spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Reversal potentials of K+ current and hyperpolarisation-induced current. (A) Sample traces of tail currents recorded subsequently in one fibre. Left: deactivating K+ currents, mainly consisting of A currents. For K+ current activation the fibre was first depolarised from –70 to +10 mV for 80 ms, then the voltage was stepped to different levels as seen in B. Right: deactivation of hyperpolarisation-dependent currents. For activation the voltage was stepped from –50 mV to –120 mV for 4 s, followed by deactivating jumps to –50 mV or more positive levels as seen in B. (B) Mean current–voltage relationships of peak tail-currents obtained, as in A, from paired recordings of four fibres from two animals. Note that the ordinate gives relative sizes of the currents, i.e. normalised to IK at V=–30 mV and to hyperpolarisation-dependent current at –50 mV, respectively. [K+]o and [Cl]o were standard, i.e. 10 mmol l–1 and 95 mmol l–1, respectively. The mean reversal potential was –55.2±4.1 mV for the K+ current and –20.5±4.0 mV for the hyperpolarisation-activated current (l=2, f=4). The current electrode contained 3 mol l–1 KCl; recordings of the hyperpolarisation-dependent currents were performed 5 to 10 min after impaling the fibre.





Right arrow Return to article