maximum work density of silk fibers is 500 kJ m–3, 50 times
higher than most biological muscles
(Kornbluh et al., 1998
;
Madden et al., 2004
). Thus,
spider silk rapidly achieves high force at an impressively light weight.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
100–900µm and many layers have to be stacked together to scale
up the devices to larger dimensions (Osada
et al., 1992
The main limitation of silk as a biomimetic muscle fiber is the small
maximum displacement that can be achieved (maximum strain of 2.5%). In general
though, materials that exhibit higher strains have substantially lower
sustainable stress and modulus compared with spider silk
(Table 1). Moreover, there is
considerable variation in silk produced by different species of spiders
(Swanson et al., 2006
) such
that bioprospecting may reveal species whose silk maintains higher cyclic
strain without compromising other properties. More importantly, we also
observed cyclic contraction in silkworm silk
(Fig. 6). Even though the
maximum power density for silkworm silk is lower than spider silk, its
commercial availability offers the possibility of using large lengths of silk
threads. The potential limitation of lower strain can therefore be overcome by
using larger lengths of silk or through strain amplification. The use of silk
threads, or even two-dimensional woven silk mats, is an attractive technology
for lightweight biomimetic muscles. The micron to sub-micron diameters of
spider silk fibers results in a high surface to volume ratio that is ideal for
fabricating devices controlling application of water through microfluidic
geometries (e.g. Sia and Whitesides,
2003
; Wheeler and Stroock,
2008
).
|
Our focus here is on the potential applicability of silk as a biomimetic
muscle, rather than on the causes of the cyclic contraction itself. However,
cyclic contraction is clearly a phenomenon distinct from supercontraction
(Blackledge et al., 2009
). It
is repeatable both before and after supercontraction, and infiltration of
water causes the relaxation phase. We hypothesize that water molecules cause a
general swelling of the silk and their removal during drying results in
contraction. This is strikingly similar to the mechanism proposed to explain
how plant tissues can act as motors – actively expelling seeds from the
parent plant and even burying seeds in the ground
(Dawson et al., 1997
;
Elbaum et al., 2007
). For
instance, differential expansion and contraction on opposite sides of the
cellulose awns of wheat seeds causes them to bend under daily fluctuations of
humidity thereby burying the seeds in the ground
(Elbaum et al., 2007
). Thus,
cyclic contraction of spider silk may result from a relatively general
response of biological tissues to humidity. This is supported by our finding
of a lack of cyclic contraction in hydrophobic synthetic fibers, such as
polyethylene and acrylic, whereas it is weakly exhibited by natural fibers
such as cotton and hair (0.6±0.1 and 6.1±3.0 MPa, respectively).
Moreover, cyclic contraction occurs in other types of silk, such as fibers
spun by silkworms (Fig. 6). The
stresses generated in all of these materials during humidity cycling scale
directly with stiffness. Thus, the impressive capacity of spider silks to
perform work probably depends in large part on the high modulus of spider silk
(10–20 GPa), the hydrophilic nature of some of its constituent proteins,
and the relatively high cyclic strain caused by changes in humidity. Together,
these properties combine to generate work density 50x higher than
biological muscles.
In summary, we demonstrate the use of dry and wet air to control the contraction and relaxation of spider silk and silkworm fibers. This results in a very environmentally friendly and energy efficient mimic of biological muscles that generates impressive power density. Silk thus emerges as an attractive model for biomimetic muscle fibers that could be used for a range of applications in industry and the biomedical sciences.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2003). Actuation of biologically inspired intelligent robotics using artificial muscles. Ind. Rob. 30,331 -337.[CrossRef]
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2004). Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential and Challenges. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Publications.
Bar-Cohen, Y., Kim, K. J., Choi, H. R. and Madden, J. D. W. (2007). Electroactive polymer materials. Smart Mater. Struct. 16,S195 -S196.
Beebe, D. J., Moore, J. S., Bauer, J. M., Yu, Q., Liu, R. H., Devadoss, C. and Jo, B. H. (2000). Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 404,588 -590.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bell, F. I., McEwen, I. J. and Viney, C. (2002). Fibre science: Supercontraction stress in wet spider dragline. Nature 416,37 .[CrossRef][Medline]
Blackledge, T. A., Cardullo, R. A. and Hayashi, C. Y. (2005a). Polarized light microscopy, variability in spider silk diameters, and the mechanical characterization of spider silk. Invertebr. Biol. 124,165 -173.
Blackledge, T. A., Swindeman, J. E. and Hayashi, C. Y.
(2005b). Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of
the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider
Latrodectus hesperus. J. Exp. Biol.
208,1937
-1949.
Blackledge, T. A., Boutry, C., Wong, S.-C., Baji, A.,
Dhinojwala, A., Sahni, V. and Agnarsson, I. (2009). How super
is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity
in spider dragline silk. J. Exp. Biol.
212,1981
-1989.
Dawson, C., Vincent, J. F. V. and Rocca, A. (1997). How pine cones open. Nature 390, 668.[CrossRef]
Elbaum, R., Zaltzman, L., Burgert, I. and Fratzl, P.
(2007). The role of wheat awns in the seed dispersal unit.
Science 316,884
-886.
Gosline, J. M., Denny, M. W. and Demont, M. E. (1984). Spider silk as rubber. Nature 309,551 -552.[CrossRef]
Gosline, J. M., Demont, M. E. and Denny, M. W. (1986). The structure and properties of spider silk. Endeavour 10,37 -43.[CrossRef]
Gosline, J. M., Guerette, P. A., Ortlepp, C. S. and Savage, K. N. (1999). The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 202,3295 -3303.[Abstract]
Guinea, G. V., Elices, M., Pérez-Rigueiro, J. and Plaza, G. (2003). Self-tightening of spider silk fibers induced by moisture. Polymer 44,5785 -5788.[CrossRef]
Hayashi, C. Y., Shipley, N. H. and Lewis, R. V. (1999). Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24,271 -275.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jelinski, L. W., Blye, A., Liivak, O., Michal, C., LaVerde, G., Seidel, A., Shah, N. and Yang, Z. T. (1999). Orientation, structure, wet-spinning, and molecular basis for supercontraction of spider dragline silk. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24,197 -201.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kornbluh, R., Pelrine, R., Eckerle, J. and Joseph, J. (1998). Electrostrictive polymer artificial muscle actuators. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. 3,2147 -2154.
Madden, J. D. W., Vandesteeg, N. A., Anquetil, P. A., Madden, P. G. A., Takshi, A., Pytel, R. Z., Lafontaine, S. R., Wieringa, P. A. and Hunter, I. W. (2004). Artificial muscle technology: physical principles and naval prospects. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 29,706 -728.[CrossRef]
Osada, Y., Okuzaki, H. and Hori, H. (1992). A polymer gel with electrically driven motility. Nature 355,242 -244.[CrossRef]
Schafer, A., Vehoff, T., Glisovic, A. and Salditt, T. (2008). Spider silk softening by water uptake: an AFM study. Eur. Biophys. J. 37,197 -204.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shahinpoor, M., Bar-Cohen, Y., Simpson, J. O. and Smith, J. (1998). Ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) as biomimetic sensors, actuators and artificial muscles – a review. Smart Mater. Struct. 7,R15 -R30.[CrossRef]
Sia, S. K. and Whitesides, G. M. (2003). Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis 24,3563 -3576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stauffer, S. L., Coguill, S. L. and Lewis, R. V. (1994). Comparison of the physical properties of three silks from Nephila clavipes and Araneus gemmoides. J. Arachnol. 22,5 -11.
Swanson, B. O., Blackledge, T. A., Summers, A. P. and Hayashi, C. Y. (2006). Spider dragline silk: correlated and mosaic evolution in high performance biological materials. Evolution 60,2539 -2551.[Medline]
Tanaka, T., Fillmore, D., Sun, S. T., Nishio, I., Swislow, G. and Shah, A. (1980). Phase transition in ionic gels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45,1636 -1639.[CrossRef]
Termonia, Y. (1994). Molecular modeling of spider silk elasticity. Macromolecules 27,7378 -7381.[CrossRef]
Vadlamudi, S. (1995). Suitability of spider silks for biomedical applications. MS Thesis, University of Wyoming.
Vollrath, F. and Knight, D. P. (2001). Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410,541 -548.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vollrath, F. and Porter, D. (2006). Spider silk as a model biomaterial. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Proc. 82,205 -212.[CrossRef]
Wheeler, T. D. and Stroock, A. D. (2008). The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree. Nature 455,208 -212.[CrossRef][Medline]
Work, R. W. (1977). Dimensions, birefringences, and force-elongation behavior of major and minor ampullate silk fibers from orb-web-spinning spiders-the effects of wetting on these properties. Tex. Res. J. 47,650 -662.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Knight SPIDER SILK CONTRACTS LIKE MUSCLE J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Blackledge, C. Boutry, S.-C. Wong, A. Baji, A. Dhinojwala, V. Sahni, and I. Agnarsson How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): 1981 - 1989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||