spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 10


Fig. 10. Molecular model of yield and self-healing in the distal byssal thread. Our data suggests that His–metal coordinate cross-links in the termini of the preCols are bonds that are reversibly sacrificed in yield and self-healing. A difference in healing rate between species, despite high homology of the His-rich domains, suggests that there is a separate entropic elastomeric component driving recovery. Since preCol D and preCol NG are co-localized in the distal thread, and since preCols are believed to align in register, we propose that the flanking domain of NG is playing this role. In this model, the stiffness of the amorphous Gly-rich flanking domain of preCol NG is roughly the same as the His-rich domain of preCol D, and the silk domain and NG His-rich domain are somewhat stiffer. During yield, the His–metal cross-links of preCol D begin to rupture as the Gly-rich domain begins to unravel, whereas the stiffer silk domain, collagen domains, and NG His-rich domain stay folded. When the tensile force is released, there is a time-dependent entropic drive for the Gly-rich domain of preCol NG to recover its initial length. In doing so, the histidine residues are brought back within proximity of one another, allowing the metal coordination bonds to reform and initial mechanical properties to be recovered. The covalent bonds between the ends of preCols in series have been proposed to be diDOPA cross-links.





Right arrow Return to article