QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online November 28, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3879-3888 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.020289

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Temple, S. E. Articles by Hawryshyn, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Temple, S. E. Articles by Hawryshyn, C. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ontogenetic changes in photoreceptor opsin gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum)

S. E. Temple¹, K. M. Veldhoen¹, J. T. Phelan¹, N. J. Veldhoen² and C. W. Hawryshyn^1,3,*

¹ Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
² Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
³ Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: craig.hawryshyn{at}queensu.ca)

Accepted 13 October 2008

	Summary

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Pacific salmonids start life in fresh water then migrate to the sea, after a metamorphic event called smoltification, later returning to their natal freshwater streams to spawn and die. To accommodate changes in visual environments throughout life history, salmon may adjust their spectral sensitivity. We investigated this possibility by examining ontogenetic and thyroid hormone (TH)-induced changes in visual pigments in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum). Using microspectrophotometry, we measured the spectral absorbance (quantified by _max) of rods, and middle and long wavelength-sensitive (MWS and LWS) cones in three age classes of coho, representing both freshwater and marine phases. The _max of MWS and LWS cones differed among freshwater (alevin and parr) and ocean (smolt) phases. The _max of rods, on the other hand, did not vary, which is evidence that vitamin A₁/A₂ visual pigment chromophore ratios were similar among freshwater and ocean phases when sampled at the same time of year. Exogenous TH treatment long wavelength shifted the _max of rods, consistent with an increase in A₂. However, shifts in cones were greater than predicted for a change in chromophore ratio. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated that at least two RH2 opsin subtypes were expressed in MWS cones, and these were differentially expressed among alevin, parr and TH-treated alevin groups. Combined with changes in A₁/A₂ ratio, differential expression of opsin subtypes allows coho to alter the spectral absorbance of their MWS and LWS cones by as much as 60 and 90 nm, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the largest spectral shift reported in a vertebrate photoreceptor.

Key words: development, retina, fish, teleost, rhodopsin, porphyropsin, isoform, retinal, eye

	INTRODUCTION

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Movements of an organism from one habitat to another are often coupled with changes in spectral environment and visual tasks (Lythgoe, 1988). This is particularly true in aquatic environments where the spectral transmittance of water itself may change drastically both spatially and temporally. To compensate for these changes, some vertebrates are able to use mechanisms that alter spectral sensitivity including: (i) gain or loss of a photoreceptor class (Allison et al., 2003; Allison et al., 2006a); (ii) changes in chromophore type [retinal (A₁) or 3,4-dehydroretinal (A₂)] (reviewed by Temple et al., 2006); and (iii) expression of different opsin classes or subtypes within a photoreceptor class (reviewed by Bowmaker and Loew, 2008). All of these mechanisms are present among Pacific salmonids (Oncorhynchus spp.), which migrate from cold freshwater streams and lakes to the open ocean within days to months of hatching and then migrate back to their natal freshwater streams and lakes a few years later to spawn and die (Beatty, 1966; Bowmaker and Kunz, 1987; Browman and Hawryshyn, 1992; Allison et al., 2003; Hawryshyn et al., 2003; Cheng and Novales Flamarique, 2004; Temple et al., 2008).

Of the seven species of Pacific salmonids, coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum) are appropriate for examining the timing of changes in spectral sensitivity because they typically reside in fresh water for over a year before undergoing metamorphosis (smoltification) prior to migrating to the sea (reviewed by Groot and Margolis, 1991). This extended period of freshwater residency necessitates a visual system that is well adapted to the spectral environment and visual tasks at hand. Furthermore, they have been the subject of debate concerning the timing of changes in visual pigment (VP) A₁/A₂ chromophore ratio (reviewed by Temple et al., 2006), which, combined with a large body of work on other Pacific salmonids, has provided considerable background information about their visual system (Alexander et al., 1994; Alexander et al., 1998; Alexander et al., 2001; Beatty, 1966; Beatty, 1972; Novales Flamarique, 2005; Temple et al., 2006; Temple et al., 2008).

Coho salmon possess rod photoreceptors and four classes of cone photoreceptors: ultraviolet, short wavelength, medium wavelength and long wavelength sensitive (UVS, SWS, MWS and LWS). These photoreceptors express all five vertebrate opsin classes: RH1, UVS, SWS, RH2 and LWS, respectively (Dann et al., 2004), and we have recently shown (Temple et al., 2008) that coho express at least two subtypes of the RH2 opsin (RH2A and RH2B). Preliminary evidence suggests that the expression of these two RH2 opsin subtypes may vary throughout life history (Temple et al., 2008).

In the present study, we investigated whether coho salmon alter expression levels of RH2A and RH2B opsin subtypes with ontogeny, and whether exogenous thyroid hormone (TH) could induce a change in RH2A/B opsin subtype expression during the freshwater alevin stage. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (QPCR) was used to measure relative changes in expression levels of RH2A and RH2B opsin subtypes, and microspectrophotometry was used to compare the _max values (wavelength of maximum absorbance) of MWS and LWS cones with those of rods in different age classes and fish treated with TH.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Animals and care
Three age classes of coho salmon (alevin, parr and ocean smolt) were obtained from a local salmon hatchery (Target Marine Products, Sechelt, British Columbia, Canada). Live specimens were transported to the University of Victoria aquatic facilities in April and May of 2005. Here they were maintained under conditions matched to those at the hatchery (natural daylight and 11.0±1.0°C) until used in experiments (less than 5 days, except for a subgroup of alevins that were treated with TH for 4 weeks).

Alevins were 4 months old, 5.5±0.2 cm in length and 2.0±0.3 g in weight. Their yolk sacs were not apparent and they readily fed on dry food. Parr were 16 months old and in the initial stages of smoltification (parr–smolt transformation). Parr were 8.6±0.5 cm in length and 6.9±1.0 g in weight. Ocean smolts were 28 months old, 45±12 cm in length, and between 1.5 and 2.0 kg in weight.

Thyroid hormone treatment
Treatment with exogenous TH was used to test the hypothesis that RH2 opsin subtype expression levels vary at smoltification. We compared expression levels of RH2 opsin subtypes and photoreceptor _max in control and TH-treated coho. Two groups of 25 alevins were maintained outdoors under natural, partly shaded, daylight in 15 l tanks with static water kept at 11.0±1.0°C using a thermostatically controlled water bath. TH was delivered by adding L-thyroxine (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in 1.5 ml of 0.1 mol l^–1 NaOH to the tank water to a final concentration of 300 µgl^–1 L-thyroxine. The control tank received the vehicle only (1.5 ml of 0.1 mol l^–1 NaOH). Tank water was changed three times per week. Care and treatment of fish were in accordance with the University of Victoria's Animal Care Committee, under the auspices of the Canadian Council for Animal Care.

Microspectrophotometry
Fish were dark adapted for at least 1 h prior to being killed with an overdose of Euganol (100 mg l^–1; ICN Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA), followed by cervical transection. The right eye was enucleated and hemisected along an anterior–posterior axis. A piece of retina 1–2 mm² was cut out of the dorsal-most section of the dorsal hemisphere. The dorsal retina was used because the A₁/A₂ VP chromophore ratio varies across the retina in coho salmon (Temple et al., 2006), therefore standardizing the sampling location reduced inter-fish variability. The retinal sample was teased apart on a glass coverslip and a drop of minimum essential medium (Sigma, Oakville, Ontario, Canada; pH adjusted to 7.4–7.6) was applied to the sample. A second coverslip was placed over the sample and sealed with paraffin. All procedures were performed under deep red illumination (>650 nm) or using a dissecting microscope equipped with infrared light-emitting diode (800 nm) illumination and monitored with a charge-coupled device (CCD)–camera.

A CCD-microspectrophotometer (MSP), that has been described previously (Hawryshyn et al., 2001), was used to measure spectral absorbance of individual rod and cone photoreceptors. The CCD–MSP device delivered a short flash [0.05–0.5 s; duration was dependent on intensity and was set to deliver an optimum number of photons per exposure time = total counts (500,000 counts)] of full spectrum light (300–800 nm; 150 W xenon light source – intensity regulated; Oriel, Stratford, CT, USA) to the photoreceptor outer segment. Beam size was approximately 2 µmx3 µm. After passing through the sample, the transmitted beam was directed through a spectrometer (300 nm blazed grating; Acton Research Corporation, Acton, MA, USA) and onto a 1340 pixelx400 pixel, Peltier-cooled (–45°C), back-illuminated CCD-detector (Princeton Instruments, Roper Scientific, Trenton, NJ, USA). Photoreceptor absorbance [log₁₀(1/T)] was calculated by comparing the transmitted intensity through the photoreceptor (I_M) with the transmitted intensity through an area clear of debris adjacent to the photoreceptor (I_R); thus, T=I_M/I_R.

Retinal samples were examined under infrared illumination (Schott RG850 filter; Ealing Optics, London, UK) and monitored by an infrared camera (Canadian Photonics Laboratory, Minnedosa, Manitoba, Canada). The search image and infrared filtered beam (Schott RG850 filter) were displayed on a computer monitor. A motorized X–Y stage (Marhauser-Wetzlar GmbH & Co., KG, Steindorf, Germany) was used to position the photoreceptor outer segment relative to the measurement beam. The path of the motorized stage was recorded to prevent repeated measurements of photoreceptor outer segment. Difference spectra were used to verify that the -absorption band was due to the presence of a photolabile pigment and were calculated by subtracting the bleached absorbance curve (full spectrum bleach 2–5 s) from the initial absorbance curve.

Criteria for acceptance of absorbance spectra were: (i) presence of a baseline on the long wavelength limb (Harosi and MacNichol, 1974); (ii) _max near the expected wavelength for known Oncorhynchus spp. photoreceptors UVS 350–380 nm, SWS 420–450 nm, MWS 490–550 nm, LWS 540–630 nm and rod 500–530 nm (Hawryshyn et al., 2001; Hawryshyn and Harosi, 1994); (iii) minimal absorbance by photoproduct and; (iv) signal-to-noise ratio of the main absorption band (-band) greater than 5:1. Determinations of _max, and percentage A₂ from acceptable absorbance records were performed offline subsequent to initial sampling.

A custom-designed analysis program was used to determine _max from absorbance records using existing templates. Each MSP record consisted of over 1000 points collected between 300 and 750 nm. Each record was linear detrended if necessary (Harosi, 1987). A nine-point adjacent averaging function was used for line smoothing, and the smoothed curve was normalized to zero at baseline on the long wavelength arm and to one at the centre of the -band. The fit of the normalized curve was compared with a non-linear least-squares routine to the upper 20% of the weighted A₁/A₂ averaged Govardovskii et al. template (Govardovskii et al., 2000) (based on the centre of the -peak ±40 nm).

For some rods, we also obtained a second estimate of _max based on a template created by Munz and Beatty for coho rod pigments (Munz and Beatty, 1965). Rod absorbance curves were compared (minimum variance fit) to the Munz and Beatty template (Munz and Beatty, 1965), which extends from _max to a point at 20% of the maximum on the long wavelength arm. The Munz and Beatty template assumes that _max values of coho rods vary from 503 to 527 nm, which is in close agreement with published models that predict the shift that occurs when A₁ is replaced by A₂ in the same opsin (Bridges, 1965; Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965; Harosi, 1994; Parry and Bowmaker, 2000) (reviewed by Temple et al., 2008; Tsin et al., 1981; Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989). However, many of the rods we measured had _max values that exceeded 527 nm and therefore were not fitted by the Munz and Beatty template (Munz and Beatty, 1965). In these cases, we used the estimate obtained by the fit to the Govardovskii et al. template (Govardovskii et al., 2000).

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR
Retinal isolation
Fish were dark adapted for 1 h and then killed by immersion in 100 mg l^–1 euganol for 10 min, followed by cervical transection. Under deep red illumination (>650 nm), the right eye was enucleated and hemisected along an anterior–posterior axis. The neural retina was then dissected free of pigmented epithelium. The entire dorsal retinal hemisphere was used in the following procedures. Immediately after dissection, each isolated retina was preserved in 0.5 ml RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and stored at 4°C.

Preparation of retinal total RNA and cDNA
Total RNA was isolated from the retina using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) as per the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Each retinal sample was placed in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube containing TRIzol reagent (100 µl for alevin retina and 200 µl for parr retina) and was homogenized using a disposable Kontes® Pellet Pestle® with cordless motor tissue grinder (Kimble Kontes, Vineland, NJ, USA). Due to the small amount of tissue, 20 µg of glycogen (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, Québec, Canada) was used as a nucleic acid carrier during preparation of total RNA from alevin retinal samples. Isolated RNA was re-suspended in 20 µl RNase-free water. RNA concentration was determined by measuring absorbance using spectrophotometry at a standard wavelength of 260 nm.

Total cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg total RNA. Each RNA sample was annealed with 500 ng random hexamer oligonucleotide (Amersham Biosciences, Baie d'Urfe, Québec, Canada) and cDNA prepared using Superscript II RNase H-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA samples were diluted 20-fold for QPCR analysis.

Primer design
Primers were designed against O. kisutch RH2A and RH2B open reading frame sequences (GenBank accession numbers AY214147 and DQ309027, respectively) using Primer Premier V4.1 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and were synthesized by Operon Biotechnologies (Huntsville, AL, USA) (Table 1). Primer pairs were diluted and combined in an equimolar ratio to a final concentration of 10 µmol l^–1. We chose β-actin as our normalization reference for gene expression across samples because, in this study, its expression did not vary significantly either spatially within the retina (i.e. dorsal vs ventral) or following TH treatment (data not shown). We utilized primers designed for rainbow trout cytoplasmic β-actin to PCR amplify and clone a partial β-actin ORF sequence from coho retinal cDNA (GenBank accession number EU262946).

The specificity of each QPCR primer pair was tested by amplifying target gene sequences present within cDNA synthesized from 1 µg parr retinal total RNA. Amplified DNA products were separated in a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. If the amplified product obtained from each primer pair consisted of a single DNA band and was of the correct size, it was excised from the gel and extracted by freeze–thaw centrifugation (Smith, 1980). Extracted DNA was cloned into PCR2.1-TOPO vector using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was purified using a QIAprep Spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and sequenced (Centre for Biomedical Research DNA Sequencing Facility, University of Victoria). Positive identification of cloned DNA amplicons (three independent clones for each primer pair) served to confirm that each gene-specific primer pair was amplifying the correct cDNA target sequence from coho retinal samples.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR
QPCR analysis of individual retinal cDNA samples was carried out using β-actin, RH2A and RH2B primer sets. Each 15 µl reaction contained 10 mmol l^–1 Tris HCl, 50 mmol l^–1 KCl, 3 mmol l^–1 MgCl₂, 0.01% Tween 20, 0.8% glycerol, 40,000-fold dilution of SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), 200 µmol l^–1 dNTPs, 83 nmol l^–1 ROX reference dye (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), 10 pmol of each primer, 2 µl of cDNA diluted 20-fold, and 1.0 U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). DNA amplification was carried out using an MX4000 real-time quantitative PCR system (Stratagene). The thermocycle program was 95°C for 9 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 62°C for 30 s and 72°C for 45 s. Controls included a reaction lacking cDNA template and one lacking Taq DNA polymerase. The potential for genomic DNA contamination was assessed by comparison of amplification patterns generated from cDNA and genomic DNA using the RH2A primer set. No genomic DNA contamination was evident in the cDNA samples used for QPCR. Opsin gene expression for each retinal sample was analysed in quadruplicate, averaged, and normalized to expression of the β-actin control. Cycle threshold values were converted to copy number using standard plots generated for each target DNA sequence using known amounts of serially diluted plasmid DNA containing the amplicon of interest.

Data analysis
MSP records were collected from individual photoreceptors from the dorsal retina of the right eye. Photoreceptors were assigned to classes based on morphology and _max. We collected a sufficient number of records from each fish to perform our statistical analysis on _max values from rods, and MWS and LWS cone types. For MWS and LWS cones it was possible to use _max to assign outer segments to MWS and LWS cone classes as there was no overlap in _max values measured from these two cone classes within any single fish or within a group of fish (age class or TH treated). For each fish, a mean _max value ±1 s.d. was calculated for all three photoreceptor classes (we refer to these as fish mean _max values). For comparisons between age classes/groups (alevin, parr, smolt and TH-treated alevin), we calculated a `group mean _max' ±1 s.d., which was the mean of all individual fish mean _max values for a specific receptor type within that age class/group. Except when specified otherwise, all mean _max values reported hereafter refer to group mean _max values. Our approach of using individual fish as the sample unit is appropriate since photoreceptors from a single fish are not independent observations (Temple et al., 2008).

Comparisons among group mean _max values, and relative expression (copy number) of RH2A and RH2B, were made using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with =0.05. Tukey's HSD post hoc analysis was used for pair-wise comparisons among groups.

	RESULTS

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Photoreceptor _max differs among age classes and TH-treated fish
The _max values recorded from rods, MWS and LWS cones varied, not only between fish and between fish in different age classes/treatments, but also within a single fish. This variation is expected in a species with a variable A₁/A₂ chromophore ratio since the A₁/A₂ ratio varies across the retina. The mean standard deviation in rod _max for individual fish from all age classes and the TH-treated group was ±3.6 nm. This variation in _max is equivalent to a change in A₁/A₂ chromophore ratio of nearly 40%. To account for high within-fish variability in _max and to avoid pseudoreplication (Temple et al., 2008), comparisons between groups were made using group mean _max values for each photoreceptor class.

The mean _max of rods measured from each group of fish, which is an estimate of the proportion of vitamin A₁- to A₂-based VPs in rods, did not differ significantly (P>0.262) among age classes (alevin, parr and ocean smolts). The combined mean _max for these three groups was 509.6±1.2 nm, equivalent to a chromophore ratio of 36.6% A₂. However, the mean _max of TH-treated alevins was 533.0±1.0 nm, equivalent to a chromophore ratio of 100% A₂, and was significantly long wavelength shifted (P<0.001) relative to all three untreated groups (Fig. 1).

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Mean max ±2 s.e.m. for rods, middle wavelength-sensitive (MWS) cones and long wavelength-sensitive (LWS) cones from alevin (A), parr (P), ocean smolt (O) and TH-treated alevin (TH) coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum). The mean values for each group were calculated from the means of all individual fish in each group (N-values below the error bars). The means for each fish were based on the max values obtained for that receptor class (see text for details).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Frequency histograms of max values of individual MWS cones from coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum): (A) all groups combined, (B) alevins, (C) TH-treated alevins, (D) parr, (E) ocean smolts and (F) an individual alevin. Bin size=1 nm. The max values were obtained by microspectrophotometry (MSP) of individual MWS cones from the dorsal retina of coho salmon obtained from Target Marine Products in April–May, 2005. There are progressively fewer MWS cones with max values below 500 nm as the coho increase in size from alevin (B) to parr (D) and ocean smolt (E). Treatment with exogenous TH (C) resulted in a significant increase in the max of MWS cones, mostly as a result of a conversion from predominantly A1- to A2-based chromophores.

Mean _max of LWS cones differed significantly (P<0.001) among the four groups (Fig. 1). Ocean smolts (556.6±1.6 nm) were significantly short wavelength shifted (P0.001) and TH-treated alevins (624.2±0.5 nm) were significantly long wavelength shifted (P<0.001) relative to the other groups (Fig. 1). However, there was no significant difference (P=1.000) between the two age classes found in fresh water (alevin 570.4±1.3 nm and parr 570.5±1.9 nm).

It was not possible to estimate the A₁/A₂ ratio from MWS or LWS cones because half-bandwidth, which is used as an estimate of A₁/A₂ content, would also have been affected by co-expression of multiple opsins in photoreceptor outer segments. The half-bandwidth of the absorbance curve of A₂-based VPs is wider than that of A₁-based VPs (Govardovskii et al., 2000; Harosi, 1994); however, the expression of more than one opsin in a single photoreceptor will also broaden the half-bandwidth (Archer and Lythgoe, 1990). For this reason we devised a different approach to interpret our MWS and LWS data (see below) (see also Temple et al., 2008).

Distribution of MWS and LWS cone _max values
Plotted as frequency histograms, the broad distribution of _max values indicated the presence of multiple opsin subtypes in MWS and LWS cones. The _max values from individual MWS cones from all four groups extended from below 490 nm to above 550 nm (Fig. 2A). There are several published models that predict the spectral shift in _max that results from exchanging A₁ and A₂ in the same opsin (Bridges, 1965; Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965; Harosi, 1994; Parry and Bowmaker, 2000; Tsin et al., 1981; Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989). When compared with these models, the observed variation in MWS cone _max was greater than could be explained by a change in A₁/A₂ chromophore ratio in a single opsin (Table 2). When we plotted the frequency histograms for MWS cones for each age class separately, the variation recorded in alevin and parr groups was still greater in both cases than could be explained by a change in A₁/A₂ chromophore ratio in a single opsin (Fig. 2B,D). However, the variance did not mask the clear differences between the TH-treated alevin (Fig. 2C) and the control alevin groups (Fig. 2B). Comparatively, there was less variance in MWS cone _max values in ocean smolts (Fig. 2E) than in alevin and parr. The broad distribution of MWS cone _max values recorded in the alevin group was also evident within an individual fish (Fig. 2F). The simplest model to explain the breadth of the distribution of _max values observed in MWS cones requires that coho salmon express at least two RH2 opsin subtypes.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Models for calculating A2 and A1 max values from known A1 and A2 max values and the predicted values based on our MSP observations

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Scatter plot showing max values for MWS and LWS outer segments of individual double cones measured in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum). Vertical dotted lines predict the range of max values for the MWS cones at the short wavelength range of the data set. Taking the lower value of 4901 nm as the A1 observed value, we used the Whitmore and Bowmaker model (Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989) to calculate that the same opsin would have a max of 5162 nm if combined with an A2 chromophore. Vertical dashed lines indicate the range for the longer of the two opsins, with a pigment pair that would have a range of 5121 to 5482 nm. The horizontal dotted lines predict the range for the shorter of the two proposed LWS cone opsins, having a pigment pair that extends from 5451 to 6002 nm based on Harosi's model (Harosi, 1994). Likewise, the horizontal dashed lines indicate the range for the longer of the two proposed LWS opsins, with a pigment pair that has a range of 5631 to 6332 nm. All data points fit between these vertical and horizontal limits within the measurement error of the MSP device (±3 nm), except those in the lower range of the LWS data set (see text).

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Frequency histograms of max values of individual LWS cones from coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum): (A) all groups combined, (B) alevins, (C) TH-treated alevins, (D) parr and (E) ocean smolts. Bin size=2 nm. The max values were obtained by MSP of individual LWS cones from the dorsal retina of coho salmon obtained from Target Marine Products in April–May, 2005. Treatment with exogenous TH resulted in a significant increase in the max of LWS cones, mostly as a result of a conversion from predominantly A1- to A2-based chromophores.

Estimating _max of opsin subtypes in MWS and LWS cones
To estimate _max values of MWS and LWS opsin subtypes, when both chromophore and opsin subtype expression were variable, we plotted LWS vs MWS cone _max values from measurements made on approximately 100 double cones from which both outer segments had been recorded (Fig. 4). The distribution of points in Fig. 4 demonstrates that more than one opsin subtype was being expressed in both MWS and LWS cones [see analysis in our previous publication (Temple et al., 2008)]. By placing lines at the upper and lower limits of the horizontal and vertical scatter in this data set (Fig. 4), and allowing for a measurement error of ±3 nm, we obtained estimates of _max values when one opsin subtype was combined with A₁ and the other was combined with A₂ (lower and upper limits, respectively). MWS cone _max distribution extended from 490 to 548 nm indicating that one opsin subtype combined with A₁ had an observed _max at approximately 490₁ nm (subscript denotes the chromophore associated with this _max: subscript 1, A₁; subscript 2, A₂). The upper limit provided an estimate of yet another opsin subtype combined with A₂, which had an observed _max of approximately 548₂ nm.

Using existing models that predict the change in _max (_max=A_{2 max}–A_{1 max}) that occurs when A₁ and A₂ chromophores are exchanged in a single VP opsin (Table 2), we calculated predicted _max values for A₁ and A₂ counterparts for each opsin subtype based on the values obtained from Fig. 4. As a conservative measure, to reduce the probability of type I error, we compared our observed data set with the model that predicted the largest shift in _max for the given A₁–A₂ VP pair. For the range of _max values encompassed by MWS cones, the most conservative model (Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989) predicted that the 490₁ nm VP would be paired with a 516₂ nm VP and that the 548₂ nm VP would be paired with a 512₁ nm VP (Fig. 4). The same analysis performed on the observed LWS cone _max values predicted two pairs of pigments with _max values at 545₁–600₂ nm and 563₁–633₂ nm.

Change in opsin subtype expression levels
Expression levels of the two RH2 opsin subtypes differed among the groups of fish tested (alevin, parr and TH-treated alevin). Due to technical difficulties, we did not obtain retinal material of sufficient quality for PCR from ocean smolts so they are not included in these analyses. RH2A expression levels were significantly higher in TH-treated alevin than in both control alevin (P=0.013) and parr (P=0.041), while RH2B expression levels were significantly higher in control alevin than in both parr (P=0.015) and TH-treated alevin (P<0.001; Fig. 5).

View larger version (8K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. RH2 opsin subtype expression in dorsal retinas of alevin, parr and TH-treated alevin coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum) measured using real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Expression levels are the mean of three replicates per fish (N-values above error bars represent the number of fish) and were normalized to the β-actin gene. Error bars represent 2 s.e.m.

	DISCUSSION

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

Rods
The fish mean _max values of rods varied from 506₁ to 534₂ nm, a range that is consistent with previous observations in coho salmon (Alexander et al., 1994; Alexander et al., 1998; Alexander et al., 2001; Beatty, 1966; Beatty, 1972; Novales Flamarique, 2005; Temple et al., 2006; Temple et al., 2008). The coho rod VP when combined with A₁ has been shown to have a _max of 503₁ nm; when combined with A₂ it is predicted to have a _max of between 521.9₂ and 534.1₂ nm, depending on the model used (Bridges, 1965; Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965; Harosi, 1994; Parry and Bowmaker, 2000; Tsin et al., 1981; Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989). To date, only one RH1 (rod) opsin has been found in coho (Dann et al., 2004); however, there is some evidence for the existence of a second RH1 opsin subtype in the congener O. mykiss, Walbaum (Allison et al., 2006b). The distribution of _max values recorded from individual rods, from all fish used in this study, ranged from 503 to 540 nm. This range is greater than would be expected for a single opsin combining with A₁- and A₂-based chromophores. Examining the data set in this way suggests that more than one RH1 opsin subtype may also be present in coho salmon. Further work toward isolating and cloning RH1 opsin subtypes from this species would be useful.

That all three age classes (alevin, parr and ocean smolt), measured at the same time of year, had mean rod _max values that did not differ significantly, supports previous findings of a seasonal shift in chromophore ratio in coho salmon (Temple et al., 2006). The seasonal shift is further supported by the fact that the mean _max of rods in this study (509.6±1.2 nm) did not differ significantly (P=0.532) from measurements that we reported in a previous study that sampled three different age classes of coho salmon from three different locations (510.4±4.3 nm) in the same month in two consecutive years (Temple et al., 2006).

A close correlation between the timing of changes in A₁/A₂ ratio and seasonal changes in temperature and day length is not restricted to coho salmon; similar observations have been made recently in Japanese dace (Tribolodon hakonensis Günther) by Ueno and colleagues (Ueno et al., 2005) as well as in several other vertebrates and an invertebrate [see Table 1 in Temple et al. (Temple et al., 2006)]. That seasonal shifts in A₁/A₂ VP ratio are found in such a diverse range of species suggests that vitamin A₁/A₂ VP ratio is not linked directly to migration and metamorphic events as was previously thought (Crescitelli, 1958; Crescitelli, 1991; Munz and Beatty, 1965; Wald, 1939; Wald, 1941; Wald, 1960), particularly when the seasonal timing of these events is taken into consideration.

MWS and LWS cones
The spectral distribution of _max values observed in both MWS and LWS cones was greater than predicted for a shift in chromophore ratio (Bridges, 1965; Dartnall and Lythgoe, 1965; Harosi, 1994; Parry and Bowmaker, 2000) (reviewed by Temple et al., 2008; Tsin et al., 1981; Whitmore and Bowmaker, 1989). As an explanation for this observation, we proposed that more than one opsin subtype was being expressed in both MWS and LWS cone classes. To test this hypothesis, we plotted the _max of individual MWS cone outer segments against the _max of the other member of the double cone pair, in this case LWS cone outer segments (Fig. 4). The resultant scatter plot was effective because the two outer segment members of a double cone should have similar A₁/A₂ VP ratios. Though regulation of A₁/A₂ VP ratio in the retina is poorly understood, the two proposed sources of 11-cis chromophore for VP regeneration (retinal pigmented epithelium and Müller cells) (Bridges and Yoshikami, 1970; Mata et al., 2002) would be expected to provide neighbouring photoreceptor outer segments with similar A₁/A₂ ratios. Furthermore, differences in A₁/A₂ ratio are not expected between adjacent outer segments because vertebrate photoreceptors and their opsins do not differentiate among chromophore isomers (Chen and Liu, 1996; Makino et al., 1990; Parry and Bowmaker, 2000). Given the assumption that A₁/A₂ ratios are not dissimilar in individual double cone outer segments, it follows that the distribution of _max values observed in MWS and LWS cones is best explained by the expression of more than one opsin in each of these cone classes.

The distribution of MWS and LWS cone _max values in Fig. 4 shows that at least four different opsins must be expressed in MWS and LWS cones in order to explain the spread of _max values observed in coho double cones. The _max values of MWS and LWS cone outer segments fall into a spectral range that extends from approximately 490 to 633 nm. Using the most conservative models (Table 2) to predict the shift in _max resulting from a change in chromophore ratio in a single opsin, this spectral range can only be explained by the presence of at least four different opsins (490₁–516₂ nm; 512₁–548₂ nm; 545₁–600₂ nm; 563₁–633₂ nm). As the data set used to generate these estimates is based on measurements made from both outer segments of individual double cones where one member always had a higher _max than the other (Fig. 4), and because there is little overlap in the spectral range of the four proposed opsins, we suggest that there are at least two different opsins expressed in MWS cones and another two different opsins expressed in LWS cones.

We found differences in expression levels of RH2 opsin subtypes and mean _max values of MWS cones among age classes and TH-treated fish, which indicated that the timing of the change in VPs in MWS cones occurs prior to smoltification. This timing of change is consistent with previous MSP records in coho (Novales Flamarique, 2005), which showed a shift from 490 nm to 553 nm for parr to smolts. However, in that study it was hypothesized that the shift in _max was the result of a change in chromophore ratio, despite the fact that none of the published models (Table 2) predict a shift in _max as large as 60 nm for a change in chromophore ratio in a VP with a _max of 490 nm. We have demonstrated that the ontogenetic shift in MWS cone _max can be explained by a change in opsin expression.

Our hypothesis, that more than one opsin was being expressed in MWS cones, was supported by the discovery of a second RH2 opsin subtype in coho salmon (Temple et al., 2008). Based on amino acid sequence, the new opsin subtype, named RH2B, had 48 amino acid differences from the previously sequenced coho RH2A opsin (Dann et al., 2004) and was predicted to be a functional opsin. The RH2B opsin subtype possessed a substitution of glutamate for glutamine at position 123 (analogous to position 122 in bovine rod opsin), which would be expected to shift the _max to shorter wavelengths relative to RH2A (Sakmar et al., 1989; Temple et al., 2008). Our finding, that individual fish possess MWS cones with a broad range of _max values (Fig. 2F), indicates that our results are not due to a polymorphism in the RH2 opsin, as proposed for LWS opsins in guppies (Poecilia reticulata, Peters) by Archer and colleagues (Archer et al., 1987), but, rather, to simultaneous expression of multiple RH2 opsin subtypes as reported for zebrafish (Danio rerio, Hamilton) (Takechi and Kawamura, 2005).

We have not yet isolated, cloned and sequenced a second LWS opsin subtype in coho salmon, but multiple LWS opsins have been found in other teleosts (Chinen et al., 2003; Hoffmann et al., 2007; Matsumoto et al., 2006; Takechi and Kawamura, 2005; Weadick and Chang, 2007).

Significance of visual pigment changes
Changes in A₁/A₂ VP ratio and opsin expression appear to occur on different temporal scales in coho salmon. We have demonstrated that coho salmon at various life history stages (fresh or salt water) will shift their A₁/A₂ chromophore ratio in correlation with changes in season (Temple et al., 2006), a finding that was corroborated in this study. The proposed shift in opsin expression for MWS and LWS cones occurs sometime between alevin and ocean smolt stages. We predict that the change in opsin expression may occur prior to seaward migration as a means to prepare the visual system for a different photic environment and visual tasks. Other members of the genus Oncorhynchus lose a large portion of their UV cone population at the time of smoltification, a transition that can also be induced with the application of exogenous TH (Allison et al., 2006a; Allison et al., 2003; Browman and Hawryshyn, 1992; Hawryshyn et al., 1989).

Changes in opsin expression have been proposed to account for ontogenetic changes in photoreceptor _max in several other fish species [e.g. eels (Anguilla spp.) (Beatty, 1975; Carlisle and Denton, 1959; Wood and Partidge, 1993; Wood et al., 1992); cardinal fish (Apogon brachygrammus, Jenkins) (Munz and McFarland, 1973); yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares, Bonnaterre) (Loew et al., 2002); pollock (Pollachius pollachius, L.), goatfish (Upeneus tragula, Richardson); black bream (Acanthopagrus butcheri, Munro) (Shand, 1993; Shand et al., 2008; Shand et al., 2002; Shand et al., 1988); and cichlids (Oreochromis niloticus, L.) (Spady et al., 2006). If changes in MWS and LWS opsin expression are linked to smoltification in coho, then the two mechanisms of shifting spectral sensitivity examined here (seasonal A₁/A₂ shift and ontogenetic change in opsin expression) might fit a recent model in which changes in VPs are classified as either reversible (responding to habitat changes on a daily, seasonal or migratory cycle) or irreversible (shifting with metamorphosis or ontogeny) (Evans, 2004). Or, alternatively, it may be that VP systems in fishes remain highly plastic throughout life history and that both chromophore ratio and opsin expression are dynamic and can be tuned to environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, day length, spectral distribution of light, etc.) or visual tasks at anytime.

The dynamic nature of A₁/A₂ VP shifts and changes in opsin expression provide coho salmon with highly flexible spectral tuning mechanisms. The two mechanisms together may allow for a shift of approximately 60 nm in the MWS cones and nearly 90 nm in the LWS cones. This flexibility might permit precise spectral tuning to the variable spectral environments which salmonids inhabit (Novales-Flamarique and Hawryshyn, 1993; Novales-Flamarique et al., 1992) while maintaining some optimum signal-to-noise ratio in the face of temperature variation. Based on these findings, coho possess one of the most naturally flexible vertebrate VP systems discovered to date.

The short wavelength shift in LWS cone _max, observed between the freshwater and oceanic life history stages, matches the blue shift in photic environment when coho migrate from fresh water to the sea. The spectral distribution of light in freshwater environments is typically richer in long wavelength light than the open ocean (Jerlov, 1976; Lythgoe and Partridge, 1989; Tyler and Smith, 1970). Therefore, the proposed change in opsin expression that would shift LWS cones to a shorter _max may fit the hypothesis that, in fishes, double cones match the background photic environment (Levine and MacNichol, 1979; Loew and Lythgoe, 1978; Lythgoe, 1984).

The adaptive significance of the ontogenetic shift in MWS cone _max to longer wavelengths is less obvious. The observed shift in MWS cones was attributed to a decrease in variance with a reduction in the number of cones that had _max values below 500 nm in ocean smolts. One possibility is that the MWS cone is acting as an offset detector for horizontal light and a matched receptor for downwelling light once the fish reaches the ocean. This might explain the shift to slightly longer wavelengths [see description of matched and offset pigments in Munz and McFarland (Munz and McFarland, 1975)].

Conclusions
The present findings support the seasonal hypothesis for explaining the timing of the A₁/A₂ shift in labile pigment pair species, as well as providing further evidence for the expression of more than one opsin subtype in MWS and LWS cones in coho salmon and possibly more than one RH1 opsin subtype in salmonids in general. Our research has demonstrated that coho possess a highly flexible VP spectral tuning mechanism that can be attributed to changes in A₁/A₂ ratio combined with changes in opsin expression. Furthermore, we suggest that this potential flexibility in VP _max is probably more common among fishes than was previously thought and that considerable effort will be required to elucidate the functional significance of this plasticity in the visual system.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

A₁ and A₂

the aldehydes of vitamin A₁ and A₂ (retinal and 3,4-dehydroretinal, respectively)

LWS

long wavelength sensitive

MSP

microspectrophotometer or microspectrophotometry

MWS

middle wavelength sensitive

RH1, RH2, SWS1, SWS2, MWS, LWS, UVS, RH2A, RH2B

short forms for opsins and cone types as described in the text

SWS

short wavelength sensitive

TH

thyroid hormone

max

wavelength of maximum absorbance

	Acknowledgments

 
The authors would like to express gratitude to the staff and management of Target Marine Products Ltd for their generous donations of coho salmon. Thanks to Dr Caren C. Helbing for use of Primer Premier software and Dr Bradley R. Anholt for use of Stratagene MX4000. Funding for this project was provided by NSERC/SSHRC Major Collaborative Research Initiative, Coasts Under Stress grant (P.I. Rosemary Ommer, grant participant C.W.H.), and a NSERC Equipment Grant to C.W.H. Partial support for S.E.T. came from a King-Platt Memorial Award. C.W.H. is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

	References

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 

Alexander, G., Sweeting, R. and McKeown, B. (1994). The shift in visual pigment dominance in the retinae of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): an indicator of smolt status. J. Exp. Biol. 195,185 -197.[Abstract]

Alexander, G., Sweeting, R. and McKeown, B. A. (1998). The effect of thyroid hormone and thyroid hormone blocker on visual pigment shifting in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 168,157 -168.[CrossRef]

Alexander, G., Sweeting, R. and McKeown, B. A. (2001). The effects of 3,4,3'-triiodo-l-thyronine on didehydroretinol synthesis by isolated coho salmon retinal pigment epithelial cells. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 123,192 -202.[CrossRef][Medline]

Allison, W. T., Dann, S. G., Vidar Helvik, J., Bradley, C., Moyer, H. D. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2003). Ontogeny of ultraviolet-sensitive cones in the retina of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Comp. Neurol. 461,294 -306.[CrossRef][Medline]

Allison, W. T., Dann, S. G., Veldhoen, K. M. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2006a). Degeneration and regeneration of ultraviolet cone photoreceptors during development in rainbow trout. J. Comp. Neurol. 499,702 -715.[CrossRef][Medline]

Allison, W. T., Veldhoen, K. M. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2006b). Proteomic analysis of opsins and thyroid hormone-induced retinal development using isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT) and mass spectrometry. Mol. Vis. 12,655 -672.[Medline]

Archer, S. N. and Lythgoe, J. N. (1990). The visual pigment basis for cone polymorphism in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Vision Res. 30,225 -233.[CrossRef][Medline]

Archer, S. N., Endler, J. A., Lythgoe, J. N. and Partridge, J. C. (1987). Visual pigment polymorphism in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Vision Res. 27,1243 -1252.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beatty, D. D. (1966). A study of the succession of visual pigments in Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). Can. J. Zool. 44,429 -455.[Medline]

Beatty, D. D. (1972). Visual pigment changes in salmonid fishes in response to exogenous L-thyroxine, bovine TSH and 3-dehydroretinol. Vision Res. 12,1947 -1960.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beatty, D. D. (1975). Visual pigments of the American eel Anguilla rostrata. Vision Res. 15,771 -776.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bowmaker, J. K. and Kunz, Y. W. (1987). Ultraviolet receptors, tetrachromatic colour vision and retinal mosaics in the brown trout (Salmo trutta): age-dependent changes. Vision Res. 27,2101 -2108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bowmaker, J. K. and Loew, E. (2008). Vision in fish. In The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. Vol.1 (ed. A. I. Basbaum A. Kaneko G. M. Shepherd and G. Westheimer), pp. 53-76. San Diego: Academic Press.[CrossRef]

Bridges, C. D. B. (1965). The grouping of fish visual pigments about preferred positions in the spectrum. Vision Res. 5,223 -238.[Medline]

Bridges, C. D. B. and Yoshikami, S. (1970). The rhodopsin-porphyropsin system in freshwater fishes. 2. Turnover and interconversion of visual pigment prosthetic groups in light and darkness: role of the pigment epithelium. Vision Res. 10,1333 -1345.[CrossRef][Medline]

Browman, H. I. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (1992). Thyroxine induces a precocial loss of ultraviolet photosensitivity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Teleostei). Vision Res. 32,2303 -2312.[CrossRef][Medline]

Carlisle, D. B. and Denton, E. J. (1959). On the metamorphosis of the visual pigments of Anguilla anguilla (L.). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 38, 97-102.

Chen, R.-L. and Liu, R. S. H. (1996). New isomers of bovine porphyropsin: a nondestructive method for determining chromophore configuration during formation of visual pigment analogs. Bioorg. Chem. 24,207 -219.[CrossRef]

Cheng, C. L. and Novales Flamarique, I. (2004). Opsin expression: new mechanism for modulating colour vision. Nature 428,279 .

Chinen, A., Hamaoka, T., Yamada, Y. and Kawamura, S. (2003). Gene duplication and spectral diversification of cone visual pigments of zebrafish. Genetics 163,663 -675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crescitelli, F. (1958). The natural history of visual pigments. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 74,230 -255.

Crescitelli, F. (1991). The natural history of visual pigments: 1990. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 11, 1-32.[Medline]

Dann, S. G., Allison, W. T., Levin, D. B., Taylor, J. S. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2004). Salmonid opsin sequences undergo positive selection and indicate an alternative evolutionary relationship in Oncorhynchus. J. Mol. Evol. 58,400 -412.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dartnall, H. J. A. and Lythgoe, J. N. (1965). The spectral clustering of visual pigments. Vision Res. 5,81 -100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Evans, B. I. (2004). A fish's eye view of habitat change. In The Senses of Fish, Adaptations for the Reception of Natural Stimuli (ed. G. von der Emde J. Mogdans and B. G. Kapoor), pp. 1-30. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Govardovskii, V. I., Fyhrquist, N., Reuter, T., Kuzmin, D. G. and Donner, K. (2000). In search of the visual pigment template. Vis. Neurosci. 17,509 -528.[CrossRef][Medline]

Groot, C. and Margolis, L. (1991). Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Harosi, F. I. (1987). Cynomolgus and rhesus monkey visual pigments: application of Fourier transform smoothing and statistical techniques to the determination of spectral parameters. J. Gen. Physiol. 89,717 -743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harosi, F. I. (1994). An analysis of two spectral properties of vertebrate visual pigments. Vision Res. 34,1359 -1367.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harosi, F. I. and MacNichol, E. F., Jr (1974). Visual pigments of goldfish cones: spectral properties and dichroism. J. Gen. Physiol. 63,279 -304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hawryshyn, C. W. and Harosi, F. I. (1994). Spectral characteristics of visual pigments in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Vision Res. 34,1385 -1392.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hawryshyn, C. W., Arnold, M. G., Chaisson, D. J. and Martin, P. C. (1989). The ontogeny of ultraviolet photosensitivity in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Vis. Neurosci. 2,247 -254.[Medline]

Hawryshyn, C. W., Haimberger, T. J. and Deutschlander, M. E. (2001). Microspectrophotometric measurements of vertebrate photoreceptors using CCD-based detection technology. J. Exp. Biol. 204,2431 -2438.[Medline]

Hawryshyn, C. W., Martens, G., Allison, W. T. and Anholt, B. R. (2003). Regeneration of ultraviolet-sensitive cones in the retinal cone mosaic of thyroxin-challenged post-juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Exp Biol. 206,2665 -2673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoffmann, M., Tripathi, N., Henz, S. R., Lindholm, A. K., Weigel, D., Breden, F. and Dreyer, C. (2007). Opsin gene duplication and diversification in the guppy, a model for sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 274, 33-42.[Medline]

Jerlov, N. G. (1976). Marine Optics. New York: Elsevier.

Levine, J. S. and MacNichol, E. F. (1979). Visual pigments in teleost fishes: effects of habitat, microhabitat, and behavior on visual system evolution. Sens. Proc. 3, 95-131.

Loew, E. R. and Lythgoe, J. N. (1978). The ecology of cone pigments in teleost fish. Vision Res. 18,715 -722.[CrossRef][Medline]

Loew, E. R., McFarland, W. N. and Margulies, D. (2002). Developmental changes in the visual pigments of the yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar. Freshwater Behav. Physiol. 35,235 -246.[CrossRef]

Lythgoe, J. N. (1984). Visual pigments and environmental light. Vision Res. 24,1539 -1550.[Medline]

Lythgoe, J. N. (1988). Light and vision in the aquatic environment. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals (ed. J. Atema, R. R. Fay, A. N. Popper and W. N. Tavolga), pp. 57-82. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Lythgoe, J. N. and Partridge, J. C. (1989). Visual pigments and the acquisition of visual information. J. Exp. Biol. 146,1 -20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Makino, C. L., Kraft, T. W., Mathies, R. A., Lugtenburg, J., Miley, M. E., van der Steen, R. and Baylor, D. A. (1990). Effects of modified chromophores on the spectral sensitivity of salamander, squirrel and macaque cones. J. Physiol. 424,545 -560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mata, N. L., Radu, R. A., Clemmons, R. C. and Travis, G. H. (2002). Isomerization and oxidation of vitamin A in cone-dominant retinas: a novel pathway for visual-pigment regeneration in daylight. Neuron 36,69 -80.[CrossRef][Medline]

Matsumoto, Y., Fukamachi, S., Mitani, H. and Kawamura, S. (2006). Functional characterization of visual opsin repertoire in Medaka (Oryzias latipes). Gene 371,268 -278.[CrossRef][Medline]

Munz, F. W. and Beatty, D. D. (1965). A critical analysis of the visual pigments of salmon and trout. Vision Res. 5,1 -17.[CrossRef][Medline]

Munz, F. W. and McFarland, W. N. (1973). The significance of spectral position in the rhodopsins of tropical marine fishes. Vision Res. 13,1829 -1874.[CrossRef][Medline]

Munz, F. W. and McFarland, W. N. (1975). Part I: presumptive cone pigments extracted from tropical marine fishes. Vision Res. 15,1045 -1062.[CrossRef][Medline]

Novales Flamarique, I. (2005). Temporal shifts in visual pigment absorbance in the retina of Pacific salmon. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 191, 37-49.[CrossRef][Medline]

Novales-Flamarique, I. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (1993). Spectral characteristics of salmonid migratory routes from southern Vancouver Island (British Columbia). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50,1706 -1716.[CrossRef]

Novales-Flamarique, I., Hendry, A. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (1992). The photic environment of a salmonid nursery lake. J. Exp. Biol. 169,121 -141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parry, J. W. and Bowmaker, J. K. (2000). Visual pigment reconstitution in intact goldfish retina using synthetic retinaldehyde isomers. Vision 40,2241 -2247.[CrossRef]

Sakmar, T. P., Franke, R. R. and Khorana, H. G. (1989). Glutamic acid-113 serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86,8309 -8313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shand, J. (1993). Changes in the spectral absorption of cone visual pigments during the settlement of the goatfish Upenus tragula: the loss of red sensitivity as a benthic existence begins. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 173,115 -121.

Shand, J., Partridge, J. C., Archer, S. N., Potts, G. W. and Lythgoe, J. N. (1988). Spectral absorbance changes in the violet/blue sensitive cones of the juvenile pollack, Pollachius pollachius. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 163,699 -703.[CrossRef]

Shand, J., Hart, N. S., Thomas, N. and Partridge, J. C. (2002). Developmental changes in the cone visual pigments of black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri. J. Exp. Biol. 205,3661 -3667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shand, J., Davies, W. L., Thomas, N., Balmer, L., Cowing, J. A., Pointer, M., Carvalho, L. S., Trezise, A. E. O., Collin, S. P., Beazley, L. D. et al. (2008). The influence of ontogeny and light environment on the expression of visual pigment opsins in the retina of the balck bream Acanthopagus butcheri. J. Exp. Biol. 211,1495 -1503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith, H. O. (1980). Recovery of DNA from gels. Meth. Enzymol. 65,371 -380.[Medline]

Spady, T. C., Parry, J. W., Robinson, P. R., Hunt, D. M., Bowmaker, J. K. and Carleton, K. L. (2006). Evolution of the cichlid visual palette through ontogenetic subfunctionalization of the opsin gene arrays. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23,1538 -1547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takechi, M. and Kawamura, S. (2005). Temporal and spatial changes in the expression pattern of multiple red and green subtype opsin genes during zebrafish development. J. Exp. Biol. 208,1337 -1345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Temple, S. E., Plate, E. M., Ramsden, S., Haimberger, T. J., Roth, W. M. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2006). Seasonal cycle in vitamin A₁/A₂-based visual pigment composition during the life history of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 192,301 -313.[CrossRef][Medline]

Temple, S. E., Ramsden, S. D., Haimberger, T. J., Veldhoen, K. M., Veldhoen, N. J., Carter, N. L., Roth, W.-M. and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2008). Effects of exogenous thyroid hormones on visual pigment composition in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J. Exp. Biol. 211,2134 -2143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tsin, A. T., Liebman, P. A., Beatty, D. D. and Drzymala, R. (1981). Rod and cone visual pigments in the goldfish. Vision Res. 21,943 -946.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tyler, J. E. and Smith, R. C. (1970). Measurements of Spectral Irradiance Underwater. London: Gordon and Breach.

Ueno, Y., Ohba, H., Yamazaki, Y., Tokunaga, F. and Hariyama, T. (2005). Seasonal variation of chromophore composition in the eye of the Japanese dace, Tribolodon hakonensis. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 191,1137 -1142.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wald, G. (1939). On the distribution of vitamin A₁ and A₂. J. Gen. Physiol. 22,391 -415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wald, G. (1941). The visual systems of euryhaline fishes. J. Gen. Physiol. 25,235 -245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wald, G. (1960). The distribution and evolution of visual systems. In Comparative Biochemistry. Vol.1 (ed. M. Florkin and H. Mason), pp.311 -345. New York: Academic Press.

Weadick, C. J. and Chang, B. S. W. (2007). Long-wavelength sensitive visual pigments of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): six opsins expressed in a single individual. BMC Evol. Biol. 7,S11 .

Whitmore, A. V. and Bowmaker, J. K. (1989). Seasonal variation in cone sensitivity and short-wave absorbing visual pigments in the rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 166,103 -116.

Wood, P. and Partridge, J. C. (1993). Opsin substitution induced in retinal rods of the eel, Anguilla anguilla (L.): a model for G-protein-linked receptors. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 254,227 -232.[CrossRef]

Wood, P., Partridge, J. C. and Grip, W. (1992). Rod visual pigment changes in the elver of the eel Anguilla anguilla L. measured by microspectrophotometry. J. Fish Biol. 41,601 -611.[CrossRef]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Collin, W. L. Davies, N. S. Hart, and D. M. Hunt The evolution of early vertebrate photoreceptors Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2009; 364(1531): 2925 - 2940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Temple, S. E. Articles by Hawryshyn, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Temple, S. E. Articles by Hawryshyn, C. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?