(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 3. Artificial visual rotation during saccades does not affect saccade dynamics
(amplitude, duration or peak angular velocity). Flies performed spontaneous
saccades in a visual panorama displaying a 45° dark stripe in the
foreground (represented here in light gray for clarity) over a background of
thin vertical stripes with a spatial frequency of 22.5°. When a fly began
a saccade, either the foreground or background was rotated by a predetermined
amount. Top to bottom: no visual rotation (control, n=134 saccades);
foreground rotated with fly's turn (n=151); foreground rotated
against fly's turn (n=148); background with (n=163);
background against (n=142). Most of the distributions (here and in
other figures) are neither normal nor lognormal (Shapiro-Wilk test,
W<0.05); therefore, pink bars show the median value. None of the
distributions here differed significantly from the control (Kruskal-Wallis
nonparametric one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple
comparisons, P>0.05). N=14 flies.