(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 9. The summation of feature attractors. (A) Hypothetical attractor in which
retinal error is converted to a yaw force of the ant. (B) At three different
goal locations (F, Fnear and Ffar) the stored retinal
position of a local landmark, or, equivalently, equilibrium point of an
associated attractor, will vary. (C,D) Weighted averages of attractors. If two
attractors from snapshots taken close together (e.g. F and Fnear)
are averaged across retinal position (C) then the resulting combined attractor
has a single equilibrium point that moves as the relative weightings change
(solid circles). If the two attractors come from snapshots taken far apart (F
and Ffar) then the resulting combined attractor (D) has two stable
equilibrium points (at F and Ffar) that do not move as the
weighting is changed. The zero crossings between the two equilibrium points
(dashed portion of the attractor curve) are unstable as turns are away rather
than towards the zero point. (E,F) Simulated routes to two feeders using
spatially limited attractors of different weights. Further explanation is
given in the text.