(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 5. (A) Coefficient of lift, (B) coefficient of drag, and (C) lift-to-drag
ratio vs relative camber. Individual gliders use different ranges of
relative camber. There was no significant correlation between relative camber
and lift coefficient. Although no correlation is apparent between drag
coefficient and relative camber, multiple regression results detected a
significant negative correlation. There is a significant positive correlation
between lift-to-drag ratio and relative camber. Points represent averages over
a glide sequence for 4 animals (Ind1–4).