spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 7


Fig. 7. 5-HT-induced pH changes in the lumen of the salivary gland as measured with double-barrelled pH-sensitive microelectrodes. (A) Effects of three different 5-HT concentrations (1, 3 and 10 nmol l–1) on transepithelial potential (upper trace) and luminal pH (lower trace). The slightly positive transepithelial potential in the unstimulated gland became at least transiently negative upon 5-HT stimulation and displayed a large positive overshoot after 5-HT withdrawal as described previously (Berridge and Prince, 1971). In our hands the time courses of the transepithelial potential changes recorded by the reference barrel of the pH-sensitive microelectrodes differed slightly from those recorded by the classical paraffin oil-gap method (e.g. Berridge and Prince, 1971) for unknown reasons. However, similar differences were noted earlier in luminal recordings with double-barrelled K+-sensitive microelectrodes by the same group (see e.g. fig. 5 in Gupta et al., 1978). (B) Dose–response relationship of the 5-HT-induced pH changes obtained from recordings similar to those shown in A.





Right arrow Return to article