spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. Cell survival test for cell clusters 9 and 10. Number of BrdU+ cells in cluster 9 (A,B) and in cluster 10 (C,D) after 7 days and 14 days of social interaction. Values are the sum of labeled cells from the two bilateral cell clusters 9 or 10 of a brain, and expressed as median ± interquartile range. (A) 7 days of social interaction did not affect the number of surviving BrdU+ cells in cluster 9 (Kruskal–Wallis test for overall difference: P=0.28). The number of BrdU+ cells in the three experimental groups doubled relative to that of the age-control animals. (B) After 14 days of social interaction, dominant animals (D) had significantly more surviving BrdU+ cells in cluster 9 than subordinate animals (S) but were not different from isolate animals (I) (Kruskal–Wallis test for overall difference: *P<0.05 (P=0.029); multiple comparison tests: PDvsS<0.05; PIvsD and PIvsS>0.10). Over 14 days of survival time, the number of BrdU+ cells in the three experimental groups approximately doubled twice relative to that of the age-control animals. (C,D) The number of cluster 10 BrdU+ cells did not differ among social groups after surviving 7 days (C) or 14 days (D) of social interaction (Kruskal–Wallis test for overall difference: P7days=0.98, P14days=0.93). The number of BrdU+ cells in the 7-day survival groups was similar to that of the age-control animals (C), while the number of BrdU+ cells in the 14-day survival groups approximately doubled (D). (Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of animals examined.)





Right arrow Return to article