|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1700-1714 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02716
Review Article |
Tribute to P. L. Lutz: putting life on `pause' molecular regulation of hypometabolism
Institute of Biochemistry, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kenneth_storey{at}carleton.ca)
Accepted 15 January 2007
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: metabolic rate depression, anoxia tolerance, hibernation, reversible protein phosphorylation, signal transduction, stress-induced gene expression, cell cycle arrest, antioxidant defense
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
"Turn off your mind, relax and float downstream, it is not dying, it is not dying" from `Tomorrow Never Knows' by Lennon and McCartney, 1966
Metabolic rate depression is a widespread survival strategy found across
all kingdoms of life. When challenged by environmental or physiological
constraints that make normal life impossible and challenge viability, many
organisms retreat into a hypometabolic, or even ametabolic, state. Sometimes
this involves a change to another life stage (e.g. production of seeds,
spores, eggs, cysts, etc.) that can `wait out' the stress, but often
multicellular organisms can make reversible excursions into hypometabolic
states that can last for days, months or sometimes years. In animals,
hypometabolic states are integral parts of phenomena including hibernation,
estivation, diapause and anaerobiosis, to name a few, and virtual ametabolic
states occur in anhydrobiosis and some forms of extreme cold tolerance (for
reviews, see Hochachka and Guppy,
1987
; Clegg, 2001
;
Denlinger, 2002
;
Storey, 2002
;
Storey and Storey, 1990
;
Storey and Storey, 2004
;
Hochachka and Lutz, 2001
;
Heldmaier et al., 2004
).
Hypometabolism can be a seasonal phenomenon (e.g. winter hibernation in small
mammals) or linked with a particular life stage (e.g. an obligate diapause at
one stage of insect development) so that circannual or developmental
considerations are often involved. In other cases, entry into a hypometabolic
state is opportunistic, occurring repeatedly over a lifetime whenever
environmental conditions are poor (e.g. estivation in response to water/food
deprivation; anaerobiosis in response to lack of oxygen). Furthermore, in some
systems, the production of dormant forms (e.g. eggs, embryos, spores, seeds)
that refrain from hatching despite developmental preparedness and favorable
environmental conditions may have a different purpose and provide
`bet-hedging' against future catastrophes by instituting variable emergence
timing (Evans and Dennehy,
2005
). All of these examples of hypometabolism have been well
studied as independent phenomena. However, it is now well recognized that they
share common biochemical mechanisms and my laboratory has been particularly
interested in the commonalities of metabolic regulation that underlie
transitions to/from hypometabolic states (for reviews, see
Storey and Storey, 1990
;
Storey and Storey, 2004
).
| Anoxia tolerance and the `terrrtle' model |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our laboratory has a long-standing interest in the biochemical mechanisms
of anoxia tolerance in mollusks, freshwater turtles, and several other models,
ranging from studies of intermediary metabolism and enzyme regulation, through
analysis of intracellular signal transduction mechanisms, evaluation of the
role of antioxidant defenses and, most recently, studies of anoxia-induced
gene expression (for reviews, see Storey,
1996
; Storey,
2004a
; Storey,
2007
; Brooks and Storey,
1997
; Hermes-Lima et al.,
2001
; Larade and Storey,
2002
). Our work with turtles has examined not only submergence
hypoxia/anoxia in adult freshwater turtles but also freeze tolerance and its
attendant anoxia/hypoxia stress in hatchling painted turtles (reviewed in
Storey, 1996
;
Storey, 2004a
;
Storey, 2006a
;
Storey, 2007
). Our interests
in the mechanisms of turtle anoxia tolerance led to frequent contact with the
laboratory of Dr Peter L. Lutz, and over the years, one of us (K.S.) traveled
several times to Florida (not surprisingly, during the Canadian winter) to
interact with Peter and his `terrrtles', as his Scottish brogue pronounced
them. Peter's interests in respiratory and neurophysiology of turtle anoxia
tolerance dovetailed with our lab's interests in metabolic biochemistry,
resulting in a 1997 joint review on the respiratory, neurological and
biochemical adaptations of animals to low oxygen
(Lutz and Storey, 1997
).
Research in both our labs led to realization of the central role that
metabolic rate depression plays in anoxia survival. Peter's work focused on
ion channel arrest and the role of adenosine as the neurotransmitter mediating
the suppression of neuronal activity in the anoxic brain (for reviews, see
Lutz and Nilsson, 1997
;
Lutz and Nilsson, 2004
),
whereas our lab studied the control of intermediary metabolism during anoxia,
particularly the role that reversible phosphorylation, catalyzed by protein
kinases and protein phosphatases, has in the suppression of enzyme/protein
function under anoxic conditions (for reviews, see
Storey, 1996
;
Storey, 2004a
;
Storey, 2004b
;
Storey and Storey, 1990
;
Storey and Storey, 2004
).
Most recently, both our labs began to explore the role of differential gene
expression in turtle anoxia survival (Cai
and Storey, 1996
; Willmore et
al., 2001a
; Prentice et al.,
2003
; Prentice et al.,
2004
; Milton et al.,
2006
; Storey,
2004a
; Storey,
2006b
). Recent review articles from our laboratory have elaborated
on the important contributions to understanding natural anoxia tolerance made
by Peter Lutz (Storey, 2007
)
and by another Peter the `godfather' of comparative biochemistry,
Peter W. Hochachka (Storey,
2004b
). Those and other recent articles
(Storey, 2004a
;
Storey and Storey, 2004
)
examined the development of ideas in the field and showed how an initial focus
on the regulation of anaerobic energy metabolism provided the framework that
has since allowed other labs to explore the regulation of many other areas of
metabolic function in anoxia.
| Principles of metabolic rate depression |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In general, we can identify several criteria as necessary for long-term survival in a hypometabolic state. These are: (1) global metabolic rate suppression, (2) fuels for long-term survival, including adequate and appropriate supplies, altered patterns of fuel use, and mechanisms to limit internal pollution by accumulated end products, (3) triggering and signal transduction mechanisms to deliver and coordinate metabolic responses by all cells and organs, (4) reorganization of metabolic priorities for ATP expenditure both within cells and between organs, including differential regulation of many ATP expensive processes such as ion pumping, transcription, translation, growth and development, (5) changes in gene expression, and (6) enhancement of defense mechanisms that stabilize macromolecules and promote long-term viability in the hypometabolic state. Each of these criteria is considered below. Some receive only brief attention because they have been well reviewed elsewhere. Others are discussed in greater detail, in particular to highlight new areas of interest and very recent advances.
| Global metabolic rate suppression |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Fuel supplies, energy metabolism and handling of end products |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50%
(Wang and Lee, 1996
Necessary controls are also implemented to direct the appropriate use of
fuels during dormancy. For example, mammalian hibernators upregulate a variety
of genes whose protein products support lipid catabolism during torpor (e.g.
fatty acid binding proteins, lipoprotein lipase, subunits of electron
transport chain complexes) (Carey et al.,
2003
; Storey and Storey,
2004
). Anoxia-tolerant marine invertebrates use reversible protein
phosphorylation controls on key enzymes of glycolysis to achieve both net
glycolytic suppression and a re-routing of carbohydrate flow into alternative
end products that are associated with enhanced ATP production
(Storey and Storey,
1990
).
Hypometabolic states also typically require novel solutions to minimize
internal `pollution' from the accumulation of metabolic end products over the
long term; this is most prominent in anoxic systems. Among the solutions used
are (a) a switch to the production of volatile or diffusible end products
(e.g. propionate, acetate, ethanol) that can be excreted, (b) high buffering
capacities to minimize metabolic acidosis resulting from the build-up of
anaerobic end products, (c) novel solutions for long-term storage of end
products (e.g. anoxic turtles store lactate in their shells), or (d) putting
end products to useful purposes (e.g. urea accumulation as a result of protein
catabolism aids desiccation resistance in estivation)
(Hochachka and Mommsen, 1983
;
Hochachka and Somero, 2002
;
Storey, 2002
;
Jackson, 2004
).
| Triggering and signal transduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Triggering and signal transduction in anoxia-tolerant systems has also
received considerable attention. Here we need to differentiate those signals
that are designed to improve/rescue oxygen-based metabolism under
oxygen-limited conditions from those signals that are designed to induce
metabolic arrest and protect tissues from injury over long-term anoxia. Much
recent work has focused on the former, and particularly on the role of the
hypoxia inducible transcription factor 1 (HIF-1) in mediating gene expression
responses in hypoxia. Under low oxygen conditions, the alpha subunit HIF-1 is
stabilized, allowing it to migrate to the nucleus, bind with the beta subunit,
and trigger the upregulation of genes containing a hypoxia response element
(Semenza, 2003
). Genes under
HIF-1 control typically produce proteins that serve one of two purposes: (a)
to enhance oxygen delivery to cells by stimulating capillary growth or
increasing numbers of red blood cells, or (b) to enhance the capacity for
glycolytic ATP production. HIF-1 activation also seems to occur in response to
anoxia exposure in some anoxia-tolerant species but the question is why.
Excellent facultative anaerobes (such as turtles) make transitions into anoxia
without showing `traditional' actions of HIF-1 such as upregulation of
glycolytic enzyme activities (Willmore et
al., 2001b
). Angiogenic and erythropoietic actions of HIF-1 are
also of no value if oxygen levels are zero. Hence, a question of current
interest to us is whether the multiple categories of HIF-1 effects are
differentially regulated to achieve altered goals in anoxia-induced
hypometabolism. For example, HIF-1 action in growth arrest may be a key action
needed in anoxic systems whereas angiogenic action may be inhibited. Some
emerging ideas about this are discussed in later sections.
Other signalling mechanisms involved in anoxia tolerance derive from
products of ATP degradation, providing a link between metabolic arrest and
energy restriction. Hypoxia or anoxia stress produces a characteristic fall in
cellular ATP levels (although typically just transient in hypoxia/anoxia
tolerant species) and leads to the production of ATP degradation products that
have metabolic effects. These include: (a) AMP that can activate catabolic and
inhibit anabolic pathways both by allosteric effects on enzymes and by
activating the AMP-dependent protein kinase
(Hardie and Sakamoto, 2006
),
(b) IMP + NH +4 that are produced by AMP deaminase in
tissues where stabilization of adenylate energy charge is key (e.g. working
muscle); both have allosteric effects on enzymes
(Mommsen and Hochachka,
1988
), and (c) adenosine and inosine that are produced from AMP
and IMP by specific 5' nucleotidases. Adenosine is well known to have a
key role as the neurotransmitter mediating the suppression of neuronal
activity in anoxia-tolerant species (Lutz
and Nilsson, 2004
) including ion channel arrest
(Buck, 2004
;
Buck and Pamenter, 2006
),
whereas new research suggests an equally critical action of inosine in
triggering antioxidant defense responses in response to hypoxia, hyperoxia or
H2O2 insult (Gelain
et al., 2004
; Buckley et al.,
2005
; Tomaselli et al.,
2005
). This latter is very exciting for two reasons: (a) the
enzyme that makes inosine, 5' nucleotidase cytosolic II isozyme (NT5C2),
is upregulated in brain of adult turtles Trachemys scripta elegans in
response to anoxia (Storey,
2007
), and (b) enhancement of antioxidant defenses is seen widely
in hypometabolic states, as discussed later in this article.
| Reorganization of metabolic priorities |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Reversible protein phosphorylation main mechanism for metabolic reorganization |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The earliest demonstration of the role of RPP in hypometabolism came from
studies of marine mollusks, where anoxia-induced phosphorylation-mediated
inactivation of pyruvate kinase (PK) was shown to regulate the fate of
glycolytic carbon between aerobic and anoxic routes of catabolism (reviewed by
Storey and Storey, 1990
).
Later, RPP was also found to coordinate phosphofructokinase and glycogen
phosphorylase in anoxia, developing the idea of overall glycolytic pathway
suppression by RPP. The link to the control of hypometabolism in general came
with the realization that the same mechanism also applied to glycolytic
suppression in situations of aerobic metabolic arrest including estivation and
hibernation and, furthermore, that in aerobic systems, RPP controls extended
to the suppression of enzymes in mitochondrial oxidative catabolism such as
pyruvate dehydrogenase (Storey,
1997b
; Brooks and Storey,
1997
; Storey and Storey,
1990
). Given these RPP controls on enzymes of ATP-producing
catabolic pathways in hypometabolic systems, the search was then extended to
show that RPP also coordinated the consumption of ATP by functional proteins
(e.g. transmembrane carriers, chaperones, etc.) and anabolic pathways (e.g.
lipid and protein biosynthesis) (Hochachka
and Lutz, 2001
; Bickler et
al., 2001
; Storey and Storey,
2004
). Below we discuss some recent studies that have further
extended the known metabolic functions that are regulated and coordinated by
RPP in hypometabolic states.
Membrane ion channels and ion motive ATPases
Maintenance of membrane potential difference is critical for cell
viability, and in multiple situations of hypometabolism it is clear that
transmembrane sodium and potassium gradients are maintained but at much
reduced rates of ATP turnover; studies with both anoxic turtles and estivating
frogs support this (Buck and Hochachka,
1993
; Flanigan et al.,
1993
). This is achieved via suppression of ion movements
across membranes in both directions, both facilitated flow through ion
channels and active, ATP-driven ion pumping. The need for this can be
appreciated when it is realized that the Na+,K+-ATPase
alone may utilize 540% of total ATP turnover in different cell types
(Clausen, 1986
). The concept
of `channel arrest' was put forward by Hochachka
(Hochachka, 1986
) and
considerable evidence for this mechanism has accumulated in studies with
turtle brain as well as for the concept of `spike arrest' (a strong decrease
in neuronal excitability under anoxia), much of it arising from research done
by Lutz and collaborators (Hylland et al.,
1997
; Perez-Pinzon et al.,
1992
; Bickler et al.,
2001
; Hochachka and Lutz,
2001
; Lutz and Nilsson,
2004
). Although other regulatory mechanisms are also involved, RPP
controls have been widely identified in the process, affecting voltage-gated
ion channels (Na+, Ca2+,K+) and membrane
receptors (e.g. N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate
receptor) in anoxia-tolerant turtles
(Hochachka and Lutz, 2001
;
Bickler et al., 2001
;
Bickler and Buck, 2007
).
Suppression of Na+K+-ATPase activity by RPP was
specifically demonstrated in hibernating mammals
(MacDonald and Storey, 1999
)
and multiple proteins of Ca2+ metabolism are also regulated during
hibernation (Malysheva et al.,
2001
). We recently showed that RPP also regulates
Na+,K+-ATPase during estivation in foot muscle and
hepatopancreas of the land snail Otala lactea
(Ramnanan and Storey, 2006a
),
which indicates a broad phylogenetic conservation of the mechanism. Snail
Na+,K+-ATPase showed distinctly different properties in
the estivating versus active state: maximal activity fell by about
one-third, affinity for Mg.ATP was reduced (Km was 40%
higher), and activation energy (derived from Arrhenius plots) was increased by
45%. Foot muscle Na+,K+-ATPase from estivated
snails also showed reduced affinity for Na+ substrate and
Mg2+ activator (Km Na+ rose by 80%
increase, Ka Mg2+ increased by 60%).
Immunoblotting revealed no change in total enzyme protein during estivation,
but in vitro incubations that manipulated the activities of
endogenous kinases and phosphatases found a major change in phosphorylation
state. Na+,K+-ATPase from estivating snails proved to be
a high-phosphate, low-activity form, whereas dephosphorylation returned the
enzyme to the high-activity state characteristic of active snails. Stimulation
with protein kinases A, C or G mimicked the changes in enzyme properties that
were seen during estivation, whereas treatments with protein phosphatase 1 or
2A had the opposite effect. Phosphorylation of the catalytic alpha-subunit of
Na+,K+-ATPase is well known in mammalian systems
(Ewart and Klip, 1995
;
Bertorello and Katz, 1995
), as
well as the action of PKA or PKC altering substrate affinity in response to
various signals (Bertorello et al.,
1991
; Beguin et al.,
1994
). Cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) has been
implicated in regulating enzymatic responses to anoxia in several marine
molluscs (Brooks and Storey,
1990
; Michaelidis and Storey,
1990
; Larade and Storey,
2002
) and was singled out as the kinase mediating
estivation-induced phosphorylation of PK in O. lactea
(Brooks and Storey, 1994
).
This strongly suggests that PKG may also be the physiological regulator of
Na+,K+-ATPase during snail estivation, indicating a
major physiological role for this kinase in hypometabolism across the Mollusca
and perhaps even in other phyla.
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and the pentose phosphate pathway
To date, studies of the regulation of enzymes during hypometabolism have
largely focused on central catabolic pathways, such as glycolysis and
lipolysis, but clearly other pathways must also be regulated. One candidate is
the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), also known as the hexose monophosphate
shunt. The PPP has multiple functions in cells. It is the primary source of
NADPH reducing power for most biosynthetic reactions (e.g. fatty acid
synthesis) and for the production of reduced forms of antioxidants (e.g.
glutathione, thioredoxin). Carbon shuffling within the PPP also produces the
ribose needed for DNA and RNA synthesis as well as 37 carbon sugars or
sugar phosphates for many uses. Carbon entry into the PPP is gated by
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), the first of two NADPH-generating
reactions in the pathway. G6PDH is often considered to be a `housekeeping'
enzyme but recent work has shown that modulation of G6PDH activities in
various tissues (particularly liver) has an important impact on cell growth,
nutrient processing, antioxidant defense and death
(Kletzien et al., 1994
;
Tian et al., 1998
). In a new
study of hepatopancreas G6PDH from the land snail, O. lactea, we
reported the first evidence of RPP-mediated changes in the properties of G6PDH
between active and hypometabolic (estivating) states
(Ramnanan and Storey, 2006b
).
During estivation G6PDH activity increased by 50%, substrate affinity improved
(Km G6P decreased by 50%), and sensitivity to citrate
activation increased (Ka magnesium citrate decreased by
35%). These changes were linked with a change in the abundance of low-
versus high-phosphate forms of the enzyme; the low-phosphate form of
G6PDH dominated in active snails (57% of total activity) whereas the
high-phosphate form dominated during estivation (71%). The high-phosphate form
also showed reduced sensitivity to urea inhibition and greater resistance to
thermolysin proteolysis, indicating greater structural stability of the enzyme
during dormancy. The interconversion of G6PDH between active and estivating
forms was linked to the actions of PKG and protein phosphatase 1 and, in
contrast with the effects of RPP on glycolytic enzymes in O. lactea
(Brooks and Storey, 1997
), the
phosphorylation-mediated changes in G6PDH argued for a more active and more
stable form of the enzyme during dormancy.
We proposed that the prominent function of G6PDH in antioxidant defense was
the reason for the estivation-responsive modification of the enzyme. As
discussed in a later section, improved antioxidant defenses are a common theme
across all forms of hypometabolism and since the backbone of antioxidant
defense is NADPH reducing power, the key role of G6PDH in gating the PPP can
be appreciated. Indeed, G6PDH activity is elevated in response to oxidative
stress in systems ranging from yeast to humans
(Ursini et al., 1997
),
whereas inhibited and/or reduced G6PDH activity has been correlated with
reduced antioxidant defense capacities, ROS-related cellular damage and
ROS-induced cell death (Tian et al.,
1999
).
| Hypometabolism and transcriptional suppression recent advances |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, 4E-BP1) or elongation (e.g. eEF2)
(Storey and Storey, 2004
A variety of mechanisms for transcriptional suppression and/or gene
silencing have been uncovered in recent years. Included are mechanisms that
focus at the level of gene transcription such as histone modifications or the
regulation of RNA polymerase II activity, as well as post-transcriptional gene
silencing mechanisms such as the inhibitory actions of short (micro) RNAs. The
latter are small non-coding RNA transcripts (1825 nucleotides in
length) that are known to regulate gene expression by binding to target mRNAs
to either inhibit their translation or direct them into degradation pathways
(Bartel, 2004
;
Farh et al., 2005
). Recent
studies, especially in plants, are showing that short RNAs play a role in
environmental adaptation (Dalmay,
2006
) and another study
(Dresios et al., 2005
) has
implicated microRNAs in the regulation of global protein synthesis under
normal (37°C) versus cold-stress (32°C) conditions in
cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells. Although this mouse study does not
approach the level of cold stress that many organisms must deal with, it does
provide the intriguing suggestion that microRNAs could have a role to play in
cellular responses to cold and/or other environmental stresses. It will be
exciting to see how this novel mechanism is applied in the regulation of
hypometabolism.
As an initial foray into the investigation of mechanisms of transcriptional suppression during hypometabolism, recent studies in our laboratory have evaluated selected mechanisms of global transcriptional control in hibernating mammals. Three mechanisms were examined (Table 1) and these and others deserve to be explored in multiple systems of hypometabolism in order to elucidate the pattern(s) of transcriptional suppression in dormant states.
|
Histone modification
Covalent modifications of histones are a crucial component of epigenetic
events that regulate chromatin structure and gene function
(Hassan and Zempleni, 2006
).
Multiple modifications of histones are known including phosphorylation,
acetylation, methylation, biotinylation, ubiquitylation, sumoylation and
ADP-ribosylation (Holbert and Marmorstein,
2005
; Hassan and Zempleni,
2006
). Histone acetylation makes chromatin more accessible to the
transcriptional machinery and is known to be a prominent mechanism of
transcriptional activation (Hebbes et al.,
1988
). Phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine residue 10 has also
been linked with transcriptional activation
(Cheung et al., 2000
). Using
western blotting we evaluated histone H3 responses during hibernation. Total
histone H3 content remained constant between euthermic and hibernating states
but the amounts of both phosphorylated histone H3 (Ser 10) and acetylated
histone H3 (Lys 23) were reduced by 3839% during hibernation in
skeletal muscle of 13-lined ground squirrels Spermophilus
tridecemlineatus, as compared with euthermia
(Morin and Storey, 2006
).
Both of these modifications of histone H3 are consistent with an overall
decrease in transcriptional activity during hibernation. Histones H2A/H2B and
H4 are also subject to acetylation that regulates their activity and these may
also be modified in a parallel way during hibernation. Interestingly, studies
of the response to anoxia by the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans,
produced the same result. Levels of the phosphorylated forms of
cell-cycle-regulated proteins were virtually undetectable in embryos exposed
to anoxia but reappeared during aerobic recovery
(Padilla et al., 2002
). These
included histone H3 as well as a variety of proteins that are prominently
phosphorylated during mitosis and recognized by the MPM-2 antibody. Hence,
phosphorylation regulation of histone H3 may prove to be a widely conserved
component of metabolic arrest across phylogeny (from nematodes to mammals)
operating in situations of both aerobic and anoxic hypometabolism.
Control of histone deacetylases
The acetylation state of histones is controlled by acetylase and
deacetylase enzymes and regulation of these is key to histone modification in
response to stimuli (Holbert and
Marmorstein, 2005
). Given the above results for histone H3 in
hibernators, we predicted that histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity or protein
content would be modified during hibernation to promote deacetylation. At
least 18 isoforms of HDAC are known in mammals, belonging to three different
classes (Lin et al., 2006
). We
measured both total HDAC activity and the relative protein levels of two
prominent HDACs, HDAC1 and HDAC4 belonging to class I and II, respectively, in
skeletal muscle of S. tridecemlineatus
(Morin and Storey, 2006
).
Total HDAC activity was 1.82-fold higher in muscle of hibernating squirrels,
compared with euthermic animals (Table
1). Furthermore, both HDAC1 and HDAC4 protein levels were elevated
in hibernation by 1.2- and 1.5-fold, respectively, suggesting that enhanced
synthesis of these enzymes is responsible, at least in part, for the overall
elevation of HDAC during torpor. Although other HDACs should also be examined,
both the increase in HDAC activity and in HDAC1 and HDAC4 protein content
point to a regulated reduction in transcriptional activity during hibernation
by targeted control of histones.
Regulation of RNA polymerase II
RNA polymerase II is the enzyme that transcribes DNA to make mRNA. Previous
studies showed that overall rates of transcript elongation were suppressed
during hibernation, providing presumptive evidence that RNA polymerase II was
suppressed. We directly measured RNA polymerase II activity by monitoring its
ability to transcribe the gene for enhanced green fluorescent protein in
vitro (Morin and Storey,
2006
). Transcriptional activity in nuclear extracts from muscle of
hibernating ground squirrels was only 57% of the value in euthermic muscle
(assayed at 37°C) (Table
1). However, western blotting showed that total polymerase protein
did not change during hibernation, which argues that the change in activity is
the result of a stable modification of the enzyme. RNA polymerase II is known
to be covalently modified with particularly prominent phosphorylation at Ser 2
and Ser 5 of a peptide sequence (YSPTSPS) that is repeated multiple times in
the C terminal domain (CTD) (Kim et al.,
1997
), although the functional significance of phosphorylation at
these sites is still debated. Using an antibody specific for the 5th
phosphoserine residue in this sequence, we found that the amount of
phosphorylated (Ser5) RNA polymerase II protein increased 1.79-fold in muscle
from hibernating squirrels. This suggests a correlation between
transcriptional repression and hyperphosphorylation of the CTD.
| Cell cycle arrest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, to date cell cycle arrest as it relates to hypometabolism in
non-embryonic organisms has received very little attention. This is a key area
for future research because there are many types of proliferative cells (as
well as whole organs such as liver or skin) that should predictably exit from
the cell cycle during hypometabolism. In brief, the traditionally defined
stages of the cell cycle are: (a) gap phase 1 (G1), when preparatory events
for DNA replication are initiated (e.g. genes activated, necessary proteins
synthesized), (b) S phase, when DNA replication occurs, (c) gap phase 2, (G2)
when proteins needed for mitosis are accumulated, (d) M phase, during which
mitosis occurs and including subphases of prophase, metaphase, anaphase,
telophase and cytokinesis (Douglas and
Haddad, 2003
). After cytokinesis, cells either reenter G1 or exit
the cell cycle into G0 phase, where they typically differentiate or enter
quiescence. One might think that cell cycle arrest in hypometabolism would
simply be a matter of reversible exit into G0 phase, but new studies indicate
much greater complexities and show that there is much to be explored.
Hypoxic/anoxic models provide some interesting insights. It is well known
that hypoxia induces growth arrest and that this is mediated as an action of
HIF-1. The mechanism in mammalian fibroblasts appears to involve the
activation of p21cip1, a key cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that
controls the G1 checkpoint (Koshiji et
al., 2004
). However, HIF-1 action on p21cip1 is not
direct because this gene does not contain a hypoxia response element (HRE).
Instead, HIF-1 counteracts the action of the mitogenic transcription factor
Myc, which normally represses p21cip1 expression. The situation is
different, however, in the anoxia-tolerant nematode, C. elegans. Full
anoxia exposure triggers entry into a reversible state of suspended animation
that includes cessation of cell division, developmental progression, feeding
and motility. HIF-1 deficient mutants survive just as well as the wild type,
indicating that the mechanism involved is not HIF-1 dependent
(Padilla et al., 2002
).
Studies with Drosophila melanogaster embryos found another set of
mechanisms. Under severe hypoxia these cells arrested either in metaphase or
pre-S phase (i.e. late G1) (Douglas et
al., 2005
). The metaphase arrest seemed to result from
stabilization of cyclin A levels, which normally must degrade before cells can
progress to anaphase. The pre-S block was linked with elevated levels of the
transcription factor E2F1, which stimulates preparatory measures in G0 or G1
cells that are moving into a proliferative state. Again, E2F1 is normally
degraded before the move into S phase. Whether this E2F1 mechanism might be
interrelated with the p21cip1 mechanism remains to be seen. To add
to the complexity, embryos of Drosophila, C. elegans, zebrafish and
brine shrimp each arrest at different stages in the cell cycle in response to
oxygen deprivation (Douglas and Haddad,
2003
). Hence, it is very likely that multiple mechanisms for cell
cycle arrest have been developed that serve different life stages (e.g. embryo
versus adult), different cell types and different species, and that
unraveling the complexities of cell cycle arrest in hypometabolic states will
prove to be very challenging.
Further insights into the possible regulatory mechanisms that could be
involved come from a fascinating new study that used microarray
transcriptional profiling to evaluate human fibroblasts making the transition
into the quiescent state (Coller et al.,
2006
). Significantly, the gene expression profile was different
depending on the stress used to trigger exit from the cell cycle (mitogen
withdrawal, contact inhibition or loss of adhesion). However, a subset of
genes whose specific expression in non-dividing cells proved to be
signal-independent was identified and assigned to the quiescence program
itself. These included genes that enforced the non-dividing state as well as
others that ensured the reversibility of the cell cycle arrest by suppressing
terminal differentiation. This study suggests an important principle for
species that use reversible hypometabolism to escape intermittent
environmental stress exposures. Normally proliferative cells in these
organisms must not only be arrested but programs of terminal differentiation,
which often take over after exit from the cell cycle, must be inhibited so
that the cells have the option of returning from the quiescent state once the
stress is removed.
| Gene expression |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-macroglobulin in liver, moesin in intestine, isozyme 4 of
pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK4) and pancreatic lipase in heart, isoforms
of uncoupling proteins (UCPs) and fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) in
multiple tissues, muscle motor proteins, six kinds of membrane transporters in
kidney, the melatonin receptor, eight types of serpins in multiple organs,
HIF-1 in BAT and muscle, the transcription factors PPAR
and
PGC-1
, carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1ß, several antioxidant
enzymes, iron-storage proteins, and four genes on the mitochondrial genome
(Srere et al., 1995
Interestingly, the types of genes that are upregulated in hypometabolic
systems are also proving to be the same ones that underlie the phenomenon of
ischemic preconditioning. Stenzel-Poore et al.
(Stenzel-Poore et al., 2003
)
reported microarray analysis of the patterns of gene expression in a mouse
brain stroke model of injurious ischaemia versus preconditioning
followed by injurious ischaemia (PII model). The patterns were strikingly
different between the two and, notably, a pronounced downregulation of genes
was observed in the PII model along with transcriptional changes that would
suppress metabolic pathways and immune responses, reduce ion-channel activity,
and decrease blood coagulation. All of these are hallmarks of natural
hypometabolic states, which suggests that, with appropriate signalling (e.g.
preconditioning), a program of metabolic suppression providing ischemia
defense can be activated in mammalian models that are normally harmed by
ischemia.
The upregulated genes identified to date in hypometabolic systems often
fall into two general categories: (a) those that protect or preserve cellular
metabolism and macromolecules under stress, and (b) those that address special
needs for species-, tissue- or stress-specific functions during
hypometabolism. Examples of the former include chaperone proteins, serpins,
iron-storage proteins and antioxidant enzymes. Examples of the latter include
enhancement of proteins and enzymes of fatty acid oxidation during mammalian
hibernation, upregulation of urea cycle enzymes in estivating amphibians,
increased expression of antifreeze proteins and/or enzymes involved in
cryoprotectant synthesis in cold-hardy species, etc. Because normal routes of
translation initiation (i.e. cap-dependent binding of the 5'end of mRNA
with the eukaryotic initiation factor 4) are inhibited during dormancy by
strong controls on ribosomal initiation and elongation factors, different
mechanisms of translation initiation can be required to achieve the synthesis
of stress-responsive genes (DeGracia et
al., 2002
). One of the ways of doing this is via a
cap-independent mechanism involving an internal ribosome entry site in the
5'UTR of these genes. Approximately 35% of cellular mRNAs are
translated in this manner, one of the most notable being the alpha subunit of
HIF-1 (Holcik and Sonenberg,
2005
).
Another way to achieve differential synthesis of stress-responsive proteins
is to ensure that their mRNA transcripts remain associated with polysomes, the
active translation machinery. Polysome dissociation has been widely documented
in metabolic depression in situations as diverse as mammalian hibernation and
anaerobiosis in brine shrimp and marine snails (reviewed by
Storey and Storey, 2004
). The
effect is to permit the vast majority of mRNA transcripts to be retained
during hypometabolism but sequestered into the translationally silent monosome
fraction. However, transcripts of selected proteins whose expression is
upregulated during hypometabolism remain in the polysome fraction; for
example, this was seen for the H isoform of fatty-acid-binding protein in
hibernator BAT and for the iron-binding protein, ferritin, in anoxia-tolerant
marine snails (Hittel and Storey,
2002
; Larade and Storey,
2004
).
| Defense mechanisms for long-term viability |
|---|
|
|
|---|