|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online June 29, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2444-2452 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.005587
Thermoregulation in pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana Ord) in the summer
1 Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
82071, USA
2 Department of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg,
South Africa
3 Physiology, School of Biomedical and Chemical Sciences, University of
Western Australia, Perth, Australia
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mitchg{at}uwyo.edu)
Accepted 16 May 2007
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50°C daily during the summer and
maximum solar radiation was
900 W m2. Brain temperature
(38.9±0.3°C) was consistently
0.20.5°C higher than
carotid blood temperature (38.6±0.3°C), which was the same as
abdominal temperature (38.8±0.4°C). Jugular blood temperature
(38.0±0.4°C) varied, probably because of changes in Respiratory
Evaporative Heat Loss (REHL), and was lower than other temperatures.
Subcutaneous temperature (38.3±0.6°C) varied, probably because of
peripheral vasoactivity, but on average was similar to other temperatures.
Carotid blood temperature had a circadian/nycthemeral rhythm weakly but
significantly (r=0.634) linked to the time of sunrise, of amplitude
0.8±0.1°C. There were daily variations of up to 2.3°C in
carotid body temperature in individual animals. An average range of carotid
blood temperature of 3.1±0.4°C over the study period was recorded
for the group, which was significantly wider than the average variation in
brain temperature (2.3±0.6°C). Minimum carotid temperature
(36.4±0.8°C) was significantly lower than minimum brain temperature
(37.7±0.5°C), but maximum brain and carotid temperatures were
similar. Brain temperature was kept relatively constant by a combination of
warming at low carotid temperatures and cooling at high carotid temperatures
and so varied less than carotid temperature. This regulation of brain
temperature may be the origin of the amplitude of the average variation in
carotid temperature found, and may confer a survival advantage.
Key words: pronghorn, brain warming, thermoregulation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
" in my walk I Killed a Buck Goat of this Countrey, about the hight of the Grown Deer, its body Shorter the Horns which is not very hard forksup one prong short the other round & Sharp arched, Verry actively made, has only one pair of hoofs to each foot, his brains on the back of his head, his Nostrals large, his eyes like a Sheep he is more like the Antilope or Gazella of Africa than any other Species of Goat."
In the intervening 200 years very few studies of their anatomy and
physiology have been done. Perhaps the most famous study is that of Lindstedt
et al. (Lindstedt et al.,
1991
), who investigated the capacity of pronghorns for aerobic
exercise. They found it to be remarkable, with a
VO2 of 300 ml kg1
min1, the highest recorded so far for any vertebrate except
perhaps for hovering hummingbirds (Suarez
et al., 1991
) and bats
(Lindstedt et al., 1991
). To
support this oxygen consumption Lindstedt et al. showed that, compared to
goats, pronghorn have a greater capacity for oxygen diffusion across the lung,
a greater capacity to deliver oxygen to muscles, and a greater total volume of
mitochondria in skeletal muscle (Lindstedt
et al., 1991
). These results confirmed aspects of an earlier study
by McKean and Walker (McKean and Walker,
1974
) who, also comparing pronghorns to goats (Capra
hircus), found that pronghorns have a greater heart weight:body weight
ratio and a lower airway resistance. Dhindsa et al.
(Dhindsa et al., 1974
) found
that pronghorn blood was unremarkable compared to several species of deer,
while McKean and Walker (McKean and
Walker, 1974
) found 50% more haemoglobin, a higher haematocrit,
and larger blood volume compared to goats. From the data provided by Dhindsa
et al. (N=4) (Dhindsa et al.,
1974
) and from the eight individual animals on which McKean and
Walker based their report (McKean and
Walker, 1974
), however, it is also clear that pronghorns have very
different blood indices compared to those calculated from average data for
nine different species of southern African antelope
(Rhodes, 1975
). Pronghorns
have significantly higher haematocrit (44.5±3.4 vs
39.8±3.7%; t=2.76), haemoglobin concentration (16.8±2.0
vs 13.4±1.4 g dl1; t=4.36), and red
blood cell number (11.8±1.1 vs
6.9±1.6x1012 l1; t=7.42),
and significantly smaller red cells (mean corpuscular volume,
MCV=37.1±2.7 vs 60.9±14.2 fl; t=4.76)
containing a lower absolute amount of haemoglobin (MCH=14.1±1.1
vs 20.7±5.1 pg; t=3.70) but with a higher
concentration of haemoglobin per cell (MCHC=38.8±3.1 vs
33.5±1.3%; t=4.34). All these attributes allow them to run at
100 km h1 for 34 min
(McCabe et al., 2004
) and 65
km h1 for 10 min (McKean
and Walker, 1974
). The anatomy of their cranial vasculature has
been described (Carlton and McKean,
1977
) and it is similar to that in other artiodactyls,
specifically in that it has a well developed carotid rete-cavernous sinus
system, one of the functions of which is to cool arterial blood destined for
the brain (Maloney and Mitchell,
1997
).
Two measurements of their body temperatures have been reported. Average
temperature "under the deep musculature of the paralumbar
fossa" was 40.7°C (range 36.242.2°C) in a mature doe
and 39.0°C (range 36.842.2°C) in a yearling doe
(Thorne, 1975
). Both animals
were semi-tame. Mean rectal temperature was 40.8°C (range
38.543.3°C) in 41 wild, hand-captured animals
(Barrett and Chalmers,
1977
).
We report here a further study of pronghorn physiology, with an emphasis on
thermoregulation, using techniques we have developed for use in southern
hemisphere animals (Fuller et al.,
2005
). The climatic conditions in the northern hemisphere are
different to those of the southern hemisphere and thermoregulatory challenges
experienced by pronghorn could, therefore, be expected to be different. The
aims of the study were to record body temperatures in free-living pronghorn,
to describe the thermoregulatory mechanisms used by pronghorn during a 3-month
period in the summer in Wyoming, and to compare these with temperatures and
mechanisms we have found in a free-living, similar-sized, South African
antelope (springbok Antidorcas marsupialis) during a southern
hemisphere summer (Fuller et al.,
2005
). We show that thermoregulatory patterns in pronghorn and
springbok are similar, but pronghorns also seem to have evolved a mechanism
for warming their brains, not seen in southern hemisphere artiodactyls.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Five adult pronghorn Antilocapra americana Ord (one male and four
females, body mass 4050 kg) were captured by darting (thiafentanil, 5
mg; Wildlife Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA) at Warren Air Force
Base, and transported to the research center. Prior to the start of the study
the animals were kept in a small, holding enclosure for 34 weeks so
they could recover from transport and acclimate to the local environment. For
the duration of the experiment they were kept in a 200 hectare enclosure with
four other pronghorns where they were free-living for the 3-month recording
period. During the study one of the females gave birth to twins.
Measurement of body temperatures
Temperatures were measured and recorded from five body sites (brain,
carotid artery, jugular vein, abdominal cavity and subcutaneous) using small
bead thermistors (GE Thermometrics ABOE3-BR11KA 103K-L10). Data were stored on
data loggers (Onset, Pocasset, USA; XITC 32+34+36) connected to the
thermistors by a flexible coax cable (#83265, Belden, Richmond, IN, USA), and
able to record temperature between 34°C and 46°C, every 5 min, to an
accuracy of 0.04°C. The loggers were waxed (paraffin wax/Elyax,
Mini-Mitter, Sunriver, OR, USA) to make them waterproof and biologically
inert. After waxing the loggers weighed approximately 55 g and had dimensions
of 50 mmx45 mmx20 mm. Each of the thermistor/logger assemblies was
calibrated against a quartz thermometer (Quat 100, Heraeus, Hanau,
Germany).
Surgical procedures
At the time of surgery the animals were re-darted using thiafentanil and
anesthetized with isoflurane (Abbott Animal Health, Abbot Park, IL, USA)
administered via a face mask at a concentration of 8% for induction
and 12% for maintenance (mean=3.9±2.1%) in oxygen. The effects
of thiafentanil were reversed with nalterzel (5 ml; Wildlife Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.). Using aseptic surgical techniques, thermistors were implanted into the
five body sites and the loggers were buried subcutaneously nearby.
Brain
To measure brain temperature a thermistor was encased in a rigid guide tube
(cellulose acetate butyrate tubing: World Precision Instruments, Savarola, FL,
USA; o.d. 3.2 mm, i.d. 1.98 mm, length 34 mm) and pushed through a 3.2 mm hole
drilled through the skull in the midline 12.5 mm anterior to the suture
between the frontal and parietal bones, so that the thermistor in the tip of
the guide tube was near the hypothalamus. These coordinates were determined by
prior dissection and analysis of pronghorn heads. The guide tube was attached
to a head plate (22 mmx15 mmx9 mm, LxWxH), which was
fixed to the skull by two 6-gauge, 15 mm long, self-tapping, stainless steel
screws. No neurological sequelae arose from this procedure.
Blood vessels
Thermistors in a blind-ended, thin-walled, polytetra-fluorethylene (PTFE)
tube approximately 100 mm long, made from a catheter (o.d. 0.9 mm; Straight
Flush 4F Catheter, Cordis, The Netherlands), were inserted into the carotid
artery and jugular vein about midway along the length of the neck in a
direction opposite to the direction of the flow of blood so that the
thermistor was detecting the temperature of free-flowing blood. The site of
insertion in the vessels was closed by a purse-string suture using 4/0
nylon.
Subcutaneous and abdominal measurements
Thermistors used to measure subcutaneous and abdominal temperatures were
encased in a wax cylinder 40 mm long and 5 mm in diameter. The abdominal
thermistor was inserted into the abdominal cavity at the paralumbar fossa
using a trocar and cannula, and the logger buried subcutaneously above the
site of insertion. This method resulted in consistent placement of the
thermistor tip in the abdomen within small intestine folds and posterior to
the rumen (confirmed at autopsy). The logger assembly was placed
subcutaneously in the paralumbar fossa on the opposite side to the abdominal
assembly.
All animals were given 5 ml dexamethasone (Vedco, St Joseph, MO, USA) and 2 ml penicillin (GC Hanford Mfg. Co., Syracuse, NY, USA) intramuscularly at the start of surgery. Baytril tablets (22.7 mg; Bayer HealthCare LLC, Shawnee Mission, KS, USA) were placed in all surgical sites prior to wound closure.
Climatic conditions
Weather conditions during the study were measured using a 15-channel HOBO
weather station (Onset). Six variables were measured: black globe temperature,
ambient air temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, wind speed and
wind direction. Black globe temperature is an integral of air temperature,
solar radiation and wind speed, and is the best measure of total heat
load.
Data analysis
Temperature data were obtained from all loggers in three animals and from
three loggers in a fourth animal. Insufficient data was collected from the
fifth animal. We obtained measurements for 6 days from one animal, 12 from
another, 92 from a third and 97 from the fourth. Most data analysis was based
on the measurements obtained from the latter two animals. The data were
consolidated by pooling the 12x 5 min-interval data points obtained from
each logger for each hour of measurement to produce 24 average hourly
temperatures for each animal for each day. These hourly averages for the four
animals were, in turn, averaged to produce a mean hourly temperature for them
as a group. These averages could be further pooled for all study days or
component days of the study period to provide a comprehensive overview of body
temperatures throughout the recording period. For example, a second
consolidation was to average daily means into a week, to produce 14 separate
weekly temperature profiles for each body site over the study period. These 14
weekly periods were used to establish correlations between the weather
variables and body temperatures in each week of the study period.
Similar consolidations were made for weather data using the two data points recorded each hour for each of the variables.
Calculation of cerebral blood flow (CBF)
The amount of heat lost from the brain (or any other tissue) by convection
to blood flow can be calculated from the convective heat loss equation:
![]() |
T is the temperature gradient (°C) between
Tbrain and Tcarotid. W varies with
Tbrain, which we assumed to have a Q10 of 2.3
(Yablonskiy et al., 2000
![]() |
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
06:00 h and maximum
Tglobe at
13:00 h each day. Mean air temperature
(Tair) was 18.3±5.0°C with a range of 2.0°C
to 37.8°C. Mean daily solar radiation was 256±34 W
m2 and maximum solar radiation was 870±71 W
m2. Mean photoperiod was 14 h, 45±24 min, with
sunrise occurring at 05 h, 41±0.13 min and sunset at 20 h,
27±0.11 min. Wind speed was 1.1±0.3 m s1. No
rainfall was recorded.
Body temperatures
Mean temperatures
The mean temperatures for the different body locations are shown in
Table 1. These data were
derived by pooling hourly mean temperatures over the study period for each
temperature site in the four animals. On average brain temperature
(Tbrain=38.9±0.3°C) was significantly higher
than carotid artery blood temperature
(Tcarotid=38.6±0.3°C; t=5.23) and
jugular vein temperature (Tjugular=38.0±0.4;
t=3.21). Tcarotid was also significantly higher
than Tjugular (t=2.14) but not different from
abdominal temperature (Tabdominal; t=0.71) or
subcutaneous temperature (Tsubcut; t=0.81).
Tjugular was lower than Tabdominal
(t=8.00). Subcutaneous temperatures showed the largest difference
between maximum and minimum temperature (6.2°C) and as a result on average
were similar to Tabdominal (t=0.75),
Tbrain (t=1.62) and
Tabdominal (t=1.25).
Tabdominal did not differ from Tbrain
(t=0.36).
|
Individual variation in temperatures
Table 2 summarizes the
variation in carotid and brain temperatures in each of the four animals over
the study period. The male pronghorn had a minimum carotid temperature
1.6°C higher than the female average and a maximum
Tcarotid 1.0°C higher than the female average. The
male's minimum brain temperature was 0.9°C higher than the female average
but its maximum brain temperature was the same as the female average. These
differences suggest that the male regulated its body temperatures in a higher
range than did the female pronghorn. The minimum Tcarotid
for all four animals was significantly less than the minimum
Tbrain (P<0.05; t-test) and the range
of Tcarotid was significantly wider than the range of
Tbrain (P<0.05; t-test). Maximum
Tcarotid and Tbrain were not
significantly different.
|
These conclusions are supported by a slightly different analysis of Tabdominal shown in Table 3. To obtain these data, hourly means for each hour of each day were averaged. Thereafter the minimum and maximum temperature for each day for each animal was calculated. These data support the idea that the male pronghorn regulated his body temperatures within a narrower and higher range than did the females, although with data on only one male we cannot draw firm conclusions on gender differences.
|
Frequency distribution of Tcarotid, Tbrain and Tjugular
Arithmetical means of temperatures are not necessarily the same as
preferred or mode temperatures, which are the physiological, `set-point'
temperatures. The three most important temperatures from a thermoregulatory
point of view are Tbrain, Tcarotid and
Tjugular, indicative of hypothalamic temperature, core
body temperature and the capacity for respiratory convective and evaporative
heat loss (REHL), respectively. To determine the `set point' temperatures for
Tbrain and Tcarotid, frequency
distributions of these two temperatures were constructed for each animal by
pooling measurements made for each of them into 0.1°C intervals, combining
these intervals for all four animals and plotting the frequency (%) occurrence
of each 0.1°C interval. These analyses, derived from over 52 000 paired
data points (mainly from two animals) for Tbrain,
Tjugular and Tcarotid, are shown in
Fig. 1A,B. For all animals,
Tcarotid varied from 35.8°C to 40.3°C.
Tbrain frequency distribution was narrower
(37.440.7°C). Fig. 1
also shows the position of the distribution of jugular temperatures in
relation to carotid and brain temperatures. Tjugular is
significantly left-shifted to both (Table
1) and is characterized by a long tail.
|
|
Circadian/nychthemeral rhythm
Consecutive maximum and minimum Tcarotid occurred on
average 24.0±1.5 h and 23.8±1.2 h apart, respectively. Using the
method of Nelson et al. (Nelson et al.,
1979
), variations (over a period of three consecutive but randomly
selected days in each month) in Tglobe, and
Tcarotid over the same days, in each of the four animals
were analyzed for the occurrence of a circadian rhythm and evidence for daily
adaptive heterothermy. This analysis showed that throughout the summer,
maximum Tglobe occurred around 13:00 h (13 h 24±30
min), coinciding with maximum solar radiation (12:24±0:24 h), while
Tcarotid peaked 7 h later between 18:00 h and 21:00 h
(18:47±1:05 h). The amplitude of the circadian change was
0.8±0.1°C (Fig. 3).
To determine if the circadian rhythm was adjusted by photoperiod, the mean
time of occurrence of maximum Tcarotid and minimum
Tcarotid in each of the 14 weekly periods was correlated
with mean time of sunrise or sunset in each epoch. This analysis showed that
the time of minimum Tcarotid was positively correlated
with the time of sunrise (r=0.634) and negatively with the time of
sunset (r=0.726). The time of maximum Tcarotid
was not significantly correlated with either sunrise (r=0.019) or
sunset (r=0.139).
|
Subcutaneous temperature
Tsubcut follows Tglobe quite
closely throughout a day (Fig.
4), although at night it separates from
Tglobe. To assess if peripheral vasoactivity could be a
factor contributing to this pattern, Tsubcut was compared
to Tcarotid. Assuming that the pelage minimizes radiant
heating of the subcutaneous space, then when Tglobe is low
vasoconstriction will result in an increase in the difference between
Tsubcut and Tcarotid, and a decrease
in the difference, resulting from vasodilation, will occur when
Tglobe is increasing.
|
Respiratory evaporative heat loss
The occurrence of REHL in pronghorn can be estimated by analysis of
Tjugular. If heat is being lost via the nasal
mucosa then Tjugular will fall because the temperature of
blood returning in the nasal veins to the jugular vein will fall. Conversely
when REHL is reduced Tjugular will increase.
The relationship between Tcarotid and Tjugular is shown in Fig. 5A. When Tcarotid is below 37.5°C Tjugular is warmer than Tcarotid by 0.51.0°C, suggesting that REHL is reduced at these Tcarotid. As Tcarotid increases mean and minimum Tjugular become less than Tcarotid indicating an increase in REHL. At Tcarotid of approximately 39.5°C Tjugular falls sharply, suggesting an increase in REHL to a level greater than it is at lower Tcarotid. The overall trend of this relationship is that as Tcarotid increases so does Tjugular but at a slower rate with the net effect that the two temperatures diverge.
|
Fig. 6 shows these three phases of Tbrain plotted with Tjugular against Tcarotid. At Tcarotid of 37.8°C or less, Tbrain is remarkably constant and both Tbrain and Tjugular are warmer than Tcarotid. Tjugular is approximately 0.5°C warmer and Tbrain can be up to 2.5 to 3.0°C warmer.
|
The third phase of Tbrain occurs at Tcarotid greater than 39.5°C. This phase is characterized by a sharp decline in both Tbrain and Tjugular such that Tcarotid becomes 0.5°C warmer than Tbrain, which is characteristic of selective brain cooling (SBC), and implies that brain heat is being removed faster than it is being produced.
SBC constitutes a small part of the regulation of
Tbrain. Its onset [as defined by a mean
Tbrain less than Tcarotid
(IUPS Thermal Commission,
1987
)] occurs at a Tcarotid close to
39.5°C, a Tcarotid that occurs infrequently (less than
10% of all recorded Tcarotid in this study). However,
brain temperatures lower than Tcarotid can be detected at
Tcarotid as low as 38.0°C
(Fig. 5B), implying that SBC
occurs over a wider range of brain temperatures. The regulation of
Tbrain also depends on the amount of convective heat loss
by CBF. The relative contributions of CBF and SBC to brain heat removal can be
estimated from the
TcarotidTbrain gradients
recorded during the study. If CBF is able to remove all brain heat then all
the temperature gradients between Tcarotid and
Tbrain measured should be accounted for by variations in
CBF between the minimum (
20 ml 100 g1
min1) (Heckman,
2001
) and the maximum (
80 ml 100 g1
min1) (Purves,
1972
) possible. Using the modified convection equation to
calculate CBF, Fig. 7 shows the
results of an analysis of this possibility and it is clear that many of the
measured gradients require explanations other than changes in CBF: gradients
of less than 0.2°C (Fig.
7A) would require CBF above the assumed maximum and those greater
than 1°C (Fig. 7C) would
require CBF below values necessary to provide oxygen and glucose for brain
metabolism.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pronghorns were exposed to weather conditions typical of a hot and arid
environment, characterized by large variations in ambient temperature. They
are dissimilar to southern African climatic conditions. In the southern
hemisphere summer days are longer, wind speed lower and, while mean globe and
air temperatures are similar, in Wyoming the variation in globe and air
temperatures is 23-fold higher. Despite these conditions our data show
that the pronghorns in our study were able to maintain a remarkably constant
body temperature (38.6±0.3°C) over a period of 3 months. These
temperatures are lower than those reported previously
(Thorne, 1975
;
Barrett and Chalmers, 1977
),
and lower than those recorded in springbok in the southern hemisphere summer
(39.5±0.1) (Fuller et al.,
2005
). In the former studies
(Thorne, 1975
;
Barrett and Chalmers, 1977
) the
difference can be attributed to the method of measurement and the fact that
the animals in those studies were subjected to stress, while in ours they were
free-living and able to use the full array of thermoregulatory mechanisms
available to them from behavioral to physiological.
We did not make formal observations of behavior nor correlate behavior with
body temperature. However it was obvious that pronghorn used the landscape,
for example, to avoid excess solar radiation (midday) and exposed themselves
to solar radiation in the mornings and evenings. It can also be inferred that
they used typical thermoregulatory mechanisms associated with homeothermy,
such as peripheral vasoactivity (Fig.
3) and REHL (Fig.
5). The mechanisms underlying REHL depend on an adequate surface
area for heat loss. We analyzed the anatomy of the pronghorn nasal cavity and
found that the turbinate bones are scrolled, the length of the nasal cavity is
short (approximately 20 cm in the four animals in this study) and the nasal
mucosa surface area was 14.4 cm2 for each cm of length. Total
surface area was 280 cm2, and this surface area is similar to that
in similar sized antelope (Kamau,
1992
). During REHL cardiac output is redistributed to the head,
anastomotic channels are opened between nasal mucosal arteries and veins to
enlarge the surface area for cooling, respiratory rate increases, and finally,
but not necessarily, there is panting
(Maloney and Mitchell, 1997
).
Our data provide some evidence that the same mechanisms function in
pronghorn.
Our data also reveal, however, that individual pronghorn show a much
greater variation in body temperatures than has been found in southern
hemisphere artiodactyls. Mean Tabdominal was almost
1°C lower than it is in springbok and the difference between maximum and
minimum Tabdominal of 5.4°C was fivefold greater than
that reported in springbok (Fuller et al.,
2005
). There was a degree of heterothermy of more than 2.0°C
in a day in one animal and it seems that the females in the group varied more
than the male, although as there was only a single male this latter conclusion
is speculative. The females had an average daily variation in
Tabdominal of 1.8°C, which also is higher than we have
found in southern hemisphere artiodactyls. We have previously attributed
variation in body temperatures to episodes of exercise or fever and a
nycthemeral rhythm. Our animals in this study were not subjected to exercise
and data that could be attributed to fever were excluded. They did show a
well-developed circadian rhythm linked to sunrise as it is in southern
hemisphere animals (Fuller et al.,
2005
) but its amplitude was about 1°C, and can explain neither
the wider daily variation nor the much larger range of temperatures
(4.5°C) found over the study period.
A variation in mean body temperature that correlates with variations in
mean and range of Tglobe over the course of the summer are
suggestive of a longer term heterothermy that could account for another
0.25°C of the variation over the study period. The amplitude of this
variation is larger than that found in springbok
(Fuller et al., 2005
).
Tcarotid does not appear to be affected by changes in day
length as in southern hemisphere animals
(Fuller et al., 2005
), and
Tglobe was not significantly correlated with day length
(r=0.14). The dissociation between Tglobe and
Tcarotid in pronghorn as revealed by this analysis
confirms the presence of a circadian rhythm, and suggests that pronghorn, even
if they allow their body temperature to fluctuate over a summer, do not have a
daily adaptive heterothermic response to environmental heat load.
To account for the remaining variation and the much wider range of
temperatures found than we have reported for springbok, we think that another
possible contributor is a lower variation in Tbrain than
in Tcarotid. The maximal thermoregulatory responses to
body temperature changes and, therefore, the smallest variation in body
temperature occur when both Tbrain and
Tcore were changed in the same direction
(Jessen and Feistkorn, 1984
).
In our study this association is shown by the very high proportion of core
body (carotid) temperatures that were recorded within the temperature range of
38.139.0°C (Fig. 1).
Within this range changes in Tcarotid and
Tbrain are correlated significantly
(Fig. 6; r=0.979),
resulting in maximal thermoregulatory responses to temperature challenges, and
defence of body temperature.
Outside of this `set point' range Tbrain was
dissociated from Tcarotid and as a result thermoregulatory
responses should be blunted. The dissociation is achieved by what appears to
be a unique combination of mechanisms that combine to regulate
Tbrain rather than Tbody. Three
factors influence Tbrain: its metabolism, the rate of
blood flow through it, and the temperature of the blood perfusing it. Of these
only the latter two can be controlled. Brain metabolic rate is related to its
temperature. CBF is controlled to some extent by nerves but mostly by
metabolic rate and the demands for glucose and oxygen and, we think, for heat
removal. The temperature of cerebral blood can be altered by the carotid
rete-cavernous sinus system which exists in all artiodactyls including
pronghorns (Carlton and McKean,
1977
).
We calculate that changes in CBF can account for the heat removed from the
brain and the gradient between Tbrain and
Tcarotid in the range of 0.21.0°C, i.e. those
which exist at preferred Tcarotid. This conclusion is
conservative. Our estimates are based on the assumption that
Tcarotid is the temperature of blood entering the brain.
In fact internal carotid artery (post-rete) blood is cooler than
Tcarotid when SBC is occurring
(Maloney et al., 2007
) so the
curve shown in Fig. 7 is likely
to be left shifted, SBC will account for a larger proportion of the gradients
below 0.8°C, and changes in CBF for a smaller proportion. Nevertheless
gradients smaller than 0.2°C and indeed negative gradients
(Tcarotid>Tbrain), which occur at
Tcarotid>39.5°C, cannot be explained by changes in
CBF and must depend on the onset of SBC. Gradients above 1°C (and some as
high as 3°C), which occur at Tcarotid less than
38°C, similarly cannot be explained by a reduction in CBF. They are
not conspicuous in the southern hemisphere artiodactyls we have studied and
therefore are so far unique to pronghorn. The only way they can be achieved is
by a brain warming mechanism. As Tjugular is greater than
Tcarotid at these Tcarotid, it follows
that REHL is reduced during this phase of brain temperature regulation, but in
addition there is the possibility that warm blood leaving the brain is being
re-circulated past the cavernous sinus before entering the jugular vein.
Warming of blood entering the brain, rather than cooling it as is the more
usual function of the carotid sinuscavernous sinus system, will result.
However no anatomical basis for this sort of re-circulation has been described
in any animal. A second possibility is that glial cell metabolism is activated
at low Tcarotid as it is in dolphins
(Manger, 2006
). Again,
however, no anatomical basis for this possibility has been described in any
artiodactyl.
Whatever the mechanism of brain warming, it, and SBC at high
Tcarotid, produces a relatively constant
Tbrain over the whole range of
Tcarotid temperatures we recorded during this study
(Fig. 5). If
Tbrain is kept constant then a consequence should be
blunted thermoregulatory responses. The result will be an increase in
variation in Tcarotid, until Tcarotid
and/or Tabdominal are themselves sufficiently low or high
to activate thermoregulatory responses
(Jessen and Feistkorn, 1984
).
This effect could be the origin of the significantly lower minimum
Tcarotid and Tabdominal than
Tbrain, and the long tail of Tcarotid
shown in Fig. 1.
These data show that pronghorns are homeotherms that have some typical thermoregulatory mechanisms found in southern hemisphere artiodactyls. They also, and specifically females, seem to have evolved some heterothermic characteristics that have made them well adapted to an arid environment in which ambient temperature can vary by over 50°C during the course of a typical summer day. While some of the temperature variations can be attributed to a well-developed circadian/nycthemeral rhythm, and to a longer term, direct effect of changes in Tglobe, our data also strongly suggest that there may also be a contribution arising from divergence between Tbrain and Tcarotid. Our data show that at low body temperatures Tbrain is maintained by a warming mechanism. At high body temperatures Tbrain is cooled by SBC as in southern hemisphere artiodactyls. The relatively constant brain temperature that results is likely to result in the conservation of water and energy needed by pronghorn to survive in their typical habitat in the summer, when daily temperature fluctuations are high and the availability of water is low.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Barrett, M. W. and Chalmers, G. A. (1977). Clinicochemical values for adult free-ranging pronghorn. Can. J. Zool. 55,1252 -1260.[Medline]
Carlton, C. and McKean, T. (1977). The carotid and orbital retia of the pronghorn, deer, and elk. Anat. Rec. 189,91 -108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dhindsa, D. S., Metcalfe, J., McKean, T. and Thorne, T. (1974). Comparative studies of the respiratory functions of mammalian blood. XI. Pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana). Respir. Physiol. 21,297 -306.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fuller, A., Kamerman, P. R., Maloney, S. K., Matthee, A.,
Mitchell, G. and Mitchell, D. (2005). A year in the life of a
free-ranging herd of springbok Antidorcas marsupialis. J. Exp.
Biol. 208,2855
-2864.
Hassanin, A. and Douzery, E. J. P. (2003).
Molecular and morphological phylogenies of Ruminantia and the alternative
position of the Moschidae. Syst. Biol.
52,206
-228.
Heckman, J. G., Erbguth, F. J., Hilz, M. J., Lang, C. J. and Neundorfer, B. (2001). Cerebrovascular circulation from a clinical view. Historical review, physiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Med. Klin. 96,583 -592.
IUPS Thermal Commission (1987). Glossary of terms for thermal physiology. Pflugers Arch. 410,567 -587.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jessen, C. (2001). Temperature Regulation in Humans and Other Mammals. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Jessen, C. and Feistkorn, G. (1984). Some characteristics of core temperature signals in the conscious goat. Am. J. Physiol. 247,R456 -R464.[Medline]
Kamau, J. M. Z. (1992). Morphogenetic analysis of nasal passages in ungulates. Ongulès/Ungulates 91, 91-94.
Lewis, M. and Clark, W. (1904). Original Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, 1804-1806; Printed from the Original Manuscripts in the Library of the American Philosophical Society (ed. R. Gold Thwaites). New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.
Lindstedt, S. L., Hokansen, J. F., Wells, D. J., Swain, S. D., Hoppeler, H. and Navarro, V. (1991). Running energetics in the pronghorn antelope. Nature 353,748 -750.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maloney, S. K. and Mitchell, G. (1997). Selective brain cooling: the role of angularis oculi and nasal thermoreception. Am. J. Physiol. 273,R1108 -R1116.[Medline]
Maloney, S. K., Mitchell, D. and Blache, D. (2007). The contribution of carotid rete variability to brain temperature variability in sheep in a thermoneutral environment. Am. J. Physiol. 292,R1298 -R1305.[CrossRef]
Manger, P. R. (2006). An examination of cetacean brain structure with a novel hypothesis correlating thermogenesis to the evolution of a big brain. Biol. Rev. 81,293 -338.[Medline]
McCabe, R. E., O'Gara, B. W. and Reeves, H. M. (2004). Prairie Ghost: Pronghorn and Human Interaction in Early America Colorado: University of Colorado Press.
McKean, T. and Walker, B. (1974). Comparison of selected cardiopulmonary parameters between the pronghorn and the goat. Respir. Physiol. 21,365 -370.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mitchell, G. and Skinner, J. D. (2003). On the origin, evolution and phylogeny of giraffes Giraffa camelopardalis.Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 58,51 -73.
Nelson, W., Tong, Y. L., Lee, J.-K. and Halberg, F. (1979). Methods for cosinor-rhythmometry. Chronobiologica 6,305 -323.[Medline]
Purves, M. J. (1972). The Physiology of the Cerebral Circulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, J. (1975). Biochemical profiles in exotic captive animals. Proc. Am. Assoc. Zoo Vet. 1975,81 -111.
Suarez, R. K., Lighton, J. R. B., Brown, G. S. and
Mathieu-Costello, O. (1991). Mitochondrial respiration in
hummingbird flight muscles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88,4870
-4873.
Thorne, E. T. (1975). Normal body temperature of pronghorn antelope and mule deer. J. Mammal. 56,697 -698.[CrossRef]
Yablonskiy, D. A., Ackerman, J. J. H. and Raich, M. E.
(2000). Coupling between changes in human brain temperature and
oxidative metabolism during prolonged visual stimulation. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,7603
-7608.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G Mitchell and A Lust The carotid rete and artiodactyl success Biol Lett, August 23, 2008; 4(4): 415 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hebert, A. Lust, A. Fuller, S. K. Maloney, D. Mitchell, and G. Mitchell Thermoregulation in pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana, Ord) in winter J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 749 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Blackburn WARM BRAIN, COLD BODY J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2007; 210(14): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||