|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online February 15, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 965-977 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02066
Syringeal muscles fit the trill in ring doves (Streptopelia risoria L.)
1 Experimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG,
Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257S 1400E, UT 84112, Salt Lake
City, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: elemans{at}biology.utah.edu)
Accepted 27 December 2005
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: biomechanics, bioacoustics, muscular control, vocal control, ring dove, Streptopelia risoria
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both songbirds and non-songbirds generate sound by flow-induced vibrations
of the labia and syringeal membranes, respectively
(Fee et al., 1998
;
Fletcher, 1988
;
Gardner et al., 2001
;
Laje et al., 2002
;
Mindlin et al., 2003
;
Mindlin and Laje, 2005
). Birds
possess several syringeal muscle pairs
(King, 1989
). The functions of
individual syringeal muscles that have been studied were derived either from
correlating electromyographic (EMG) recordings with parameters such as
respiratory pressure, syringeal airflow and sound characteristics (e.g.
Brackenbury, 1979
;
Gaunt et al., 1982
;
Goller and Suthers, 1996a
;
Goller and Suthers, 1996b
;
Suthers et al., 1999
;
Vicario, 1991
) or from direct
endoscopic observations of the mechanical action of the muscles when
stimulated in situ (Goller and
Larsen, 1997a
; Goller and
Larsen, 1997b
; Larsen and
Goller, 1999
; Larsen and
Goller, 2002
). These studies established that songbirds use six or
more pairs of intrinsic syringeal muscles to control the position and tension
of bilateral external or internal labia
(Goller and Larsen, 2002
;
Goller and Suthers, 1995
;
Suthers, 1990
). Pigeons,
however, have only two pairs of antagonistic muscles that control position and
tension of their syringeal membranes
(Goller and Larsen,
1997a
).
While these endoscopic and EMG studies convincingly demonstrated that
muscle contractions affect the labial configuration, we still do not know how
the muscles effect control because the mechanical action of a muscle cannot be
inferred reliably from EMG activity alone. Furthermore, we do not know the
quantitative effects of muscular contraction on syringeal reconfiguration.
From an extensive body of literature on muscle physiology, we know that the
force and power output of a muscle strongly depend on its contractile
properties, architecture, activation level and strain regime (e.g.
Askew and Marsh, 2001
;
Dickinson et al., 2000
;
Josephson, 1985
;
Rome et al., 1988
). These
factors are all essential and largely unknown for syringeal muscles.
In this study, we test the hypothesis that syringeal muscles are
physiologically able to control the syringeal aperture by mapping the
contractile performance of syringeal muscles, in particular the link between
strain, frequency and power during cyclic contractions. We chose ring doves
(Streptopelia risoria) because their relatively simple syrinx
contains only two muscle pairs to control sound generation at the syringeal
membranes (Fig. 1). The ring
dove's most common vocalization, the perch coo, consists of two syllables,
S1 and S2, separated by a pause p. The second
syllable S2 starts with a trill (tr) with a repetition rate
of about 20 Hz. Rapid frequency modulations occur during the trill. By analogy
to the pigeon (Columba livia), vibrations of the paired lateral
tympaniform membranes (LTM) most likely produce sound
(Goller and Larsen, 1997b
;
Larsen and Goller, 1999
). The
sound is filtered by the upper vocal tract
(Beckers et al., 2003b
;
Fletcher et al., 2005
;
Riede et al., 2004
). Both the
syringeal membranes' position and tension determine the gating and the
frequency of the sound (Fee et al.,
1998
; Fletcher,
1988
; Gardner et al.,
2001
; Laje et al.,
2002
; Mindlin et al.,
2003
). Position and tension of the LTM are controlled by a complex
interplay of forces exerted on the LTM, whose absolute magnitudes and
interactions are largely unknown. Firstly, force is exerted on the LTM by the
bronchial pressure. The bronchialtracheal pressure gradient induces
self-sustained oscillations of the LTM, which generate the sound wave.
Secondly, force is exerted by a difference between the pressure in the
bronchitrachea and the pressure in the interclavicular air sac (ICAS).
This pressure difference leads to a net force on the LTM and thus an overall
tension change. In ringdoves pressure in the ICAS correlates with the
fundamental frequency of the phonation
(Beckers et al., 2003a
).
Thirdly, force is exerted by two paired extrinsic muscles, the m.
tracheolateralis (TL) and m. sternotrachealis (ST). The TL applies an
abductive force directly on the LTM, and the ST adducts the LTM indirectly by
pulling the syrinx caudad (Goller and
Larsen, 1997b
; Gaunt et al.,
1982
; Warner,
1972
). The ST and TL muscles pull in parallel but opposite
directions. Anatomical drawings have tended to misrepresent this fact. The
syringeal aperture resulting from LTM excursion varies from 0 mm (fully
closed) to 3 mm (tracheal diameter).
|
To gate the individual trill elements, the syringeal muscles must be able
to control the syringeal aperture at high trill rates of 20 Hz, as argued
above. Isometric measurements have already shown that both syringeal muscles
are superfast (Elemans et al.,
2004
). To determine whether the muscles can indeed generate the
power to be able to move the syringeal membranes in and out of the air stream,
we need to extend our isometric analysis to the dynamic situation.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
For the in vitro study, performed at Wageningen University in the
Netherlands, nine adult male ring doves (Streptopelia risoria L.,
body mass Mb=156±9 g) were commercially obtained in
Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ring doves were anaesthetized with a
CO2/O2 gas mixture and decapitated. Rectal temperature
was recorded (to ±0.1°C; Lutron TM-906A, Taipei, Taiwan) while the
animals were anaesthetized.
For the in vivo EMG study performed at the University of Utah, USA, eight adult male ring doves (Mb=152±14 g) were commercially obtained in Salt Lake City, USA.
Morphology of the syringeal muscles in ring doves
To study the exact attachment sites of the TL and ST, the syrinxes of two
male adult ringdoves were sectioned and stained with Masson's Trichrome stain
(Kiernan, 1990
). The muscle
fascia were identified in consecutive sections (Nikon Microphot-FXA,
Badhoevedorp, The Netherlands) and photographed (Olympus DP50, Zoeterwoude,
The Netherlands). Toto images of the syrinx were made with a
stereomicroscope (Zeiss SV11, Sliedrecht, The Netherlands). Multiple images
were combined to generate a high-resolution overview using 2D
cross-correlation algorithms (AnalySIS pro, Münster, Germany).
In vivo study: EMG and sound recordings
The electromyographic (EMG) activity of musculus tracheolateralis (TL) and
m. sternotrachealis (ST) were recorded in spontaneously vocalizing male ring
doves. Teflon-coated copper wire electrodes (65 µm diameter) with 1 mm tips
of Nickel wire (25 µm diameter) were inserted about 2 mm apart in the
muscle body. Using methods similar to those described
(Gaunt et al., 1982
),
measurements suffered from severe movement artefacts due to syrinx vibrations
at 400800 Hz (tested on three spontaneously vocalising male subjects;
results not shown). Separated electrodes provided a signal from several motor
units at low impedance and a better signal-to-noise ratio, and minimised
movement artefacts. The electrodes were glued to the fascia with cyanoacrylate
tissue adhesive, routed out of the interclavicular airsac and led
subcutaneously to a backpack, as described in detail elsewhere
(Goller and Suthers, 1996a
;
Goller and Suthers, 1996b
).
Spontaneous vocalizations started 12 days after surgery. The caged bird
was placed in the centre of a larger box (1 m3 volume), open at the
front, with sound-insulating foam to suppress reflections. Sound was recorded
at 2030 cm from the cage using two microphones (Audiotechnica AT835b,
Stow, OH, USA, and for calibrations a 1/4'' Brüel & Kjær
omni-directional condenser microphone model 4939, Veenendaal, The
Netherlands). Signals were filtered (Brown-Lee Precision Instruments, model
410, San Jose, CA, USA) and digitized at a sample frequency of 12.5 kHz using
a 12-bit A/D converter (National Instruments PCI 6036, Kaysville, UT, USA). We
obtained EMG signals from three healthy, spontaneously vocalising males. In
individual D#1, both sound and EMG signals showed distinct pulses in the trill
of syllable S2, and the quality of both signals allowed for analysis
using single thresholds. In individual D#2, the sound modulations were not
distinct enough and in individual D#3, the sound amplitude of the S2
syllable was too weak after surgery to analyse individual sound pulses in the
trill.
To calculate parameters of the sound and EMG signals, we constructed bins
of 10 ms (125 points) sliding over the time signal with a shift of 1 ms (13
points). We calculated the root mean square (RMS) value and the fundamental
frequency of every bin of the sound signal. To determine the fundamental
frequency, we estimated the power spectral density using the periodogram
method (Oppenheim and Schafer,
1989
). Every bin was zero padded to 8192 points, resulting in a
frequency resolution of 3.1 Hz. EMG signals were integrated with a time
constant of 1 ms. To create binary signals, the EMG and sound signals were
thresholded using a value equal to 34 times the standard deviation
(s.d.) of a 100 ms no-activity segment. We conducted standard
cross-correlations to determine the relationship between thresholded,
integrated EMG and sound signals. We compared correlations using a Wilcoxon
Signed Rank test (Zar, 1998
).
Experiments followed federal regulations and approval for animal
experimentation at the University of Utah.
In vitro study
Sound recordings
Individual coos of all animals used in the in vitro study were
recorded in a semi-anechoic chamber (Brüel & Kjær condenser
microphone 4939; pre-amplifier 2670; amplifier Nexus dual channel) at
Wageningen University. Signals were digitized at a sample frequency of 12 kHz
using a 12-bit A/D converter (National Instruments PCI MIO 16E4) with a
built-in amplifier. All analysis software was written in-house in Matlab (The
Mathworks Inc., Gouda, The Netherlands). Mean trill repetition rate (TRR) was
defined as the reciprocal of the time between the middle of successive trill
elements, averaged over all trill elements for each coo.
Muscle performance
We dissected the syrinx and part of the trachea including TL and ST. To
isolate the left TL, the syrinx was cut medially from the fusion point of the
bronchi along the trachea (black dotted line in
Fig. 2A). The exact origin of
the TL muscle fibres could not be determined in vivo, because the
fibres seemingly merged with fibres of the m. trachealis that run along the
trachea towards the larynx. Based on observations of histological sections,
the trachea was cut at the twentieth tracheal ring (T20) to avoid damage to TL
fibres (prep. 1 in Fig. 2A).
The TL was fixed in a Petri dish covered with Sylgard gel (silicone
elastomere, Dow Corning Corp. Midland, MI, USA) and carefully pared down from
the insertion on the membrane to T9. Some collagenous tissue from the LTM was
left attached to mount the preparation in the test set-up. TL length was
measured from the insertion in the LTM to T11. The paired ST could not be
separated at their insertion site around T17T19 without the risk of
severe damage. Therefore, the ST were left unseparated at their insertion with
a part of the trachea attached (prep. 2 in
Fig. 2A). At the origin side,
small bony protuberances of the sternum were left attached (typically under 1
mm). Both muscle preparations measured about 1 mm in diameter.
|
The preparations were fixed on Sylgard gel in Petri dishes and submerged in
oxygenated Ringer's solution for birds
(Askew and Marsh, 2001
). In
this form, they could be stored for several hours at room temperature without
the performance being affected. We began measuring muscle performance
alternately with TL or ST. When needed, the preparations were quickly
transferred to a small chamber with circulating Ringer's solution that was
saturated with oxygen. The Ringer's temperature was maintained at
39±0.1°C, which was slightly lower than the average body
temperature (41.3±0.5°C, N=9), by heating a reservoir of
Ringers' solution au bain Marie (water bath: LKB Bromma 2219, Lehman
Scientific, Wrightsville, PA, USA).
The tracheal rings of the preparations were secured to the base of the experimental chamber using insect pins. At the other end, the preparations were attached to a curved insect pin that was glued to the arm of an ergometer transducer (Dual-mode Servo series 300b, Aurora Scientific Inc., Ontario, Canada) that measured force and displacement. The TL was attached to the ergometer by pinning the collagenous LTM on the insect pin. To connect the left ST, the small piece of still attached sternum was mounted on the insect pin of the transducer. The right ST was mounted away from the transducer arm and did not affect the measured force during contraction. The position and length of the muscle was varied using three micro-manipulators. Flexible platinum wire electrodes ran parallel along the full length on opposite sides of the muscle. Stimuli were applied with a pulse generator (TGP110, Thurlby-Thandar Instruments Ltd, Huntingdon, UK). After mounting, the preparations were left to recover for about 60 min. After the experiments, all non-contractile and dead tissue was removed from the preparation and the mass (m) of the fibres was measured (to ±0.1 mg; Mettler Toledo, Tiel, The Netherlands).
The ergometer measured force and length and was controlled using the application Muscle Work (kindly provided by Drs R. K. Josephson and J. J. Malamud) developed in Labview 6.0 (National Instruments). Signals were digitized at a sample frequency of 7.5 kHz using a 12-bit A/D converter (National Instruments PCI MIO 16E4) with a built-in amplifier. Analysis software was written in-house in Matlab 6.0 (The Mathworks Inc.).
First, a series of isometric twitches and 100 ms tetanic contractions were
performed to measure the twitch dynamics and isometric stress of the
preparations. We used similar parameters as previous authors (e.g.
Askew and Marsh, 2001
;
Rome et al., 1996
;
Young and Rome, 2001
) to
characterize the twitch (Fig.
2B). Maximum isometric stress (MIS, N m2) was:
![]() | (1) |
L), where m is the
mass of the preparation,
is the muscle density of 1060 kg
m3 (Mendez and Keys,
1960
Muscles were subjected to a series of five sinusoidal strain cycles with
frequency f and amplitude Lmax about
L0 (Fig.
2C). The first and last cycle were omitted from the analysis to
avoid on- and offset transients. Lagrangian strain amplitude was expressed as
=
L/L0, with maximal amplitude
m. A run consisted of a series with stimulation (i.e. active
series), followed by a series without stimulation (i.e. passive series). The
measured force, length and stimulus signals of a run were aligned in time by
cross-correlation of the strain signals of the two series. To estimate the
force pattern solely caused by the contractile elements in the muscles, we
subtracted the aligned force signals of the passive set from those of the
active set (Fig. 2D). This
procedure also reduced deviation in force measurements due to inertial forces
at high cycle frequencies. The instantaneous power Pinst
was Pinst=F(dL/dt) (W). The
maximal instantaneous power (MIP) was measured for each cycle and averaged to
obtain the value for each run (Fig.
2E). Work per cycle was defined as the area of the work loop
(Fig. 2F): W=
F.dL (J). Mean power
was calculated as the product of mean net work over three cycles and cycle
frequency:
=
.f
(W).
We stimulated the muscle preparation at various phases in the strain cycle
[
=0, 22.5, 45, 67.5, 90, 120, 162, 198 and 260° (360° comprises
a full sine wave)] with a fixed duration of one quarter (=90°) of the
cycle to find optimal stimulation phase. Because initial work loops at 10 Hz
and a strain of 5% showed that muscle power was highest with the stimulus
onset at the maximal length during 25% of the cycle, we used these stimulation
settings for all further experiments. The deactivation time is short enough to
enable a slightly higher duty factor at the lowest frequencies and hence to
increase work output during the shortening phase. We may therefore have made a
slight underestimation of the power at the lower frequencies of the
investigated range. The muscles function, however, primarily at higher
frequencies. We subjected the preparations to a range of cycle frequencies
(TL: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 Hz; ST: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50
Hz) and strain amplitudes [TL: 1, 2, 5, 10 and 15% (and 20% for two
preparations); ST:1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25%]. To show consistent patterns in
performance between muscles, the presented MIP and mean power
(
) values were normalized to the
maximal value within the parameter space for each preparation.
Preparations were allowed to rest for 2 min between isometric contractions
and 3 min between series of work loops. Every 30 min, a twitch contraction and
a run of work loops (f=10 Hz and
m=5%) was performed
to monitor changes in performance. We obtained seven TL and ST preparations in
good condition. The isometric data recorded from the preparations have been
reported earlier (Elemans et al.,
2004
). The Committee of Experimental Animal Use of Wageningen
University approved all experiments.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In vivo muscle activity
Doves use both syringeal muscles simultaneously to control their song
(Fig. 3). We obtained EMG
signals from three individuals. From individual D#1, we obtained coos from
five different bouts, of which the quality of both sound and EMG signals
allowed an automated trill analysis using a single threshold (Figs
3AD,
4). From individual D#2, we
obtained coos from 15 bouts, but the second syllable S2 decreased in
sound amplitude after surgery (Fig.
3EH). From individual D#3, we obtained coos from 11 bouts.
D#3 produced trills whose elements were not separated by distinct pauses
(Fig. 3IL).
The ST is active during the entire coo for all three animals (Fig. 3D,H,L). Its activity attenuates slightly or remains constant during the silent interval between syllables (Fig. 3D,H,L). ST activity does not modulate in correspondence with individual sound elements within the trill. In contrast, TL activity modulates strongly during the trill for all three animals (Fig. 3C,G,K). TL activity correlates highly (binary signals: r=0.87±0.08; N=5) with the voiced periods of the trill for individual D#1 (Fig. 4). The correlation of TL activity with the silent periods (binary signals: r=0.55±0.14; N=5) remains strong due to the periodic nature of the signal, but it is significantly weaker (P<0.05 Wilcoxon Signed Rank test). Clearly, activating the TL muscles facilitates the vibration of the membranes and switches on the sound. Onset of TL activation precedes the onset of sound generation during the trill (compare Fig. 4B,C) by 14.8±1.1 ms (N=5). Prior to the first TL pulse associated with the first sound element in the trill (arrow in Fig. 4C), we observed pre-phonatory TL pulses that were synchronized with weak ST pulses in individual D#1 (Fig. 4). The EMG amplitude pattern of the TL in individual D#1 also correlates with fundamental frequency during the trill (r=0.88±0.07; N=5) and even the entire coo (r=0.82±0.08; N=5).
|
In vitro muscle performance
Isometric results of the muscle preparations are listed in
Table 1. Under isometric
conditions, both the TL and the ST demonstrated benchmark values for superfast
muscles, as reported earlier (Elemans et
al., 2004
). The rest lengths of TL (N=7) and ST
(N=7) were 7.56±0.38 mm and 14.60±0.73 mm,
respectively. The masses of the muscles were 5.4±0.8 mg and
5.7±1.4 mg, respectively. One of the ST preparations showed 50%
performance decline during work loop experiments and was used only for initial
isometric measurements. Under dynamic sinusoidal strain, the preparations
showed the highest power output when stimulated at maximal length
(
=90° of the strain cycle) at 10 Hz
(Fig. 6).
|
|
Both TL and ST generated positive power over a broad range of cycle frequencies and strains (Fig. 7). TL produced maximum mean power at 20 Hz and a strain of 10% (7.15±4.04 W kg1, normalized: 0.964±0.072, N=7). Power was not very sensitive to strain in the investigated range. TL reached maximum instantaneous power (MIP) (Fig. 7B) at 15 Hz and a strain of 20% (58.48±14.32 W kg1, normalized: 0.996±0.006, N=2). At the maximum mean power output for TL (at 20 Hz and a strain of 10%) the absolute and normalized maximum instantaneous powers were 31.00±16.86 W kg1 and 0.864±0.12 (N=7), respectively. Out of seven preparations, five showed a similar pattern of maximum instantaneous power, i.e. the maximum at 20 Hz at a strain of 10%.
|
Biomechanical effects of the syringeal muscles
To control the physically most demanding vocal element of the dove's coo,
the trill, the syringeal muscles must be able to open and close the syringeal
aperture at the trill repetition rate of 24 Hz. Both the TL and ST lengths
affect syringeal aperture, because contraction of either TL or ST results in a
lateral excursion of the LTM (Goller and
Larsen, 1997a
). The syringeal aperture can be varied maximally
from 0 mm (fully closed) to about 3 mm (tracheal diameter) in situ,
which corresponds to a bilateral excursion of about 1.5 mm for each LTM. Our
results show that the TL and ST have their highest power output and thus
function optimally in vivo at strains of 10% and 5%, respectively.
This corresponds to contraction amplitudes of 0.76±0.04 mm and
0.73±0.04 mm and peak-to-peak amplitudes of 1.52 mm and 1.46 mm for TL
and ST, respectively, which are not significantly different (Students
t-test; P<0.001). First, this shows that both muscles
have a very similar mechanical dynamic range. Second, the optimal action of
the syringeal muscles overlaps the in situ range of syringeal
aperture over a range of at least 1.5 mm.
Furthermore, both muscles generate peak mean power at 20 Hz, a frequency that closely matches the mean trill repetition rate of 24.2±3.0 Hz (N=9). However, we used cycle frequency settings with, respectively, 5 and 10 Hz resolution, and therefore cannot determine the optimum cycle frequency of the syringeal muscles with the same precision as the trill repetition rate.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our in vivo measurements show that electrical activity of the TL
accompanies voiced rather than silent periods. TL activation in vivo
precedes the onset of sound generation during the trill by 14.8±1.1 ms
(N=5, Fig. 4). This
delay between EMG and sound signal reflects the combined effect of (1) the
delay between muscle activation and force development and (2) the delay
between force development and significant effect on membrane position. The TL
pulls the syringeal membranes apart allowing them to vibrate in the flow,
which supports indirect observations that the syrinx is closed (partially) in
between the trill elements (Beckers et al.,
2003a
). The EMG data suggest that the TL muscles exert control
directly at the syringeal membranes by altering membrane position, which in
turn should alter membrane tension. The proposed control mode implies that
membrane position determines gating, and membrane tension determines pitch. To
conclude, its anatomy, EMG activity and contractile properties all support the
hypothesis that the TL moves the membranes to gait individual trill
elements.
The role of the m. sternotrachealis (ST) in controlling sound generation
has been unclear (Goller and Larsen,
1997a
; Smith,
1977
). Phonation was still possible with completely severed STs in
several species of songbirds and non-songbirds
(Smith, 1977
). Also
gas-induced phonation in anesthetised pigeons resulted in phonation
(Goller and Larsen, 1997a
).
Gaunt et al. (Gaunt et al.,
1982
) report TL and ST modulations during the trill in the ring
dove. When we used similar methods as described
(Gaunt et al. 1982
), our EMG
measurements showed strong modulation in both TL and ST activity (tested on
three spontaneously vocalising male subjects, results not shown). Frequency
analysis showed that both TL and ST electrodes recorded energy at the coo's
sound frequency. The vibrating LTMs generate vibrations with enough energy to
induce vibrations of the whole syrinx and to override the energy in the
recorded EMG signal. The signal modulations were caused by movement artefacts
of the electrodes and not by the electrical activity of the muscles.
Separation of our electrodes by about 2 mm meant that we could avoid movement
artefacts due to syringeal vibrations at sound frequencies.
The ST can act as a damper
We found that the intrinsic contractile properties of the TL and ST are
nearly identical: both have similar twitch kinetics and power performance
distributions as a function of cycle frequency and strain. This shows that
they can function as an antagonistic muscle pair. EMG recordings indicate that
the ST is active during the trill, but the EMG signal does not correlate
clearly with gating of the sound elements during the trill (Figs
3D,H,L,
4D). It is possible that the TL
alone controls syringeal aperture to gate individual sound elements during the
trill. However, such a simple control mechanism would not require a ST muscle
capable of fast modulation. These observations therefore fail to explain the
specialized in vitro properties of the ST.
Muscles have functionally diverse roles
(Dickinson et al., 2000
). We
propose that the ST can function as a damper that stabilizes the
sound-generating system. Given that the TL contracts during the trill, its
insertion on the trachea can cause it to move not only the membranes but also
the trachea. Such longitudinal movement of the trachea and syrinx affects the
position and tension of the membranes and can thus alter the on- and offset of
sound elements. The longitudinal movement of the trachea can be stabilized by
a second muscle, with one insertion point on the trachea and another outside
the syrinx. If this muscle were considerably slower than the driver muscle, it
would let the high-frequency components pass, which can cause unwanted
oscillations of the system. Cockroaches also use two muscles to stabilise
their leg joint one muscle counteracts the oscillations driven by the
other and these two muscles share similar contractile properties
(Ahn and Full, 2002
). The ST
contractile properties, its position in the body, the mechanical effect of its
contraction on the syrinx configuration, and its activity during sound
generation, all agree with the hypothesis that the ST acts as a damper that
counteracts longitudinal movements of the trachea.
At the same time, the ST can bring the syrinx into a different operation
regime, i.e. increased ST activity probably increases the phonation threshold.
In ringdoves, the TL and ST potentially have an equally important role in
fine-tuning the LTM position and tension. By stabilising the trachea, the ST
might enable the TL to execute subtle changes of the membrane position and
tension. Such subtle changes are known to dramatically affect the perceived
sound: in humans, small changes in the vocal fold affect the relative time
that the fold is open vs closed and hence change the perceived
quality of the voice (Henrich et al.,
2003
). Similarly in birds, a lack of stabilisation of the trachea
may have detrimental effects on the quality of sound for a conspecific mate.
Hence, both muscles need to cooperate to control the complex vibration of the
LTM and thus the nature of the produced sound.
Frequency control in ring doves
The fundamental frequency of the produced sound in ring doves is most
likely determined by the tension in the LTM, similar to human phonation
(Fletcher, 1988
;
Gardner et al., 2001
;
Laje et al., 2002
;
Mindlin et al., 2003
). As
mentioned in the Introduction, the tension in the LTM is affected by a complex
interplay of forces resulting from syringeal muscle activity, pressure in the
air sac system and body posture that affects the positioning of the syrinx.
Elemans et al. (Elemans et al.,
2004
) suggested that the TL controls the position and tension of
the LTM and as such controls pitch and gating during phonation in ring doves.
Our analysis in Fig. 5 suggests
that TL control of frequency also depends on other effectors of LTM tension.
One such mechanism is generation of a pressure differential between the
interclavicular air sac (ICAS) and bronchial lumen
(Beckers et al., 2003a
;
Elemans, 2004
;
Fletcher, 1988
). Beckers et
al. (2003a
) found a tight
correlation between fundamental frequency and temporal patterns of
interclavicular air sac pressure. Combining the observations by Beckers et al.
(Beckers et al., 2003a
) with
our data, suggests that the TL moves the LTM from a silent to a phonatory
position and in this way establishes the range within which the fundamental
frequency responds to pressure changes in the interclavicular air sac. The
mechanism by which interclavicular air sac pressure is differentially
modulated relative to the pressure in other air sacs or bronchi is not
understood (Beckers et al.,
2003a
; Boggs et al.,
2001
; Duncker,
1972
). With a biomechanical model of the dove's syrinx, additional
knowledge on material properties and calibrated pressure signals, it would be
possible to explore the separate effects of position and tension of the LTM on
the fundamental frequency of the generated sound and the phonation onset,
respectively.
Syringeal muscle performance
Syringeal muscles of ring doves can be classified as superfast muscles
based on isometric contraction kinetics
(Elemans et al., 2004
). The
maximum mass-specific power of about 10 W kg1 that we
observe in the two syringeal muscles is very low compared with 200400 W
kg1 in locomotory muscles, but in the same order of
magnitude as other superfast muscles, such as the toadfish Opsanus
tau swimbladder muscle (Young and
Rome, 2001
; Fine et al.,
2001
; Parmentier et al.,
2003
; Rome et al.,
1999
) and western diamondback rattlesnake Crotalus atrox
tail shaker (Rome et al.,
1996
). Syringeal muscles do not need to generate high power to
move the LTMs.
|
Of all the coo elements, the trill puts the highest demands on the control
of sound production. The contraction speed of the syringeal muscles obviously
limits the trill repetition rate. In experiments with canaries Serinus
canaria and swamp sparrows Melospiza georgiana, females
preferred artificial songs that consisted of notes with higher repetition
rates than normal songs (Draganoiu et al.,
2002
; Ballentine et al.,
2004
). Such a selective pressure on trill repetition rate
(Podos and Nowicki, 2004
) or
fast amplitude or frequency modulated syllables can explain the evolution of
superfast syringeal muscles in ring doves, and possibly also in songbird
species.
Here, we present the first data on non-isometric contraction dynamics of
syringeal muscles. Yet, many essential aspects of in vivo use of
syringeal muscles are unknown. We know neither how muscle fibres are recruited
during different tasks nor how many motor units exist and how they are
innervated. Furthermore, we do not know how the muscles effect control by
altering muscle length in vivo. The TL in the ring dove could alter
the position of the LTM in the airflow by short jerks using its superfast rise
times or by using sinusoidal movements. To establish the optimum strain and
stimulation regime for each muscle to deliver maximum power, further
measurements are necessary that vary strain regime, duty cycle and activation
phase. Power output might increase with longer duty cycles and asymmetric
strain regimes. For example, the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis
calling muscle generated 60% more power using asymmetric strain cycles
(Girghenrath and Marsh, 1999
).
In the case of the TL, some of the contraction is presumably taken up in
vivo by a longitudinal compression of the trachea because both the origin
and insertion sites move toward the middle of the muscle as described
(Gaunt et al., 1982
).
Consequently, we do not know how muscle length changes of either TL or ST
translate into changes of LTM position. Our data demonstrate that the optimal
action of the syringeal muscles overlaps with the in situ range of
syringeal aperture, but in an anaesthetized bird, maximal contraction of ST
did not completely close the syringeal lumen
(Goller and Larsen, 1997a
).
Measuring syringeal muscle strains during song production in freely moving
birds remains a major experimental challenge.
Intrinsic muscle properties add complexity to sound production
The mechanical behaviour of the peripheral sound production system is
highly non-linear and too complex to map the neural activity of motor areas in
the brain directly onto the produced sound. For example, the nonlinear
intrinsic material properties of the syrinx in general, and of the labia and
membranes in particular, lead to sudden frequency jumps in the acoustic output
(Fee, 2002
; Fee et al., 1997).
Furthermore, experiments and acoustical models suggest that acoustic feedback
from the trachea and from beak movements
(Goller et al., 2003
) can play
a role in introducing further nonlinearities in the relationship between
labial oscillation and produced sound
(Laje et al., 2001
;
Laje and Mindlin, 2005
). The
intrinsic muscle properties and the biomechanical effect of syringeal muscles
on the dynamic state of the syrinx add yet another layer of nonlinearity when
attempting to map the neural activity directly onto the produced sound. First,
we confirmed that the force and power output of syringeal muscles are
intrinsically related to their strain regime in a non-linear fashion, which is
the case for any other vertebrate muscle (e.g.
Woledge et al., 1985
). Other
current gaps in our knowledge of syringeal muscles, such as architecture at
the ultra-structure level, in vivo activation levels, muscle fibre
differentiation and recruitment, will further add to this nonlinear
relationship between neural activity and force output. Second, because most
biological tissues have highly nonlinear elastic properties (e.g.
Vincent, 1992
), small
mechanical perturbations induced by the syringeal muscles alter the position
and tension in vibratory tissues nonlinearly. Such small tension changes in
oscillating tissues can cause bifurcations in their nonlinear vibratory
behaviour, such as the commonly observed periodic doublings in mammalian and
avian phonations (Fee et al.,
1998
; Fee, 2002
;
Fitch et al., 2002; Herzel et al.,
1995
). In the light of the complex mechanical behaviour of the
syrinx, it is more profitable to focus on the biomechanical control parameters
of sound production than to attempt to correlate neural processing parameters
with vocal output (Suthers and Margoliash,
2002
). Therefore, we need a solid understanding of the mechanics
of the sound producing system. Syringeal muscles and respiratory muscles are
the motors that control the virtuosity of birds' vocalizations. Understanding
their mechanical performance in vivo is essential to understand vocal
performance and plasticity. Therefore, we ultimately need to integrate
dynamical models for muscle performance into future mathematical models of
sound production.
| List of abbreviations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ahn, A. N. and Full, R. J. (2002). A motor and
a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy
differently in a running insect. J. Exp. Biol.
205,379
-389.
Askew, G. and Marsh, R. L. (2001). The
mechanical power output of the pectoralis muscle of blue-breasted quail
(Coturnix chinensis): the in vivo length cycle and its
implications for muscle performance. J. Exp. Biol.
204,3587
-3600.
Ballentine, B., Hyman, J. and Nowicki, S.
(2004). Vocal performance influences female response to male bird
song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol.
15,163
-168.
Beckers, G. J. L., Suthers, R. A. and ten Cate, C.
(2003a). Mechanisms of frequency and amplitude modulation in ring
dove song. J. Exp. Biol.
206,1833
-1843.
Beckers, G. J. L., Suthers, R. A. and ten Cate, C.
(2003b). Pure-tone birdsong by resonance filtering of harmonic
overtones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100,7372
-7376.
Boggs, D. F., Baudinette, R. V., Frappell, P. B. and Butler, P. J. (2001). The influence of locomotion on air-sac pressure in little penguins. J. Exp. Biol. 204,3581 -3586.
Bolhuis, J. J., Zijlstra, G. G. O., Den Boer-Visser, A. M. and
Van Der Zee, E. A. (2000). Localized neuronal
activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song
learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97,2282
-2285.
Brackenbury, J. H. (1979). Aeroacoustics of the voal organs of birds. J. Theor. Biol. 81,341 -349.[Medline]
Bradbury, J. W. and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1998). Principles of Animal Communication. Canada: Sinauer Associates.
Brainard, M. S. and Doupe, A. J. (2002). Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of behaviour. Nature 417,351 -358.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chiel, H. J. and Beer, R. D. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body, and environment. Trends Neurosci. 20,553 -557.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dickinson, M. H., Farley, C. T., Full, R. J., Koehl, M. A. R., Kram, R. and Lehman, S. (2000). How animals move: an integrative view. Science 288,1001 -1106.
Doupe, A. J. and Kuhl, P. K. (1999). Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22,567 -631.[CrossRef][Medline]
Draganoiu, T. I., Nagle, L. and Kreutzer, M. (2002). Directional female preference for an exaggerated mail trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269,2525 -2531.[Medline]
Duncker, H. R. (1972). Structure of the avian lungs. Resp. Physiol. 14, 44-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
Elemans, C. P. H. (2004). How do birds sing? Sound analysis mechanical modelling muscular control. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Elemans, C. P. H., Spierts, I. L. Y., Muller, U. K., van Leeuwen, J. L. and Goller, F. (2004). Superfast muscles control dove's trill. Nature 431, 146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fee, M. S. (2002). Measurement of the linear and nonlinear mechanical properties of the oscine syrinx: implications for function. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188,829 -839.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fee, M. S., Shraiman, B., Pesaran, B. and Mitra, P. P. (1998). The role of nonlinear dynamics of the syrinx in the vocalisations of a songbird. Nature 395, 67-71.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fine, M. L., Malloy, K. L., King, C. B., Mitchell, S. L. and Cameron, T. M. (2001). Movement and sound generation by the toadfish swimbladder. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187,371 -379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fitch, W. T., Neubauer, J. and Herzel, H. (2001). Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim. Behav. 63,407 -418.[CrossRef]
Fletcher, N. H. (1988). Bird song a quantitative acoustic model. J. Theor. Biol. 135,455 -481.[CrossRef]
Fletcher, N. H., Riede, T., Beckers, G. J. L. and Suthers, R. A. (2005). Vocal tract filtering and the `coo' of doves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116,3750 -3756.
Gardner, T., Cecchi, G., Magnasco, M., Laje, R. and Mindlin, G. B. (2001). Simple motor gestures for birdsongs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87,208101 -208105.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gaunt, A. S., Gaunt, S. L. L. and Casey, R. M. (1982). Syringeal mechanisms reassessed: evidence from Streptopelia. Auk 99,474 -494.
Girghenrath, M. and Marsh, R. L. (1999). Power of sound producing muscles in the gray tree frogs Hyla versicolor and Hyla chrysoscelis. J. Exp. Biol. 202,3225 -3237.[Abstract]
Goller, F. and Suthers, R. A. (1995). Implications for lateralisation of bird sound from unilateral gating of ilateral motor patterns. Nature 373, 63-66.[CrossRef]
Goller, F. and Suthers, R. A. (1996a). Role of
syringeal muscles in gating airflow and sound production in singing brown
thrashers. J. Neurophysiol.
75,867
-876.
Goller, F. and Suthers, R. A. (1996b). Role of
syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song. J.
Neurophysiol. 76,287
-300.
Goller, F. and Larsen, O. N. (1997a). In situ biomechanics of the syrinx and sound generation in pigeons. J. Exp. Biol. 200,2165 -2176.[Abstract]
Goller, F. and Larsen, O. N. (1997b). A new
mechanism of sound generation in songbirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 94,14787
-14791.
Goller, F. and Larsen, O. N. (2002). New perspectives on mechanisms of sound generation on songbirds. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188,841 -850.[Medline]
Goller, F., Mallinckrodt, M. J. and Torti, S. D. (2003). Beak gape dynamics during song in the zebrafinch. J. Neurobiol. 59,289 -303.
Henrich, N., Sundin, G., Ambroise, D., D'Alessandro, C., Castellengo, M. and Doval, B. (2003). Just noticeable differences of open quotient and asymmetry coefficient in singing voice. J. Voice 17,481 -494.[Medline]
Herzel, H., Berry, D. A., Titze, I. R. and Steinecke, I. (1995). Nonlinear dynamics of the voice: signal analysis and biomechanical modeling. Chaos 5, 30-34.[Medline]
Josephson, R. K. (1985). The mechanical power
output from striated muscle during cyclic contraction. J. Exp.
Biol. 114,493
-512.
Kao, M. H., Doupe, A. J. and Brainard, M. S. (2005). Contributions of an avian basal gangliaforebrain circuit to real-time modulation of song. Nature 433,638 -643.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kiernan, J. A. (1990). Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition. New York: Pergamon Press.
King, A. S. (1989). Functional anatomy of the syrinx. In Form and Function in Birds (ed. A. S. King and J. McLelland), pp. 105-192. New York: Academic Press.
Laje, R. and Mindlin, G. B. (2005). Modeling source-source and source-filter acoustic interaction in birdsong. Phys. Rev. Lett. E 72,036218 .
Laje, R., Gardner, T. J. and Mindlin, G. B. (2001). Continuous model for vocal fold oscillations to study the effect of feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. E 64, 056201.
Laje, R., Gardner, T. J. and Mindlin, G. B. (2002). Neuromuscular control in vocalizations in birdsong: a model. Phys. Rev. Lett. E 65, 051921.
Larsen, O. N. and Goller, F. (1999). Role of syringeal vibrations in birds vocalizations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266,1609 -1615.[CrossRef]
Larsen, O. N. and Goller, F. (2002). Direct
observations of syringeal muscle function in songbirds and a parrot.
J. Exp. Biol. 205,25
-35.
Liu, W. C., Gardner, T. J. and Nottebohm, F.
(2004). Juvenile zebra finches can use multiple strategies to
learn the same song. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101,18177
-18182.
Margoliash, D. (2003). Offline learning and the role of autogenous speech: new suggestions from birdsong research. Speech Commun. 41,165 -178.[CrossRef]
Méndez, J. and Keys, A. (1960). Density and composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism 9, 184-188.
Mindlin, G. B. and Laje, R. (2005). The Physics of Birdsong. Heidelberg: Springer.
Mindlin, G. B., Gardner, T. J., Goller, F. and Suthers, R. A. (2003). Experimental support for a model of birdsong production. Phys. Rev. E 68, 041908.