spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. Conditioning protocol also affects recall after single-trial conditioning. The proportion of subjects responding to the first recall test with the rewarded odor immediately (NAPC=35; NAC=40; NPC=33; NUNP=31), 24 h (NAPC=39; NAC=25; NPC=42; NUNP=29) or 96 h (NAPC=48; NAC=75; NPC=30; NUNP=22) after conditioning is shown. None of the honey bees trained with the unpaired protocol responded on the immediate recall test. Recall at each time post-conditioning depended upon the conditioning protocol (lreg; {chi} 23=39.6, P<0.001). Recall of the odor CS decays for all conditioning protocols (APC, PC, AC) over a period of 96 h (lreg; {chi} 22=6.27, P=0.043). Recall for AC, PC and UNP was compared to that for APC using a least-squares contrast at each time point; * indicates a difference of P<0.05.





Right arrow Return to article