spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a Workshop for 2011 spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 19, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, iii (2007)
Copyright © 2007 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.014266
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inside JEB

LIMITS ON LACTATION

Kathryn Phillips

kathryn{at}biologists.com


Figure 1

Nursing mouse mothers must be hungry all the time. Feeding multiple greedy mouths takes a lot out of a girl. So what limits the amount of energy a nursing mother can supply her litter? According to John Speakman, a mother is limited by the amount of energy she can take in, but the aspect of her physiology that imposes the limit wasn't clear. Having previously found that the gut and mammary gland did not restrict energy intake, Speakman, Elzbieta Król and Michelle Murphy decided to test whether lactating mice are constrained by the amount of waste heat generated by digestion and milk production (p. 4233). The team shaved some nursing mice to see if removing their insulation allowed them to cool off, and increase their energy intake and milk output. The team monitored the mothers' milk production and found that it was 15.2% more than unshaved mums, and the shaved mums' youngsters were 15.4% bigger too. So the amount of heat that a mammal can dispose of seems to limit the amount of energy they can take in, which could have far reaching consequences for evolution, not least in our warming climate.

References

Król, E., Murphy, M. and Speakman, J. R. (2007). Limits to sustained energy intake. X. Effects of fur removal on reproductive performance in laboratory mice. J. Exp. Biol. 207,4233 -4243.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

Limits to sustained energy intake. X. Effects of fur removal on reproductive performance in laboratory mice
Elzbieta Król, Michelle Murphy, and John R. Speakman
JEB 2007 210: 4233-4243. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?