|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online December 16, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 42-49 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.025700
Ligand-specific induction of endocytosis in taste receptor cells
1 Physiology Program, Department of Molecular Bioscience, PO Box 1041,
University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
2 Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo and Department of
Biochemistry, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital,
Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
3 Department of Ichthyology, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University,
119991, Moscow, Russia
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kjelld{at}imbv.uio.no)
Accepted 29 October 2008
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: fish, endocytosis, taste cells, stimulants, deterrents
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Numerous electron microscopy studies have described vesicles, microtubules
and filaments in the apical parts of taste bud cells of mammals and fishes
(Farbman, 1965
;
Ganchrow et al., 1993
;
Reutter and Hansen, 2005
;
Reutter and Witt, 1993
). These
elements are essential for endocytosis and transport of endocytic vesicles.
Endocytosis was studied in the sensory cells of frog taste disks with
multi-photon microscopy (Li and Lindemann,
2003
), and the authors found a staining of sensory cells after 24
h exposure of taste buds to the styryl dye FM1-43. It has also been reported
that FM1-43 rapidly and specifically labels taste buds by a channel permeation
mechanism in mice after subcutaneous injection
(Meyers et al., 2003
).
In the present study, we demonstrate a ligand-specific induction of
endocytosis in taste cells. Such a feature has, to our knowledge, not been
demonstrated before. We used brown trout because of the abundance of taste
buds in the oral cavity (Hara et al.,
1994
; Marui et al.,
1983
) and because of knowledge of substances accepted (stimulants)
or rejected (deterrents) when presented to brown trout in food pellets
(Kasumyan and Sidorov, 2005
).
The oral cavity was exposed to taste substances in combination with dyes or to
dyes alone. Thus, we stimulated the taste buds in a way that is normal for
taste perception. As we see a ligand-specific induction of endocytosis, it
seems probable that the stained cells were of the `taste receptor cell' type.
Fluorescent styryl dyes (FM dyes) have been frequently used as probes for
membrane trafficking and endocytic and exocytic activity because of their
physical properties giving an enhanced fluorescence in lipids
(Betz et al., 1992a
;
Betz et al., 1992b
;
Betz et al., 1996
;
Brumback et al., 2004
;
Cochilla et al., 1999
). There
are several forms of endocytosis and although clathrin-dependent uptake of
receptor–ligand complexes has received much attention
clathrin-independent forms also exist
(Mukherjee et al., 1997
;
Mayor and Pagano, 2007
;
Sandvig et al., 2008
).
In our experiments, dye reached all parts of taste receptor cells rapidly after apparent endocytic uptake and vesicular transport, since low temperature and disruption of microtubules inhibit ligand-induced staining of the taste receptor cells. An additional finding is that taste receptors for a stimulant and a deterrent seem to be expressed mainly in separate taste receptor cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Staining procedure
Fluorescent dye uptake by taste receptor cells was examined at room
temperature (20°C), unless otherwise indicated. Dye solutions were applied
to the oral cavity of fish at a rate 1 ml min–1. To examine
the rate of styryl dye entry into taste cells, we bathed the oral cavity for
10 s, 30 s, 1, 2, 5 and 10 min. In all experiments the test substances
were dissolved in distilled water. Immediately after the end of application,
the oral cavity was rinsed in tap water, the fish was decapitated and the head
fixed in paraformaldehyde (4% in 0.1 mol l–1 phosphate
buffer, pH 7.1). To study the temperature dependence of dye uptake,
experiments were repeated at +2°C. Long-range transport of endocytic
vesicles are often dependent on molecular motors and microtubules which can be
disrupted by nocodazole (Schliwa and
Woehlke, 2003
) so the effect of nocodazole was studied with a
pre-exposure for 20 min at 35 µmol l–1 at room temperature
before exposing the oral cavity to a mixture of FM dye and
L-cysteine for 5 min. The dextrans were applied at 10 or 20 µmol
l–1.
Reagents
FM 1-43 and FM4-64 FX were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR,
USA). L-cysteine, glycine and nocodazole M1404 were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). AM1-43, the fixable analogue to FM1-43 was
purchased from Biotium (Hayward, CA, USA). The following fluorescent dextrans
were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA): 3 kDa, Texas Red, lysine
fixable D3328; 3 kDa Alexa Fluor 488; anionic D-34682; 3 kDa Alexa Fluor 688,
D34681, and 40 kDa fluorescein, anionic lysine fixable D1845.
Fluorescence and confocal examination
The upper and lower jaws were mounted in Petri dishes to view taste buds on
the epithelium. All photographs were made of taste buds in situ. We
standardized our examination to the following regions of the oral cavity: the
upper and lower lips, 3 mm from the midline to the left and to the right, the
anterior 3 mm of the vomer and the anterior 3 mm of the tongue. Taste buds
with stained taste receptor cells were counted using a fluorescence microscope
(BX50WI, with a 20x water immersion lens; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan)
equipped with a digital camera (ProgRes, Jena, Germany). The software program
ImageJ (1.37v, Wayne Rasband, NIH, USA) was used to extract information from
photographs taken at different depths, usually 2.5 µm. Images were imported
and the stacks added in a z-projection with the max intensity parameter. A
confocal microscope (Olympus FluoView 1000, BX61W1) was used to observe the
details of the taste receptor cells in the taste buds and the possible overlap
or colocalization between taste receptor cells in double staining experiments.
Images were taken in planes, separated by z-axis steps varying between 0.4 and
2 µm.
Behaviour
Eight brown trout juveniles were placed in individual aerated aquaria
(18°C) and trained to take 2% agar pellets, 3.0 mm in length and 1.3 mm in
diameter, prepared with Ponceau 4R (red; 5 µmol l–1). In
trial sessions, test pellets with dextran Texas Red (0.5 mmol
l–1), L-cysteine (100 mmol l–1)
or Chironomidae larvae water extract (75 gl–1) were offered
to the fish at random, one by one at intervals of more than 20 min. In total,
141 taste trials were performed. The acceptance ratio was calculated as the
number of pellets accepted over the number of pellets taken into the
mouth.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Staining of taste cells by different dyes
The different dyes when they were applied alone varied greatly in their
ability to stain cells. Table 1
give the dyes used, the number of cells stained, and the number of taste buds
with stained cells. From the table it is evident that fluorescein dextran,
Alexa Fluor 488 dextran and Alexa Fluor 680 dextran, stained only a few taste
cells. FM1-43 resulted in a moderate number of stained taste cells, whereas
the fixable analogue AM1-43 stained more receptor cells than FM1-43. The
staining efficiency with the dextrans was dependent upon the conjugated dye.
The efficiency of Texas Red and tetramethylrhodamine-conjugated 3 kDa dextran
was particularly high, and it is worth noting that more than two taste cells
per taste bud were stained.
|
FM dye and stimulant
Exposure of the oral cavity to FM1-43 in distilled water (1 µmol
l–1; 2 min) stained only 40 taste cells in 32 taste buds
(Table 1). By contrast,
exposing the oral cavity to FM1-43 (1 µmol l–1) together
with the taste stimulant L-cysteine (100 mmol
l–1), stained 175 taste cells in 144 taste buds distributed
as follows: the upper lip 31, vomer 51, lower lip 49, and tongue 44.
|
Threshold
The behavioural threshold for L-cysteine in taste preference
tests with agar pellets is about 10 mmol l–1
(Kasumyan and Sidorov, 2005
).
At this concentration we found 84 taste buds with stained cells. Given the
background staining with FM1-43 alone (32 taste buds), it indicates that about
52 taste buds (9%) have to be activated to evoke an appropriate behavioural
response to a taste stimulant. At the subthreshold concentration of 1
mmoll–1, around 27 additional taste buds (5%) were stained,
suggesting that these numbers are insufficient for the fish to assess the
palatability of the food object and make the decision to swallow it.
|
10 s gave a weak staining of
about 20 µm depth of the apical part of taste cells. A 30 s exposure was
sufficient to stain most parts of a taste cell
(Fig. 2A). It should, however,
be noted that it may take some time before the fixative penetrates into the
taste bud and reaches the transport processes along the microtubules; thus
allowing movements of vesicles for somewhat longer time. With 1, 2, 5 and 10
min exposure before application of fixative, the whole taste cell was stained
(Fig. 2). Fluorescence was distributed throughout the cytosol, and the cell soma was clearly visible. The staining was punctate, i.e. bright spots on a diffuse background (Fig. 2A). The staining made it easy to see the pyriform shape of the taste cells with the apical part being long, slender and curved, and often more intensely staining than the basal part. The cytoplasm around the nucleus was thin. Often the basal part of the cell consisted of a thin protrusion that ended in a small foot (Fig. 3A).
|
Dye entry is via endocytosis
There are a variety of endocytic mechanisms which have been determined in a
number of different tissues (Sandvig and
van Deurs, 2005
). In mammals, temperatures near 0°C
effectively stop all types of endocytosis. In rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus
mykiss, and tilapia, Oreochromis nilotica, endocytic activity is
strongly reduced at +5°C during the initial lowering the temperature
(Padron et al., 2000
). We
placed the anesthetized fish in iced water, irrigated the gills and exposed
the oral cavity to ice cold solutions of 100 mmol l–1
L-cysteine together with 1 µmol l–1 AM1-43. The
temperatures measured in the solution and mouth cavity was +2°C. We
observed on the upper jaw (lip and vomer) a considerable reduction from 431
taste cells in 248 taste buds at room temperature to 15 stained taste cells in
14 taste buds at +2°C (Table
2).
|
Application of nocodazole (see Materials and methods) reduced substantially the number of stained taste cells on the upper lip and vomer from 431 to 111 (Table 2). The reduction in the number of stained taste cells in the vomer was less efficient, probably because irrigation of the gills with tap water caused some backflow and rinsing during application of nocodazole. In sum, these results indicate a taste-specific induction of endocytosis, and furthermore that the endocytic vesicles are transported via microtubules toward the taste receptor cell soma.
A single subcutaneous injection of FMl-43 in mice brightly labels hair
cells, Merkel cells, muscle spindles, taste buds, enteric neurons and primary
sensory neurons within the cranial and dorsal root ganglia
(Meyers et al., 2003
). The
authors provided evidence that this cationic dye is able to pass through a
number of different ion channels. Given these studies, we applied dextrans
with high molecular mass, which are unlikely to pass through ion channels:
Texas Red 3 kDa dextran and FITC 40 kDa dextran, together with 100 mmol
l–1 L-cysteine. Both types of dextran stained a
substantial number of taste receptor cells
(Fig. 3). It is unlikely that
these large conjugated dextrans would pass through ion channels. Our data
suggest that they are internalized by endocytosis.
Texas Red is a taste deterrent
The basic knowledge of which substances are stimulants and which deterrents
in fish is surprisingly fragmentary
(Kasumyan and Døving,
2003
). As seen from Table
1, Texas Red 3 kDa dextran alone was remarkably efficient in
staining taste receptor cells in brown trout. These findings provoked a series
of taste preference studies with Texas Red dextran to verify that this
substance, which stains taste receptor cells, also evoked a taste sensation in
brown trout. The behavioural taste experiments demonstrated that the Texas
Red-conjugated dextran at a concentration of 0.5 mmol l–1
evoked an acceptance ratio of 6%. In comparison, control pellets, and pellets
with L-cysteine or water extract of Chironomidae larvae (75 g
l–1) gave acceptance ratios of 29, 91 and 94%, respectively
(Table 3). These findings
demonstrated that pellets with Texas Red dextran (0.5 mmol
l–1) were spat out, and this dye is a deterrent for brown
trout at a much lower concentration than is effective for the stimulant,
L-cysteine (100 mmol l–1). It is probable that the
dye Texas Red alone is responsible for the aversive effect, since dextrans
conjugated with other dyes induced a small number of stained taste receptor
cells.
|
Application of stimulant and deterrent substances
Taste substances that induce different behavioural effects ought to stain
different taste cells and/or different taste buds if the staining that we see
are cells giving rise to taste perception. We carried out several experiments
to investigate this assumption.
From previous behavioural experiments it is known that glycine is a
deterrent taste substance for brown trout
(Kasumyan and Sidorov, 2005
).
We applied this substance at a concentration of 100 mmol l–1
together with 1 µmol l–1 AM1-43 to three fish (for 5 min).
In three other fish we applied 100 mmol l–1
L-cysteine together with 1 µmol l–1 AM1-43 (5
min). In the anterior 3 mm of the lips, tongue and vomer we counted the number
of taste buds with stained cells, and how many stained cells there were in
each taste bud (Table 4). There
were no great differences in distribution in the regions investigated, or in
the number of stained cells per taste bud.
|
Given that there are no gross differences in distribution in the regions investigated, one could ask if there are differences in the small scale. Could it be that stimulant and deterrent substances stained taste cells in the same or in separate taste buds? In order to answer this question, we did several experiments with stimulants and deterrents. First, we exposed the oral cavities of two fish first to 100 mmol l–1 glycine + 1 µmol l–1 AM1-43, then to 100 mmol l–1 L-cysteine + 20 µmol l–1 Alexa Fluor 680 dextran for 3 min each solution. Inspection under the fluorescence microscope revealed that in these fish, a total of 324 taste buds contained stained cells. Of these taste buds, 164 were stained yellow with 100 mmol l–1 glycine (deterrent) + 1 µmol l–1 AM1-43, 98 were stained red with 100 mmol l–1 L-cysteine (stimulant) + 20 µmol l–1 Alexa Fluor 680 dextran, and 62 taste buds had both yellow and red cells. Thus, the majority of taste buds responded either to glycine or to L-cysteine. However, 19.1% of the taste buds had taste cells that stained either yellow for glycine (deterrent) or red for L-cysteine (stimulant) at these concentrations of the applied substances.
Second, the oral cavity of three fish were exposed, first to 100 mmol l–1 L-cysteine + 1 µmol l–1 AM1-43, then to 100 mmol l–1 glycine + 2 µmol l–1 FM4-64 FX each for 3 min. Inspection of the vomer in these fish showed that in total 99 (46.3%) taste buds had only yellow stained cells, 78 (36.4%) had only red stained cells, and 37 (17.3%) had both yellow and red stained cells. Confocal microscopy of some of these taste buds with both yellow and red stained cells demonstrated colocalization of the two dyes in the same cell (Fig. 4).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
What type of cell is stained?
In the vertebrate taste bud there are three types of epithelial cells.
Several arguments suggest that the cells that stained in our experiments were
the so-called receptor cells, or type II cells, following the nomenclature of
Murray (Murray, 1974
). These
cells have the taste receptors and the molecular machinery for downstream
processing and thus express the elements of the taste transduction
cascade.
There is a vast literature on electron microscopy studies of taste buds in
vertebrates, and also taste buds in fishes have been described in great detail
(Reutter and Witt, 1993
).
These electron microscopic examinations indicate that the taste cells contain
elements such as vesicles and microtubules that could indicate endocytic
processes (Ezeasor, 1982
;
Fujimoto et al., 1993
). Also
different types of filaments or filament-associated structures have been found
in taste cells, such as actin, espin and keratin
(Hofer and Drenckhahn, 1999
;
Sekerkova et al., 2004
;
Takeda et al., 1990
). It seems
reasonable to assume that a similar division might apply also to taste buds in
fish (Finger, 2005
). Also, the
taste receptor cells have a large, round nucleus
(Finger, 2008
), a
characteristic feature of the cells that stained in the present study.
Our data demonstrate that ligands are essential for staining of cells, and one dye (Texas Red) that was particular efficient when tested as control, turned out to be a taste deterrent. The number of stained cells increased with increasing concentration of ligand. These results also support the assumption that the stained cells are related to taste perception.
Finally, our results demonstrate that the majority of taste buds had cells
that respond to either stimulants or deterrents, and both types of taste buds
are evenly distributed throughout the fish mouth. Thus, the majority of taste
cells either expressed receptors for taste stimulants or deterrents, which is
a prerequisite if the substances should induce different behavioural effects,
i.e. acceptance and rejection, respectively. The fact that the majority of
these cells were found in different taste buds, might be related to the
species and sets of substances that we used. Ishimaru et al. and Oike et al.
examined the types of taste receptors (T1R and T2R) expressed in the taste
buds of zebrafish and medaka (Ishimaru et
al., 2005
; Oike et al.,
2007
). They suggested that, among vertebrates, attractive tastants
are recognized by T1Rs and aversive tastants by T2Rs. They showed that
although the T1Rs and T2Rs are expressed in different taste cells, they
generally are co-expressed in the same taste bud. These results are in
contrast to the present findings in brown trout, showing that stimulants and
deterrents, in general, stained receptors cells in different taste buds. By
combining the ligand-specific endocytosis with in situ hybridization
techniques in the same species, it should be possible to verify these
hypotheses.
Uptake of dye by endocytosis
The results described here support the surprising finding that there is a
massive taste-specific induction of endocytosis in receptor cells of taste
buds: there is a substantial reduction of dye uptake at low temperature
similar to the reduction of endocytosis in other cell types
(Sandvig and Olsnes, 1979
).
There is also a reduction of dye uptake and staining of taste receptor cells
after exposure to nocodazole, which disrupts the microtubules needed for
transport of endocytic vesicles. There is a rapid, nocodazole-sensitive
transport of vesicles with dye into the basal part of the taste receptor
cells, and the uptake is concentration dependent.
Li and Lindemann (Li and Lindemann,
2003
) showed that in the taste receptor cells of the frog taste
disks there is an uptake of FM dyes by endocytosis after 24 h exposure;
although without the use of taste substances. In mice, a single subcutaneous
injection of FM1-43 brightly labels hair cells, Merkel cells, muscle spindles,
taste buds, enteric neurons and primary sensory neurons within the cranial and
dorsal root ganglia (Meyers et al.,
2003
). The authors presented evidence that entry of dye into the
hair cells was via transduction channels. However, the possibility
that the entry into taste cells was by endocytosis was not discussed. In the
present experiments, 3 and 40 kDa dextrans together with L-cysteine
were used and extensive staining of the taste receptor cells was found. As the
40 kDa dextran in particular is so large that it would hardly enter the cells
through non-selective ion channels, it supports our conclusion that the
internalization of stain in taste receptor cells of taste buds is via
endocytosis. The specific induction of endocytosis we describe is initiated by
the taste substance presented in the medium applied on the taste bud pore. The
use of FM1-43 alone stained a modest number of taste receptor cells. We
propose the following scenario as a possible mechanism: the ligand binds to a
taste receptor and induces a series of transduction events that finally
results in exocytosis of transmitter substance at the basal part of the cell.
This process is accompanied by internalization apically, probably of the
receptor with ligand. Whether also vesicles without receptors are formed is an
open question. There could be induction of different types of endocytosis
similar to those previously described at the apical pole of polarized MDCK
cells (Sandvig and van Deurs,
2005
). Vesicles formed are transported via microtubules
towards the cell soma. The fate of the internalized membrane will be
investigated in future studies.
Specificity of taste cells
The successive application of stimulants and deterrents, substances that
evoke different feeding behaviours in brown trout, demonstrated selective
staining of taste receptor cells in the taste buds. It is important to note
that the majority of stained taste receptor cells were in separate taste buds.
We seldom observed doubled labelled taste buds, but in some cases confocal
images showed co-staining in single receptor cells. A possible conclusion from
these observations would be that most taste receptor cells have taste
receptors either for a stimulant or a deterrent.
Why endocytosis?
The prominent endocytosis in taste cells is a new observation and there are
a multitude of questions related to this process. The massive endocytosis in
the peripheral part of the taste cells would require a recycling of the
membrane. At present, we do not know how this is achieved. What could be the
physiological role of this endocytosis? Could it be that receptor proteins are
internalized to reduce that taste perception? Are the receptors recycled at
the apical part of the cell? What is the fate of ligands? Is the endocytosis
related to adaptation of the physiological response from taste nerve fibres?
To what extent will the internalization of activated receptor proteins
regulate the homeostasis of this sensory system? These questions will be
addressed in future studies.
Ligand-specific induction of endocytosis; a common process in chemosensory organs?
In other chemosensory cells, as for example the sensory neurons in the
olfactory and vomeronasal organs of mice, the structure of the endocytic
machinery has been studied and demonstrated to be an uptake of ferritin
molecules (Bannister and Dodson,
1992
). In isolated olfactory sensory neurons of catfish,
clathrin-dependent endocytosis was reported to occur after perfusion with
L-glutamate together with FM1-43, but not with a mixture of
L-alanine, L-arginine, L-cysteine and FM1-43
(Rankin et al., 1999
). It
seems, however, probable that ligand-specific processes similar to those shown
by the present in situ study, is common for all chemosensory
structures in vertebrates.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bannister, L. H. and Dodson, H. C. (1992). Endocytic pathways in the olfactory and vomeronasal epithelia of the mouse: ultrastructure and uptake of tracers. Microsc. Res. Tech. 23,128 -141.[CrossRef][Medline]
Betz, W. J., Bewick, G. S. and Ridge, R. M. (1992a). Intracellular movements of fluorescently labeled synaptic vesicles in frog motor nerve terminals during nerve stimulation. Neuron 9,805 -813.[CrossRef][Medline]
Betz, W. J., Mao, F. and Bewick, G. S. (1992b). Activity-dependent fluorescent staining and destaining of living vertebrate motor nerve terminals. J. Neurosci. 12,363 -375.[Abstract]
Betz, W. J., Mao, F. and Smith, C. B. (1996). Imaging exocytosis and endocytosis. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6,365 -371.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brumback, A. C., Lieber, J. L., Angleson, J. K. and Betz, W. J. (2004). Using FM1-43 to study neuropeptide granule dynamics and exocytosis. Methods 33,287 -294.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clapp, T. R., Medler, K. F., Damak, S., Margolskee, R. F. and Kinnamon, S. C. (2006). Mouse taste cells with G protein-coupled taste receptors lack voltage-gated calcium channels and SNAP-25. BMC Biol. 4,7 .[CrossRef][Medline]
Cochilla, A. J., Angleson, J. K. and Betz, W. J. (1999). Monitoring secretory membrane with FM1-43 fluorescence. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22,1 -10.[CrossRef][Medline]
DeFazio, R. A., Dvoryanchikov, G., Maruyama, Y., Kim, J. W.,
Pereira, E., Roper, S. D. and Chaudhari, N. (2006). Separate
populations of receptor cells and presynaptic cells in mouse taste buds.
J. Neurosci. 26,3971
-3980.
Ezeasor, D. N. (1982). Distribution and ultrastructure of taste buds in the oropharyngeal cavity of the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J. Fish Biol. 20, 53-68.[CrossRef]
Farbman, A. I. (1965). Fine structure of the taste bud. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 12,328 -350.[CrossRef][Medline]
Finger, T. (2005). Cell types and lineages in
taste buds. Chem. Senses
30,i54
-i55.
Finger, T. E. (2008). Sorting food from stones: the vagal taste system in Goldfish, Carassius auratus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 194,135 -143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujimoto, S., Yamamoto, K., Yoshizuka, M. and Yokoyama, M. (1993). Pre- and postnatal development of rabbit foliate papillae with special reference to foliate gutter formation and taste bud and serous gland differentiation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 26,120 -132.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ganchrow, J. R., Ganchrow, D., Royer, S. M. and Kinnamon, J. C. (1993). Aspects of vertebrate gustatory phylogeny: morphology and turnover of chick taste bud cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 26,106 -119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hara, T. J., Kitada, Y. and Evans, R. E. (1994). Distribution patterns of palatal taste buds and their responses to amino acids in salmonids. J. Fish Biol. 45,453 -465.[CrossRef]
Hofer, D. and Drenckhahn, D. (1999). Localisation of actin, villin, fimbrin, ezrin and ankyrin in rat taste receptor cells. Histochem. Cell Biol. 112, 79-86.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ishimaru, Y., Okada, S., Naito, H., Nagai, T., Yasuoka, A., Matsumoto, I. and Abe, K. (2005). Two families of candidate taste receptors in fishes. Mech. Dev. 122,1310 -1321.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kasumyan, A. and Døving, K. B. (2003). Taste preferences in fish. Fish and Fisheries 4, 289-347.[CrossRef]
Kasumyan, A. O. and Sidorov, S. S. (2005). Taste preferences of the brown trout Salmo trutta from three geographically isolated populations. J. Ichthyol. 45,111 -123.
Li, J. H. and Lindemann, B. (2003). Multi-photon microscopy of cell types in the viable taste disk of the frog. Cell Tissue Res. 313,11 -27.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marui, T., Evans, R. E., Zielinski, B. and Hara, T. J. (1983). Gustatory responses of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) palate to amino acids and derivates. J. Comp. Physiol. 153A,423 -433.[CrossRef]
Mayor, S. and Pagano, R. E. (2007). Pathways of clathrin-independent endocytosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8,603 -612.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meyers, J. R., MacDonald, R. B., Duggan, A., Lenzi, D.,
Standaert, D. G., Corwin, J. T. and Corey, D. P. (2003).
Lighting up the senses: FM1-43 loading of sensory cells through nonselective
ion channels. J. Neurosci.
23,4054
-4065.
Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, R. N. and Maxfield, F. R.
(1997). Endocytosis. Physiol. Rev.
77,759
-803.
Murray, R. G. (1974). The ultrastructure of taste buds. In The Ultrastructure of Sensory Organs (ed. I. Friedmann), pp. 1-81. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Oike, H., Nagai, T., Furuyama, A., Okada, S., Aihara, Y.,
Ishimaru, Y., Marui, T., Matsumoto, I., Misaka, T. and Abe, K.
(2007). Characterization of ligands for fish taste receptors.
J. Neurosci. 27,5584
-5592.
Padron, D., Bizeau, M. E. and Hazel, J. R.
(2000). Is fluid-phase endocytosis conserved in hepatocytes of
species acclimated and adapted to different temperatures? Am. J.
Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.
278,R529
-R536.
Rankin, M. L., Alvania, R. S., Gleason, E. L. and Bruch, R. C. (1999). Internalization of G protein-coupled receptors in single olfactory receptor neurons. J. Neurochem. 72,541 -548.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reutter, K. and Hansen, A. (2005). Subtypes of light and dark elongated taste bud cells in fish. In Fish Chemosenses (ed. K. Reutter and B. G. Kapoor), pp.211 -230. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.
Reutter, K. and Witt, M. (1993). Morphology of vertebrate taste organs and their nerve supply. In Mechanisms of Taste Transduction (ed. S. A. Simon and S. D. Roper), pp.29 -82. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Reutter, K., Boudriot, F. and Witt, M. (2000).
Heterogeneity of fish taste bud ultrastructure as demonstrated in the
holosteans Amia calva and Lepisosteus oculatus. Philos. Trans. R.
Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 355,1225
-1228.
Sandvig, K. and Olsnes, S. (1979). Effect of temperature on the uptake, excretion and degradation of abrin and ricin by HeLa cells. Exp. Cell Res. 121, 15-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sandvig, K. and van Deurs, B. (2005). Delivery into cells: lessons learned from plant and bacterial toxins. Gene Ther. 12,865 -872.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sandvig, K., Torgersen, M. L., Raa, H. A. and van Deurs, B. (2008). Clathrin-independent endocytosis: from nonexisting to an extreme degree of complexity. Histochem. Cell Biol. 129,267 -276.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schliwa, M. and Woehlke, G. (2003). Molecular motors. Nature 422,759 -765.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sekerkova, G., Zheng, L., Loomis, P. A., Changyaleket, B.,
Whitlon, D. S., Mugnaini, E. and Bartles, J. R. (2004).
Espins are multifunctional actin cytoskeletal regulatory proteins in the
microvilli of chemosensory and mechanosensory cells. J.
Neurosci. 24,5445
-5456.
Takeda, M., Obara, N. and Suzuki, Y. (1990). Keratin filaments of epithelial and taste-bud cells in the circumvallate papillae of adult and developing mice. Cell Tissue Res. 260,41 -48.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tomchik, S. M., Berg, S., Kim, J. W., Chaudhari, N. and Roper,
S. D. (2007). Breadth of tuning and taste coding in mammalian
taste buds. J. Neurosci.
27,10840
-10848.
Yee, C. L., Yang, R., Bottger, B., Finger, T. E. and Kinnamon, J. C. (2001). "Type III" cells of rat taste buds: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of neuron-specific enolase, protein gene product 9.5, and serotonin. J. Comp. Neurol. 440,97 -108.[CrossRef][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||