|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online June 11, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2154-2162 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.005363
Oxidation rate and turnover of ingested sugar in hovering Anna's (Calypte anna) and rufous (Selasphorus rufus) hummingbirds
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9610, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: k_welch{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu)
Accepted 2 May 2007
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: energetics, hummingbird, stable isotope, turnover
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent work with broad-tailed hummingbirds S. platycercus
(Welch et al., 2006
) has shown
the feasibility of determining the contribution of ingested fuel to the
fueling of oxidative metabolism during hovering flight. The methodology
employed in this and previous studies
(Carleton et al., 2006
;
Carleton et al., 2004
;
Welch et al., 2006
) takes
advantage of the difference in stable isotopic signature of carbon in sugar
derived from two distinct plant sources. Sugar from sugar beets displays a
carbon stable isotope ratio particular to plants with a C3 photosynthetic
pathway, while sugar from sugar cane displays a distinct carbon stable isotope
ratio particular to plants with a C4 photosynthetic pathway. By varying the
availability of sugar from each source and then tracking the isotopic
composition of the CO2 expired by the birds, it is possible to
determine the contribution of dietary sugar to oxidative metabolism. These
studies benefit from the ability to conduct repeated measurements over time,
and may be conducted under natural field conditions. Because hummingbirds
absorb nearly all of the sugar they ingest
(Karasov et al., 1986
;
McWhorter et al., 2006
), sugar
not oxidized is reserved for energy storage by conversion to glycogen or fat.
Thus, by monitoring sugar intake, and by tracking the use of ingested sugar
via stable isotope analysis of expired CO2, it is possible
to estimate rates of net energy storage non-invasively using the same
individual.
Thus, our goals in the studies reported here were: first, to determine the
timing and extent to which Anna's and rufous hummingbirds support hovering
flight with newly ingested sugars. We hypothesize that the ability to rely
primarily on recently ingested sugar to fuel oxidative metabolism during
flight is a trait common to hummingbirds. If so, then Anna's and rufous
hummingbirds should oxidize recently ingested sugars as quickly and
extensively as broad-tailed hummingbirds
(Welch et al., 2006
). Second,
we wished to determine the rate of turnover of newly ingested sugar within the
pool of actively metabolized substrates, while mimicking conditions
experienced by foraging wild hummingbirds. We hypothesize that recently
ingested sugars are removed from the pool of actively metabolized substrates
approximately as quickly as they are incorporated. Third, we wished to
evaluate the rate of net energy gain by Anna's and rufous hummingbirds by
combining stable isotope tracking of carbon in expired CO2 with
monitoring of nectar intake and energy expenditure.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
13C on a per mil (
) basis relative to
the international carbon standard, Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB), where:
![]() | (1) |
This facility utilizes a Roboprep-CN stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Europa Scientific, Crew, UK) equipped with an autosampler for introduction of gas samples into the continuous flow combustion chamber.
Animal care and experimental design
All hummingbirds were captured with a modified Hall trap
(Russell and Russell, 2001
).
Individual Selasphorus rufus Gmelin 1788 (body mass at start of
experiment=3.4±0.2 g; N=4, 2 male/2 female) were captured in
Inyo, Mono and Santa Barbara Counties in California, USA. Individual
Calypte anna Lesson 1829 (body mass at start of
experiment=4.8±0.8 g; N=3, 2 male/1 female) were captured in
Santa Barbara County, California, USA. Captive hummingbirds were housed at the
UCSB Aviary in individual outdoor, wire-mesh enclosures measuring 1.8 m tall
by 0.6 m wide by 2.4 m long. Birds were fed ad libitum on a 13% (w/v)
solution of Nektar-Plus (Guenter Enderle, Tarpon Springs, FL, USA)
supplemented with beet sugar (5% w/v). The
13C value of the
maintenance diet was 25.84±0.11
(N=10;
Table 1). Birds were subjected
to natural photophase and ambient weather conditions. Capture, housing and
experimental protocols were approved by the University of California, Santa
Barbara Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol 672).
|
Data collection was conducted in an enclosure measuring 0.92 m wide
x0.54 m high x0.51 m deep, in the laboratory at an average
temperature of 24.0±0.3°C. The only perch available to the
hummingbird within the cage was placed on top of a balance, which was
monitored in order to determine bird mass. Data collection took place between
August and October of 2006 between 06:00 h and 11:00 h. Prior to each
experiment, the selected hummingbird was fasted overnight to ensure that it
would be oxidizing primarily fat at the beginning of the period of data
collection (Suarez et al.,
1990
; Welch et al.,
2006
).
Experimental design and data collection were based largely on those
reported in Welch et al. (Welch et al.,
2006
). Following the overnight fast of approximately 810 h,
hummingbirds were provided with a disposable 20 ml syringe containing a
solution of cane (C4 photosynthetic pathway) sugar (20% w/v). The
13C value of this solution was
11.63±0.11
(N=10;
Table 1) and it was available
to the bird for approximately 1 h. The syringe containing the cane sugar
solution was weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g immediately prior to and
following the period that it was available to the bird. The difference in mass
before and after the period it was available to the bird was taken as the mass
of the solution ingested. As the density of solid sucrose is 1.587 g
cm3, a 20% w/v sucrose solution is equal to an 18.6% w/w
solution. Given that the specific density of an 18.6% w/w sucrose solution is
1.07677 (Horwitz, 1975
), this
means that the mass of sucrose ingested (Sucingest; in g) may be
determined by the following equation:
![]() | (2) |
sol is the specific gravity of an 18.6% w/w
sucrose solution and 0.186 is the proportion (w/w) of the solution that is
sucrose.
Immediately after removing and weighing the cane sugar solution, the
hummingbird was provided with a 20% w/v beet sucrose solution. The
13C value of the beet sucrose solution was
24.02±0.11
(N=10;
Table 1). This solution was
available to the hummingbird for approximately one additional hour, such that
the total time allotted to this experiment for each individual was 2 h.
Respirometry
Hummingbirds had to hover to feed, inserting their head into a plastic tube
extending from the front of the feeder. This tube was derived from a
disposable 30 ml syringe and, except for the front opening, was airtight.
Halfway along its length, plastic tubing was attached to the mask, allowing
incurrent air to be drawn through the mask and delivered to respirometry
equipment. Air first passed through a column of DrieriteTM (W. A. Hammond
Drierite, Xenia, OH, USA) to scrub water vapor before entering the carbon
dioxide analyzer (CA-2A, Sable Systems International, Las Vegas, NV, USA).
After leaving the carbon dioxide analyzer, air passed through a
DrieriteTMAscariteTMDrieriteTM column (Ascarite
II, Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA, USA), to scrub any carbon dioxide and
additional water from the line, and then into the oxygen analyzer (FOXBOX,
Sable Systems International). Air flow was maintained by a mechanism internal
to the FOXBOX (thus, after the removal of water vapor) at a rate of 500 ml
min1. An infrared emitter and receiver were placed on either
side of the front edge of the mask such that the infrared beam was disrupted
by the presence of the hummingbird's head in the mask. By determining the
length of time the infrared emitter was occluded, we were able to resolve the
duration of any feeding event (and subsequent gas analysis event). The signal
from the infrared receiver, along with data from the carbon dioxide analyzer,
oxygen analyzer and balance, was reported to a notebook computer for recording
via connection to a Universal Interface II (Sable Systems
International). Data were recorded at 0.05 s intervals for 2 h using Expedata
software (v. 1.0.17, Sable Systems International).
Immediately before data collection, the oxygen analyzer was calibrated with well-mixed ambient air drawn through the mask in the absence of a hummingbird. The carbon dioxide analyzer was calibrated with CO2-free nitrogen gas (zero gas) and 0.5% CO2 in nitrogen gas (Praxair, Danbury, CT, USA). In each case, tubing was removed directly downstream of the mask and held inside a small reservoir into which flowed the calibration gas at a rate in excess of the flow rate of air pulled through the respirometry system.
STP-corrected oxygen depletion and carbon dioxide enrichment associated
with each feeding event were determined after first correcting by subtracting
baseline values (determined as the linear extrapolation of points directly
before and after the feeding event in question). These baseline-corrected data
were then converted to ml of gas by application of standard equations
(Withers, 1977
). Determination
of absolute rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production was not
possible during this experiment because subsampling of incurrent air was
attempted in each case (see below). However, as subsampling did not
discriminate between oxygen and carbon dioxide, relative volumes (ml) of
oxygen and carbon dioxide respired by the bird were determined. These were
obtained by integrating the gas depletion or enrichment peak over time (min)
and used to calculate respiratory quotient (RQ).
For the purpose of estimating metabolic rate of hovering hummingbirds
during this experiment, complementary measurements of
O2 and
CO2 during
hover-feeding were obtained for all individuals. These measurements were taken
on the same day approximately 2 h after the experiment described above. Flow
rate was held at 1200 ml min1 and no expired breath
subsamples were taken (see below). Otherwise, the methodology adopted during
this complementary data collection period was identical to that described
above.
Collection and analysis of expired CO2
Expired CO2 was collected while hummingbirds were hover-feeding
at the respirometry mask by drawing air from the incurrent airline
approximately halfway between the mask and the carbon dioxide analyzer
via a 60 ml syringe (Welch et
al., 2006
). These samples contained both ambient CO2 as
well as CO2 expired by the hummingbird. Thus, in order to estimate
13C of respired breath
(
13Cbreath) we used a two-part
concentration-dependent mixing model adapted from Phillips and Koch
(Phillips and Koch, 2002
),
such that:
![]() | (3) |
13Csample is
13C of air
collected in the syringe.
13Cambient is average
13C of air collected at three points during the 2-h
experimental period (one within the first 15 min, one near the halfway point,
and one within 20 min of the end of the 2 h period) in the same manner as
above when a hummingbird was not present at the mask. fa
is the fraction of CO2 in the gas sample from ambient air. Ambient
[CO2] (p.p.m.) was determined using the carbon dioxide analyzer
immediately before a feeding bout. [CO2] (p.p.m.) of the air sample
was determined during stable isotope analysis by the University of California,
Santa Barbara Marine Science Analytical Lab. Immediately following collection,
contents of the 60 ml syringe were injected into pre-evacuated 12 ml Exetainer
vials (Labco Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) until a positive pressure was
achieved. Samples were stored at room temperature for as long as 5 days before
submission for analysis. All data associated with individual feeding events
having
13Cbreath values for which the
CO2 concentration of the sample was not at least twice the
CO2 concentration of the ambient air were excluded from further
analysis.
Time and energy budgets
The activity of hummingbirds was recorded on videotape during the entirety
of the 2-h experimental period. The recording period was divided into 2 min
blocks for further analysis, with the first block beginning when the
hummingbird first fed from the suspended feeder. Hummingbird activity was
classified as either hovering/flying or perching. The proportion of each 2 min
block devoted to either activity was quantified.
Energy expenditure (in ml O2) during each 2 min block was
determined by multiplying the amount of time spent either hovering/flying or
perching by metabolic rates associated with each activity. As described above,
hovering metabolic rate (in ml O2 g1
h1) was estimated via measurement of mass-specific
oxygen consumption rate for each hummingbird during complimentary experiments.
The relatively small size of the experimental enclosure greatly constrained
the forward flight speed of the hummingbirds. Estimates of the oxygen
consumption rate in small hummingbirds as a function of flight speed indicate
a relatively flat relationship at low flight speeds, suggesting metabolic rate
during hovering is equal to metabolic rate during forward flight in this range
(Berger and Hart, 1972
). As a
result, we assume the metabolic cost of low-speed forward flight within the
enclosure to be equal to the cost of hovering. We ignore the energetic costs
of acceleration and deceleration, as good estimates of these do not exist.
Estimates of mass-specific oxygen consumption rate (in ml O2
g1 h1) during perching for both C.
anna and S. rufus were taken from Lasiewski's seminal work
(Lasiewski, 1963
). These
mass-specific oxygen consumption rates were multiplied by an estimate of the
hummingbirds mass (as described above) during the feeding event closest in
time to each 2 min period to obtain total metabolic rates (MRblock;
in ml O2 h1) for each activity for that
period.
As described above, estimates of the respiratory quotient were obtained for
each feeding event. Assuming hummingbirds oxidize primarily fat and/or
carbohydrate (Suarez et al.,
1990
; Welch et al.,
2006
), total energy expenditure during each 2 min period
(Eblock; in J) can be estimated as:
![]() | (4) |
Determination of cane sugar oxidation rate
A non-linear function was fitted to
13Cbreath
values during the first hour (feeding events for which cane sugar solution was
available) and separately to
13Cbreath values
during the second hour (feeding events for which beet sugar solution was
available). Thus, instantaneous estimates of
13Cbreath values were possible. We assume that
the incorporation of carbon into expired CO2 can be approximated by
single-compartment, first-order kinetics
(Carleton et al., 2006
). The
non-linear fitting formula is:
![]() | (5) |
13C(t) is the isotope composition of the
carbon in expired CO2 at time t,
13Cbreath(0) is the estimated initial isotope
composition of the carbon in expired CO2,
13Cbreath(
) is the asymptotic equilibrium
isotope composition of the carbon in expired CO2 and k is
the fractional rate of isotope incorporation into the pool of expired
CO2 (Carleton et al.,
2006
13Cbreath value was estimated by solving Eqn 5
with time (t) equal to the median value for that 2 min block (in
min).
This
13Cbreath value provides a means of
estimating the proportion of expired CO2 derived from oxidation of
exogenous carbohydrate (Carleton et al.,
2006
; Welch et al.,
2006
). Specifically, the fraction of expired CO2
derived from oxidation of cane sugar (fexo) during any 2
min block was estimated as:
![]() | (6) |
13CC4 is the
13C value of
the cane sugar solution and
13CC3 is the
13C value of endogenous fuels [estimated as
13Cbreath(0) from Eqn 6], during the first hour
of the experiment, and
13CC3 is the
13C value of the beet sugar solution during the second hour
of the experiment.
For each mol sucrose oxidized, 12 mol O2 are consumed (2x6
mol O2 per unit hexose). Thus, the amount of cane sugar oxidised
(Mcane; in µmol) during each 2 min period may be
estimated as:
![]() | (7) |
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the first feeding bout following the fast,
13Cbreath values were near the
13C value of the maintenance diet containing beet sugar and
increased over the first hour towards the
13C value of cane
sugar in the experimental diet (Fig.
1A, Table 2).
13Cbreath averaged
27.02±1.36
(N=2) in S. rufus, and
27.36±1.15
(N=3) in C. anna during the
first feeding event. For both species, this value was more negative than, but
not significantly different from, the
13C value of the
maintenance diet (S. rufus: t1=1.2299,
P=0.4346; C. anna: t2=2.2889,
P=0.1493). The fractional rate of isotopic incorporation into the
pool of expired CO2 (ki) varied extensively
between individuals. ki averaged 7.1±7.6%
(min1; range 0.716.2%; N=4) in S. rufus.
ki averaged 4.5±3.7% (min1; range
0.27.1%; N=3) in C. anna. During a period of
availability of cane sugar solution, when
13Cbreath values had reached a plateau (the
period beginning 40 min after the first feeding on cane sucrose), the
proportion of metabolism (i.e.
CO2) fuelled by
dietary cane sugar (fexo) approached 100%, similar to
results shown previously in S. platycercus
(Welch et al., 2006
).
fexo averaged 0.83±0.18 (range 0.611.01;
N=4) for S. rufus during this steady state period of feeding
on cane sugar (Fig. 1A,
Table 2).
fexo averaged 0.81±0.31 (range 0.461.03;
N=3) for C. anna during this steady state period of feeding
on cane sucrose (Fig. 1A,
Table 2).
|
When the diet was switched from cane sugar back to beet sugar (the second
hour of the experiment), the decrease in
13Cbreath over time mirrored the increase in
13Cbreath seen during the previous period of cane
sugar feeding. There was less variability between individuals in the
fractional rate of disappearance of labelled carbon in expired CO2
compared to 13C enrichment curves observed during the previous hour
(Fig. 1B). The fractional rate
of isotopic disappearance from the pool of expired CO2
(kd) averaged 10.9±2.9% (min1;
range 9.213.5; N=4) in S. rufus. kd
averaged 5.7±0.4% (min1; range 5.35.9;
N=3) in C. anna. During the period of beet sucrose
availability when
13Cbreath values had reached a
plateau (the period beginning at least 40 min after the first feeding on beet
sucrose)
13Cbreath values neared the
13C signature of the beet sucrose solution.
13Cbreath averaged
23.97±0.54
(N=4) for S. rufus and
23.08±0.59
(N=3) for C. anna. These
values are not significantly different from the
13C
signature of the beet sucrose solution (S. rufus:
t3=0.1955, P=0.8575; C. anna:
t2=2.7620, P=0.1099).
RQ and
13Cbreath values were highly
significantly correlated during the period of cane sugar availability in both
rufous and Anna's hummingbirds (data pooled by species;
Fig. 2; S. rufus:
r20=0.9494, P<0.0001; C. anna:
r17=0.9065; P<0.0001), suggesting that newly
ingested sugars were fuelling metabolism during this period. By contrast,
there was no significant correlation between RQ and
13Cbreath values for either species during the
period of beet sugar availability (data pooled by species; S. rufus:
r36=0.1880, P=0.2722; C. anna:
r29=0.3294, P=0.0810). As RQ remained near 1.0
during the entire period of beet sugar availability, no correlation would be
expected.
|
|
|
Hummingbirds also ingested variable total amounts of cane sugar solution (Table 3). S. rufus ingested an average of 0.601±0.224 ml (N=4) of cane sugar solution, equivalent to 350.9±131.0 µmol (N=4) of sucrose. C. anna ingested an average of 0.347±0.278 ml (N=3) of cane sugar solution, equal to 352.2±142.6 µmol (N=3) of sucrose.
The amount of ingested cane sugar oxidized by individual hummingbirds over the 2-h experimental period varied widely (Table 3). S. rufus oxidized an average of 109.5±34.3 µmol (N=4) while C. anna oxidized an average of 160.5±73.4 µmol (N=3) of the sucrose they ingested. Interestingly, there seemed to be correspondence between the amount of cane sugar each hummingbird ingested and the amount of sucrose oxidized from these meals during the 2-h experimental period (Fig. 3, Table 3). S. rufus oxidized an average 31.7±2.7% while C. anna oxidized an average of 45.5±5.9% of the sucrose they ingested in the form of cane sugar. These average values were significantly different (F1,5=17.7556, P=0.0084).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initial
13Cbreath values indicate that
hummingbirds were oxidizing endogenous energy stores derived from the
maintenance diet. Respiratory quotients (RQ) associated with these initial
feeding events averaged 0.74±0.01 for S. rufus and
0.76±0.02 for C. anna, implicating fat as the primary
metabolic fuel. Average initial
13Cbreath values
were 1.18 and 1.52
lower than the
13C value of the
maintenance diet (S. rufus and C. anna, respectively). This
small discrepancy is based, in part, on the fractionation that occurs as
sugars are converted into stored fat, resulting in a relative depletion of
13C (DeNiro and Epstein,
1977
). The magnitude of difference between the initial
13Cbreath values and the
13C
value of the maintenance diet is likely to be less than the actual degree of
fractionation that occurs during fat synthesis from sugars as the initial RQ
values are slightly greater than 0.71, indicating some contribution of
carbohydrate (which would not be subject to the same fractionation) to the
fuelling of hovering metabolism.
As hummingbirds continued to feed on the cane sugar solution,
13C values rose towards the
13Cbreath value of the cane sugar solution and,
in several individuals, actually reached this value. The increase in hovering
RQ values during the period of cane sugar availability in parallel with the
rise in
13Cbreath values indicates that the
source of carbohydrates being oxidized was almost exclusively dietary. That
is, the rise in RQ was due almost entirely to the recruitment of newly
ingested sugars into the pool of actively metabolized substrates. RQ values
displayed during the subsequent period of beet sugar availability remained
near 1.0, indicating a continuing reliance upon carbohydrate oxidation,
despite the fact that
13Cbreath values declined
towards the
13C value of the beet sugar solution. As both
cane and beet sugars consist of sucrose molecules, indistinguishable except
via stable isotope analysis, no change in RQ would be expected as
hummingbirds transitioned from reliance on one dietary sugar to the other.
Thus, there was no expected significant correlation between RQ and
13Cbreath values during this period, and none was
observed.
These results indicate that rufous and Anna's hummingbirds possess a
capacity for the rapid and extensive use of recently ingested sugar in
fuelling ongoing metabolism, suggesting convergence of physiological traits
with other nectarivorous hovering animals such as bees and sphingid moths
(Blatt and Roces, 2001
;
O'Brien, 1999
;
Welch et al., 2006
). In
support of our initial hypothesis, these results are strikingly similar to
those described in broad-tailed hummingbirds
(Welch et al., 2006
),
indicating that such physiological capacities are likely widespread among
small hummingbirds.
The fact that
13Cbreath values quickly
declined and approached the
13C value of beet sugar once
hummingbirds were given access to this food source further supports our
hypothesis that these animals make use primarily of the most recently ingested
sugars when involved in steady-state foraging. As indicated by
13Cbreath values
(Fig. 1B), hummingbirds engaged
in steady state foraging were no longer relying upon oxidation of cane sugar
to support hovering metabolism after approximately 30 min of feeding on beet
sugar. By comparison, humans exercising at approximately 45% of their maximal
O2 were observed
to be still oxidizing glucose ingested more than 200 min earlier at a
significant rate (Krzentowski et al.,
1984
). When individuals ingested glucose, rested, and then
exercised at approximately 45% of their maximal
O2, the ingested
fuel remained available to the pool of actively metabolized substrates for an
even greater period of time (Jandrain et
al., 1984
). The more rapid turnover of ingested sugars in the pool
of actively metabolized substrates in hummingbirds is consistent with their
small size and high mass-specific metabolic rates
(Suarez, 1992
).
Studies revealing net energy gain or loss in hummingbirds have
traditionally relied on the monitoring of body mass over a period of several
hours to several weeks (e.g. Calder et al.,
1990
; Carpenter et al.,
1993
; Gass et al.,
1999
). However, studies over shorter time-scales face problems
associated with smaller mass changes due to fuel storage and utilization, as
well as variation in mass due to dietary water intake, and water loss. With
few exceptions (e.g. Gass et al.,
1999
), not much can be learned when mass change is near or equal
to zero.
Other methods for determining the fate of ingested carbon in birds are
available. Tissues can be sampled to characterize their carbon stable isotopic
signature in relation to the signature of the diet (e.g.
Hobson et al., 2005
;
O'Brien et al., 2000
;
Sydeman et al., 1997
;
Wolf and Martínez del Rio,
2000
). However, these techniques require invasive sampling that,
in the case of hummingbirds, would likely be fatal and non-repeatable. On the
other hand, biological 13C-NMR spectroscopy for monitoring of fuel
storage and metabolism requires that animals be restrained. As a result, the
techniques described here are uniquely suited to the study of energy turnover
in foraging hummingbirds.
Because recently ingested sugars appear and then disappear from the pool of
actively oxidized substrates (as indicated by the appearance/disappearance of
a characteristic
13C signature from expired CO2),
and because nearly all of ingested sugars are absorbed by the hummingbird
while little is lost in excreta (Karasov
et al., 1986
; McWhorter et
al., 2006
), it is likely that sugars not immediately oxidized to
support ongoing metabolic needs are stored. Although some carbohydrate is
stored in the form of glycogen, it is likely that most of the excess dietary
carbon is stored as fat (Carpenter et al.,
1993
; Odum et al.,
1961
; Suarez et al.,
1990
). By quantifying the amount of a given sugar (with a distinct
isotopic signature) ingested and monitoring its rate of utilization
via a combination of respirometry and stable isotope analysis, it is
possible to determine whether sugar molecules are oxidized or stored.
Despite widely varying rates of activity, energy expenditure and rates of
cane sucrose ingestion across individuals, the proportion of ingested cane
sugar that was oxidized remained relatively constant within each species
(Table 3). This means that
within species, each individual stored the same fraction of ingested sugar
despite variation in total intake. This intriguing result implies that, within
species, there is relatively precise matching between each individual's rate
of energy expenditure and its rate of energy intake and storage. This adds
further support for the suggestion that hummingbirds possess an accurate means
of matching energy intake rate to energy demand
(Gass et al., 1999
).
On average, Anna's hummingbirds oxidized a significantly greater proportion
of ingested cane sugar than rufous hummingbirds during the 2-h experimental
period (F1,5=17.7556, P=0.0084). One possible
explanation for the difference in the proportion of ingested energy that is
oxidized as opposed to reserved for energy storage between these species lies
in the differences in their life histories. The Anna's hummingbirds collected
for this study were taken from a resident population at the University of
California, Santa Barbara campus. Anna's hummingbirds, particularly those
inhabiting coastal areas of southern and central California, tend to stay in
place in August through October (Russell,
1996
) (K. Welch, personal observation), the period when our
experiments were conducted. Then, they disperse after breeding in late spring
and summer. On the other hand, rufous hummingbirds undergo one of the most
impressive annual migrations of any animal, with some individuals migrating
upwards of 6000 km from breeding grounds as far north as Alaska to wintering
grounds in central Mexico (Calder,
1987
; Phillips,
1975
). These flights are interrupted by refuelling stops to
replenish fat stores (Carpenter et al.,
1983
). Hiebert (Hiebert,
1993
) noted that captive rufous hummingbirds maintained a higher
average daily body mass during periods of the year corresponding to their
southward migration compared to non-migratory times. This period of elevated
body mass (mid-August through November) encompasses the period when our
experiments were conducted. In contrast, Calder et al.
(Calder et al., 1990
) noted
that resident territorial broad-tailed hummingbirds appeared to restrain food
intake so as to maintain a lower body mass, presumably facilitating aerial
agility. Anna's hummingbirds (adult males in particular) are territorially
aggressive and may derive similar benefits from restraining mass gain during
the majority of the foraging period. So, the possibility exists that rufous
hummingbirds oxidized, on average, a smaller percentage of the cane sugar they
ingested compared to Anna's hummingbirds, in part because of the seasonal
predisposition to fat deposition. A potential application of the techniques
described here is to test this hypothesis using a variety of hummingbird
species with disparate life history characteristics. In contrast with other
methods, the range of possibilities is considerably broadened given that the
procedures can be carried out in the field.
| List of abbreviations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2
CO2
O2/
CO2)
13C
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Berger, M. and Hart, J. S. (1972). Die Atmung beim Kolibri Amazilia fimbriata wahrend des Schwirrfluges bei verschiedenen Umgebungstemperaturen. J. Comp. Physiol. 81,363 -380.[CrossRef]
Blatt, J. and Roces, F. (2001). Haemolymph
sugar levels in foraging honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica):
dependence on metabolic rate and in vivo measurement of maximal rates
of trehalose synthesis. J. Exp. Biol.
204,2709
-2716.
Brouwer, E. (1957). On simple formulae for calculating the heat expenditure and the quantities of carbohydrate and fat oxidized in metabolism of men and animals, from gaseous exchange (oxygen intake and carbonic acid output) and Urine-N. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Neerl. 6,795 -802.[Medline]
Calder, W. A., III (1987). Southbound through Colorado: migration of rufous hummingbirds. Nat. Geogr. Res. 3,40 -51.
Calder, W. A., Calder, L. L. and Frazier, T. D. (1990). The hummingbird's restraint: a natural model for weight control. Experientia 46,999 -1002.[CrossRef]
Carleton, S. A. and Martínez del Rio, C. (2005). The effect of cold-induced increased metabolic rate on the rate of C-13 and N-15 incorporation in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Oecologia 144,226 -232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carleton, S. A., Wolf, B. O. and Martínez del Rio, C. (2004). Keeling plots for hummingbirds: a method to estimate carbon isotope ratios of respired CO2 in small vertebrates. Oecologia 141,1 -6.[Medline]
Carleton, S. A., Bakken, B. H. and Martínez del Rio,
C. (2006). Metabolic substrate use and the turnover of
endogenous energy reserves in broad-tailed hummingbirds (Selasphorus
platycercus). J. Exp. Biol.
209,2622
-2627.
Carpenter, F. L., Paton, D. C. and Hixon, M. A.
(1983). Weight gain and adjustment of feeding territory size in
migrant hummingbirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80,7259
-7263.
Carpenter, F. L., Hixon, M. A., Beuchat, C. A., Russell, R. W. and Paton, D. C. (1993). Biphasic mass gain in migrant hummingbirds: body composition changes, torpor, and ecological significance. Ecology 74,1173 -1182.[CrossRef]
DeNiro, M. J. and Epstein, S. (1977). Mechanism
of carbon isotope fractionation associated with lipid synthesis.
Science 197,261
-263.
Gass, C. L., Romich, M. T. and Suarez, R. K. (1999). Energetics of hummingbird foraging at low ambient temperature. Can. J. Zool. 77,314 -320.
Hiebert, S. M. (1993). Seasonal changes in body mass and use of torpor in a migratory hummingbird. Auk 110,787 -797.
Hobson, K. A., Thompson, J. E., Evans, M. R. and Boyd, S. (2005). Tracing nutrient allocation to reproduction in Barrow's Goldeneye. J. Wildl. Manage. 69,1221 -1228.[CrossRef]
Horwitz, W. (1975). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Washington, DC: The Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.
Jandrain, B., Krzentowski, G., Pirnay, F., Mosora, F., Lacroix,
M., Luyckx, A. and Lefebvre, P. (1984). Metabolic
availability of glucose ingested 3 h before prolonged exercise in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol. 56,1314
-1319.
Karasov, W. H., Phan, D., Diamond, J. M. and Carpenter, F. L. (1986). Food passage and intestinal nutrient absorption in hummingbirds. Auk 103,453 -464.
Krzentowski, G., Jandrain, B., Pirnay, F., Mosora, F., Lacroix,
M., Luyckx, A. S. and Lefebvre, P. J. (1984). Availability of
glucose given orally during exercise. J. Appl.
Physiol. 56,315
-320.
Lasiewski, R. C. (1963). Oxygen consumption of torpid, resting, active and flying hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 36,122 -140.
McWhorter, T. J., Bakken, B. H., Karasov, W. H. and Martínez del Rio, C. (2006). Hummingbirds rely on both paracellular and carrier-mediated intestinal glucose absorption to fuel high metabolism. Biol. Lett. 2, 131-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
O'Brien, D. M. (1999). Fuel use in flight and its dependence on nectar feeding in the hawkmoth Amphion floridensis.J. Exp. Biol. 202,441 -451.[Abstract]
O'Brien, D. M., Schrag, D. P. and Martínez del Rio, C. (2000). Allocation to reproduction in a hawkmoth: a quantitative analysis using stable carbon isotopes. Ecology 81,2822 -2831.[CrossRef]
Odum, E. P., Connell, C. E. and Stoddard, H. L. (1961). Flight energy and estimated flight range ranges of some migratory birds. Auk 78,515 -527.
Phillips, A. R. (1975). Migrations of Allens and other hummingbirds. Condor 77,196 -205.
Phillips, D. L. and Koch, P. L. (2002). Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models. Oecologia 130,114 -125.
Russell, S. M. (1996). Anna's Hummingbird. In The Birds of North America. Vol.226 (ed. F. Gill), pp. 1-23. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
Russell, S. M. and Russell, R. O. (2001). The North American Banders' Manual for Banding Hummingbirds. Point Reyes Station, CA: North American Banding Council.
Suarez, R. K. (1992). Ecological implications of metabolic biochemistry. Experientia 48,535 -536.[CrossRef][Medline]
Suarez, R. K., Lighton, J. R. B., Moyes, C. D., Brown, G. S.,
Gass, C. L. and Hockachka, P. W. (1990). Fuel selection in
rufous hummingbirds: ecological implications of metabolic biochemistry.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87,9207
-9210.
Sydeman, W. J., Hobson, K. A., Pyle, P. and McLaren, E. B. (1997). Trophic relationships among seabirds in central California: combined stable isotope and conventional dietary approach. Condor 99,327 -336.
Welch, K. C., Bakken, B. H., Martínez del Rio, C. and Suarez, R. K. (2006). Hummingbirds fuel hovering flight with newly ingested sugar. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 79,1082 -1087.[CrossRef][Medline]
Withers, P. C. (1977). Measurement of
VO2, VCO2, and evaporative
water loss with a flow-through mask. J. Appl. Physiol.
42,120
-123.
Wolf, B. O. and Martínez del Rio, C. (2000). Use of saguaro fruit by white-winged doves: isotopic evidence of a tight ecological association. Oecologia 124,536 -543.[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. C. Welch Jr, L. G. Herrera M., and R. K. Suarez Dietary sugar as a direct fuel for flight in the nectarivorous bat Glossophaga soricina J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||