QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online November 14, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, iii (2008)
Copyright © 2008 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.026773

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Phillips, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Inside JEB

RAM FEEDING COSTS WHALES DEAR

Kathryn Phillips

kathryn{at}biologists.com

Filtering tiny zooplankton from the sea, baleen whales have three options for getting a good mouthful of water. They can slurp it up, swim continually with their mouths open or lung forward intermittently. Jeremy Goldbogen from The University of British Columbia explains that humpback whales and other rorqual species have adopted the lunging approach to feeding. However, their foraging dives are much shorter than the foraging dives of whales that continually filter the sea, which suggests that the energetic cost of lunging is significantly greater than the cost of constant filtering. Curious to know whether lunge-feeding whales breathed harder as a result of their exertions, Goldbogen and colleagues successfully tagged two humpback whales off the California coast to record their foraging lunges and the number breaths they took after returning to the surface (p. 3712).

Analysing the results, the team found that the animals take longer dives when they lunge more. The animals also take more breaths when they return to the surface after a long dive than they do when they surface after shorter dives.

So surfacing humpback whales breath more heavily after a series of lunges, but this doesn't necessarily mean that lunge diving is more energetically costly than simply sitting beneath the surface and not exercising, such as when singing.

Comparing dive lengths between lunging and singing whales, Goldbogen found that the singing whales could remain submerged for twice as long, and that lunging whales breathed three times harder when they returned to the surface. So lunge feeding is certainly an energetically costly alternative to other more sedate feeding styles.

References

Goldbogen, J. A., Calambokidis, J., Croll, D. A., Harvey, J. T., Newton, K. M., Oleson, E. M., Schorr, G. and Shadwick, R. E. (2008). Foraging behavior of humpback whales: kinematic and respiratory patterns suggest a high cost for a lunge. J. Exp. Biol. 211,3712 -3719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

Foraging behavior of humpback whales: kinematic and respiratory patterns suggest a high cost for a lunge

Jeremy A. Goldbogen, John Calambokidis, Donald A. Croll, James T. Harvey, Kelly M. Newton, Erin M. Oleson, Greg Schorr, and Robert E. Shadwick
JEB 2008 211: 3712-3719. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Phillips, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?