|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online December 16, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 78-88 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.024612
Multiplicity of expression of Na+,K+–ATPase
-subunit isoforms in the gill of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): cellular localisation and absolute quantification in response to salinity change
Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: steffen{at}biology.sdu.dk)
Accepted 29 October 2008
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and
β-subunit transcripts in Atlantic salmon gill during salinity change. The
combined expression level of all
-isoforms in the gill increased by
100% after freshwater (FW) to seawater (SW) transfer. The
1a
and
1b isoforms were both in the range 1–6 amol 20
ng–1 total RNA;
1a decreased and
1b increased after SW-transfer, their ratio changing from
5:1 in FW to 0.26:1 in SW. The
1c and
3
levels were 10- and 100-fold lower, respectively. The
β1-subunit mRNA level was 0.1–0.3 amol 20
ng–1 total RNA, thus much lower than the sum of
-subunits. Even though increasing 3-fold after SW-transfer,
β-subunit availability may still limit functional pump synthesis. The
mRNAs of the predominant
1a and
1b
isoforms were localised by in situ hybridisation in specific gill
cells of both FW and SW salmon. Labelling occurred mainly in presumed chloride
cells and cells deep in the filament but occasionally also on lamellae.
Overall, the salinity-induced variation in labelling pattern and intensity
matched the quantification data. In conclusion, the predominant switching of
Na+,K+–ATPase
-subunit isoform mRNA during
salinity acclimation reflects a marked remodelling of mitochondrion-rich cells
(MRCs) in the gill and probably tuning of the pump performance to accomplish a
net reversal of gill ion transport in hypo- and hypertonic environments.
Key words: absolute quantification, chloride cell, in situ hybridisation, mRNA
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and β-type), localisation
within the gill (in lamellae, at base of lamellae, interlamellar in filament,
etc.), dynamics in response to salinity change (recruitment to/from lamellae,
hyperplasia in filament) or expression of additional ion-transport proteins
(V-type H+–ATPase, Cl–/HCO
– 3 exchanger, CFTR-chloride channel,
Na+,K+2Cl– cotransporter) (for reviews,
see Evans et al., 2005
The active and passive steps in gill ion-translocation have been unravelled
from studies involving both stenohaline and euryhaline teleosts of FW as well
as SW origin. At both salinities, net ion-transfer is based on the activity of
Na+,K+–ATPase as the primary energy-consuming
step, even though in certain species this may be supplemented by the active
transfer of protons by V-type H+–ATPase
(Evans et al., 2005
). The
level of complexity has recently increased by the discovery of three different
isoforms of the
1-subunit in gill tissue of Oncorhynchus
mykiss (Richards et al.,
2003
):
1a,
1b and
1c. These are present in addition to an
3
isoform, which has also been described in a number of other species
[Oreochromus mossambicus (Lee et
al., 1998
); Danio rerio
(Rajarao et al., 2001
);
Trematomus spp (Guynn et al.,
2002
)]. The relative abundances of some of these isoforms in
whole-gill RNA extracts have been investigated during salinity acclimation in
a few studies [O. mykiss, Salvelinus alpinus, Salmo salar
(Richards et al., 2003
;
Bystrianski et al., 2006
;
Bystrianski et al., 2007); O. nerka
(Shrimpton et al., 2005
);
Fundulus heteroclitus (Scott et
al., 2004
)]. Based on analyses of relative mRNA levels by
real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-QPCR), the general
picture emerging from these studies is that salinity induces a reciprocal
regulation (switching) – primarily of the
1a and
1b isoforms,
1a generally being
upregulated in FW and
1b being upregulated in SW. This led
Richards et al. to suggest that the
1a is a FW-isoform
driving in ion-uptake whereas
1b is a SW-isoform driving
ion-secretion (Richards et al.,
2003
). Accordingly, the
1b is upregulated during
salmon smoltification in FW – a process preparing the juvenile fish for
movement into the marine environment
(Nilsen et al., 2007
). In
support of this, Jorgensen recently showed that a few particular amino acid
differences between the two isoforms may critically influence cation binding
properties, and reduce the Na+:ATP ratio from 3:1 in
1b to 2:1 in the
1a isoform
(Jorgensen, 2008
). In O.
mykiss and S. salar, the presence of a lysine residue instead of
asparagine at site 783 in transmembrane segment 5 of the
1a
isoform thus leads to this isoform being energetically better suited for
Na+ transport against extreme electrochemical gradients, as is the
case for ion uptake in FW.
Only relative measures of mRNA abundance have been reported so far, and
nothing is known neither about the quantitative relationship between the four
isoforms nor of their cellular localisation in the gill. Based on relative
measures, attempts have been made to calculate changes in the total abundance
of
-subunit mRNA during salinity changes
(Bystrianski et al., 2006
;
Bystrianski et al., 2007); however, such an arithmetic exercise requires
absolute quantification and is invalid when based on relative measures. The
purpose of the present study was to investigate the cellular localisation of
the
-subunit isoform mRNAs in the Atlantic salmon gill by in
situ hybridisation (ISH) and to clarify the time course and the exact
quantitative interrelationship of the four
-subunit isoforms in the
gill when subject to salinity change. The β1-subunit, which is
needed in a 1:1 ratio with the
1-subunit for functional
maturation and membrane targeting (Scheiner-Bobis, 2002) was also quantified
to give insight into the stoichiometric relationships between the two
subunits.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Real-time QPCR analysis
Total RNA was purified using GenEluteTM Mammalian Total RNA kit (Sigma
Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. RNA concentration and purity was determined by measuring
A260/A280 on undiluted samples on a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop
Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). One µg RNA was DNase treated (Promega,
Madison, WI, USA) and then reverse transcribed using 2 µg oligo dT primers
(GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK) and 200 units MMLV reverse
transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at 37°C in the
presence of 40 units of RNAguard (GE Healthcare) in a total volume of 25
µl. At the end the cDNA was diluted to 50 µl with milliQ H2O.
Real-time PCR analysis using SYBR Green detection was performed on a Mx3000-P
PCR machine (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) using standard software settings
including adaptive baseline for background detection, moving average and
amplification based threshold settings with the built-in FAM
(5-carboxyfluorescein) filter (excitation wavelength, 492 nm; emission
wavelength, 516 nm). Reactions were carried out with 1 µl cDNA, 150 nmol
l–1 forward and reverse primer
(Table 1) and 1x
SYBR® Green JumpStartTM Taq ReadyMixTM (Sigma Chemical Co.) in a
total volume of 25 µl. Cycling conditions were: 95°C for 120 s followed
by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s and 60°C for 60 s. Melting curve
analysis was performed following each reaction to confirm the presence of only
a single product in the reaction. Negative control reactions using DNase
treated total RNA from representative samples were used to analyse carry over
of genomic DNA. In all samples and with all primers there was negligible
genomic contamination.
|
Primers
The primers used to amplify the Na+,K+–ATPase
1b, and
1c isoforms were the same as used
by Richards et al. (Richards et al.,
2003
). These were designed for O. mykiss and have been
successfully used for S. salar by Bystrianski et al.
(Bystrianski et al., 2006
). The
sequences of the primers used for the
1a isoform in O.
mykiss (Richards et al.,
2003
) and S. salar (Bystrianski et al., 2007) in previous
studies were identical to the
1b sequence in the primer
region (mismatch 1/18 and 2/18 for forward and reverse primers, respectively)
and in our hands, were found not to be specific for the
1a
isoform (not shown). Therefore, we designed specific primers for the
1a near the 3'terminus of the complete mRNA sequence
(for O. mykiss) in order to obtain maximum isoform specificity. For
the
3 isoform we designed primers based on a S.
salar EST sequence (acc. no. CX355357), which is 99% identical to the
O. mykiss
3 isoform. For the
β1-subunit, primers were designed based on a partial S.
salar β1-sequence (acc. no. AJ250810). Primers were
designed using the NetPrimer software (Premier Biosoft International, CA, USA)
with standard settings and double checked using the Primer3 software
(Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000
)
and BLASTed. All primers were tested for non-specific product amplification
and primer–dimer formation using both melting curve analysis and agarose
gel verification. All primers were synthesised by DNA Technology A/S (Aarhus,
Denmark).
Standard curves and calculations
In order to convert threshold cycle (Ct)-values from a given PCR reaction
into absolute quantities of the corresponding transcript, it was necessary to
generate a standard curve for each of the five transcripts of interest
(
1a,
1b,
1c,
3 and β1). Therefore, a specific single
stranded polynucleotide (approximately 100 bases long)
(Table 1) based on the
antisense chain of each
-isoform gene sequence was synthesised
(Invitrogen), thus defining the amplicon of each primer pair. The amount of
specific polynucleotides used per PCR reaction to generate the standard curves
ranged from 0.01 amol to 1 fmol. This generated Ct-values in the range
10–28 depending on the amplicon. For each standard curve, the regression
line was then used for calculations of cDNA quantity in the unknown samples.
Ct-values of the unknown samples were always within the range of the actual
standard curve. Amplification efficiencies of the five PCR reactions were in
the range of 92 to 103% both when using polynucleotides or actual cDNAs
amplified from tissue RNAs as template.
ISH
In a separate experiment using long term (>3 weeks) FW- and
SW-acclimated S. salar, blocks of gill tissue (2 mm wide) were
quickly removed from euthanised fish. After trimming away the cartilage rod, a
2–3 mm gill block was placed in a small alufoil mould, embedded in
Optimal Cutting Temperature Compound (Miles, Eikhart, IN, USA) and quick
frozen on dry ice. The specimens were stored desiccated at –80°C
until further processing. Sections (8–10µm) of the frozen specimens
were then cut on a cryostat at –14°C, transferred to Superfrost Plus
glass slides (Erie Scientific Company, Portsmouth, NH, USA) and dried for 1 h
at 50°C. The sections were then transferred to –80°C until
further processing. Upon use, the sections were thawed at room temperature,
soaked in 96% ethanol for 1 h and dried at 37°C for 30 min. They were
incubated overnight under cover glass with 3 pmol ml–1 of
alkaline phosphatase (AP) labelled cDNA probes
(Table 2) in hybridisation
buffer at 37°C in a sealed chamber with 100% humidity. Depending on the
base composition and theoretical melting point of the DNA–RNA duplexes
(Tm) hybridisation conditions were varied (see
Table 2): 30–50%
formamide, 1.5–4x saline sodium citrate buffer (SSC: 165 mmol
l–1 NaCl, 3.3 mmol l–1 sodium citrate),
1x Denhardt's solution (0.2 mg ml–1 Ficoll, 0.2 mg
ml–1 polyvinyl pyrrolidon, 0.2 mg ml–1
bovine serum albumin), 10% dextran sulphate, 10 µgml–1
single-stranded salmon sperm DNA. The hybridisation temperature was always
37°C, which is 20–25°C lower than the theoretical Tm
of all probes in solution and thus near the optimal temperature for
hybridisation in the tissue (Augood et al.,
1993
; Tecott et al.,
1987
). After incubation, the cover glass was carefully removed and
the sections rinsed in three 30 min changes of 3x SSC (22.5 mmol
l–1 NaCl, 2.3 mmol l–1 sodium citrate,
pH8.0) at 37°C followed by two 10 min rinses in post-hybridisation buffer
(0.01 mol Tris-HCl, 0.15 mol NaCl, pH9.5) at room temperature. For colour
development, the specimens were incubated in freshly made AP developer buffer
(0.32 mg ml–1 nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT; Sigma Chemical
Co.), 0.17 mg ml–1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate
(BCIP; Sigma Chemical Co.), 0.1 mol Tris-HCl, 0.1 mol NaCl and 0.05 mol
MgCl2, pH9.5) for 1 to 3 days in the dark at room temperature until
an appropriate colour deposition was observed. Finally, the specimens were
rinsed in distilled water (30°C, 30 min) to stop the colorimetric
reaction. Cover slips were mounted using Aquatex (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
The above methodology is based on the protocol described by Lambertsen et al.
(Lambertsen et al., 2001
).
|
ISH probes and validation
AP-labelled 28-mer cDNA probes were designed using the Oligo 6 software
(Molecular Biology Insights, West Cascade, CO, USA) with standard settings
(Table 2). Probes were designed
in order to have minimal hairpin and dimer formation, and all sequences were
BLASTed. Due to the high similarity of the
-isoform sequences, each
probe sequence was aligned against the other isoforms. Identity generally
ranged between 10/28 and 16/28 bases.
Two series' of control hybridisation experiments were done in order to
validate the specificity of the 28-mer cDNA probes. In one series, the
specificity of the
1a and
1b probes were
checked by co-incubating gill sections with the AP-conjugated cDNA probe (3
pmol ml–1) for a particular target (
1a
vs
1b) with 10-fold excess of the matching cDNA
sequence of the alternate isoform in the probe region (see
Table 3). In both cases, the
identity between the AP-labelled probe and the cDNA sequence of the alternate
isoform was 14/28. In another series, the ability of the unlabelled probe
sequence to displace the AP-conjugated probe was checked by co-incubating
tissue with the probe (3 pmol ml–1) and 5-fold excess of the
unlabelled cDNA sequence.
|
Statistics
All data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed
by Bonferroni adjusted Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) test,
taking into account the total number of paired comparisons. When necessary,
data was log-transformed to obtain normality and homogeneity of variances. In
all cases, a significance level of
<0.05 was used. All tests were
performed using SAS (v. 9.1 for Windows, by SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1a transcript level was in the range 0.7–3.9
amol 20 ng–1 total RNA
(Fig. 2A).
1a
Transcript levels were affected by both time and salinity and there was a
significant interaction between the two factors, with SW-values being lower
than FW-values at 3 and 7 days after transfer. The
1b
transcript level was in the range 0.5–5.3 amol 20 ng–1
total RNA (Fig. 2B).
1b Transcript levels were affected by both time and salinity
and there was a significant interaction between the two factors, with
SW-values being higher than FW-values at 1, 3 and 7 days after transfer. The
1c transcript level was in the range 0.3–0.4 amol 20
ng–1 total RNA (Fig.
2C). Overall, it was affected by time but not salinity and with a
significant interaction between the two factors. The
3
transcript level was in the range 0.02–0.05 amol 20
ng–1 total RNA (Fig.
2D) and was affected by salinity and time. The level was generally
lower in SW than in FW. The sum of
-transcripts was in the range
3–7 amol 20 ng–1 total RNA
(Fig. 2E) and was affected by
both time and salinity with a significant interaction. The sum increased after
SW-transfer being significantly higher at 3 and 7 days compared with the
FW-level. The ratio of
1a:
1b was in the
range 4–5 in FW and decreased to a lower value of 0.26 after SW-transfer
(Fig. 2F). The ratio was
significantly affected by both time and salinity and with a significant
interaction.
|
|
-subunit isoforms in FW and after
SW-transfer are shown in Fig.
4. In FW, the contribution of the four subunits was
1a, 68–74%;
1b, 15–23%;
1c, 7–13%;
3, 0.7–1.2%. After
SW-transfer, a major shift in
1a and
1b
was observed in favour of
1b being the dominating isoform.
Seven days post-transfer the relative proportions were:
1a,
19%;
1b, 75%. No major changes occurred in the relative
contribution of
1c and
3, their shares
being 4% and 1.7%, respectively, on day 7 in SW.
|
-subunits in the gill
1a isoform was primarily located in cells in the
interlamellar region at the base of the lamellae in both FW and SW gills
(Fig. 5A,B). These cells were
more numerous in FW than in SW gill sections
(Fig. 5A–C vs
Fig. 5D,E). Cells on the
secondary lamellae also stained positive with the
1a probe
in FW (Fig. 5A-B) but this
labelling disappeared in SW gills (Fig.
5D). The contour of the FW-cells was larger and they were often in
contact with the surface of the epithelium
(Fig. 5B) compared with
SW-cells, which appeared smaller and deeper in the epithelium
(Fig. 5D).
|
In FW, the
1b staining occurred in cells almost
exclusively in the interlamellar region
(Fig. 6A). The cells appeared
small and deep in the epithelium, without contact with the apical surface of
the epithelium. Rarely, labelling also appeared in cells on the lamellae. In
SW-acclimated fish, there was a much higher density of positively reacting
cells – again primarily in the interlamellar region of the filament
epithelium (Fig. 6B-D). These
cells were larger than those observed in FW and generally were in contact with
the apical surface. In SW, there was no labelling of cells on the lamellae
(Fig. 6B,C). Application of the
1c or the
3 probe gave no clear staining
of gill cells either in FW or SW (not shown). The use of the β-actin
probe gave a strong and almost uniform staining of all cell types in the gill
(Fig. 6E).
|
1a or
1b) and the corresponding
unlabelled cDNA sequence of the alternate isoform (
1b or
1a) in 10-fold excess, gave no changes in staining pattern
or staining intensity as shown in Fig.
7A–D. Thus, the probes were highly isoform specific.
However, simultaneous incubation of gill sections with a specific cDNA probe
(
1a or
1b) and the corresponding
unlabelled cDNA sequence of the same isoform in 5-fold excess, completely
displaced the hybridisation signal (Fig.
7E,F) (shown for
1b only), showing that the
hybridisation signal is target specific.
|
Quantitative considerations of
-subunit mRNA in chloride cells
Based on the present quantitative estimates of
-subunit mRNA in
whole gill RNA extracts and a few simple assumptions, we can make a rough
calculation of the fraction of the mRNA pool in chloride cells made up of
-subunit isoforms. Consider the following situation: the mRNA pool of
gill tissue makes up 1–3% of the total RNA extract, thus in 20 ng of
total RNA (1 QPCR reaction) the mRNA amounts to 0.2–0.6 ng. Assuming
100% efficiency in the first strand cDNA synthesis reaction this is all
converted 1:1 into cDNA. The sum of
-subunit isoform transcript is
presently found to be around 5 amol 20 ng–1 total RNA. The
mean transcript size (of
1a and
1b
isoforms) is 3350 bases (based on full length sequences in O.
mykiss). With an approximate nucleotide molar weight of 307 g
mol–1, the mean molar weight of
-subunit mRNA is
1x106 g mol–1. Thus, the mean weight of 5
amol
transcript is 5.2 pg. This amount equals 0.8–2.5% of the
estimated mRNA pool in the gill extract. From the ISH analyses,
1a and
1b isoforms are predominantly
located in presumed chloride cells in the gill. The relative fraction of
mitochondrion-rich chloride cells have been estimated to be in the order of
<10% of the total cell number in the gill (Goss et al., 2004). Assuming the
mRNA content per cell is the same – irrespective of cell type – it
can be estimated that the amount of
-subunit mRNA within the chloride
cells makes up 8–25% of the total mRNA pool. Even though connected with
some uncertainty, this gives a rough estimate of the total abundance of
-subunit transcripts in the chloride cells.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-isoforms of
Na+,K+–ATPase in the gill of any fish species and
to quantify all
- and β-isoforms in absolute terms at the mRNA
level in response to a salinity change. Two
-subunit isoforms
(
1a and
1b) were predominant in the gill
irrespective of salinity and were present in almost equimolar amounts. They
both varied in response to salinity whereas the additional
1c and
3 isoforms were expressed at lower
levels – especially the
3 isoform, which was present
at negligible levels and showed little variation. Based on these measures, the
sum of
-subunit transcripts is in the range of 5 amol
-subunit
transcript per 20 ng total gill RNA, which we estimated to correspond to
8–25% of the mRNA pool within chloride cells. Even though some
uncertainty is connected with this estimate, this is a very high fraction of
total mRNA but matches well with the high abundance of
Na+,K+–ATPase pumps estimated to reach 200 million
pumps per chloride cell (Karnaky,
1980
The
1a and
1b transcripts
The primers we used to quantify these two major transcripts were designed
in order to obtain maximum isoform specificity. The
1b
primer pair was the same as used by Richards et al.
(Richards et al., 2003
) in
O. mykiss, by Bystrianski et al.
(Bystrianski et al., 2006
;
Bystrianski et al., 2007) in S. alpinus and S. salar, and by
Shrimpton et al. (Shrimpton et al.,
2005
) in O. nerka. These primers were designed near the
3'-terminus, where there is a region of maximum heterology between the
-isoforms. In all of the above studies, however, the
1a-primers were designed in the middle of the transcript in
a region with very high identity between the isoforms. These primers had only
one (forward) and two (reverse) mismatches compared with the
1b sequence, and when tested against specific cDNA sequences
of the two isoforms, they annealed and amplified the two isoforms with almost
equal efficiency (not shown). Thus, in the former studies there is a risk that
the
1a primers may have amplified both
1a
and
1b transcript. In order to avoid this, we designed the
1a-primers in the 3'-region in order to obtain maximum
isoform specificity (zero and 10 mismatches in forward and reverse primers,
respectively) and when tested against the synthetic polynucleotide sequences
of the two isoforms, they amplified only the
1a isoform, as
expected.
Our present study confirms previous reports of a reciprocal change of the
two major
-isoforms in response to salinity change. When the salinity
was increased from FW to SW,
1a decreased and
1b increased within a 1–3 day time course, the sum of
these two showing a doubling. This pattern is in accordance with Richards et
al. [(Richards et al., 2003
)
O. mykiss], Mackie et al.
[(Mackie et al., 2005
) S.
salar] and Bystrianski et al.
[Bystrianski et al., 2006
)
S. alpinus], who speculated that this pattern of regulation may
reflect major functional differences of these isoforms with respect to their
putative roles in ion uptake (
1a) and ion secretion
(
1b), respectively. In maturing O. nerka, Shrimpton
et al. (Shrimpton et al.,
2005
) found upregulation of
1a upon FW entry;
however,
1b was unchanged after FW-encounter and upregulated
in fish on the spawning grounds, suggesting a non-specific response to stress
in moribund fish.
There were already marked changes in the transcript levels on day 1
increasing until day 3 after SW-transfer. This is probably initiated by the
osmotic stress apparent at 12 h and peaking on day 1, and mediated by
osmoregulatory hormones, of which cortisol is a likely candidate
(McCormick, 2001
). Remarkably,
Na+,K+–ATPase hydrolytic activity, which is a
measure of total protein abundance, was not elevated until day 7. An overall
increase in Na+,K+–ATPase activity is seen in
response to hyperosmotic conditions in many euryhaline fish
(Marshall, 2002
), and a lag
period of several days is not unusual
(Bystrianski et al., 2006
;
Madsen et al., 1995
). It has
been argued that this reflects the time for protein synthesis in
poikilothermic fish (Conte and Lin,
1967
), however, we propose that de novo synthesis of
`secretory'-type Na+,K+–ATPase may be accomplished
prior to that. Because the enzymatic assay does not separate between
`FW-absorptive-type' and `SW-secretory-type' enzyme in the gill, the gross
capacity is merely a static measure of a highly dynamic enzymatic pool
reflecting the difference between protein being degraded and synthesised.
Thus, new `SW-secretory-type' (
1b)
Na+,K+–ATPase may be synthesised well before day 7
without being observed in measures of catalytic capacity, which also explains
why plasma [Na+] is stabilised and already regulated after <3
days. The presence and reciprocal regulation of two dominating isoforms may be
specific to salmonids, as in killifish, the
1a isoform
increases in both hyper- and hyposaline environments compared with brackish
water (Scott et al., 2004
)
whereas the
1b isoform remains unchanged.
The
1c transcript
The
1c variant of the
1 isoform has
only been described in salmonids [O. mykiss
(Richards et al., 2003
);
S. salar (Nilsen et al.,
2007
)]. In the present study as well as the quoted studies, the
transcript level of
1c was unresponsive to salinity as well
as during smoltification. The level was somewhat lower than the
1a and
1b isoforms. In O. mykiss,
there is a universal tissue distribution of the transcript of this isoform
(Richards et al., 2003
) and if
this also applies to cell types within the gill, this may lead to a very low
transcript level per cell and thus explain why the isoform was not detected
using AP-conjugated ISH probes. All together, the data conform with the
`house-keeping' function suggested by Richards et al. and Nilsen et al.
(Richards et al., 2003
;
Nilsen et al., 2007
).
The
3 transcript
The levels of
3 mRNA have only been reported in a single
study in O. mykiss, where it was found to be unresponsive to SW (80%
SW) (Richards et al., 2003
)
and is, thus, suggested to be a housekeeping isoform. In our present study,
3 mRNA levels were extremely low in whole-gill extracts,
making up only approximately 1% of the total
-transcript level. Despite
this low level,
3 showed an overall significant decrease in
response to SW. Even if the transcript may be concentrated in a few specific
cell types, the level is still very low. At the protein level, three studies
have investigated the presence of a
3-like isoform in the
gills of teleosts. Pressley reported lack of presence in the catfish gill by
using a heterologous antibody (TED) raised against the rat
3
isoform (Pressley, 1992
).
D'Cotta et al. detected the
3 in S. salar gills
using the same antibody (D'Cotta et al.,
2000
). The isoform was found in both FW parr and in FW and SW
smolt but no attempts were made to quantify the abundance. The
3 isoform was also reported in a study of euryhaline tilapia
(Lee et al., 1998
) (use of a
polyclonal antibody against rat
3), where it was found not
to change in the gills after transfer to SW. This was in contrast to the
1 in their study (use of polyclonal antibody against avian
1), which was higher in gills of SW than FW fish. Both the
1 and
3 were localised by
immunocytochemistry in MRC apparently belonging to different populations.
Unfortunately, we were unable to localise the
3 transcript
in the salmon gill. We suspect that this is due to the extremely low abundance
of the mRNA in this species.
The β1 transcript
Whereas the
-subunit is the catalytic component determining the
transport kinetics of the Na+,K+-ATPase, the
β-subunit is essential for stabilisation of the
-subunit, membrane
targeting, structural and functional maturation of the pump (Ackerman and
Geering, 1990; Geering, 1990
;
Scheiner-Bobis, 2002). Compared with the
-subunit, very few studies
have addressed the expression and regulation of the β-subunit in teleosts
[Danio rerio (Appel et al.,
1996
); Anguilla anguilla
(Cutler et al., 2000
);
Sparus sarba (Deane and Woo,
2005
); S. salar
(Nilsen et al., 2007
)]. In
mammals, three isoforms (β1–β3) are
expressed in different tissues and may assemble with different
-isoforms, thus increasing the number of possible
,
β-heterodimers considerably. In the eel, the β1 and a
duplicate β1 isoform, named β233 are the only
isoforms expressed in the gill (Cutler et
al., 1995
; Cutler et al.,
2000
) whereas a β3 isoform is found exclusively
expressed in the brain (Cutler et al.,
1997
). Both the β1 and the β233
isoform showed a strong response to salinity changes in the eel gill and the
latter also in other ion-transporting epithelia. We found that the
β1 transcript overall increased (doubled) after transfer to
hypersaline conditions, with an initial peak at 24 h followed by an increase
on day 7 after transfer. Remarkably, the absolute level of β1
is considerably lower (approximately 1/50) than the sum of
-subunits,
and assuming that the transcripts are localised in the same cell types, this
suggests that the rate of β-subunit production may be a limiting step in
generation of new pumps. β-Isoform multiplicity is unknown in salmonids
at this moment but based on the present findings, it should be pursued in
future studies. In mammalian and cellular model systems, there are examples of
co-expression and regulation of the two subunits in both equimolar and
different levels (Ewart and Klip,
1995
). In these situations, where different transcript levels are
found, the β-subunit transcript is usually expressed at the lower level
(Young and Lingrell, 1987
). In
addition to differentially regulated rates of transcription, there is evidence
that the translational efficiency of the β-subunit may be several-fold
higher than the
-subunit, which may account for equal accumulation of
the two subunit proteins in those cells and tissues where
-mRNA is more
abundant than β-mRNA. There are several examples of differential control
of
- and β-subunit genes in cell systems
(Corthésy-Theulaz et al.,
1991
; Farman et al.,
1992
; Geering et al.,
1989
) and one remarkable example among teleosts. Deane and Woo
cloned both the
- and β-subunit in S. sarba gill and
examined the response to various hormones
(Deane and Woo, 2005
). The two
subunits were mostly regulated in parallel, even though absolute
quantification was not performed. However, there was a remarkable divergence
with regard to the effect of cortisol, which stimulated the
-subunit
but had no effect on the β-subunit, neither at the mRNA nor the protein
level. In agreement herewith, the authors found no effect of cortisol on
Na+,K+–ATPase enzymatic activity. This clearly
demonstrates that expression of the β-subunit in some instances may exert
important control with overall pump abundance. Future studies should include
analyses of
- as well as β-subunit expression to increase our
understanding of their regulatory diversity.
Localisation of Na+,K+–ATPase
-isoforms in the gill
The mRNAs of the two predominant
1a and
1b isoforms were localised by ISH in the gill of S.
salar whereas we were unsuccessful in localising the
1c
and
3 isoforms. Based on the quantitative expression data,
the obvious reason for the lack of success with the latter isoforms is their
low level of expression in the gill. This is particularly the case for the
3 isoform. Isoforms
1a and
1b were generally localised in discrete cells primarily in
the filament epithelium but occasionally also in lamellar positions. Both
isoforms were present in cells in FW and SW; however, their cellular
expression pattern changed in a characteristic way, in accordance with the
reciprocal regulation described above. Judged from their location, these cells
correspond to mitochondrion-rich chloride cells of one type or another (see
Introduction).
In FW, the
1a isoform was localised in numerous cells in
the interlamellar space and also frequently in cells on the lamellae. Most of
these cells appeared elongated and large and were typically in contact with
the apical (water) surface of the epithelium. The
1b isoform
was also expressed in cells in the interlamellar region but less so than the
1a isoform. Occasionally, cells in the lamellae also stained
positive for
1b. However, in FW the
1b-probe stained rounded cells, notably small and localised
deep in the epithelium without contact with the apical surface. This suggests
these cells to be non-functional, possibly immature differentiated chloride
cells awaiting stimulus to become functionally mature. This stimulus for
development appears to be under the influence of salinity, as the staining
intensity and apparent many-fold increase in cell size in the SW-gill, the
mRNA now being localised in large, elongated cells with apical contact
exclusively in the interlamellar region. It seems probable that these cells
represent the functional stage of the smaller cells described for the FW-gill
– thus representing the secretory SW-type chloride cell. Not much is
known about cellular differentiation mechanisms and morphogenesis of the
various types of MRCs in the fish gill. However, a model of epidermal stem
cell differentiation into various types of MRCs in zebrafish (Danio
rerio) embryos has recently been proposed by Hsiao et al.
(Hsiao et al., 2007
).
In the SW gill, the
1a mRNA is present in several cells
– mostly in the interlamellar region and only rarely on the lamellae.
These cells appear deeper in the epithelium than their FW-counterparts and may
be non-functional. The general picture emerging from the localisation part of
this study is in good agreement with the quantification data and shows a very
morphoplastic gill epithelium with at least two cell types responsible for
ion-transport being recruited to- and from- the epithelial surface in response
to salinity. The mRNAs of
1a and
1b are
present in the functional state as well as presumed precursor state of these
cells, characterised by their deeper position below the epithelial surface.
This picture supports the hypothesis by Richards et al. that the
1a isoform is predominantly involved in ion-uptake and
1b is the isoform driving ion-secretion, even though both
isoforms are present in the basolateral membrane network and pump
Na+ into the basolateral space
(Richards et al., 2003
).
Whereas the localisation data suggest that expression of the
1b isoform is exclusive to secretory-type chloride cells and
their early differentiated stages, it cannot be excluded that the
1a may also play a role in secretory-type chloride cells.
This question shall await co-localisation studies with other proteins involved
in ion secretion (e.g. CFTR, Na+K+2Cl–
cotransporter) or ion absorption (e.g. ENaC, V-type H+ATPase)
respectively.
Perspectives
Successful acclimation to hypo- and hyperosmotic media requires a net
reversal of ion transport across the gill epithelium. The recent, discovery of
multiple Na+,K+–ATPase
-isoforms is an
important step in understanding the molecular basis for this reversal
(Richards et al., 2003
). Our
present study is the first to localise these isoforms in gill tissue, to
investigate their dynamics during remodelling of the gill and to establish the
real quantitative relationship between the transcript levels of the
-isoforms and the auxiliary β-subunit of
Na+,K+–ATPase. Importantly, the histological
evidence suggests that
1b may be good marker for SW-type
chloride cells and their putative precursor cells deeper in the filament
whereas it cannot be excluded that
1a may play a dual role
in both FW- and SW-type chloride cells. The observed
1a–
1b isoform switch during
FW–SW acclimation may form the molecular basis for the reversal of
Na+ transport across the gill epithelium
(Jorgensen, 2008
). In the SW
gill, Na+,K+–ATPase may be rooted in
glycosphingolipid-enriched rafts whereas the dominant isoform in FW
(
1a) due to sequence differences probably is not associated
with rafts and it has been suggested that this leads to uncoupled
Na+ transport (Lingwood et al.,
2005
). A lysine substitution found in
1a in the
ion binding site may reduce the Na+:ATP ratio from 3 to 2 making
ion extrusion in FW thermodynamically more favourable
(Jorgensen, 2008
). In
addition, a substitution of glutamate953 with serine in the
1a isoform may interfere with interaction with FXYD peptides
and thereby alter the affinities for Na+ or K+. With the
recent findings that several FXYD isoforms are expressed in the salmon gill
(Tipsmark, 2008
), this may
have important implications for the tuning of ion transport during osmotic
adjustments. However, two interesting questions are open for future research:
are the two main types of MRCs interconvertible and do they differentiate from
the same stem cells given the right stimuli? There is elegant evidence that,
at least in some species, both transformations may occur
(Hiroi et al., 1999
;
Hsiao et al., 2007
;
Hwang and Lee, 2007
).
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ackermann, U. and Geering, K. (1990). Mutual
dependence of Na,K–ATPase
- and β-subunits for correct
posttranslational processing and intracellular transport. FEBS
Lett. 269,105
-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Appel, C., Gloor, S., Schmalzing, G., Schachner, M. and Bernhardt, R. R. (1996). Expression of a Na,K–ATPase β3 subunit during development of the Zebrafish central nervous system. J. Neurosci. Res. 46,551 -564.[CrossRef][Medline]
Augood, S. J., McGowan, E. M., Finsen, B. R., Heppleman, B. and Emson, P. C. (1993). Non-radioactive ISH using alkaline phosphatase-labeled oligonucleotides. In In situ Hybridization: Biological Techniques Series (ed. W. Wisden and B. J. Morris), pp. 81-97. New York: Academic Press.
Bystrianski, J. S., Richards, J. G., Schulte, P. M. and
Ballantyne, J. S. (2006). Reciprocal expression of gill
Na+/K+–ATPase
-subunit isoforms
1a
and
1b during seawater acclimation of three salmonid fishes that vary
in their salinity tolerance. J. Exp. Biol.
209,1848
-1858.
Bystriansky, J. S., Frick, N. T., Richards, J. G., Schulte, P. M. and Ballantyne, J. S. (2007). Wild arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) upregulate gill Na+,K+–ATPase during freshwater migration. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 80,270 -282.[CrossRef][Medline]
Conte, F. P. and Lin, D. H. Y. (1967). Kinetics of cellular morphogenesis in gill epithelium during sea water adaptation of Oncorhynchus (Walbaum). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 23,945 -957.[Medline]
Corthésy-Theulaz, I., Mérillat, A. M., Honegger,
P. and Rossier, B. C. (1991). Differential regulation of
Na-K-ATPase isoform gene expression by T3 during rat brain
development. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
261,C124
-C131.
Cutler, C. P., Sanders, I. L., Hazon, N. and Cramb, G. (1995). Primary sequence, tissue specificity and mRNA expression of the Na+,K+–ATPase β1 subunit in the European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 14,423 -429.[CrossRef]
Cutler, C. P., Sanders, I. L. and Cramb, G. (1997). Expression of Na+,K+–ATPase β subunit isoforms in the European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 17,371 -376.[CrossRef]
Cutler, C. P., Brezillon, S., Bekir, S., Sanders, I. L., Hazon,
N. and Cramb, G. (2000). Expression of a duplicate
Na,K–ATPase β1-isoform in the European eel (Anguilla
anguilla). Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp.
Physiol. 279,R222
-R229.
D'Cotta, H., Valotaire, C., Le Gac, F. and Prunet, P.
(2000). Synthesis of gill
Na+,K+–ATPase in Atlantic salmon smolts:
differences in
-mRNA and
-protein. Am. J. Physiol.
Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 278,R101
-R110.
Deane, E. E. and Woo, N. Y. S. (2005). Cloning
and characterization of sea bream Na+-K+–ATPase
and β subunit genes: in vitro effects of hormones on
transcriptional and translational expression. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Comm. 1331,1229
-1238.
Evans, D. H. (2008). Teleost fish
osmoregulation: what have we learned since August Krogh, Homer Smith, and
Ancel Keys? Am. J. Physiol. Regul Integr. Comp.
Physiol. 295,R704
-R713.
Evans, D. H., Piermarini, P. M. and Choe, K. P.
(2005). The multifunctional fish gill: dominant site of gas
exchange, osmoregulation, acid–base regulation, and excretion of
nitrogenous waste. Physiol. Rev.
85, 97-177.
Ewart, H. S. and Klip, A. (1995). Hormonal
regulation of the Na+-K+-ATPase: mechanisms underlying
rapid and sustained changes in pump activity. Am. J. Physiol. Cell
Physiol. 269,C295
-C311.
Farman, N., Coutry, N., Logvinenko, N., Blot-Chabaud, M.,
Bourbouze, R. and Bonvalet, J. P. (1992). Adrenalectomy
reduces
1 and not β1
Na+-K+–ATPase mRNA expression in rat distal
nephron. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
263,C810
-C817.
Geering, K. (1990). Subunit assembly and functional maturation of Na,K–ATPase. J. Membr. Biol. 115,109 -121.[CrossRef][Medline]
Geering, K., Theulaz, I., Verrey, F., Häuptle, M. T. and
Rossier, B. C. (1989). A role for the β-subunit in the
expression of functional Na+-K+–ATPase in
Xenopus oocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Cell
Physiol. 257,C851
-C858.
Goss, G. G., Adamia, S. and Galvez, F. (2001).
Peanut lectin binds to a subpopulation of mitochondria-rich cells in the
rainbow trout gill epithelium. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp.
Physiol. 281,R1718
-R1725.
Guynn, S. R., Scofield, M. A. and Petzel, D. H.
(2002). Identification of mRNA and protein expression of the
Na/K–ATPase
1-,
2- and
3-subunit isoforms in
Antarctic and New Zealand nototheniid fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol.
Ecol. 273,15
-32.[CrossRef]
Hiroi, J., Kaneko, T. and Tanaka, M. (1999). In vivo sequential changes in chloride cell morphology in the yolk-sac membrane of Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) embryos and larvae during seawater adaptation. J. Exp. Biol. 202,3485 -3495.[Abstract]
Hsiao, C. D., You, M. S., Guh, Y. J., Ma, M., Jiang, Y. J. and Hwang, P. P. (2007). A positive regulatory loop between foxi3a and foxi3b is essential for specification and differentiation of zebrafish epidermal ionocytes. PLos ONE 2,e302 .[CrossRef][Medline]
Hwang, P. P. and Lee, T. H. (2007). New insights into fish ion regulation and mitochondrion-rich cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 148A,479 -497.
Jorgensen, P. L. (2008). Importance for
absorption of Na+ from freshwater of lysine, valine and serine
substitutions in the
-1a-isoform of Na,K–ATPase in the gills of
rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo
salar). J. Membr. Biol.
223, 37-47.[CrossRef][Medline]
Karnaky, K. J., Jr (1980). Ion-secreting
epithelia: chloride cells in the head region of Fundulus heteroclitus.Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.
238,R185
-R198.
Keys, A. and Willmer, E. N. (1932). `Chloride
secreting cells' in the gills of fishes, with special reference to the common
eel. J. Physiol. (Lond.)
76,368
-378.
Lambertsen, K. L., Gregersen, R., Drøjdahl, N., Owens, T. and Finsen, B. (2001). A specific and sensitive method for visualization of tumor necrosis factor in the murine central nervous system. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 7, 175-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, T., Tsai, J., Fang, M., Yu, M. and Hwang, P. P.
(1998). Isoform expression of the
Na+,K+–ATPase
-subunit in gills of the
teleost Oreochromis mossambicus. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr.
Comp. Physiol. 275,R926
-R932.
Lingwood, D., Harauz, G. and Ballantyne, J. S.
(2005). Regulation of fish gill
Na+,K+–ATPase by selective sulfatide-enriched raft
partitioning during seawater adaptation. J. Biol.
Chem. 280,36545
-36550.
Mackie, P., Wright, P. A., Glebe, B. D. and Ballantyne, J. S. (2005). Osmoregulation and gene expression of Na+/K+–ATPase in families of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62,2661 -2672.[CrossRef]
Madsen, S. S., Jensen, M. K., Nohr, J. and Kristiansen, K.
(1995). Expression of Na+,K+–ATPase
in the brown trout Salmo trutta: in vivo modulation by hormones and
seawater. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp.
Physiol. 269,R1339
-R1345.
Marshall, W. S. (2002). Na+, Cl–, Ca2+ and Zn2+ transport by fish gills: retrospective review and prospective synthesis. J. Exp. Zool. 293,264 -283.[CrossRef][Medline]
McCormick, S. D. (1993). Methods for nonlethal gill biopsy and measurements of Na+,K+–ATPase activity. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50,656 -658.[CrossRef]
McCormick, S. D. (2001). Endocrine control of osmoregulation in teleost fish. Am. Zool. 41,781 -794.[CrossRef]
Nilsen, T. O., Ebbesson, L. O. E., Madsen, S. S., McCormick, S.
D., Andersson, E., Björnsson, B. T., Prunet, P. and Stefansson, S. O.
(2007). Differential expression of gill
Na+,K+-ATPase
- and β-subunits,
Na+,K+,2Cl–-cotransporter and CFTR
anion channel in juvenile anadromous and landlocked strains of Atlantic salmon
(Salmo salar). J. Exp. Biol.
210,2885
-2896.
Pressley, T. A. (1992). Phylogenetic
conservation of isoform-specific regions within
-subunit of
Na+,K+-ATPase. Am. J. Physiol.
262,C743
-C751.[Medline]
Rajarao, S. J., Canfield, V. A., Mohideen, M. A., Yan, Y. L.,
Postlethait, J. H., Cheng, K. C. and Levenson, R. (2001). The
repertoire of Na,K–ATPase
and β subunit genes in the
zebrafish, Danio rerio. Genome Res.
11,1211
-1220.
Richards, J. G., Semple, J. W., Bystriansky, J. S. and Schulte,
P. M. (2003). Na+/K+–ATPase
-isoform switching in gills of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus
mykiss) during salinity transfer. J. Exp. Biol.
206,4475
-4486.
Rozen, S. and Skaletsky, H. (2000). Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132,365 -386.[Medline]
Scheiner-Bobis, G. (2000). The sodium pump. Its molecular properties and mechanics of ion transport. Eur. J. Biochem. 269,2424 -2433.
Scott, G. R., Richards, J. G., Forbush, B., Isenring, P. and
Schulte, P. M. (2004). Changes in gene expression in gills of
the euryhaline killifish Fundulus heteroclitus after abrupt salinity
transfer. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
287,C300
-C309.
Seidelin, M., Madsen, S. S., Blenstrup, H. and Tipsmark, C. K. (2000). Time-course changes in the expression of Na+,K+–ATPase in gills and pyloric caeca of brown trout (Salmo trutta) during acclimation to seawater. Phys. Biochem. Zool. 73,446 -453.[CrossRef]
Shrimpton, J. M., Patterson, D. A., Richards, J. G., Cooke, S.
J., Schulte, P. M., Hinch, S. G. and Farrell, A. P. (2005).
Ionoregulatory changes in different populations of maturing sockeye salmon
Oncorhynchus nerka during ocean and river migration. J.
Exp. Biol. 208,4069
-4078.
Tecott, L. H., Eberwine, J. H., Barchas, J. D. and Valentino, K. L. (1987). Methodological considerations in the utilization of in situ hybridization. In In Situ Hybridization: Applications to Neurobiology (ed. K. L. Valentino, J. H. Erberwine and J. D. Barchas), pp. 3-24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tipsmark, C. K. (2008). Identification of FXYD
protein genes in a teleost: tissue-specific expression and response to
salinity change. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr Comp.
Physiol. 294,R1367
-R1378.
Tipsmark, C. K., Luckenbach, J. A., Madsen, S. S. and Borski, R.
J. (2007). Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and branchial
IGF receptor expression and localization during salinity acclimation in
striped bass. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp.
Physiol. 292,R535
-R543.
Uchida, K., Kaneko, T., Yamauchi, K. and Hirano, T. (1996). Morphometrical analysis of chloride cell activity in the gill filaments and lamellae and changes in Na+K+ ATPase activity during seawater adaptation in chum salmon fry. J. Exp. Zool. 276,193 -200.[CrossRef]
Varsamos, S., Diaz, J. P., Charmantier, G., Flik, G., Blasco, C. and Connes, R. (2002). Branchial chloride cells in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) adapted to fresh water, seawater, and doubly concentrated seawater. J. Exp. Zool. 293, 12-26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilkinson, D. G. (1992). The theory and practice of in situ hybridization. In In Situ Hybridization, A Practical Approach (ed. D. G. Wilkinson), pp.1 -13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, R. M. and Lingrel, J. B. (1987). Tissue distribution of messenger-RNAs encoding the alpha-isoforms and the beta-subunit of rat Na+,K+–ATPase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 145, 52-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. K Tipsmark and S. S Madsen Distinct hormonal regulation of Na+,K+-atpase genes in the gill of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 203(2): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Knight GILLS SWITCH ATPASE DOMAIN TO SWITCH PUMP DIRECTION J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||