|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 2, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1122-1134 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02080
The role of single spiking spherical neurons in a fast sensory pathway
1 Department of Integrative and Computational Neurosciences, Instituto de
Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Associated Unit of the
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Av. Italia 3318,
Montevideo, Uruguay
2 Department of Histology and Embriology, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad
de la República, Gral. Flores 2515, Montevideo, Uruguay
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: angel{at}iibce.edu.uy)
Accepted 5 January 2006
 |
Summary |
|---|
 TOP Summary IntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In the present study, we further characterize the input–output relationship at the second order neurons by recording field potentials, and ascertain its cellular basis using in vitro whole cell patch recordings. The field potentials from freely behaving, socially interacting fish were obtained from chronically implanted fish restrained in a mesh pen. In addition, at the end of some experiments the fish was curarized and the fast electrosensory path responses to artificial stimuli were further explored. These in vivo approaches showed that larger stimuli cause larger and longer windows of low responsiveness. The simple spherical geometry of the second order cells allowed us to unveil the membrane mechanisms underlying this phenomenon in vitro. These spherical cells respond with a single spike at the onset of current steps of any amplitude and duration, showing inward and outward rectification, and a long refractory period. We postulate that a low-threshold K+ conductance generates the outward rectification. The most parsimonious interpretation of our data indicates that slow deactivation of this conductance causes the long refractory period. These non-linear properties of the membrane explain the single spiking profile of spherical cells and the low-responsiveness window observed in vivo. Since the electric organ discharges are emitted at intervals slightly longer than the duration of the low-responsiveness window, we propose that the described cellular mechanisms allow fish streaming self-generated images.
Key words: intrinsic properties, electroreception, time coding, low-responsiveness window, onset neuron, electric fish
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TOPSummaryIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
), whereas the
computations performed by circuits are characterized by the signals encoded
and the relationship between input and output
(Marr, 1982;
Arbib et al., 1997). These
difficulties are more easily overcome by studying neurons of simple geometry
belonging to relatively simple circuits where the links between the structure
of a neuron and its functional role in a network can be more readily
established (Marder, 2002;
Koch and Segev, 2000). This
paper addresses this problem in spherically shaped cells belonging to a
particularly simple circuit of a gymnotid electric fish of the pulse type.
Pulse gymnotids and other electric fish use their electric organ discharges
(EOD) as a carrier for sensory signals
(Lissmann, 1951;
Lissmann, 1958;
Aguilera et al., 2001). Objects
in the fish's close environment modify the self-generated electric field
causing object-related patterns of transcutaneous current density (electric
images) that stimulate cutaneous electroreceptors
(Bullock et al., 1961).
Electrosensory signals are detected by electroreceptors innervated by afferent
fibers projecting to the electrosensory lobe (ELL) of the medulla.
Afferents from one class of electroreceptors are known as pulse markers.
These afferents encode the amplitude of the local stimulus using the latency
of a single spike. Pulse marker afferents terminate centrally on the cell
bodies of spherical cells in the deeper layers of the ELL by way of
morphologically mixed synapses
(Castelló et al., 1998;
Réthelyi and Szabo,
1973).
Spherical cells have few short dendrites that make gap junctions with the
soma of neighboring spherical cells, and also receive chemical axosomatic or
axodendritic contacts from thin fibers from still unknown origin
(Castelló et al.,
1998). Spherical cell axons project to the mesencephalic
magnocellular nucleus by way of the lateral lemniscus. The pathway that
comprises the pulse marker afferents, the ELL spherical cells and the
mesencephalic magnocellular nucleus, is referred to as the fast electrosensory
pathway (Szabo et al.,
1975).
This paper focuses on the intrinsic properties and the computational role of ELL spherical cells.
We have previously implemented a methodology to record the activity of
electrosensory structures in vivo in the freely moving fish
(Castelló et al., 1998;
Pereira et al., 2005). We
found that the characteristic sign of the activation of the fast
electrosensory pathway is a brief compound action potential occurring shortly
after the self-generated or conspecific-generated EODs. These field potential
recordings can be obtained all along the path; that is, in the electrosensory
nerve (a sign of spherical cells afferent input), the ELL, the lateral
lemniscus (a sign of the spherical cells output) and the magnocellular
nucleus.
The input–output relationship of the spherical cell population has
two main features: (i) synchronization and precise timing of spherical cells
firing, and (ii) a low-responsiveness time window after the activation of the
fast electrosensory pathway by the self-generated EOD that is slightly shorter
in duration than the inter-EOD interval. The precise synchronism between
spherical cells is revealed by the sharpness and phase locking of the
lemniscal compound action potential, and by the strong correlation between the
amplitude of primary afferent and lemniscal compound action potentials
(Szabo et al., 1975;
Castelló et al., 1998).
The low-responsiveness window prevents the subsequent activation of the path
by externally generated, potentially interfering signals
(Schlegel, 1973;
Castelló et al., 1998).
This phenomenon appears to reflect a trade-off between electrolocation, in
which responses to the EODs of other fish are a form of interference, and
electro-communication, in which such EODs are the signals of interest
(Westby, 1975;
Capurro et al., 1998;
Westby, 1979;
Black Cleworth, 1969).
The present study addresses the question of how the intrinsic membrane properties of spherical cells determine the input–output relationship of the fast electrosensory pathway at the level of the ELL. Recordings were made both in vivo in the freely discharging fish and in slice preparations in vitro. We found that the length of the low-responsiveness window depends on the relative amplitude of self- and conspecific-generated EODs. We also found that voltage dependent conductances in spherical cells endow them with an onset spiking profile and a long refractory period that corresponds to the low-responsiveness window observed in vivo.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TOPSummaryIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
),
its identity remains uncertain. Fish care and experiments were performed under
the regulations of the Comisión Honoraria de Experimentación
Animal of the Universidad de la República (ordinance 4332-99) and the
International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals.
All surgical procedures were performed under deep anesthesia induced by cold.
For this purpose, the gills were perfused with aerated water at 4°C
throughout the surgery. After a few minutes of cold-water perfusion, the EOD
and the motor responses to nociceptive stimuli stop. Cold anesthesia is
completely reversible if temperature transitions are performed slowly.
Field potential recordings in vivo
The activity evoked at the magnocellular mesencephalic nucleus by self- and
conspecific-generated EODs, or artificial stimuli, was recorded using two
attached wires (80 µm diameter, insulated except at their tips) lowered
through a small hole in the skull down to 1000–1200 µm from the brain
surface, and attached with dental cement. Signals were differentially
amplified (gain x1000), band-pass filtered (10–10 000 Hz), and
digitized with an oscilloscope for on-line visual inspection and for off-line
analysis.
In one group of experiments, the animals were first chronically implanted and then restrained in a narrow pen made of plastic screen. Freely discharging conspecifics were also restrained in a similar separated pen, located at different positions and distances from the recorded fish. The self- and conspecific-generated EODs were recorded. In some cases the conspecific EOD was mimicked by a 3 ms current `square' pulse applied between two electrodes 10 cm apart, on a parallel line to the recorded fish, at a constant distance in each experiment.
In another group of experiments, the same kinds of recordings were obtained from curarized fish to study the effect of the amplitude of the conditioning and the test stimuli on the low-responsiveness window. In this case, conditioning stimuli consisted of current `square' pulses (3 ms, 5–30 Hz) applied between a wire inserted in the dorsal muscle mass and a 1.5 cm stainless steel disc in front of the jaw (a region where the electrosensory fovea is located and the electroreceptors are most dense) by injecting current `square' pulses (3 ms) between the wire in the muscle mass and an insulated wire (100 µm diameter) with its bare tip facing the site where the maximal response at the magnocellularis nucleus was evoked with minimal intensity. This kind of stimulation allowed us to explore the response of the path to a local test stimulus delivered at the center of the receptive field of the recorded region. Conditioning and test steps were generated by two different, optically coupled and battery-operated stimulus isolation units. We examined the effects of three variables by changing one at a time: the intensity of the conditioning stimulus, the intensity of the test stimulus, and the delay between conditioning and test stimuli. Intensities of both stimuli were scaled by their respective thresholds, defined as the minimal current intensity that evoked a noticeable response in one half of the trials.
Intracellular recordings of spherical cells
Brain slices transverse to the main axis of the brain were obtained using a
vibratome. Slices were incubated in a low sodium solution containing (mmol
l–1): KCl (2), CaCl2 (2.6), KHPO4
(1.25), NaHCO3 (24), MgSO4 (1.6), glucose (20), NaCl (0)
and sucrose (201), pH 7.4. After a period of 30–60 min, slices were
transferred to the standard recording solution of the same composition but
lacking sucrose and having a physiological concentration of NaCl (120 mmol
l–1). Spherical cells are located at the border between the
deep neuropil and granule cell layers of ELL and could be identified using
Nomarski optics under infrared illumination. Whole cell patch recordings were
obtained using 5–10 M
tip-polished microelectrodes filled with a
solution containing the following (mmol l–1): potassium
gluconate 122, MgCl2 2.5, magnesium gluconate 5.6, CaCl2
0.3, Na2ATP 5, K-Hepes 5, H-Hepes 5, EGTA 1 and biocytin 10, pH
7.4.
In current clamp conditions we studied cell membrane intrinsic properties by applying the following protocols: (i) in all cells, a series of steps differing in amplitude by a constant amount was repeated several times during the experiment; (ii) in 20 cells, paired pulsed stimulation using conditioning and test pulses of different amplitudes, delays and durations was used to explore cell excitability; and (iii) in four cells, series of steps, as described in (i), were applied at different delays after conditioning pulses, to determine the relationship between conductance changes and excitability. We used two parameters to evaluate excitability: spike latency and spike threshold. Spike latency was defined as the interval between the current step onset and the peak time of the spike. Spike threshold was defined as the minimum current intensity that evokes a spike for pulses of 20 ms or longer (spike latency was never longer than 3.5 ms). In addition, we studied the effects of steady currents manually applied while spikes were evoked with a brief intracellular stimulus. We analyzed the spike after-potential and also compared voltage vs current (V/I) plots obtained 1 ms before, 5 ms after and 10 ms after in order to determine the effect of a spike on current–voltage relationships. Cells were injected with biocytin after completion of intracellular protocols by passing depolarizing and hyperpolarizing alternating current steps.
After the experiment the tissue was fixed and biocytin in the recorded
cells was revealed using a standard
avidin–biotin–peroxidase–diaminobenzidine protocol
(Horikawa and Armstrong,
1988).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TOPSummaryIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
). In the absence of skin electrical stimuli the fast
electrosensory pathway is silent.
The amplitude of the spherical cell axon's compound potential is linearly
related to the amplitude of self-generated EOD
(Pereira et al., 2005).
However, the amplitude of the responses evoked by conspecifics depends
strongly on the interval between the self-generated EOD and the
conspecific-generated EOD. This interval decreases progressively when the
conspecific EOD rate is slightly higher and increases progressively when it is
slightly lower. In association with the decrease in interval between self- and
conspecific-generated EODs there is also a reduction in amplitude of the
conspecific-generated EOD-evoked responses recorded in the lateral lemniscus
and magnocellularis nucleus, but there is no such amplitude reduction in
evoked responses recorded in the mandibular nerve. This indicates that
activation of the ELL structures of the fast electrosensory pathway by the
self-generated EOD causes a low-responsiveness window
(Castelló et al.,
1998). This phenomenon is exemplified in
Fig. 1, showing the effects of
the fast electrosensory pathway activation by the self-generated EOD and the
conspecific-generated EOD of a neighbor fish with a slightly higher EOD rate.
Consecutive traces, starting few milliseconds before the self-generated EOD
and lasting about one EOD cycle of the recorded fish, show its magnocellularis
nucleus responses to five self-generated EODs (referred to as 1–5) and
to seven conspecific-generated EODs (referred to as a–g, green). The
largest responses are caused by the self-generated EOD. The first trace
illustrates the decrease in responsiveness after the self-generated EOD: while
the second conspecific-generated EOD occurring at longer delay
(conspecific-generated EODb) causes a large response, the first one, occurring
shortly after the self-generated EOD (conspecific-generated EODa), does not
cause any response. The temporal profile of the low-responsiveness window is
shown in traces 2–4 in which the interval between the self-generated EOD
and the conspecific-generated EOD decreases progressively and the response to
the conspecific-generated EOD is gradually reduced. The last trace 5, marks f
and g, shows a return to the beginning of the sweeping cycle caused by the
small difference in EOD rate. Note that, consistent with previous findings
(Castelló et al.,
1998), the phenomenon is triggered by the activation of the fast
electrosensory pathway, since the low-responsiveness window is also elicited
by the conspecific-generated EOD (conspecific-generated EODb in blue) when it
closely precedes the self-generated EOD 2 (red).
|
To further study the characteristics of the low-responsiveness window, we used similar recordings in a curarized preparation. To mimic the fish's own EOD we delivered a conditioning current pulse to the jaw (a region where the electrosensory fovea is located and electroreceptors are most dense) and a test current pulse, locally stimulating a small site of the skin with a thin electrode (a 100 µm insulated wire except at the tip) at the center of the receptive field (see Materials and methods).
In the first set of experiments with curarized fish, we adjusted and maintained constant the conditioning stimulus intensity to match the response evoked by the self-generated EOD recorded in the same fish before curare. Responses evoked by the test stimulus increased in amplitude and decreased in latency as the delay between the conditioning and test pulses increased (Fig. 1B–D). Larger test stimuli generated larger responses when they were delivered after the same delay (Fig. 2A). Similarly, larger stimuli, such as those produced by a nearby conspecific, more easily overcame the low-responsiveness window than smaller stimuli elicited by the same conspecific at a longer distance (Fig. 2B,C).
|
|
). To elucidate the cellular basis of this phenomenon we
performed in vitro recordings from 24 spherical cells obtained from
brain slices of 18 fish. Cells were identified by their shape and location
between the deep neuropil layer and the granule cell layer, as observed with
Nomarski optics under infrared illumination. These cells were silent at rest
and showed median resting membrane potentials of –70.5 mV (range
–61.2 to –74.2 mV) with low noise (coefficient of variation
between 7x10–4 and 9x10–3).
Biocytin labeling confirmed the cell morphology in 6 of the 24 recorded
neurons. Both somata and axon were completely filled in three cells
(Fig. 4A).
|
Equal amounts of subthreshold depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current injection had asymmetrical effects on membrane potential, as shown by the time course of the voltage change during a long-lasting constant current pulse (up to 500 ms; Figs 5 and 6). The earlier changes in transmembrane voltage caused by current steps of different amplitude are analyzed in Fig. 5.
|
|
Subthreshold current steps depolarizing the cell above –65 mV (median, N=24) elicited a graded `hump', peaking between 1.9 and 2.6 ms after the pulse onset. After the hump, membrane potential remained clamped at an even value depending on the amplitude of the current step (Fig. 5A,B). In addition, the hyperpolarization caused by current steps follows a non-exponential course, as shown by the deviation of the data points from a straight line in the semilogarithmic plot of voltage time derivative vs time (Fig. 5C). Consistently, this deviation was in the upper direction, indicating a progressive increase of the membrane impedance with hyperpolarization between 2 and about 10 ms.
Voltage vs current plots (V/I plots) constructed for a set of responses at different delays from the pulse onset allowed us to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this hump. The departure of the membrane potential from its resting value and the amplitude of the current step were proportional up to the peak of the hump occurring 2.4 ms after the onset (Fig. 5B, red line, 5D, red symbols), indicating that the rising phase is mainly consequence of the passive depolarization of the membrane by the injected current. The V/I plots after the peak of the hump were well fitted by a convex curve with two different limiting slopes for depolarizing and hyperpolarizing currents. Blue symbols in Fig. 5D exemplify this relationship at 10.4 ms after the step onset (Fig. 5B, blue line, 5D, blue circles). While the hyperpolarizing limiting slope increased up to a maximum (Fig. 5D, solid line), the depolarizing limiting slope (Fig. 5D, dotted line) remained similar from the end of the hump up to the end of the steps (Fig. 5D, blue and green symbols). The depolarizing slope was on average 6–12 times smaller than the maximum slope for hyperpolarizing currents.
This asymmetric deviation from proportionality after the peak of the hump implies that depolarizations above –65 mV trigger large and persistent increases in the equivalent membrane conductance without major changes in the negative equivalent electromotive force. It also suggests that a low-threshold outward current is the main cause of the hump-and-hold profile. Conductance reduction with hyperpolarization suggests that this conductance is partially active at rest.
The other important feature in the voltage profile evoked by constant current pulses was a depolarizing sag, starting 20–70 ms after the onset of hyperpolarizing steps in most cells (Figs 5A and 6A, black arrows). The hyperpolarizing limiting slope was maximal at the voltage peak just before the sag depolarization (median: 210 mV/pA; Figs 5D, 6D, green symbols). Consistent with the sag depolarization, the hyperpolarizing limiting slope just before the offset (Fig. 6A, red line, 6D, red symbols) decayed to an intermediate value between the maximal depolarizing (Fig. 6D, dotted line) and hyperpolarizing limiting slopes (Fig. 6D, continuous line).
These long-term changes in membrane conductance caused by the departure of the membrane potential from its resting value are also evident by comparing the voltage return to the resting potential after the offset of 50 and 200 ms current steps (Fig. 6A,B). Return curves after hyperpolarizations decayed much more slowly than after depolarizations. In addition, when the pulse was turned off at the peak of the hyperpolarization (Fig. 6B), the decay time (measured as the time where the voltage returned to half of the voltage departure from resting) was more than twice the value than for longer pulses in which the sag reached a plateau (Fig. 6A). While 50 ms hyperpolarization steps were followed by slow relaxation after the offset, longer hyperpolarizations causing large sag depolarizations were followed in half of the cells by `rebound potentials' peaking about 20–25 ms after current offset (Figs 5A, asterisk, 6C). This suggests that the sag is due to a mixed-cation Ih conductance, and the rebound is the consequence of its remnant activation.
The excitability of the cell was systematically explored using paired intracellular pulses (conditioning and test steps) of different intensity, separated by different delays. These experiments demonstrated a long relative refractory period lasting from 10 to 40 ms, depending on the cell (Fig. 7A). The hump of the subthreshold response to the test step increased with the delay between pulses, but the depolarization after the hump remained similar (Fig. 7A). For a given delay and conditioning stimulus intensity, an increase in the intensity of the test stimulus provoked an increase in spike probability (Fig. 7A) and a reduction in spike latency (Fig. 7B). Inaddition, the latency of the spike evoked by the test pulse decreased with the delay between pulses (Fig. 7C). In all of 10 cells tested, a brief hyperpolarizing pulse after the conditioning stimulus suppressed these changes in excitability.
|
|
Interestingly, the spike was not necessary to provoke a decrease in excitability. Subthreshold conditioning depolarizations also caused a decrease in excitability that was graded with its amplitude (Fig. 9A, rows ii and iii). Furthermore, the amplitude of subthreshold responses to a test step was inversely related to the amplitude of a preceding subthreshold conditioning step (Fig. 9B). Therefore the conductances responsible for the changes in excitability are activated gradually by subthreshold depolarizations. In addition, after a depolarizing step the membrane potential showed an undershoot that was also graded with the step amplitude, confirming that the refractoriness is caused by a depolarization activated low-threshold outward conductance, which equilibrium potential is below the resting potential (Fig. 9B, arrows).
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TOPSummaryIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
ELL spherical cells are onset cells
Spherical cells, the secondary neurons of the fast electrosensory pathway,
characteristically respond with a single spike to sustained steps. This is a
common feature of so-called `onset cells', a highly specialized neuronal type
structurally adapted to transmit information using a latency code
(Carr et al., 2005). As shown
in Fig. 4C, the spike
frequently arises from the falling phase of a hump, indicating that the
recording site is not the lowest threshold site for the spike. Taking into
account the spherical nature of the cell and its relatively small diameter,
one may conclude that all the somata has similar membrane potential and that
the spike initiates at the axon. Increases in cell conductance might drain
synaptic currents, preventing generation of action potentials. Our results
suggest that these attributes are conferred by the non-linear intrinsic
membrane properties of the cell somata.
The outward rectification and the post-step undershoot graded with step amplitude (Fig. 8B arrows) indicate the activation of a low-threshold conductance having its equilibrium potential below the resting level, which could be either a K+ or a Cl– conductance. The activation of this low-threshold conductance shortly after the onset of small depolarizations explains the initial hump in the voltage recording. Voltage steadiness after this hump, and the constancy of the depolarizing limiting slope of the V/I curve, even for long-lasting depolarizations, indicates that the low-threshold conductance does not inactivate with time. The V/I curves obtained at the end of a series of long-lasting constant current steps showed large differences between depolarizing and hyperpolarizing limiting slopes, indicating that when low-threshold conductance is fully active, cell conductance is several times larger than at rest. However, the increase in membrane time constant 2.5 ms after the onset of an hyperpolarizing step suggests that the low-threshold conductance is partially active at rest (Fig. 5C). Outward rectification near the resting potential shortens the membrane time constant, and thus increases spike timing precision.
Preliminary data indicate that the low-threshold fast-activated and
non-inactivating conductance is insensitive to tetraethylammonium (data not
shown). This suggests that the conductance endowing the onset cell profile to
spherical cells is similar to the KLT described in the
pyramidal cells of wave gymnotids
(Fernández et al.,
2005) and onset-neurons of other fast pathways
(Carr et al., 2005).
Another characteristic that many ELL spherical cells share with other onset
cells is their response to hyperpolarizing steps, with a depolarizing sag of
the membrane potential starting between 20 and 70 ms after the step onset. The
V/I slope at the end of a long-lasting step and the rate of
voltage decay at its offset are less than half of those obtained with
short-lasting (up to the peak of the hyperpolarization) current steps. This,
and the rebound observed after the sag, indicate the presence of an inwardly
rectifying, slowly activating and deactivating, mixed cation conductance. This
family of conductances, referred to as IQ or
Ih, is present in many other preparations including some
avian and mammalian auditory cells (Bal and
Oertel, 2000; Trussell,
1999).
To sum up: we propose that the two main conductances defining the intrinsic properties of spherical cells are a low-threshold K+ conductance and a mixed-cation hyperpolarizing activated conductance. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the role of other conductances perhaps shaping spherical cell sub-phenotypes belonging to different ELL maps. Pharmacological experiments, immunohistochemistry and voltage clamp recordings are being carried out to determine the nature and dynamics of the conductances here proposed.
In contrast to other types of onset cells, spherical cells exhibit a long relative refractory period
We propose that the spherical cell's long refractory period could be caused
by a slow deactivation of the low-threshold K+ conductance. This
hypothesis was tested by calculating the slope of V/I plots
constructed at 1 ms after the onset of current steps, applied at different
delays after a conditioning spike. The gradual increase of the
V/I plot slope indicates that the membrane conductance
gradually decays back to the resting value over 10–15 ms after the
spike. Post-spike reduction in slope was well correlated with the increase in
threshold and latency of the spikes generated by the same series of test
steps, indicating that the refractory period of these neurons is due to an
increase in membrane conductance rather than to inactivation of Na+
channels. As the refractoriness is also elicited by subthreshold conditioning
steps, the most parsimonious interpretation is that the same conductance that
causes the outward rectification during the step also causes the
refractoriness after the step.
As the long relative refractory period blocks the response to the second of a pair of afferent inputs, the described spherical cell's excitability implements the low-responsiveness window observed in vivo after the fast electrosensory pathway activation. The comparison made in Fig. 11 is based on the assumption that the temporal average of intracellular recordings from a single cell could mimic the summation of activities of similar cells recorded as a compound action potential.
Larger conspecific-generated EODs recruit more primary afferent fibers and, because of convergence, increase the probability of larger inputs on each cell, more easily overcoming the long lasting refractory period and, therefore, the low-responsiveness window (as shown in Fig. 2).
Afferent convergence and electrical synapses between neighboring spherical cells may also explain the graded decrease in responsiveness of the path as a whole with the increase in amplitude of the conditioning stimuli, as observed in Fig. 3. Increased conditioning stimuli result in a more complete recruitment of the afferent population. This causes refractoriness not only in the cells that fired to the conditioning afferent volley, but also in the fringe of those cells in which afferent input provoked subthreshold depolarizations (either directly or indirectly through a neighbor cell). Thus, increasing conditioning stimulus intensity reduces the responsiveness of the path.
Consequently, we propose that the self-generated EOD, a very strong
stimulus repeated at intervals slightly longer than the low-responsiveness
window that it generates, may permit the fish to maintain a continuous stream
of self-generated information despite the occurrence of other potentially
interfering electric signals as the conspecific-generated EODs. It is known
that progressive incremental delays between self-generated EODs and
conspecific-generated EODs cause transient increases in self-generated EOD
rate (Bullock, 1969;
Westby, 1975;
Capurro et al., 1998). In
fact, G. carapo discharges very regularly with a coefficient of
variation of the inter-EOD interval less than 2%. By suddenly shortening the
inter-EOD interval between 10 and 15% and returning slowly to the basal rate,
fish provoke a phase shift between the self-generated and the conspecific EOD,
which was interpreted (Westby,
1975) as a jamming avoidance response because the faster
discharging fish appears to predict and avoid the joint occurrence of the
conspecific-generated EOD and self-generated EOD. Our results indicate that
jamming avoidance responses probably not only prevent an EOD collision, as
previously thought, but are also the actual responses to increasing
interference. In fact, as the delay increases between self-generated EOD and
the EOD of a slower discharging conspecific, the delay between the
conspecific-generated EOD and the next self-generated EOD decreases. This
causes an increase of the number of spherical cells that leave the refractory
period and respond to the conspecific-generated EOD. In turn, the increased
recruitment of spherical cells by the conspecific-generated EOD decreases the
number of spherical cells ready to be activated by the next self-generated
EOD. Thus, as the delay between conspecific-generated EOD and the next
self-generated EOD decreases, the response to this last one is more affected.
This interference is maximal when the difference in frequency is small enough
to interfere the response to several successive self-generated EODs. Fish
respond to this interference with transient accelerations of the pacemaker
that phase-reset the self-generated EOD in such a way that the
conspecific-generated EOD is forced to occur with a higher probability within
the low-responsiveness window. As a result of the combination of the
low-responsiveness window and the electromotor behavior, the response of the
fast electrosensory pathway to the self-generated EOD is facilitated and the
response to the interfering conspecific-generated EOD is stopped. Thus the
sensory driven active control of the pacemaker rate may allow the fish to
adjust the delay between self-generated EOD and conspecific-generated EOD in
such a way that streaming of self-generated information is optimized.
Comparative considerations about single spiking cells
The presence of single spiking cells in sensory subsystems that are
specialized for the preservation and analysis of timing information is not
exclusive to the fast electrosensory pathway of pulse gymnotids. Neurons with
similar characteristics and functional significance are present in the
electrosensory systems of wave gymnotids
(Szabo et al., 1975;
Heiligenberg, 1991;
Mehaffey et al., 2006), pulse
(Bell and Grant, 1989;
Xu-Friedman and Hopkins, 1999)
and wave (Kawasaki, 2005)
mormyrids, as well as in the auditory
(Carr et al., 2005) and
somatosensory (Prescott and De Koninck,
2002) systems of higher vertebrates.
The fast electrosensory pathway appears to be an electrosensory subsystem
present in all fish exhibiting active electroreception
(Szabo et al., 1975). The
second order neurons of these paths are also round adendritic cells.
Although the fast electrosensory path in wave fish and in pulse mormyrids is very well described at the system and circuit levels, to our knowledge details of the intrinsic properties of the second order neurons remain still unexplored in most fish.
In gymnotids the characterization of spherical cell phenotype is incomplete. However, spherical cells appear to be adapted for implementing the information-processing task that the organization of the electromotor-electrosensory systems of each species imposes.
Eigenmannia spherical cells differ from those of G.
carapo both in that they do not establish dendro-somatic connections and
in that they project via the lateral lemniscus to the layer VI of the
contralateral torus (Carr et al.,
1981). As in pulse gymnotids, the EOD generates a synchronized
activation of the fast electrosensory pathway of Eigenmannia
(Szabo et al., 1975). To our
knowledge, the functional properties of Eigenmannia ELL spherical
cells are only mentioned in Heiligenberg's book
(Heiligenberg, 1991) as
following 1:1 a 170 Hz stimulus.
In Apteronotus, spherical cells project onto a mesencephalic
magnocellularis nucleus (unique and medial as in pulse gymnotids) firing one
to one with the EOD at about 1 kHz (Szabo
et al., 1975). While jamming avoidance responses consist of
long-lasting changes of the pacemaker rate in wave fish, pulse fish frequently
exhibit transient accelerations (Bullock,
1969). This implies differences in both signal processing and
intrinsic properties of spherical cells. In fact, a long refractory period of
spherical neurons would be inadequate for reafferent signal processing in high
frequency wave fish. This conjecture agrees with the immunohistochemical
finding of high threshold K+ channels in spherical cells of
Apteronotus (Mehaffey, 2006) that may facilitate spike repolarization
and reduce the refractory period, as shown for other cell types in the
electrosensory lobe of Apteronotus (Rashid, 2001;
Fernandez et al., 2005).
Single spiking cells with similar outward and inward rectification were
also described in the dorsal horn of mammals
(Prescott and De Koninck,
2002) but their functional role in the computation of
somatosensory images appears to be still obscure
(Graham et al., 2004).
Finally, the spherical cells of pulse fish have much in common with
auditory cells of birds and mammals (Carr,
2004). The combination of conductances described is similar to
that exhibited by bushy and octopus cells in mammalian ventral cochlear
nucleus (Golding et al., 1999;
Manis and Marx, 1991;
Wu and Oertel, 1984;
Brew and Forsythe, 1995;
Oertel et al., 2000), and
avian angularis, magnocellularis and lemniscal nucleus, which share with
spherical cells the accurate transmission of information using a latency code
(Trussell, 1999;
Rathouz and Trussell, 1998;
Reyes et al., 1994;
Soares et al., 2002).
These comparative data suggest that single spiking cells and their
intrinsic properties are a convergent solution in the evolution of sensory
systems (Carr, 2004;
Carr et al., 2005). However,
species variations may adapt cell structure and specific functions
reciprocally. The K+ low-threshold conductance described for pulse
fish spherical cell deactivates slowly, as does the low-threshold
K+ channel observed in auditory cells of guinea pig (time constant
12.5 ms) (Manis and Marx,
1991). This K+ conductance appears to be the same that
shapes octopus cell responsiveness in mice
(Golding et al., 1999). In
other auditory cells, low-threshold K+ conductance is supplemented
by the presence of a high-threshold K+ conductance
(Carr et al., 2005). As in the
pyramidal cells of the ELL of Apteronotus, the high-threshold
conductance facilitates spike repolarization and accelerates deactivation of
the low-threshold current, allowing the auditory onset cells to follow high
frequency stimuli (Manis and Marx,
1991; Trussell,
1999).
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPSummaryIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Aguilera, P. A., Castelló, M. E. and Caputi, A. A. (2001). Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: differences between self-generated and conspecific-generated signal carriers. J. Exp. Biol. 204,185 -198.[Abstract]
Albert, J. and Crampton, W. G. R. (2005). Diversity and phylogeny of neotropical electric fishes (Gymnotiformes). In Electroreception, vol. 21 (ed. T. H. Bullock, C. D. Hopkins, A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay), pp.360 -409. New York: Springer.[CrossRef]
Arbib, M. A., Erdi, P. and Szentagothai, J. (1997). Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Bal, R. and Oertel, D. (2000).
Hyperpolarization-activated, mixed-cation current (I (h)) in octopus cells of
the mammalian cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol.
84,806
-817.
Bell, C. C. and Grant, K. (1989). Corollary discharge inhibition and preservation of temporal information in a sensory nucleus of mormyrid electric fish. J. Neurosci. 9,1029 -1044.[Abstract]
Black Cleworth, P. (1969). Social behavior in Gymnotus carapo (Pisces; Gymnotidae). PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Brew, H. M. and Forsythe, I. D. (1995). Two voltage-dependent K+ conductances with complementary functions in postsynaptic integration at a central auditory synapse. J. Neurosci. 15,8011 -8022.[Abstract]
Bullock, T. H. (1969). Species differences in effect of electroreceptor input on electric organ pacemakers and other aspects of behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav. Evol. 2, 85-118.
Bullock, T. H., Hagiwara, S., Kusano, K. and Negishi, K. (1961). Evidence for a category of electroreceptors in the lateral line of gymnotid fishes. Science 134,1426 -1427.
Capurro, A., Macadar, O., Perrone, R. and Pakdaman, K. (1998). Computational model of the jamming avoidance response in the electric fish Gymnotus carapo. Biosystems 48, 21-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carr, C. E. (2004). Timing is everything: organization of timing circuits in auditory and electrical sensory systems. J. Comp. Neurol. 472,131 -133.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carr, C. E., Maler, L., Heiligenberg, W. and Sas, E. (1981). Laminar organization of the afferent and efferent systems of the torus semicircularis of gymnotiform fish: morphological substrates for parallel processing in the electrosensory system. J. Comp. Neurol. 203,649 -670.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carr, C., Iyer, S., Soares, D., Caluri, S. and Simon, J. Z. (2005). How neurons compute: examples from temporal coding. In 23 Problems in Systems Neuroscience (ed. J. L. van Hemmen and T. J. Sejnowski), pp. 245-265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castelló, M. E., Caputi, A. and Trujillo-Cenóz, O. (1998). Structural and functional aspects of the fast electrosensory pathway in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the pulse fish Gymnotus carapo. J. Comp. Neurol. 401,549 -563.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fernandez, F. R., Mehaffey, W. H., Molineux, M. L. and Turner,
R. W. (2005). High-threshold K+ current increases
gain by offsetting a frequency-dependent increase in low-threshold
K+ current. J. Neurosci.
25,363
-371.
Golding, N. L., Ferragamo, M. J. and Oertel, D.
(1999). Role of intrinsic conductances underlying responses to
transients in octopus cells of the cochlear nucleus. J.
Neurosci. 19,2897
-2905.
Graham, B. A., Brichta, A. M. and Callister, R. J.
(2004). In vivo responses of mouse superficial dorsal horn
neurones to both current injection and peripheral cutaneous stimulation.
J. Physiol. (Lond.) 561,749
-763.
Heiligenberg, W. (1991). Neural Nets in Electric Fish. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Horikawa, K. and Armstrong, W. E. (1988). A versatile means of intracellular labeling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates. J. Neurosci. Methods 25, 1-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kawasaki, M. (2005). Physiology of tuberous electrosensory systems. In Electroreception, vol.21 (ed. T. H. Bullock, C. D. Hopkins, A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay), pp. 154-194. New York: Springer.
Koch, C. and Segev, I. (2000). The role of single neurons in information processing. Nat. Neurosci. 3,1171 -1177.
Lissmann, H. W. (1951). Continuous electrical signals from the tail of a fish. Gymnarchus niloticus Cuv. Nature 167,201 -202.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lissmann, H. W. (1958). On the function and
evolution of electric organ in fish. J. Exp. Biol.
35,156
-191.
Llinas, R. R. (1988). The intrinsic
electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: insights into central
nervous system function. Science
242,1654
-1664.
Manis, P. B. and Marx, S. O. (1991). Outward currents in isolated ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J. Neurosci. 11,2865 -2880.[Abstract]
Marder, E. (2002). Non-mammalian models for studying neural development and function. Nature 417,318 -321.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
Mehaffey, W. H., Fernandez, F. R., Rashid, A. J., Dunn, R. J. and Turner, R. W. (2006). Distribution and function of potassium channels in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of weakly electric apteronotid fish. J. Comp. Physiol. A doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0103-z .
Oertel, D., Bal, R., Gardner, S. M., Smith, P. H. and Joris, P.
X. (2000). Detection of synchrony in the activity of auditory
nerve fibers by octopus cells of the mammalian cochlear nucleus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97,11773
-11779.
Pereira, A. C., Centurion, V. and Caputi, A. A.
(2005). Contextual effects of small environments on the electric
images of objects and their brain evoked responses in weakly electric fish.
J. Exp. Biol. 208,961
-972.
Prescott, S. A. and De Koninck, Y. (2002). Four
cell types with distinctive membrane properties and morphologies in lamina I
of the spinal dorsal horn of the adult rat. J.
Physiol. 539,817
-836.
Rashid, A. J., Morales, E., Turner, R. W. and Dunn, R. J.
(2001). The contribution of dendritic Kv3 K+ channels
to burst discharge in a sensory neuron. J. Neurosci.
21,125
-135.
Rathouz, M. and Trussell, L. (1998).
Characterization of outward currents in neurons of the avian nucleus
magnocellularis. J. Neurophysiol.
80,2824
-2835.
Réthelyi, M. and Szabo, T. (1973). Neurohistological analysis of the lateral lobe in a weakly electric fish, Gymnotus carapo (Gymnotidae, Pisces). Exp. Brain Res. 18,323 -339.[Medline]
Reyes, A., Rubel, E. and Spain, W. (1994). Membrane properties underlying the firing of neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 14,5352 -5364.[Abstract]
Schlegel, P. A. (1973). Perception of objects in weakly electric fish Gymnotus carapo as studied in recordings from rhombencephalic neurons. Exp. Brain Res. 18,340 -354.[Medline]
Soares, D., Chitwood, R. A., Hyson, R. L. and Carr, C. E.
(2002). Intrinsic neuronal properties of the chick nucleus
angularis. J. Neurophysiol.
88,152
-162.
Szabo, T., Sakata, H. and Ravaille, M. (1975). An electrotonically coupled pathway in the central nervous system of some teleost fish, Gymnotidae and Mormyridae. Brain Res. 95,459 -474.[CrossRef][Medline]
Trussell, L. O. (1999). Synaptic mechanisms for coding timing in auditory neurons. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 61,477 -496.[CrossRef][Medline]
Westby, G. W. (1979). Electrical communication and jamming avoidance between resting Gymnotus carapo. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 4,381 -393.[CrossRef]
Westby, G. W. M. (1975). Has the latency dependent response of Gymnotus carapo to discharge triggered stimuli a bearing in electric fish communication? J. Comp. Physiol. A 96,307 -341.[CrossRef]
Wu, S. H. and Oertel, D. (1984). Intracellular injection with horseradish peroxidase of physiologically characterized stellate and bushy cells in slices of mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 4,1577 -1588.[Abstract]
Xu-Friedman, M. A. and Hopkins, C. D. (1999). Central mechanisms of temporal analysis in the knollenorgan pathway of mormyrid electric fish. J. Exp. Biol. 202,1311 -1318.[Abstract]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. van Bergen BLOCKING THE BUZZ OF INTERFERENCE J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2006; 209(6): i - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
