spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Fig. 1. The amplitudes of EJPs and IJPs vary as a function of temperature. (A) Intracellular recordings from a muscle fiber in which a single EJP and a single IJP are elicited in each stimulus trial over the temperature range 2–18°C. Traces are averaged from ten trials at each temperature; the resting potential (RP) recorded at each temperature is indicated above each trace. In this experiment, the IJP reversed polarity at 6.0°C. (B) Amplitude of EJPs as a function of temperature in nine muscle fibers. Data are normalized to the value measured at 2°C; at this temperature EJP amplitude in these fibers ranged from 1.4 to 12.9 mV. EJPs are depolarizing in polarity over the entire temperature range. (C) Amplitude of IJPs as a function of temperature in six muscle fibers. Data are normalized to values measured at 2°C; at this temperature IJP amplitude in these fibers ranged from –0.1 mV to –5.2 mV. The broken line indicates the reversal of the IJP polarity; data below the broken line represent IJPs of hyperpolarizing polarity. (D) Muscle resting potential (mean ± s.e.m.) measured as a function of temperature in 18 muscle fibers, including those for which data is presented in B and C. (E) Input resistance of muscle fibers (mean ± s.e.m.; N=11) measured in response to hyperpolarizing current pulses. Values are normalized to those measured at 2°C.





Right arrow Return to article