spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 14


Fig. 14. The measured control characteristics of the bumblebee system are compared with the characteristics of a human pilot-vehicle system (McRuer and Jex, 1967). For the human system, the control characteristics are fitted with a transfer function, H(s)= {omega}gc,human/s·e-{tau}e,humanS (the crossover model). On the other hand, the control characteristics in the bumblebee system can be approximated as B(s)=[{omega}gc,bumblebee/(s+3)]2.e-{tau}e,bumblebeeS, which could be called `the square crossover model'. The bumblebee system is observed to possess higher gain at {omega}<{omega}gc than the human system, indicating higher performance in terms of the steady-state characteristics. The gain crossover frequency in the bumblebee system ({omega}gc,bumblebee) is approximately twice as large as that in the human pilot-vehicle system ({omega}gc,human). Because larger {omega}gc causes larger bandwidth in the system, the bumblebee system is revealed to possess superior quick response characteristics. We already verified that the bumblebee system possesses substantial phase margin (PM; Fig. 13), indicating that the system possesses excellent damping characteristics. The bumblebee system was, therefore, revealed to have superiority in terms of the steady-state and transient (i.e. quick response and damping) characteristics, in comparison with the human pilot-vehicle system.





Right arrow Return to article