|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online April 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1746-1756 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02204
Beyond the central pattern generator: amine modulation of decision-making neural pathways descending from the brain of the medicinal leech
1 Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN
55108, USA
2 Departments of Entomology and Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, St
Paul, MN 55108, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mesce001{at}umn.edu)
Accepted 23 February 2006
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: gating neuron, command neuron, neuromodulation, locomotion, octopamine, serotonin, behavioral choice, leech, Hirudo medicinalis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The decision to swim appears to be distributed across competing populations
of swim-activating and swim-inactivating brain interneurons, each of which
exerts only a small influence on the initiation and maintenance of swimming
(Cellucci et al., 2000
). A
number of these identified cephalic projection neurons have been shown to
integrate and transfer swim-related information to down-stream gating neurons
that generate an excitatory drive to the segmental CPGs
(Weeks and Kristan, Jr, 1978
;
Weeks, 1982
;
Brodfuehrer and Friesen, 1986a
;
Brodfuehrer and Friesen, 1986b
;
Brodfuehrer and Friesen, 1986c
;
Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986d
; Brodfuehrer and
Friesen, 1986e
).
At any given time, this distributed brain network is under the influence of
circulating and local biogenic amines, which modulate behavior in all animals
(Libersat and Pflüger,
2004
). Only recently, however, have studies begun to examine the
neuromodulation of command-like systems in the brain of the leech and how
chemical modulation influences the initiation and termination of swimming
(Crisp and Mesce, 2003
;
Crisp and Mesce, 2004
). Such
limited information contrasts with what has been accumulated at the level of
the segmental swim circuits (Willard,
1981
; Hashemzadeh-Gargari and
Friesen, 1989
; O'Gara et al.,
1991
; Angstadt and Friesen,
1993a
; Angstadt and Friesen,
1993b
; Mangan et al.,
1994a
; Mangan et al.,
1994b
; Mesce et al.,
2001
).
Swimming activity is clearly modulated by serotonin (5-HT)
(Willard, 1981
;
Hashemzadeh-Gargari and Friesen,
1989
; O'Gara et al.,
1991
). and blood levels of 5-HT can quickly rise to a 100 nmol
l1 concentration during bouts of swimming
(Willard, 1981
). Large amounts
of 5-HT are secreted directly from the voluminous somata of the segmental
Retzius neurons, so relatively high concentrations of 5-HT can be established
locally within the CNS (for a review, see
De-Miguel and Trueta, 2005
).
In addition, swim-related mechanosensory inputs can activate octopamine
(OA)-containing interneurons in parallel with serotonergic cells
(Gilchrist and Mesce, 1997
).
When considering the aminergic modulation of swimming across the entire CNS,
however, the modulatory systems appear somewhat complex. Although 5-HT
promotes swimming at the level of the segmental swim networks (i.e. swim
gating and CPG cells), it suppresses swimming when focally applied to the
brain (Crisp and Mesce, 2003
).
Furthermore, 5-HT or OA can promote swimming when administered to the entire
nervous system, but a mixture of the two suppresses it. Subsequent removal of
this mixture, however, induces robust and repeated bouts of swimming that can
last for hours (Mesce et al.,
2001
). The brain-specific inhibitory effects of 5-HT help to
explain some of the non-additive effects of the 5-HT and OA mixture, and
underscore the fact that the brain is, indeed, an important site of aminergic
modulation that contributes to decision-making processes
(Crisp and Mesce, 2003
).
Here, we present the results of a study that examined how 5-HT, and a mixture of 5-HT and OA, can influence a population of identified command-like interneurons that form a decision-making pathway from the brain to swim-gating neurons and segmental oscillators responsible for swimming. Specifically, we aimed to determine if 5-HT inhibited the descending swim-activation pathway and excited the swim-inhibitory one. In addition, we describe the firing patterns of 5-HT-containing neurons in the brain when swimming is activated or initiated spontaneously, a pattern consistent with the somatic and paracrine-like secretion of 5-HT.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Extracellular recordings and focal amine perfusion to the head brain
Neuronal activity descending from the brain was recorded from the cut end
of the posterior connective of preparations consisting of just the head brain
and ganglion M1. Electrical activity was recorded from both lateral
connectives and Faivre's nerve using a suction electrode, and neural activity
was amplified on a P-15 AC pre-amplifier (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA, USA).
Every 10 s, a 1-s recording was filtered with a LPF202 low-pass bessel filter
(Warner Instruments LLC, Hamden CT, USA), and digitalized (at a sampling rate
of 20.8 kHz) using the Digidata 1322A interface and associated Axoscope data
acquisition hardware (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA). In several
experiments, recordings were obtained from a cut hemiconnective between M1 and
M2 while descending brain interneurons were recorded from with intracellular
electrodes.
Fictive swimming was recorded extracellularly from the segmentally-repeated
dorsal posterior (DP) nerve, and fictive swimming was defined as three or more
consecutive bursts of action potentials in the dorsal longitudinal muscle
exciter, motor neuron DE-3, with a cycle period of 0.42.0 s
(Ort et al., 1974
). A
petroleum jelly well was built around the cut end of a DP nerve to isolate it
electrically from the grounded perfusion bath. One Teflon-covered silver wire
was placed inside the well and another outside in the bath. The two signals
were amplified differentially by a P-15 amplifier (Grass Instruments),
digitalized at a sampling rate of 2 kHz using the MacLab 4/s data acquisition
hardware and associated Chart v 3.6.3/s software (ADInstruments, NSW,
Australia) on a Macintosh Performa 5200. A similar set-up was used to evoke
swimming with electrical excitation of the DP nerve. In these experiments, a
petroleum jelly well was built around a more posterior DP nerve [e.g. DP(19)].
A 1-s electrical stimulus consisting of a train of 100 ms, 35 V pulses
was delivered using a Grass S88 stimulator and a Grass SIU5 stimulus isolation
unit (Grass Instruments).
Petroleum jelly wells also isolated head brains from the main bath to allow
focal perfusion of normal and amine-containing saline over the brain when
recordings were made from cell 204. The connective between segmental ganglion
1 (M1) and M2 passed through the petroleum jelly barrier; no attempt was made
to isolate the head brain from M1 due to the short length of the connective in
that region of the nervous system. Although M1 was usually covered in
petroleum jelly, the potential exposure of M1 to amines could not be ruled
out. Saline was perfused into and out of the well containing the head brain at
a rate of 1 ml min1 as described elsewhere
(Crisp and Mesce, 2003
). Cell
204 is found only in M10M16 (Weeks,
1982
) and its axon projects anteriorly and posteriorly
(Weeks and Kristan, Jr, 1978
;
Nusbaum, 1987). No evidence, however, supports its projection to the head
brain, making it unlikely that cell 204 was directly affected during the amine
perfusion. All recordings from cell 204 were made in M11.
In a typical experiment, normal saline was first perfused for a 30-min
`baseline' period, followed by a 30-min perfusion of saline containing 50
µmol l1 5-HT; 50 µmol l1 OA or a
mixture of 50 µmol l1 5-HT and 50 µmol
l1 OA (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St Louis, MO, USA).
Preparations were subsequently perfused with saline for a 30-min `washout'
period. Amines were used at a concentration of 50 µmol
l1, as this is the standard concentration most often used
for physiological studies of the leech
(Kristan, Jr et al., 2005
). In
all analyses of swimming activity, the standard error of the means (s.e.m.) is
reported.
Intracellular recordings, cell identification and microscopy
Intracellular recordings were obtained using glass micropipettes with a
resistance of 4060 M
; glass electrodes were filled to their tips
with 5% Neurobiotin tracer (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and
back-filled with 2 mol l1 potassium acetate. Intracellular
signals were amplified and recorded digitally using the MacLab/4s, as
described above. At the end of each experiment, cells were filled with
Neurobiotin by iontophoresis and identified unambiguously using a variety of
physiological and morphological characteristics unique to each cell
(Crisp and Mesce, 2003
;
Crisp and Mesce, 2004
).
Methods for processing ganglia containing Neurobiotin-filled neurons have been
described elsewhere (Crisp and Mesce,
2003
; Crisp and Mesce,
2004
).
Methods used for the 5-HT immunostaining of leech embryos have been
described previously in detail (Gilchrist
et al., 1995
). Briefly, a goat anti-5-HT antiserum (gift from Dr
Robert Elde, University of Minnesota) was used at a dilution of 1:200. The
specificity of this antiserum has been previously characterized
(Maley and Elde, 1982
;
Wessendorf and Elde, 1985
;
Wessendorf and Elde, 1987
).
The primary antibody was recognized by a donkey anti-goat secondary antibody
conjugated to Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA., USA).
Following staining, all tissues were washed in hypo-osmotic Millonig's
buffer (Gilchrist et al.,
1995
), dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, and specimens
were mounted between coverslips in Depex mounting medium (Electron Microscopy
Sciences, Fort Washington, PA, USA). An MRC 1024 Laser Scanning Confocal
Microscope (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) mounted on an AX70 microscope equipped
for epifluorescence (Olympus, Lake Success, NY, USA) was used to view and
image mounted samples as described (Mesce
et al., 1993
).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The brain of the leech consists of the supraesophageal ganglion and the
subesophageal ganglion (SEG and SPEG, respectively). A laser scanning confocal
micrograph of the leech brain is shown in
Fig. 1. Using the same 5-HT
antibody we reported on previously in segmental ganglia
(Gilchrist et al., 1995
), we
immunolabeled a population of somata and their associated processes
(Fig. 1). A dense network of
5-HT-immunoreactive (5-HT-ir) fibers was associated with the SEG and SPEG
(N=6). The neuropil of the SEG was densely filled with serotonergic
arbors, emphasizing the potential importance of serotonergic neuromodulation
in the head brain. Although there were no serotonergic somata located in the
SPEG (Fig. 1B), this most
anterior portion of the leech brain was richly innervated by 5-HT-ir fibers
projecting from cells in the SEG and possibly more posterior ganglia
(Fig. 1B). At least one
serotonergic neuronal pair in neuromere 1 (labeled `1' in
Fig. 1A), the large lateral
(LL) cell pair, was observed to project contralaterally and anteriorly toward
the SPEG. Because we examined brains in filleted leeches (see Materials and
methods), we were also able to determine that none of the processes within the
brain region originated from somata within the periphery; in fact, no 5-HT-ir
somata were observed outside the CNS. In addition, a number of 5-HT-ir fibers
in the SPEG resided in a region previously identified as a neurohemal release
site (Fig. 1B)
(Webb, 1980
); these 5-HT
fibers contained varicosities and represent possible sites of neurohemal
secretion.
|
The activity of the LL and Retzius cells was altered during electrically
evoked and spontaneous swimming (Fig.
2). The LL cell was indirectly excited by the electrical shock of
a posterior DP(19) nerve (35 V, 100 ms pulses for 1 s)
(Fig. 2A left; N=5). A
DP nerve shock is a standard way to induce swimming
(Hashemzadeh-Gargari and Friesen,
1989
). During spontaneous swimming (i.e. in the absence of
electrical stimulation), the LL cell displayed rhythmic excitatory
depolarizations that were phase locked to individual bursts in the DE3 swim
motor neuron (Fig. 2A right;
N=5). These excitatory potentials suggest that the LL cell receives
rhythmic feedback from the swim CPG.
|
Net effect of 5-HT on the brain
The question remains, however, whether 5-HT, acting solely at the level of
the brain, is capable of biasing decisions made by the swim-gating neurons.
Specifically, can a local elevation of 5-HT in the brain indirectly affect the
firing rate of swim-gating neurons? Cell 204 is segmentally repeated and
integrates monosynaptic excitatory input from Tr1
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986a
; Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
) and polysynaptic inputs from Tr2
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
). It also integrates inputs from SIN1
(Brodfuehrer and Burns, 1995
)
and other descending brain interneurons. How cell 204 determines its state of
excitation or inhibition based upon a population of descending swim-activating
and swim-inactivating neurons remains unknown, but it is clear that cell 204
plays an integral role in the swim-initiation pathway
(Weeks, 1982
;
Friesen, 1989
). Thus, the
level of excitation in cell 204 reflects changes in the net contributions of
both swim-activating and swim-inactivating descending interneurons. By
recording from cell 204, a site of convergence, one can gain some insight into
how decisions to swim are regulated when the brain is influenced by 5-HT, an
amine mixture (e.g. a 5-HT/OA mixture), or other biogenic amines. Because of
the location and structure of the segmental 204s, inputs can be modulated
independently of any direct actions on cell 204 so as not to confound the
aminergic effects observed (see Materials and methods).
|
Effects of 5-HT on descending brain interneurons
Because it is not known how swim circuitry forms the decision to swim based
on parallel swim-activating and swim-inactivating pathways, we aimed to
determine if 5-HT inhibits the swim-activation system while exciting the
swim-inhibitory one. Swim-trigger neuron Tr1 is the most reliable
swim-activator yet to be identified in the leech brain
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
). Thus, we examined the effects of 5-HT on swim-trigger
neuron Tr1 and another swim-related interneuron, Tr2. All the Tr1 and Tr2
cells recorded were observed to hyperpolarize when 50 µmol
l1 5-HT was focally perfused on the brain. Tr1
hyperpolarized by 5±2 mV within minutes of bath application of 5-HT
(N=5; Fig. 4). Tr2
also hyperpolarized by a mean of 8±3 mV, within 510 min of 5-HT
application (N=5; data not shown). Because no evidence was found that
swim-inhibitor neuron SIN1 was activated by the 5-HT/OA mixture (see below),
the effects of 5-HT on SIN1 were not formally examined.
|
Effects of the 5-HT/OA mixture on descending brain interneurons
The focal delivery of a mixture of 5-HT and OA produces an even more
dramatic inhibition of swimming than 5-HT alone
(Crisp and Mesce, 2003
). Thus
we predicted that the mixture application would inhibit cell Tr1. Tr1 indeed
hyperpolarized during application of the amine mixture
(Fig. 5A). Intracellular
recordings from cell Tr1 were obtained simultaneously with extracellular
recordings from DP(16). During baseline perfusion of saline
(Fig. 5A left), Tr1
spontaneously (no electrical stimulation) fired a train of action potentials
prior to the expression of a swim episode, which also occurred spontaneously
(no electrical stimulation). This represents an event rarely observed under
baseline conditions and in the absence of amines
(Hashemzadeh-Gargari and Friesen,
1989
; O'Gara et al.,
1991
; Mesce et al.,
2001
; Crisp and Mesce,
2003
). The swim episode, or bout, is defined as a collection of
swim motor neuron DE-3 bursts recorded extracellularly from the DP nerve.
During the initial and spontaneous depolarization of Tr1, the tonic firing
activity of DE-3 was suppressed. After a latency of several seconds, swimming
was initiated. Although it was previously demonstrated
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986a
; Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
) that swimming activity could be evoked by intracellular
stimulation of Tr1, the behavior of Tr1 prior to the expression of a
spontaneous swim episode has not been reported until now.
|
After a 30-min perfusion of the 5-HT/OA mixture (Fig. 5A middle), cell Tr1 became hyperpolarized by a mean of 5±2 mV and all spike activity ceased (N=9). A close examination of its membrane potential also revealed a notable decrease in synaptic activity following mixture perfusion compared with that observed during baseline. In addition, it became more difficult to drive Tr1 sufficiently to provoke a spike train during perfusion of the mixture as compared to baseline (data not shown). Recovery of the membrane potential of Tr1 was gradual (and often incomplete) during washout (Fig. 5A right). It is unclear to what degree the spontaneous spike in Tr1 triggered the swim episode shown in washout. Possibly, in washout conditions, Tr1 had an enhanced effect on triggering swimming, such that less Tr1 activity was required to induce swimming. Furthermore, as only one of the two Tr1 cells was recorded, the activity of the contralateral Tr1 may have contributed more strongly to the swim bout shown. Washout of the 5-HT/OA mixture from Tr1 also revealed a return of synaptic activity (Fig. 5A right).
Descending brain neuron SIN1 is a potent swim-inhibiting neuron, and aside
from cell Tr2, represents the only identified source of descending swim
inhibition from the brain (Brodfuehrer and
Burns, 1995
; O'Gara and
Friesen, 1995
; Taylor et al.,
2003
). As such, we predicted that the 5-HT/OA mixture, which
inhibits swimming (Crisp and Mesce,
2003
; Mesce et al.,
2001
), would correlate with an elevated level of SIN1 excitation.
By contrast, application of the mixture was found in all preparations to
hyperpolarize SIN1 (Fig. 5B).
During baseline (Fig. 5B left),
SIN1 showed tonic spike activity. After a 30-min perfusion of the mixture
(Fig. 5B middle), SIN1 was
hyperpolarized by a mean of 18±4 mV (N=5). In addition to this
hyperpolarization, rhythmic inhibitory post-synaptic potentials were observed
in three of the SIN1 cells. Although one might expect SIN1 to remain inhibited
throughout amine washout to facilitate swimming, the membrane potential
partially recovered during washout (Fig.
5B, right). No dramatic changes in the firing frequency of SIN1
were apparent in the mixture or washout. Thus, we concluded that SIN1 makes
little contribution to either the inhibiting effects of the 5-HT/OA mixture or
the promoting effects of washout on swimming activity. These data suggest that
the inhibition of descending brain neurons by the mixture is widespread,
affecting neurons that activate and inhibit swimming.
|
Net effect of 5-HT/OA mixture on the brain
Because the amine mixture on the brain has such a robust effect on
swimming, we determined its net and indirect action on the activity of cell
204 (Fig. 7). During baseline
(Fig. 7B, top), cell 204
maintained a tonic level of spike activity. After a 30-min perfusion of the
amine mixture over the head brain (Fig.
7B, middle), cell 204 was indirectly hyperpolarized (15±5
mV in 14±10 min) and all spiking activity ceased. During washout of the
mixture (Fig. 7B, bottom), the
membrane potential of cell 204 partially recovered. When swim episodes
subsequently occurred, oscillations in cell 204 became phase-locked with
individual swim motor bursts in the DP nerve. These data indicate that,
although mixture application inhibited both swim-activating and
swim-inactivating neurons, the net effect of mixture application to the head
brain was the inhibition of cell 204 (N=5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have demonstrated that the serotonergic LL and
Retzius neurons of the brain (SEG) were activated during swim initiation and
during the progression of swim episodes. Rhythmic fluctuations in membrane
potentials were observed in cell LL (Fig.
2A right), indicating that this cell probably receives feedback
from the swim CPG. During swimming, the Retzius neurons fired trains of
impulses at relatively high frequencies. This profile of higher firing
frequency (e.g. 510 Hz vs 1 Hz) has been shown to promote the
secretion of large amounts of 5-HT from the somata of the Retzius cells
(De-Miguel and Trueta, 2005
).
In addition, the cellular mechanisms underlying this somatic secretion, such
as L-type calcium channels and calcium-induced calcium release, are common to
excitable endocrine cells (De-Miguel and
Trueta, 2005
). At higher firing rates, it has been proposed that
the Retzius cells influence entire circuits, as opposed to single synaptic
targets (De-Miguel and Trueta,
2005
). Thus, 5-HT at a concentration of 50 µmol
l1 that we bath-applied to the brain is most likely
physiological, mimicking the paracrine-like mode of 5-HT secretion that occurs
naturally during swim activation (Bruns et
al., 2000
; De-Miguel and
Trueta, 2005
; Dierkes and
Schlue, 2005
). Clearly, a differential upregulation of 5-HT
secretion from the Retzius neurons in the head brain could account for the
swim-inhibitory effects that we observed during focal application of 5-HT to
the brain. Because brain neurons Tr1 and Tr2 can also induce a gradual and
sustained excitation of the serotonergic Retzius cells
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
), descending command-like neurons also have the potential to
contribute to the release of 5-HT and other amines in the brain that, in turn,
may modulate the state of decision-making systems for on-going and subsequent
behaviors (Crisp and Mesce,
2004
; Garcia-Perez et al.,
2005
).
Several other lines of supportive evidence point to a connection between
the brain, 5-HT, swim episode length and overall swimming activity. First,
preparations with the head brain attached generate shorter duration swim
episodes than brainless nerve cords, and at least one cell in the brain, cell
SRN1, can reset the swim rhythm
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
; Brodfuehrer and
Friesen, 1986e
). Secondly, depletion of 5-HT with reserpine
increases the duration of swim episodes in intact animals, but reserpine
blocks swimming in isolated nerve cords that lack the head brain
(Hashemzadeh-Gargari and Friesen,
1989
; O'Gara et al.,
1991
). Finally, application of 5-HT to the brain is inhibitory and
is associated with shorter duration swim episodes (during washout) as compared
to trials in which the brain is treated with OA or the removal of an OA/5-HT
mixture (Crisp and Mesce,
2003
). Collectively, these observations suggest that the
modulatory state of the brain may contribute not only to the frequency or
probability of swim initiation, but also to the quality (duration and
rhythmicity) of the episodes expressed.
One additional issue to address is how quickly the system might change.
Firing of the LL and Retzius cells could be achieved with a single
swim-activating stimulus, which supports the idea that the modulatory state of
brain pathways may change from one swim-initiating stimulus to the next. While
we have demonstrated more long-term effects of 5-HT over a period of 30 min
(Crisp and Mesce, 2003
), 5-HT
can cause more fast-acting changes in leech neurons on the order of seconds to
minutes (Leake and Koubakanis, 1995;
Burrell et al., 2001
). Such a
mechanism could explain previous observations of trial-to-trial variability in
decision-making and swim initiation
(Briggman et al., 2005
).
Modulation of brain pathways, gating neurons and the decision to swim
Extracellular recordings revealed an increase in descending unit activity
during focal application of 5-HT or the 5-HT/OA mixture to the brain (data not
shown) (Fig. 6). Because of
this observation, the amine mixture was initially postulated to exert its
nonadditive and inhibitory effects on swimming by simultaneously activating a
population of descending swim-inhibitory neurons and suppressing the
swim-trigger cells. Contrary to expectations, 5-HT alone or the amine mixture
inhibited Tr2 and SIN1, both of which are swim inactivating cells. Not
surprisingly, swim-trigger neuron Tr1 was inhibited by 5-HT
(Fig. 4) and the amine mixture
(Fig. 7). Identification of the
complete population of descending neurons activated by 5-HT remains
incomplete, although it may consist of unidentified swim-inactivating neurons,
or possibly ones that play roles in the expression of other behaviors. For
example, cell R3b1, which activates swimming or crawling in a context-specific
way (Esch et al., 2002
).
Nevertheless, the net and indirect effect of 5-HT to the brain caused an
overall decrease in the excitation fed to the swim CPG via cell 204.
Furthermore, this decreased drive was correlated with changes in the basal
activity level of descending fibers (Fig.
6), and the recruitment of fibers in response to stimulation of
identified command-like interneurons (Fig.
6). Because we found no evidence that swim-terminating neurons
were excited by application of the 5-HT/OA mixture, we conclude that 5-HT
inhibits swimming at the level of the brain by decreasing the net tonic
excitation of cell 204 via the descending brain neurons. Possibly,
the paradoxical increase in descending activity in response to brain
modulation (Fig. 6) resides in
the contribution of downstream segmental anti-swim gating cells
(Taylor et al., 2003
), cells
that may contribute to the net suppression of cell 204.
Gating neurons, such as cell 204, play a vital role in transferring
information from higher-order or command-like circuits into an excitatory
drive to neural networks controlling motor behavior
(Reichert and Rowell, 1985
).
Neural circuits in the lamprey notochord, for example, gate sensory
information to directionally appropriate motor neurons that mediate the tail
fin withdrawal reflex (McClellan and
Grillner, 1983
). Accordingly, swim-gating neuron 204 integrates
indirect sensory information and descending excitation
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986a
) and inhibition
(Brodfuehrer and Burns, 1995
)
from the brain and drives swim oscillatory neurons
(Weeks, 1982
;
Nusbaum et al., 1987
).
Intracellular stimulation of cell Tr1, as well as swim-exciting brain
interneuron SE1 (Brodfuehrer et al.,
1995
), excites cell 204 via a monosynaptic connection
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
; Brodfuehrer and
Thorogood, 2001
). Cell 204 also receives polysynaptic inhibitory
input from cells SIN1 (Brodfuehrer and
Burns, 1995
) and Tr2
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
), possibly by way of the newly described segmental
anti-swim-gating interneurons 24 and 256
(Taylor et al., 2003
).
Because the amine mixture decreased the activity of cells SIN1 and Tr2, we
can conclude that the depression in cell 204 activity is probably due to an
inhibition of the descending swim-activating population rather than an
excitation in the swim-inactivating one. Although direct bath application of
5-HT to 204 does not alter the basal firing rate or membrane potential of 204
(Willard, 1981
;
Hashemzadeh-Gargari and Friesen,
1989
), 5-HT enhances the intrinsic excitability of cell 204, thus
lowering its response threshold to swim-promoting stimuli
(Angstadt and Friesen, 1993a
;
Angstadt and Friesen, 1993b
);
this helps to explain why 5-HT on brain-less preparations is highly
stimulatory for swimming. In contrast to the effects of challenging cell 204
directly with 5-HT, we have shown here that focal application of 5-HT to the
leech head brain indirectly hyperpolarizes the resting membrane potential of
cell 204 and decreases its firing frequency. This indirect modulatory effect
likely decreases the excitation that 204 feeds to cells of the swim CPG and
explains why we have observed that 5-HT to the brain inhibits swimming (see
Crisp and Mesce, 2003
).
Modulation and decision-making processes
It is not yet known whether the effects of 5-HT (or the amine mixture) on
command-like brain interneurons are due to direct modulation by the amines, or
to changes in synaptic activity from even higher-level decision-making neurons
or other circuits. For example, Tr2 has been shown to receive rhythmic input
from the crawl CPG (Crisp and Mesce,
2004
). During application of the 5-HT/OA mixture, recordings of
Tr1 and SIN1 revealed interesting alterations in presynaptic activity
(Fig. 5). The only known inputs
to cell Tr1 are sensory neurons
(Brodfuehrer and Friesen,
1986b
), including the pressure-sensitive P cells that are
inhibited by 5-HT (Sanchez-Armass et al.,
1991
; Ali et al.,
1998
). In Fig. 5A,
spontaneous depolarizations of Tr1 were observed prior to swim initiation,
perhaps due to excitation from higher-order brain neurons. Because most (if
not all) of the descending command-like interneurons (and cell 204) are
mulitfunctional [e.g. involved in crawling and shortening
(Kristan, Jr et al., 1988
;
Baader, 1997
;
Shaw and Kristan, Jr, 1997
;
Crisp and Mesce, 2004
)],
altering the probability of swimming will likely influence the expression of
other behaviors as well.
During spontaneous swimming, or when a swim-related stimulus arrives, the
decision to swim or not to swim appears to depend on the `state' of the brain
and segmental swim-related neural networks
(Briggman et al., 2005
;
Garcia-Perez et al., 2005
).
What defines this state is complex, although our studies of aminergic
modulation have attempted to contribute some insights. Because locomotory
behaviors tend to be expressed on the order of tens of seconds, the operation
of these networks may define their own and subsequent states
(Garcia-Perez et al., 2005
),
and may influence the operation of related circuits over short and longer time
periods. Altogether, our observations support the conclusion that a full
understanding of the dynamics underlying decision-making processes will
require a greater understanding of the modulatory processes that occur during
the activation of individual behavioral routines.
| List of abbreviations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ali, D. W., Catarsi, S. and Drapeau, P. (1998).
Ionotropic and metabotropic activation of a neuronal chloride channel by
serotonin and dopamine in the leech Hirudo medicinalis. J.
Physiol. 509,211
-219.
Angstadt, J. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1993a). Modulation of swimming behavior in the medicinal leech. I. Effects of serotonin on the electrical properties of swim-gating cell 204. J. Comp. Physiol. A 172,223 -234.[Medline]
Angstadt, J. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1993b). Modulation of swimming behavior in the medicinal leech. II. Ionic conductances underlying serotonergic modulation of swim-gating cell 204. J. Comp. Physiol. A 172,235 -248.[Medline]
Baader, A. P. (1997). Interneuronal and motor patterns during crawling behavior of semi-intact leeches. J. Exp. Biol. 200,1369 -1381.[Abstract]
Briggman, K. L., Abarbanel, H. D. and Kristan, W. B., Jr
(2005). Optical imaging of neuronal populations during
decision-making. Science
307,896
-901.
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Burns, A. (1995). Neuronal factors influencing the decision to swim in the medicinal leech. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 63,192 -199.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1986a).
From stimulation to undulation: a neuronal pathway for the control of swimming
in the leech. Science
234,1002
-1004.
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1986b). Initiation of swimming activity by trigger neurons in the leech subesophageal ganglion. I. Output connections of Tr1 and Tr2. J. Comp. Physiol. A 159,489 -502.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1986c). Initiation of swimming activity by trigger neurons in the leech subesophageal ganglion. II. Role of segmental swim-initiating interneurons. J. Comp. Physiol. A 159,503 -510.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1986d). Initiation of swimming activity by trigger neurons in the leech subesophageal ganglion. III. Sensory inputs to Tr1 and Tr2. J. Comp. Physiol. A 159,511 -519.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Friesen, W. O. (1986e). Control of leech swimming activity by the cephalic ganglia. J. Neurobiol. 17,697 -705.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodfuehrer, P. D. and Thorogood, M. S. E. (2001). Identified neurons and leech swimming behavior. Prog. Neurobiol. 63,371 -381.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodfuehrer, P. D., Parker, H. J., Burns, A. and Berg, M.
(1995). Regulation of the segmental swim-generating system by a
pair of identified interneurons in the leech head brain. J.
Neurophysiol. 73,983
-992.
Bruns, D., Riedel, D., Klingauf, J. and Jahn, R. (2000). Quantal release of serotonin. Neuron 28,205 -220.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burrell, B. D., Sahley, C. L. and Muller, K. J.
(2001). Non-associative learning and serotonin induce similar
bi-directional changes in excitability of a neuron critical for learning in
the medicinal leech. J. Neurosci.
21,1401
-1412.
Cellucci, C. J., Brodfuehrer, P. D., Acera-Pozzi, R., Dobrovolny, H., Engler, E., Los, J. and Thompson, R. (2000). Linear and nonlinear measures predict swimming in the leech. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 62,4826 -4834.[Medline]
Crisp, K. M. and Mesce, K. A. (2003). To swim or not to swim: regional effects of serotonin, octopamine, and amine mixtures in the medicinal leech. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189,461 -470.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crisp, K. M. and Mesce, K. A. (2004). A
cephalic projection neuron involved in locomotion is dye-coupled to the
dopaminergic neural network in the medicinal leech. J. Exp.
Biol. 207,4535
-4542.
De-Miguel, F. F. and Trueta, C. (2005). Synaptic and extrasynaptic secretion of serotonin. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 25,297 -312.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dierkes, P. W. and Schlue, W.-R. (2005). Ca++ influx into identified leech neurons induced by 5-hydroxytryptamine. J. Neurobiol. 62,106 -120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eisenhart, F. J., Cacciatore, T. W. and Kristan, W. B., Jr (2000). A central pattern generator underlies crawling in the medicinal leech. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187,631 -643.
Esch, T., Mesce, K. A. and Kristan, W. B., Jr
(2002). Evidence for sequential decision making in the medicinal
leech. J. Neurosci. 22,11045
-11054.
Friesen, W. O. (1989). Neuronal control of leech swimming movements. In Neuronal and Cellular Oscillators (ed. J. W. Jacklet), pp.269 -316. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Garcia-Perez, E., Mazzoni, A., Zoccolan, D., Robinson, H. P. C.
and Torre, V. (2005). Statistics of decision making in
the leech. J. Neurosci.
25,2597
-2608.
Gilchrist, L. S. and Mesce, K. A. (1997).
Coactivation of putative octopamine- and serotonin-containing interneurons in
the medicinal leech. J. Neurophysiol.
78,2108
-2115.
Gilchrist, L. S., Klukas, K. A., Jellies, J., Rapus, J., Eckert, M. and Mesce, K. A. (1995). Distribution and developmental expression of octopamine-immunoreactive neurons in the central nervous system of the leech. J. Comp. Neurol. 353,451 -463.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grobstein, P. (1994). Variability in brain function and behavior. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (ed. V. S. Ramachandran), pp.447 -458. New York: Academic Press.
Hashemzadeh-Gargari, H. and Friesen, W. O. (1989). Modulation of swimming activity in the medicinal leech by serotonin and octopamine. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 94C,295 -302.[CrossRef]
Jacobs, B. L. and Fornal, C. A. (1993). 5-HT and motor control: a hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 16,346 -352.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jacobs, B. L. and Fornal, C. A. (1999). Activity of serotonergic neurons in behaving animals. Neuropsychopharmacology 21, 9S-15S.[Medline]
Jellies, J., Loer, C. M. and Kristan, W. B., Jr (1987). Morphological changes in leech Retzius neurons after target contact during embryogenesis. J. Neurosci. 7,2618 -2629.[Abstract]
Jellies, J., Kopp, D. M. and Geisert, E. E. (1993). Developmental regulation of a glycolipid epitope on actively extending growth cones and central and peripheral projections in the medicinal leech. Dev. Biol. 159,691 -705.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kristan, W. B., Jr, Wittenberg, G., Nusbaum, M. P. and Stern-Tomlinson, W. (1988). Multifunctional interneurons in behavioral circuits of the medicinal leech. Experientia 44,383 -389.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kristan, W. B., Jr, Calabrese, R. L. and Friesen, W. O. (2005). Neuronal control of leech behavior. Prog. Neurobiol. 76,279 -327.[CrossRef][Medline]
Leake, L. D. and Koubanakis, M. (1995). Central and peripheral 5-HT receptors in the leech (Hirudo medicinalis) redefined. Gen. Pharmacol. 26,1709 -1717.[Medline]
Lent, C. M. (1982). Fluorescent properties of monoamine neurons following glyoxylic acid treatment of intact leech ganglia. Histochemistry 75,77 -89.[CrossRef][Medline]
Libersat, F. and Pflüger, H. J. (2004). Monoamines and the orchestration of behavior. BioScience 54,17 -25.[CrossRef]
Maley, B. and Elde, R. P. (1982). Immunocytochemical localization of putative neurotransmitters within the feline nucleus tractus solitarii. Neuroscience 7,2469 -2490.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mangan, P. S., Cometa, A. K. and Friesen, W. O. (1994a). Modulation of swimming behavior in the medicinal leech. IV. Serotonin-induced alteration of synaptic interactions between neurons of the swim circuit. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175,723 -736.[Medline]
Mangan, P. S., Curran, G. A., Hurney, C. A. and Friesen, W. O. (1994b). Modulation of swimming behavior in the medicinal leech III. Control of cellular properties in motor neurons by serotonin. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175,709 -722.[Medline]
Marder, E. and Calabrese, R. L. (1996).
Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. Physiol.
Rev. 76,687
-717.
Marsden, C. A. and Kerkut, G. A. (1969). Fluorescent microscopy of the 5HT- and catecholamine-containing cells in the central nervous system of the leech Hirudo medicinalis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 31,851 -862.[Medline]
McClellan, A. D. and Grillner, S. (1983). Initiation and sensory gating of `fictive' swimming and withdrawal responses in an in vitro preparation of the lamprey spinal cord. Brain Res. 269,237 -250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mesce, K. A., Klukas, K. A. and Brelje, T. C. (1993). Improvements for the anatomical characterization of insect neurons in whole mount: the use of cyanine-derived fluorophores and laser scanning confocal microscopy. Cell Tissue Res. 271,381 -397.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mesce, K. A., Crisp, K. M. and Gilchrist, L. S.
(2001). Mixtures of octopamine and serotonin have nonadditive
effects on the CNS of the medicinal leech. J.
Neurophysiol. 85,2039
-2046.
Nicholls, J. G. and Baylor, D. A. (1968).
Specific modalities and receptive fields of sensory neurons in CNS of the
leech. J. Neurophysiol.
31,740
-756.
Nusbaum, M. P., Friesen, W. O., Kristan, W. B., Jr and Pearce, R. A. (1987). Neural mechanisms generating the leech swimming rhythm: swim-initiator neurons excite the network of swim oscillator neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. A 161,355 -366.[CrossRef][Medline]
O'Gara, B. A. and Friesen, W. O. (1995). Termination of leech swimming activity by a previously identified swim-trigger neuron. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177,627 -636.[Medline]
O'Gara, B. A., Chae, H., Latham, L. B. and Friesen, W. O. (1991). Modification of leech behavior patterns by reserpine-induced amine depletion. J. Neurosci. 11, 96-110.[Abstract]
Ort, C. A., Kristan, W. B., Jr, and Stent, G. S. (1974). Neuronal control of swimming in the medicinal leech. II. Identification and connections of motor neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. 94,121 -154.[CrossRef]
Reichert, H. and Rowell, C. H. F. (1985).
Integration of nonphaselocked exteroceptive information in the control of
rhythmic flight in the locust. J. Neurophysiol.
53,1201
-1218.
Ribeiro-do-Valle, L. E. (1997). Serotonergic neurons in the caudal raphe nuclei discharge in association with activity of masticatory muscles. Braz, J. Med. Res. 1, 79-83.
Rude, S. (1969). Monoamine-containing neurons in the central nervous system and peripheral nerves of the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis. J. Comp. Neurol. 136,349 -372.[CrossRef]
Sanchez-Armass, S., Merz, D. C. and Drapeau, P.
(1991). Distinct receptors, second messengers and conductances
underlying the dual responses to serotonin in an identified leech neurone.
J. Exp. Biol. 155,531
-547.
Shaw, B. K. and Kristan, W. B., Jr (1997). The
neuronal basis of the behavioral choice between swimming and shortening in the
leech: control is not selectively exercised at higher circuit levels.
J. Neurosci. 17,786
-795.
Taylor, A. L., Cottrell, G. W., Kleinfeld, D. and Kristan, W.
B., Jr (2003). Imaging reveals synaptic targets of a
swim-terminating neuron in the leech CNS. J. Neurosci.
23,11402
-11410.
Webb, R. A. (1980). Intralamellar neurohemal complexes in the cerebral commisure of the leech Macrobdella decora (Say, 1824): an electron microscope study. J. Morphol. 163,157 -165.[CrossRef]
Weeks, J. C. (1982). Synaptic basis of swim initiation in the leech. I. Connections of a swim-initiating neuron (cell 204) with motor neurons and pattern-generating `oscillator' neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. A 148,253 -263.[CrossRef]
Weeks, J. C. and Kristan, W. B., Jr (1978).
Initiation, maintenance and modulation of swimming in the medicinal leech by
the activity of a single neurone. J. Exp. Biol.
77, 71-78.
Wessendorf, M. W. and Elde, R. P. (1985). Characterization of an immunofluorescence technique for the demonstration of coexisting neurotransmitters within nerve terminals. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33,984 -994.[Abstract]
Wessendorf, M. W. and Elde, R. P. (1987). The coexistence of serotonin- and substance P-like immunoreactivity in the spinal cord of the rat as shown by immunofluorescence labeling. J. Neurosci. 7,2352 -2363.[Abstract]
Wilkinson, J. M. and Coggeshall, R. E. (1975). Axonal numbers and sizes in the connectives and peripheral nerves of the leech. J. Comp. Neurol. 162,387 -396.[CrossRef][Medline]
Willard, A. L. (1981). Effects of serotonin on the generation of the motor program for swimming by the medicinal leech. J. Neurosci. 1,936 -944.[Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. D. DeLong, M. S. Kirby, D. M. Blitz, and M. P. Nusbaum Parallel Regulation of a Modulator-Activated Current via Distinct Dynamics Underlies Comodulation of Motor Circuit Output J. Neurosci., September 30, 2009; 29(39): 12355 - 12367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Puhl and K. A. Mesce Dopamine Activates the Motor Pattern for Crawling in the Medicinal Leech J. Neurosci., April 16, 2008; 28(16): 4192 - 4200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||