spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. Relationship between body mass (g) and tarsus length (mm) in blue tit (A) and great tit (B) nestlings depending on feeding treatment. Blue tit (mean tarsus length ± s.e.m.: 19.4±0.06 mm, N=108): control group: F1,53=24.75, P<0.0001, slope estimate ± s.e.m. = 0.68±0.14 (nest: Z=1.51, P=0.06); carotenoid-fed group: F1,51=3.23, P=0.08, slope estimate ± s.e.m. = 0.27±0.15 (nest: Z=1.17, P=0.12). Great tit (mean tarsus length ± s.e.m.: 22.43±0.08 mm, N=82): control group: F1,39=28.15, P<0.0001, slope estimate ± s.e.m. = 1.26±0.24, (nest: Z=1.33, P=0.09); carotenoid-fed group: F1,39=21.94, P<0.0001, slope estimate ± s.e.m. = 0.78±0.17 (nest: Z=1.24, P=0.11).





Right arrow Return to article