QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 30, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1927-1936 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.014944

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rae, R. Articles by Sommer, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rae, R. Articles by Sommer, R. J.

Isolation of naturally associated bacteria of necromenic Pristionchus nematodes and fitness consequences

Robbie Rae, Metta Riebesell, Iris Dinkelacker, Qiong Wang, Matthias Herrmann, Andreas M. Weller, Christoph Dieterich and Ralf J. Sommer^*

Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Department for Evolutionary Biology, Spemannstrasse 37, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ralf.sommer{at}tuebingen.mpg.de)

Accepted 31 March 2008

	Summary

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Nematodes and bacteria are major components of the soil ecosystem. Many nematodes use bacteria for food, whereas others evolved specialized bacterial interactions ranging from mutualism to parasitism. Little is known about the biological mechanisms by which nematode–bacterial interactions are achieved, largely because in the laboratory nematodes are often cultured under artificial conditions. We investigated the bacterial interactions of nematodes from the genus Pristionchus that have a strong association with scarab beetles. Pristionchus has a different feeding strategy than Caenorhabditis and meta-genomic 16S sequence analysis of Pristionchus individuals showed a diversity of living bacteria within the nematode gut and on the nematode cuticle. Twenty-three different bacterial strains were isolated from three Pristionchus–beetle associations and were used to study nematode–bacterial interactions under controlled laboratory conditions. We show a continuum of bacterial interactions from dissemination, to reduction in brood size and nematode mortality caused by bacteria derived from insect hosts. Olfactory discrimination experiments show distinct chemoattraction and fitness profiles of Pristionchus nematodes when exposed to different bacteria. For example, Pristionchus pacificus avoids Serratia marcescens possibly because of pathogenicity. Also, P. pacificus avoids Bacillus thuringiensis and insect pathogenic bacteria but is resistant to the human pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, unlike Caenorhabditis elegans. Pristionchus specifically recognize and respond to bacteria that cause ill health. Bringing the nematode–bacterial interaction into the laboratory allows detailed functional studies, including the genetic manipulation of the interaction in both nematodes and bacteria.

Key words: Pristionchus pacificus, Caenorhabditis elegans, nematode–bacterial interactions, Bacillus thuringiensis, entomopathogenic bacteria

	INTRODUCTION

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Nematodes and bacteria are among the most numerous organisms on Earth with numbers of nematodes thought to exceed 1 million per m² (Floyd et al., 2002) and numbers of bacterial cells in 1 g of soil thought to be approximately 10¹⁰ (Faegri et al., 1977). Many nematodes use bacteria only for food but some species have more specialized interactions, ranging from mutualism to parasitism. For example, entomopathogenic nematodes of the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis exhibit a close symbiotic relationship with the bacteria Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus, respectively (Forst et al., 1997) and rely on these bacteria to cause mortality to insect hosts. The slug parasitic nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita is thought to depend on the bacterium Moraxella osloensis to kill slugs and snails (Wilson et al., 1995a; Wilson et al., 1995b; Tan and Grewal, 2001; Tan and Grewal, 2002). Filarial nematodes such as Brugia malayi require the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia for development, fertility and survival (Taylor et al., 2005). The combination of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, and strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens are thought to be responsible for causing an increase in mortality of pine trees (Han et al., 2003). Marine nematodes from the family Stilbonematinae have a mutualistic relationship with thiotrophic ectosymbiotic bacteria (Nussbaumer et al., 2004).

Although the interaction of the aforementioned nematodes with specific bacteria has been well documented, little is known about laboratory nematode model organisms, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Pristionchus pacificus. C. elegans is a model organism for many areas of biology (see The C. elegans Research Community, 2005), whereas P. pacificus has been established as a satellite organism in evolutionary developmental biology (Hong and Sommer, 2006a). Both species have – at least in part – been selected as model organisms because they can be cultured in the laboratory using artificial Escherichia coli OP50 as food (Brenner, 1974; Sommer et al., 1996).

Recent studies started to investigate the environment in which Pristionchus can be found in nature. Several field studies revealed that Pristionchus nematodes have close associations with scarab beetles and the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) (Herrmann et al., 2006a; Herrmann et al., 2006b). For example, P. pacificus was isolated from the oriental beetle (Exomala orientalis) in Japan and the United States (Herrmann et al., 2007). Biological surveys of beetle-associated Pristionchus species have concentrated on Europe, North-America, Japan and South Africa. In total, more than 1200 Pristionchus isolates have been obtained from more than 15 000 surveyed beetles. These isolates fall into 18 distinct species with a specific biogeographic pattern (Mayer et al., 2007). P. pacificus currently represents the only cosmopolitan species (Zauner et al., 2007).

Pristionchus nematodes show a high species specificity with certain beetles. For example, the two European species Pristionchus maupasi and Pristionchus entomophagus are found on cockchafers (Melolontha sp.) and dung beetles (Geotrupes sp.), respectively (Herrmann et al., 2006a). Similarly, the Colorado potato beetle, which lives in Europe and North America, is highly infested with Pristionchus uniformis (Herrmann et al., 2006b). Chemoattraction studies have shown that different Pristionchus species display unique chemoattraction profiles towards insect pheromones and plant volatiles (Hong and Sommer, 2006b) demonstrating the utility of such assays for probing the nematodes' environment under laboratory conditions. Pristionchus chemoattraction is highly diverse and is presumably involved in shaping the specific interaction with host beetles.

In general, nematode–insect associations can be categorized as phoretic, necromenic or parasitic (Kiontke and Sudhaus, 2006). Pristionchus has a necromenic association with beetles whereby the infective juvenile nematodes enter an insect, wait for the death of the host and then feed on bacteria and fungi that proliferate on the insect carcass. Necromenic associations are typically more specific than phoretic associations, in which nematodes use insects or other invertebrates for transport but not as food. It has been suggested that necromeny represents a pre-adaptation for the evolution of true parasitism because the nematode is exposed to low oxygen levels, high temperatures and toxic host enzymes (Weischer and Brown, 2000).

In the context of the different life-style of Pristionchus nematodes, it is important to note that these nematodes show major morphological and physiological adaptations with respect to feeding when compared with C. elegans and other rhabditids. C. elegans has a grinder in the terminal bulb of the pharynx, which disrupts food bacteria (such as E. coli OP50), and under laboratory conditions bacteria are completely lysed (Fig. 1A,B). By contrast, Pristionchus nematodes have a pharynx with a metacorpus and a terminal bulb typical for rhabditid nematodes but do not have a grinder (Fig. 1C) (Fürst von Lieven and Sudhaus, 2000; Chiang et al., 2006). Pristionchus worms do not completely lyse bacteria and intact cells can be found in the intestine as revealed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Fig. 1D). Interestingly, it has been suggested that Pristionchus nematodes might be actively involved in bacterial dissemination in the wild (Chantanao and Jensen, 1968; Poinar, 1983).

View larger version (134K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Pharynx morphology of Pristionchus pacificus and Caenorhabditis elegans. (A) C. elegans pharynx with grinder and long, narrow mouth-like suction pump. (B) Escherichia coli OP50 crushed with the C. elegans grinder. (C) P. pacificus pharynx with no grinder and shorter, broader mouthparts. (D) E. coli OP50 is not completely disrupted after passage through the pharynx of P. pacificus.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Nematodes, bacteria strains and culture conditions
Nematode strains used were: Pristionchus pacificus (PS0312), P. entomophagus (RS0144), P. maupasi (RS5015) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Bristol N2). Nematodes were grown at 20°C on nematode growth medium (NGM) seeded with E. coli OP50 before use in experiments. Bacteria were isolated from beetle nematodes and soil nematodes. Bacteria were maintained on LB agar plates at 30°C. In all experiments bacteria were grown overnight in LB broth at 30°C. Bacteria used in this study were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14, Staphylococcus aureus Newman, Photorhabdus luminescens TT01Tn7GFP (associated with the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora), Xenorhabdus sp. (associated with Steinernema scapterisci), Xenorhabdus nematophila (associated with Steinernema carpocapsae). Phase variation in X. nematophila, Xenorhabdus sp. and P. luminescens was monitored using NBTA agar (nutrient agar supplemented with Bromothymol Blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride) and only phase 1 bacteria were used, which are the most virulent. All equipment was sterilized before use and bacteria were only isolated under a laminar flow. To rule out any airborne contaminants 10 LB plates were placed in the laminar flow for 5–8 h and then sealed and stored at 30°C overnight and monitored for colonies the next day. No bacterial colonies or contaminants were recorded, proving that all bacteria isolated were solely from the nematodes.

Isolation of bacteria and nematodes from beetles
Cockchafers (Melolontha hippocastani) were collected from Karlsruhe, Germany, Oriental beetles (Exomala orientalis) were collected from Carver, Massachusetts and dung beetles (Geotrupes sp.) were collected from the Schönbuch forest, near Tübingen, Germany. Beetles were cut in half transversely with scissors and then placed on 6 cm NGM plates and stored at room temperature. Beetles were inspected daily for 7–14 days for nematodes moving or reproducing on the cadavers. Any nematodes that resembled Pristionchus were removed, washed in M9 buffer for 1–2 min and placed on separate LB plates and incubated at room temperature. After 48 h the individual nematodes were removed, lysed and sequenced (see below for methods) to confirm whether the nematodes were the correct species of Pristionchus (according to Mayer et al., 2007). Bacteria growing on LB plates were isolated, subcultured and then prepared for sequencing for species identification using PCR amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA genes (Lane, 1991). The bacteria isolated from nematodes from beetles will be referred to as `beetle-derived' bacteria, hereafter.

We also extracted one adult P. entomophagus from a soil sample from the Schönbuch forest, Tübingen and isolated the bacteria that were subsequently excreted from the nematode gut and removed from the nematode cuticle and grew them on an LB plate. The bacteria were then identified (as described below) and will be referred to as `soil-derived' bacteria.

Bacteria and nematode DNA extraction and PCR amplification
Bacteria of each species were grown overnight in LB broth and DNA was extracted using Aqua Pure genomic DNA kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was carried out in 20 µl reactions using primer set 27f (5'-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3') and 1492r (5'-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') (Lane, 1991). Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95°C followed by 35 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, 1.5 min at 72°C, and a final step of 8 min at 72°C. A typical reaction contained 2 µl 10x PCR buffer, 2 µl 2 mmol l^–1 dNTPs, 1 µl 10 µmol l^–1 27f, 1 µl 10 µmol l^–1 1492r, one unit of Taq DNA polymerase, 12.8 µl H₂O and 1 µl of bacterial DNA. PCR amplicons were visualized by standard agarose gel electrophoresis (Sambrook et al., 1989) and bands were excised using a clean scalpel. DNA was extracted from bands using QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).

After isolation of bacteria, nematodes were removed from the LB plate and identified using the small subunit rRNA gene. Genomic DNA from single nematodes was isolated using the NaOH digestion method of Floyd et al. (Floyd et al., 2002). Briefly, single worms were added to 20 µl of 0.25 mol l^–1 NaOH and incubated at 25°C overnight. The worm mixture was then heated to 99°C for 3 min before the addition of 4 µl of 1 mol l^–1 HCl, 10 µl of 0.5 mol l^–1 Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 5 µl of 2% Triton X-100. The mixture was then heated to 99°C for 3 min, frozen to –20°C and then heated for a further 3 min at 99°C. Two microlitres of the extract were then used for PCR. DNA was amplified using the primers SSU18A (5'-AAAGATTAAGCCATGCATG-3') and SSU26R (5'-CATTCTTGGCAAATGCTTTCG-3'). PCR was carried out in 25 µl reactions containing 2.5 mmol l^–1 MgCl₂, 0.16 mmol l^–1 each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 0.5 µmol l^–1 each primer, 2 µl lysate, 2 units Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The mixture was then subjected to the following PCR conditions: 2 min at 95°C, 35 cycles including, 15 s at 95°C, 15 s at 50°C, 2 min at 72°C, followed by 7 min at 72°C. PCR products were then diluted 10–20-fold and added to the Big Dye terminator sequencing mix (Applied Biosciences, Foster City, CA, USA), which contained the sequencing primer SSU9R (5'-AGCTGGAATTACCGCGGCTG-3'). For bacteria we required a minimum length of 200 base pairs for the query sequence (16S rRNA). Gene sequences of nematodes and bacteria were aligned using Seqman (DNA Star, Madison, WI, USA), compared with GenBank database sequences using Blastn searches using sequence similarity matches at 90%.

Metagenomic analysis of bacteria in the Pristionchus gut and cuticle
Soil samples were taken from the Schönbuch forest, Tübingen and were added to 9 cm NGM plates and stored at room temperature. The plates were then checked for presence of nematodes every day for the next 7 days. In total, four P. entomophagus and four P. lheritieri individuals were isolated, washed in M9 buffer and placed in single worm lysis buffer. The resultant suspension was then used for nematode identification (as described above) and bacterial cloning. Bacterial DNA was amplified using conditions and reagents as described above and was then cloned using Topo cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's guidelines. The full-length gene was then ligated into pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen) and transformed into Top 10 chemically competent bacterial cells for sequence analysis. In total, 683 clones were picked and screened for bacterial inserts using PCR primers T7 (5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3') and T3 (5'-ATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGA-3'). Bacterial inserts were then sequenced using the same methods as described above.

Chemotaxis assays
Chemotaxis assays were modified from previous studies (Zhang et al., 2005; Hong and Sommer, 2006b). Briefly, 25 µl of overnight bacterial suspension was placed 0.5 cm away from the edge of a 9 cm Petri dish filled with NGM medium. The same amount of E. coli OP50 was placed on the opposing side and acted as the counter attractant. Approximately 50–200 J4/adult stage Pristionchus individuals were placed between the two bacterial spots. All nematodes used were previously fed on E. coli OP50. Plates were then sealed with Parafilm® and stored at room temperature in the dark. After 24 h the number of nematodes found in each bacterial spot was recorded. A chemotaxis index was used to score the response of the nematodes, which consisted of: number of nematodes in the test bacteria – numbers of nematodes in control bacteria/total number of nematodes counted (Zhang et al., 2005). This gave a chemotaxis score ranging from –1.0 (total revulsion from test bacteria) to 1.0 (total attraction towards test bacteria). A score of around 0 means there were equal numbers of nematodes in each bacterial spot. Five plates were used per replicate, and the procedure was repeated five times for each bacterium (a total of 25 individual assays).

Chemotaxis experiments were as follows: (1) E. coli OP50 versus soil-derived bacteria; (2) E. coli OP50 versus insect-derived bacteria; (3) B. thuringiensis or Bacillus sp. 1 versus insect-associated bacteria – this was used to examine the effect of removing E. coli from the analysis and using more ecologically relevant controls; (4) E. coli OP50 versus insect and human pathogenic bacteria; (5) P. luminescens versus human and insect pathogenic bacteria.

Survival of P. pacificus exposed to bacteria
Liquid cultures of all insect- and soil-derived bacteria as well as human and insect pathogens were grown overnight at 30°C. Bacterial suspensions (200 µl) were spread evenly on 6 cm Petri dishes with NGM medium and incubated overnight. Twenty J4 P. pacificus were added to each plate and stored at 25°C. Survival of worms was monitored daily for 8 days. Nematodes were transferred every 2 days to fresh plates to prevent misidentification of original worms from offspring. Mortality was determined by prodding worms with a metal pick and nematodes that did not respond were considered dead. One hundred P. pacificus were exposed to each of the soil-derived and insect-derived bacteria as well as the human pathogens (P. aeruginosa and S. aureus), the insect pathogens (X. nematophila and Xenorhabdus sp. and P. luminescens) and E. coli OP50 was used as the control. C. elegans was also exposed to each bacterium as a comparison to P. pacificus. Nematodes were only exposed to bacteria at the phase 1 stage which is the most virulent and were transferred to fresh plates every 2 days to ensure nematodes would be only exposed to phase 1. Nematodes were well fed on E. coli OP50 before addition to pathogenic bacteria to avoid starving. Any mortality observed was due to bacterial pathogenicity and no starvation or bagging behaviour was observed.

Fecundity experiments
Twenty microlitres of overnight bacteria suspension was placed on separate Petri dishes with NGM agar and left to dry. Five single virgin hermaphrodites of P. pacificus were individually placed on separate dishes in the bacterial spot and were stored at 25°C. The numbers of live offspring produced by each worm was recorded daily. Worms were transferred to fresh plates daily for 4–5 days.

Defecation and residence time assays
Liquid cultures of E. coli OP50, Xenorhabdus sp. and Bacillus sp. 2 were cultured overnight at 30°C. Bacteria were mixed with red fluorescent 0.5 µm carboxylate-modified polystyrene latex beads (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) to a final bead concentration of 0.8%. Standard 6 cm NGM agar plates were seeded with 20 µl of the bacteria–bead mixture and when dry, ten J4 P. pacificus or C. elegans larvae were added to separate dishes and allowed to feed overnight at 20°C. Cycle length was recorded by timing the intervals between defecations using a dissecting microscope with a halogen light source. For each species, ten defecations of ten individual worms were recorded.

Residence time was assessed by allowing worms to feed overnight on the bacteria–bead mixture (using methods as described above). Individual worms were transferred to fresh bacterial plates and the total time taken to clear the intestine of the fluorescent bead mixture was recorded as well as the total number of defecations. We took fluorescent images of worm faeces to determine the number of defecations with beads still present (until no further fluorescence could be observed). Ten worms were analyzed for each treatment.

Statistical analysis
Chemotaxis scores, fecundity and survival (after 7 days) were compared using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and differences between treatments were determined using the Bonferroni multiple comparison test using Small Stata, 9.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Mean defecation cycles and residence times were compared using Student's t-test for means. The effect of bacteria over time was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and log rank tests.

	RESULTS

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
Meta-genomic sequencing of individual Pristionchus reveals a diverse bacterial flora
A total of eight Pristionchus individuals (four P. entomophagus, four P. lheritieri) were isolated from soil samples from the Schönbuch forest, Tübingen (Germany). From those animals, we sequenced a total of 683 bacterial clones and identified 292 unique sequences with at least 40 different bacterial 16S sequences per individual nematode. The majority of these bacteria belonged to the Pseudomonadales, Burkholderiales, Flavobacteria and Xanthomonadales and also included the plant pathogens Erwinia and Agrobacterium and human pathogens such as Bordetella, Burkholderia and Microbacterium (see Tables S1 and S2 in supplementary material). Other spore-forming bacteria, such as Bacillus sp., cannot be detected with this approach because bacterial spores escape single worm lysis. This non-saturated bacterial sequencing approach clearly indicates that Pristionchus nematodes ingest an enormous diversity of bacteria. However, from this type of analysis it remains unknown if the nematodes can digest all of these bacteria as a food source.

A set of 23 bacteria from the Pristionchus intestine
We grew beetle- and soil-derived Pristionchus nematodes on rich medium and isolated a total of 23 bacterial strains (Fig. 2). Specifically, we obtained bacteria derived from each nematode–beetle system, i.e. bacteria from P. pacificus from the oriental beetle (collected in Carver, MA, USA), P. maupasi from the cockchafer (Karlsruhe, Germany) and P. entomophagus from dung beetles (Tübingen, Germany). Together, these bacterial isolates represent all major groups previously identified in the metagenomic sequencing approach. Bacterial isolates were sequenced for species designation and represent single species isolates.

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Tritrophic interactions between Pristionchus nematodes, beetle and bacteria. Phylogeny of Pristionchus nematodes with associated beetle hosts detailing bacterial species isolated and used in this study.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Chemotaxis results of Pristionchus exposed to soil- and insect-derived bacteria. (A) Chemotactic response of P. pacificus, P. entomophagus and P. maupasi after 24 h exposure to five different soil-derived bacteria isolated from adult P. entomophagus. Significant differences between number of live progeny and survival are shown for P. pacificus only (*P0.05 and **P0.001 using one way analysis of variance). Bars represent ±1 s.e.m. (B) Chemotactic response of P. pacificus, P. entomophagus and P. maupasi exposed to cockchafer-associated bacteria (isolated from P. maupasi). Significant differences between number of live progeny and survival are shown for P. pacificus only (*P0.05 and **P0.001 using one way analysis of variance). Bars represent ±1 s.e.m.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Chemotaxis results of Pristionchus exposed to insect-derived bacteria. (A) Chemotactic response of P. pacificus, P. entomophagus and P. maupasi exposed to dung beetle-associated bacteria (isolated from P. entomophagus) after 24 h. Significant differences between number of live progeny and survival are shown for P. pacificus only (*P0.05 and **P0.001 using one way analysis of variance). Bars represent ±1 s.e.m. (B) Chemotactic response of P. pacificus, P. entomophagus and P. maupasi exposed to oriental beetle-associated bacteria (isolated from P. pacificus) after 24 h. Significant differences between number of live progeny and survival are shown for P. pacificus only (*P0.05 and **P0.001 using one way analysis of variance). Bars represent ±1 s.e.m.

Survival and fecundity of P. pacificus exposed to insect- and soil-derived bacteria
P. pacificus grown on Bacillus sp. 1 and Bacillus sp. 2 (from soil-derived nematodes) reduced brood size significantly compared to E. coli OP50 (P<0.001; Fig. 3A). This is also true for B. thuringiensis, P. aurantiaca and Serratia sp. from cockchafers (P<0.05; Fig. 3B), Ochrobactrum, P. vulgaris and Serratia isolated from the dung beetle (P<0.05; Fig. 4A) and S. marcescens, P. agglomerrans and Achromobacter sp. from oriental beetle (P<0.05; Fig. 4B).

The only bacteria that affected the survival of P. pacificus were Serratia sp. from cockchafers, and S. marscens, P. agglomerrans and Achromobacter sp. from the oriental beetle (P<0.05).

P. pacificus avoids Bacillus species
Next, P. pacificus was given the choice of either E. coli OP50, B. thuringiensis or Bacillus sp. 1 as a counter attractant to a range of insect-associated bacteria as an attractant. The nematode consistently avoided both Bacillus sp. 1 and B. thuringiensis and scored chemotaxis indices between 0.96–0.99 and 0.85–0.96, respectively (Fig. 5). The response to the Bacillus species was significantly different from the response to the E. coli OP50 control (P<0.001). These results demonstrate the revulsion Pristionchus has to these Bacillus species and provides a first indication that these nematodes might be able to avoid bacteria that have a potential harmful effect on their fitness.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Chemotaxis results of P. pacificus exposed to Bacillus species. Chemotactic response of P. pacificus exposed to a selection of cockchafer-, dung beetle- and oriental beetle-associated bacteria as attractants when assayed using E. coli OP50, B. thuringiensis and Bacillus sp. 1 as counter attractants. Bars represent ±1 s.e.m.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Survival and chemotactic response of P. pacificus exposed to pathogenic bacteria. Survival of P. pacificus (A) and C. elegans (B) exposed to human and insect pathogens for 7 days. Bars represent ±1 s.e.m. (C) Chemotactic response of P. pacificus exposed to human and insect pathogens with E. coli OP50 and P. luminescens as the control. Bars represent ±1 s.e.m.

Morphological differences in nematodes influence defecation cycle and residence time of P. pacificus
We wanted to determine whether the absence of the grinder in P. pacificus affected defecation time and residence time compared with those in C. elegans. When P. pacificus is fed on E. coli OP50 the mean defecation time was 106±6.7 s compared to 48±1.9 s for C. elegans (P<0.001; Fig. 7A). When P. pacificus was fed on Bacillus sp. 2 the defecation cycle was significantly longer than when fed E. coli OP50 (P<0.001). There was no difference in defecation cycle when fed toxic Xenorhabdus sp. or E. coli OP50 (P>0.05). Conversely, the defecation cycle of C. elegans did not alter when fed Bacillus sp. 2 but was longer when fed Xenorhabdus (P<0.05). Videos demonstrating physiological differences in defecation cycles, as well as step-by-step muscle contractions can be seen in Movie 1 and Fig. S1 in supplementary material.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Mean defecation cycle and residence time of P. pacificus and C. elegans. (A) Mean defecation time (seconds) of C. elegans and P. pacificus exposed to E. coli OP50, Xenorhabdus sp. and Bacillus sp. 2. Error bars represent ±1 s.e.m. (B) Mean residence time (seconds) of E. coli OP50 and Bacillus sp. 2 mixed with fluorescent beads, in C. elegans and P. pacificus. Bars represent ±1 s.e.m.

	DISCUSSION

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 
We began an analysis of the tritrophic interactions of Pristionchus nematodes with bacteria associated with beetles and soil. We identified bacteria from Pristionchus nematodes using metagenomics and microbiological techniques and investigated the effect these bacteria have on a range of Pristionchus species using chemotaxis, survival and fecundity assays. We assessed survival of P. pacificus to human and insect pathogens and examined whether physiological functions are affected by bacterial species.

The interactions between Pristionchus and bacteria must be considered in the context of the necromenic life-style of these nematodes. On the death of the beetle infected with Pristionchus dauer larvae, bacteria and fungi rapidly colonize the beetle's body. This in turn creates a toxic `beetle soup' consisting of large numbers of competing microorganisms originally present in the beetle intestine and the local environment. Around this time Pristionchus is thought to exit from the resistant dauer stage and develop into the J4 stage and then into adult form, with the main purpose to feed and reproduce. By distinguishing between an array of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria and choosing the correct species to feed on, Pristionchus can lower the possibility of eating bacteria that cause low brood size, slow development and mortality. Once the food supply is depleted, the remaining nematodes turn into dauer larvae and search for potential beetle hosts in the surrounding soil. It is not known whether Pristionchus retains the bacteria it encounters before turning into the dauer form. Insect parasitic nematodes such as S. carpocapsae store their symbiotic bacteria X. nematophila in an intestinal vesicle (Martens et al., 2003) whereas H. bacteriophora stores P. luminescens in the intestine (Ciche and Ensign, 2003). Fedorko and Stanuszek (Fedorko and Stanuszek, 1971) observed P. uniformis dauer larva carrying bacteria cells in the gut but this observation has yet to be confirmed for Pristionchus species living on scarab beetles.

In general, nematodes show an enormous range of feeding strategies that allows them to occupy innumerable ecological niches (Munn and Munn, 2002). Predatory and plant parasitic nematodes have stylets, whereas soil-dwelling rhabditids, such as C. elegans, have a grinder in the terminal bulb of the pharynx. In contrast to C. elegans, P. pacificus lacks a grinder. Under laboratory conditions, bacterial lysis in the gut is incomplete and bacteria can survive the passage through the P. pacificus gut. We speculate that in order to gain any nutrition from these bacteria Pristionchus will have to increase time taken for digestion. Also, Pristionchus might be actively involved in bacterial dissemination in the wild, a claim that has already been made several decades ago (Chantanao and Jensen, 1968; Poinar, 1983).

The metagenomic analysis revealed that Pristionchus harbours a huge diversity of bacteria within its gut and on its cuticle including plant pathogenic and opportunistic human pathogens. Although mechanisms of immunity have been discovered in C. elegans in response to human pathogenic bacteria, C. elegans is susceptible to a range of naturally occurring Gram-negative and -positive bacteria and fungi (Ewbank, 2002). We have shown that Pristionchus associates with many different pathogenic bacteria in nature and P. pacificus is resistant to a number of bacteria that C. elegans is susceptible to, such as S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and P. fluorescens. Although future studies will reveal the exact molecular basis behind this resistance, the analysis of the P. pacificus genome provides the first insight into potential underlying mechanisms. When compared to C. elegans, the P. pacificus genome shows a large expansion of genes encoding cytochrome P450 enzymes, glucosyl transferases, ABC transporters and other proteins that are thought to be involved in the degradation of xenobiotic compounds (C. Dieterich, S. W. Clifton, L. Schuster, A. Chinwalla, K. Delehaunty, I. Dinkelacker, R. Fulton, J. Godfrey, P. Minx, M. Mitreva et al., manuscript in revision). Future research will focus on genetic studies to elucidate methods of innate immunity, pathogenicity of associated bacteria and methods of detection and avoidance when in contact with pathogenic bacteria.

This study is one of the first to utilize both microbiological and metagenomic techniques to isolate bacteria from nematodes. Studies of other nematodes such as the slug parasitic nematode P. hermaphrodita have isolated 13 bacterial species from dauer larvae, culture medium and infected slugs (Wilson et al., 1995a; Wilson et al., 1995b). Bacterial communities associated with invertebrates have also been assessed using metagenomic tools. For example the bacterial communities in the hindgut paunch of a wood-feeding termite recorded 1750 bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences that represented 12 phyla and 216 phylotypes (Warnecke et al., 2007). We did not expect to find a wealth of bacteria present in the nematode gut and on the cuticle. The function and relationship of many of these bacteria to Pristionchus remains unknown but from these results it can be seen that the nematodes associate with a huge diversity in nature.

In chemotaxis assays P. pacificus avoids species that cause ill health but the mechanism for sensing the causal properties of these bacteria currently remains unknown. We exploited this behaviour by using different Bacillus strains as a control and making other bacteria more attractive. Thus, the P. pacificus response to bacteria in chemotaxis assays differs from that of C. elegans in the type of attraction (or repulsion). Similar differences have also been observed for the P. pacificus and C. elegans responses to pure insect-associated chemicals (Hong and Sommer, 2006b). Most likely, all of these differences are part of the adaptive forces that shape the tripartite interactions between bacteria, nematodes and beetle hosts in the wild.

C. elegans protects itself from potential pathogenic bacteria by avoidance behaviour and innate immunity pathways (Pujol et al., 2001; Nicholas and Hodgkin, 2004; Kurz and Ewbank, 2003). Avoidance behaviour of C. elegans has been recorded for B. thuringiensis, S. marcescens, P. aeruginosa, P. luminescens and M. nematophila using different molecular mechanisms (Pujol et al., 2001; Pradel et al., 2007; Yook and Hodgkin, 2007; Zhang et al., 2005; Beale et al., 2006; Schulenburg and Müller, 2004; Sicard et al., 2007; Hasshoff et al., 2007). In our experiments, bacteria that cause mortality to P. pacificus tend to score low in the chemotaxis index, ranging from –0.09±0.04 for Serratia sp. (from the cockchafer) to 0.37±0.05 for S. marcescens (from the oriental beetle). Unlike previous studies (Zhang et al., 2005) that demonstrated that C. elegans grown on a mixture of OP50 and P. aeruginosa or S. marcescens would avoid the two human pathogens in chemotaxis experiments, we have shown that OP50-raised Pristionchus species avoid Bacillus species without any training. Nematodes exposed to Bacillus species, particularly Bacillus sp. 1 and B. thuringiensis had significantly lower brood size than those grown on E. coli OP50. Previous studies have demonstrated that exposure of P. pacificus to purified Cry 5B crystal protein from B. thuringiensis causes a significant reduction in brood size and affects development (Wei et al., 2003).

P. pacificus is highly susceptible to P. luminescens and X. nematophila and Xenorhabdus sp. These bacteria are commonly found in entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema and Heterorhabditis) and are responsible for causing insect mortality 24–48 h after nematode penetration (Forst et al., 1997). As Pristionchus has a strong relationship with a number of beetle hosts that entomopathogenic nematodes can also infect, e.g. Steinernema scarabaei, which has been isolated from oriental beetles (Stock and Koppenhöfer, 2003), the chances of co-infection with Pristionchus and entomopathogenic nematodes and their associated bacteria are high. Our studies suggest that P. pacificus can recognize and avoid highly pathogenic bacteria such as X. nematophila. The ecological interaction between Pristionchus and entomopathogenic nematodes and bacteria clearly warrants further research.

P. entomophagus was significantly more attracted to dung beetle bacteria than to P. maupasi and P. pacificus. This was the only nematode–beetle system for which bacterial specificity was recorded, as generally the three Pristionchus species tested responded similarly when exposed to bacteria isolated from the respective beetle host. From this study the reasons behind nematode–beetle host specificity has not be discovered but it is not due to bacteria harboured in the beetle gut. As Pristionchus nematodes show a high species specificity with cockchafers, dung beetles and Colorado potato beetles (Herrmann et al., 2006a; Herrmann et al., 2006b) and display unique chemoattraction profiles towards insect pheromones and plant volatiles (Hong and Sommer, 2006b) other reasons apart from bacteria species must be considered. The behavioural response of the entomopathogenic nematode S. carpocapsae is correlated with nematode-induced mortality and number of infective juveniles produced on each host species (Lewis et al., 1996; Lewis, 2002). Other reasons for host specificity may include increased production of males, higher reproduction rate or better health. Also as well as bacteria living in the beetle, fungi and other parasitic or phoretic nematodes are present, perhaps these organisms contribute to nematode–beetle specificity. Further studies are needed to elucidate the exact mechanism behind these complex nematode–beetle associations.

Taken together, we have analyzed the tritrophic interactions of Pristionchus nematodes with various bacteria from soil and beetles. We found a range of different interactions from bacterial dissemination by the worm to reduction in brood size, longer defecation cycles and nematode mortality caused by certain bacterial strains. Pristionchus can recognize, respond to and avoid bacteria that cause poor health. The ability to discriminate between bacteria is important for success and survival in the soil ecosystem. Given the genetic and genomic toolkit available in P. pacificus, this nematode interaction with its living environment can in the future be investigated at the molecular level to provide mechanistic insight into the adaptive and non-adaptive forces that shape this nematodes ecosystem.

	Acknowledgments

 
We are grateful to Elissa Hallem and Todd Ciche for P. luminescens, Heidi Goodrich Blair for X. nematophila, Jane Roberts and Jeremy Pearce at Becker Underwood, UK for strains of entomopathogenic bacteria. We thank members of the Sommer lab for discussions and Drs R. Hong and D. Bumbarger for comments of the manuscript. Also we thank Paul Robbins for collection of oriental beetles. This research was funded by the Max-Planck Society.

	Footnotes

 
Supplementary material available online at http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/211/12/1927/DC1

	References

TOP Summary INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION References

 

Beale, E., Li, G., Tan, M. W. and Rumbaugh, K. P. (2006). Caenorhabditis elegans senses bacterial autoinducers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72,5135 -5137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71-94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chantanao, A. and Jensen, H. J. (1969). Saprozoic nematodes as carriers and disseminators of plant pathogenic bacteria. J. Nematol. 1,216 -218.

Chiang, J. T. A., Steciuk, M., Shtonda, B. and Avery, L. (2006). Evolution of pharyngeal behaviors and neuronal functions in free-living soil nematodes. J. Exp. Biol. 209,1859 -1873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ciche, T. A. and Ensign, J. C. (2003). For the insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens, which end of a nematode is out? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69,1890 -1897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ewbank, J. J. (2002). Tackling both sides of the host-pathogen equation with Caenorhabditis elegans. Microbes Infect. 4,247 -256.[CrossRef][Medline]

Faegri, A., Torsvik, V. L. and Goksoyr, J. (1977). Bacterial and fungal activity in soil: separation of bacteria and fungi by a rapid fractionated centrifugation technique. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9,105 -112.[CrossRef]

Fedorko, A. and Stanuszek, S. (1971). Pristionchus uniformis sp. n. (Nematoda, Rhabditida, Diplogasteridae), a facultative parasite of Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say and Melolontha melolontha L. in Poland. Morphology and biology. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 19,95 -112.

Floyd, R., Abebe, E., Papert, A. and Blaxter, M. (2002). Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Mol. Ecol. 11,839 -850.[CrossRef][Medline]

Forst, S., Dowds, B., Boemare, N. and Stackebrandt, E. (1997). Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp.: bugs that kill bugs. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 51, 47-72.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fürst von Lieven, A. and Sudhaus, W. (2000). Comparative and functional morphology of the buccal cavity of Diplogastrina (Nematoda) and a first outline of the phylogeny of the taxon. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 38, 37-63.[CrossRef]

Han, Z. M., Hong, Y. D. and Zhoa, B. G. (2003). A study on pathogenicity of bacteria carried by pine wood nematodes. J. Phytopathol. 151,683 -689.[CrossRef]

Hasshoff, M., Böhnisch, C., Tonn, D., Hasert, B. and Schulenburg, H. (2007). The role of Caenorhabditis elegans insulin-like signaling in the behavioral avoidance of pathogenic Bacillus thuringiensis. FASEB J. 21,1801 -1812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Herrmann, M., Mayer, W. and Sommer, R. J. (2006a). Nematodes of the genus Pristionchus are closely associated with scarab beetles and the Colorado potato beetle in Western Europe. Zoology. 109,96 -198.[CrossRef][Medline]

Herrmann, M., Mayer, W. and Sommer, R. J. (2006b). Sex, bugs and Haldane's rule: the nematode genus Pristionchus in the United States. Front. Zool. 3,15 -31.[CrossRef][Medline]

Herrmann, M., Mayer, W. M., Hong, R. L., Kienle, S., Minasaki, R. and Sommer, R. J. (2007). The nematode Pristionchus pacificus (Nematoda: Diplogastridae) is associated with the oriental beetle Exomala orientalis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Japan. Zool. Sci. 24,883 -889.[CrossRef][Medline]

Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T. and Williams, S. T. (ed.) (2000). Gram negative aerobic/microaerophilic rods and cocci. In Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (9th edn), pp.71 -102. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

Hong, R. and Sommer, R. J. (2006a). Pristionchus pacificus: a well-rounded nematode. BioEssays 28,651 -659.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hong, R. and Sommer, R. J. (2006b). Chemoattraction in Pristionchus nematodes and implications for insect recognition. Curr. Biol. 16,2359 -2365.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kiontke, K. and Sudhaus, W. (2006). Ecology of Caenorhabditis species. In WormBook (ed. The C. elegans Research Community), doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.37.1, http://www.wormbook.org.

Kurz, C. L. and Ewbank, J. J. (2003). Caenorhabditis elegans: an emerging genetic model for the study of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 380-390.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lane, D. J. (1991). 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (ed. E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow), pp. 184-189. Chichester: John Wiley.

Lewis, E. E. (2002). Behavioral ecology. In Entomopathogenic Nematology (ed. R. Gaugler), pp.205 -224. Wallingford: CABI.

Lewis, E. E., Ricci, M. and Gaugler, R. (1996). Host recognition behavior predicts host suitability in the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Parasitology 113,573 -579.[Medline]

Martens, E. C., Heungens, K. and Goodrich-Blair, H. (2003). Early colonization events in the mutualistic association between Steinernema carpocapsae nematodes and Xenorhabdus nematophila bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 185,3147 -3154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mayer, W., Herrmann, M. and Sommer, R. J. (2007). Phylogeny of the nematode genus Pristionchus and implications for biodiversity, biogeography and the evolution of hermaphroditism. Evol. Biol. 7, 104.[CrossRef]

Munn, E. A. and Munn, P. D. (2002). Feeding and digestion. In The Biology of Nematodes (ed. D. H. Lee), pp. 211-232. London: Taylor and Francis Group.

Nicholas, H. R. and Hodgkin, J. (2004). Responses to infection and possible recognition strategies in the innate immunity system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Immunol. 41,479 -493.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nussbaumer, A. D., Bright, M., Baranyi, C., Beisser, C. J. and Ott, J. A. (2004). Attachment mechanism in a highly specific association between ectosymbiotic bacteria and marine nematodes. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 34,239 -246.[CrossRef]

Poinar, G. O. (1983). The Natural History of Nematodes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Pradel, E., Zhang, Y., Matsuyama, T., Bargmann, C. I. and Ewbank, J. J. (2007). Detection and avoidance of a natural product from the pathogenic bacterium Serratia marcescens by Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104,2295 -2300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pujol, N., Link, E. M., Liu, L. X., Kurz, C. L., Alloing, G., Tan, M. W., Ray, K. P., Solari, R., Johnson, C. D. and Ewbank, J. J. (2001). A reverse genetic analysis of components of the Toll signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 11,809 -821.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press.

Schulenburg, H. and Müller, S. (2004). Natural variation in the response of Caenorhabditis elegans towards Bacillus thuringiensis. Parasitology 128,433 -443.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sicard, M., Hering, S., Schulte, R., Gaudriault, S. and Schulenburg, H. (2007). The effect of Photorhabdus luminescens (Enterobacteriaceae) in the survival, development, reproduction and behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda: Rhabditidae). Environ. Microbiol. 9, 12-25.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sommer, R. J., Carta, L. K., Kim, A. S. Y. and Sternberg, P. W. (1996). Morphological, genetic and molecular description of Pristionchus pacificus sp. n. (Nematoda: Neodiplogastridae). Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 19,511 -521.

Stock, S. P. and Koppenhöfer, A. M. (2003). Steinernema scarabaei n. sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), a natural pathogen of scarab beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from New Jersey, USA. Nematology 5, 191-204.[CrossRef]

Tan, L. and Grewal, P. S. (2001). Pathogenicity of Moraxella osloensis, a bacterium associated with the nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, to the slug Deroceras reticulatum.Appl. Environ. Microb. 67.5010 -5016.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tan, L. and Grewal, P. S. (2002). Endotoxin activity of Moraxella osloensis against the grey garden slug, Deroceras reticulatum. Appl. Environ. Microb. 68,3943 -3947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Taylor, M. J., Bandi, C. and Hoerauf, A. (2005). Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts of filarial nematodes. Adv. Parasit. 60,245 -282.[CrossRef]

The C. elegans Research Community (ed.) (2005). Wormbook. http://www.wormbook.org.

Warnecke, F., Luginbühl, P., Ivanova, N., Ghassemian, M., Richardson, T. H., Stege, J. T., Cayouette, M., McHardy, A. C., Djordjevic, G., Aboushadi et al. (2007). Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 450,560 -565.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wei, J. Z., Hale, K., Carta, L., Platzer, E., Wong, C., Fang, S. C. and Aroian, R. V. (2003). Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins that target nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100,2760 -2765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weischer, B. and Brown, D. (2000). An Introduction to Nematodes: General Nematology, A Students Textbook. Sofia: Pensoft.

Wilson, M. J., Glen, D. M., George, S. K. and Pearce, J. D. (1995a). Selection of a bacterium for the mass production of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) as a biological control agent for slugs. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 18,419 -425.

Wilson, M. J., Glen, D. M., Pearce, J. D. and Rodgers, P. B. (1995b). Monoxenic culture of the slug parasite Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with different bacteria in liquid and solid phase. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 18,159 -166.

Yook, K. and Hodgkin, J. (2007). Mos1 mutagenesis reveals a diversity of mechanisms affecting response of C. elegans to the bacterial pathogen M. nematophilum.Genetics 175,681 -697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zauner, H., Mayer, W., Herrmann, M., Weller, A., Erwig, M. and Sommer, R. J. (2007). Distinct patterns of genetic variation in Pristionchus pacificus and Caenorhabditis elegans, two partially selfing nematodes with cosmopolitan distribution. Mol. Ecol. 16,1267 -1280.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang, Y., Lu, H. and Bargmann, C. I. (2005). Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438,179 -184.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Rae, B. Schlager, and R. J. Sommer Pristionchus pacificus: A Genetic Model System for the Study of Evolutionary Developmental Biology and the Evolution of Complex Life-History Traits CSH Protocols, October 1, 2008; 2008(11): pdb.emo102 - pdb.emo102. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rae, R. Articles by Sommer, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed