|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online November 1, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 4503-4514 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02538
Jet propulsion in the cold: mechanics of swimming in the Antarctic scallop Adamussium colbecki
Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mwdenny{at}stanford.edu)
Accepted 8 September 2006
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: abductin, Adamussium colbecki, Antarctic, jet propulsion, scallop, swimming
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As with all jet-propelled animals, swimming in scallops and file shells depends on the ability to rapidly expel fluid (thereby producing thrust) and then to re-inflate. The more frequently the animal can perform this cycle, the more thrust is produced in a given time and the more power is available to propel the body. The consequences of increased power of thrust are potentially valuable: the larger the power, the larger the mass that can be lifted against gravity, and the faster the animal moves.
Pertinent characteristics of this system emerge if, in a heuristic model,
we treat the jet-inflation cycle as the oscillation of a spring-mass system
(Fig. 1). The mass, m,
of the moving parts of the system is a combination of the mass of the shell
and the `added mass' of water that acts as if it moves with the shell
(Batchelor, 1967
). During a jet
(Fig. 1A), the adductor muscle
acts as a spring, applying a force to clap the valves together. The rotational
stiffness of this spring (the proportionality between force and angular
deflection) is Km. During inflation
(Fig. 1B), a pad of rubbery
material in the shell's hinge (the resilium) acts as a spring, applying a
force to spread the valves apart. The rotational stiffness of the resilium is
Kr. As the shell moves (during both jetting and
inflation), energy is lost to viscous process. The effect of these losses is
quantified by the damping coefficient,
, which varies between 0 (no
damping) and 1 (critical damping, for which oscillation is minimized). Given
these assumptions, we can predict the time required for either a jet,
tjet, or inflation, tinf
(Thomson, 1986
):
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
|
![]() | (3) |
Thus, the thrust power available to a jet-propelled bivalve increases if
the mass or the damping coefficient is decreased or the stiffness of the
springs is increased. From this simple heuristic model, we predict that if
increased thrust has been a factor in the mechanical evolution of scallops,
Km and Kr should be relatively large
and m and
should be relatively small compared with sedentary
clams.
|
These expectations are borne out in nature. The adductor muscle of a
scallop (the muscle responsible for clapping the valves together) forms an
unusually large proportion of the overall mass of the animal (typically
25%) and has striated fibers that contract rapidly relative to the
muscles found in other bivalves (Rall,
1981
; Marsh et al.,
1992
; Marsh and Olson,
1994
). Both factors increase Km, the apparent
stiffness of the system's spring during a jet, and thereby increase the power
of thrust (Eqn 3). The shell mass in swimming bivalves is reduced relative to
their sedentary cousins, which both increases the power of thrust (Eqn 3) and
simultaneously reduces the need for thrust by reducing the weight that must be
lifted against gravity (Gould,
1971
). Lastly, the resilium is formed from a stiff elastic
material - abductin - that causes the shell to open rapidly after it has
clapped shut (Gould, 1971
;
Cheng and DeMont, 1996
), and
the mechanical resilience of abductin (its ability to store the potential
energy of deformation with little loss to viscous processes) reduces the
damping of the system.
Although these adaptations allow scallops to swim, these bivalves are
nonetheless on the verge of failure. If scallops' shells were slightly bigger,
if their muscles were capable of producing slightly less power, or if their
abductin were less resilient, these animals might never get off the seafloor.
For example, during ontogeny, the weight of scallops increases faster than
their ability to produce thrust, and, as a consequence, adults above a certain
size are inefficient swimmers and may be incapable of swimming altogether
(Gould, 1971
;
Dadswell and Weihs, 1990
;
Cheng and DeMont, 1996
).
The ability of scallops to swim is put to a stringent test by the Antarctic scallop, Adamussium colbecki. In this animal's frigid habitat (-1.8°C), water is approximately 43% more viscous than at 10°C, where most temperate scallops live. Increased viscosity amplifies the power required both to form a propulsive jet and to push the animal through the water. At the same time, low temperature has the potential to decrease the power output of the adductor muscle. Furthermore, the resilience of rubbery materials (such as abductin) typically decreases at low temperatures. For example, the decrease in resilience of a rubber O-ring contributed to the loss of the space shuttle Challenger when the craft was launched at temperatures near freezing. A decrease in the resilience of its abductin pad would increase the damping coefficient of the Antarctic scallop's spring-mass system, potentially reducing the power available for thrust (Eqn 3).
Despite these potential problems, A. colbecki is capable of
swimming. However, it is evident that the Antarctic scallop is on the edge:
A. colbecki swims at speeds of only 25-50% of those found in
temperate scallops (Ansell et al.,
1998
), barely above the minimal speed required to stay aloft
(Cheng and DeMont, 1996
).
In this study, we address the question of what physiological and mechanical strategies allow A. colbecki to maintain its swimming ability in such an extreme environment. In light of our heuristic model, there are five likely possibilities, listed here in decreasing order of apparent effectiveness and practicality.
, could be reduced by
reducing viscous losses within the abductin pad. Again, there is a potential
problem. As noted above,
is in part determined by the resilience of
abductin, but
also depends on hydrodynamic damping as the valves move
through the water. Of these two, hydrodynamic damping is much the larger. As a
result, even large changes in the resilience of abductin are likely to produce
only small changes in the overall damping coefficient, and hence in the power
available for thrust.
|
As a first step toward evaluating jet propulsion in A. colbecki, we address seven questions related to the potential adaptive strategies listed above.
(1) Is the shell mass of Antarctic scallops reduced relative to that of temperate and tropical scallops?
Have (2) the adductor muscle mass, (3) rotational stiffness of the shell-hinge system and (4) stiffness of abductin increased in A. colbecki relative to temperate and tropical scallops?
(5) Does A. colbecki clap at its resonant frequency?
(6) Is the abductin of the Antarctic scallop indeed an entropy elastomer and therefore subject to decreased resilience at low temperature?
(7) If so, has abductin in A. colbecki adjusted to maintain high resilience in the cold?
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Morphometry
Body dimensions and masses were noted for 15 animals. Shell dimensions were
measured to the nearest 0.05 mm using Vernier calipers. The soft body parts
were separated from the shell, and the adductor muscle and remainder of the
soft tissues were blotted and weighed separately to the nearest 0.01 g.
Shell density
The density of four A. colbecki shells was determined by weighing
each shell in air (to the nearest mg) and then weighing the same shell when
suspended by a thin thread in distilled water.
Weight in water
The weight in water of the soft tissue and shell of A. colbecki
were calculated using the measured density of the shell, a density of 1027 kg
m-3 for seawater (salinity=33
, -1.8°C), and an assumed
density of 1080 kg m-3 for soft tissue
(Denny, 1993
).
Resonant frequency
Clapping frequency during active swimming was measured for two individuals
in the Station holding tanks. Scallops were induced to swim by squirting them
with freshwater, and the resulting bouts of swimming were recorded with a
video camera. Clapping frequency=1/mean time between claps.
For comparison, the resonant frequency of the shell-resilium system was determined for two specimens of A. colbecki (Fig. 2). The body was dissected from the shell, leaving the hinge and resilium intact, and the lower valve of the shell was glued to a massive weight. The shell was then submerged in a large (approximately 0.6 m2 x 6.0 m x 0.2 m deep) vat of seawater (at 8°C), and a small mirror was glued over the hinge on the upper valve. A laser beam reflecting from this mirror onto translucent paper held horizontal over the vat allowed us to measure the angle of the upper valve, which was depressed until it met the lower valve and was then released. The subsequent damped oscillation of the upper valve was recorded by a rotating camera set for a long exposure. The system was less than critically damped, but only the first three half-cycle amplitudes were large enough to be accurately measured. Examination of this image allowed us to measure the resonant period with which the shell oscillated. Resonant frequency= 1/resonant period.
Because only one shell moves, the resonant frequency measured in this
experiment is less than that expected of a free-swimming scallop. According to
the model of DeMont (DeMont,
1990
), the free-swimming resonant frequency is
2 times the
experimentally measured frequency.
Damping coefficient and system resilience
The record of shell angle through time also allowed us to measure the
amplitude of shell deflection, Ai, for consecutive half
cycles of deflection (i=1, 2, 3...; see
Fig. 2), from which the damping
coefficient of the shell-resilium system can be determined as follows. The
slope, B, of a plot of the natural logarithm of
Ai versus half-cycle number (i) allows
us to specify the logarithmic decrement,
(Alexander, 1966
):
![]() | (4) |
The logarithmic decrement of oscillation can in turn be related to the
damping coefficient (Appendix):
![]() | (5) |
Here, we are concerned with all viscous losses as the intact shell opens and closes, a combination of losses due both to viscous effects within the resilium and to interaction of the shell with water around it. As the damping coefficient of the whole shell increases, the damped period of oscillation also increases, the power available for thrust decreases (Eqn 3) and at some point the animal may no longer be able to swim.
The logarithmic decrement can also be used to calculate the resilience,
Rs, of the shell-resilium system
(Alexander, 1966
):
![]() | (6) |
If there is no viscous loss of energy, Rs=1.
If 90% of the energy initially imparted to the system is retained in each half
cycle, Rs=0.9, and so forth. Note that the logarithmic
decrement used here (
, based on the decrease in amplitude from one half
cycle to the next) is half the value often used in the engineering literature
(
e, based on the decrease in amplitude per full cycle).
Note that the damping coefficient of the shell-hinge system can be
calculated in terms of the system's resilience. Solving Eqn 6 for
and
inserting the result into Eqn 5, we see that:
![]() | (7) |
Due to the large angular change in shell orientation and refraction of the light beam by the water's surface, measurements of the logarithmic decrement could not be easily obtained from experiments in which the shell moved through its entire range of gape. A second set of experiments was conducted in which the shell was induced to oscillate through a small angle, and these experiments were used to estimate the logarithmic decrement of the shell-hinge system.
Thermoelastic measurements
Determination of the elastic mechanism of A. colbecki abductin
followed the reasoning of Alexander
(Alexander, 1966
) and Shadwick
and Gosline (Shadwick and Gosline,
1985
). In any elastic material, the force, F, required to
resist an imposed change in length, L, at constant absolute
temperature, T, and volume, V, is due to changes in the
material's internal energy, U, and its entropy, S (a measure
of the material's disorder):
![]() | (8) |
Deformation of an ideal rubber involves rearrangement of the constituent
polymer chains, but negligible stretching or compression of bonds within the
chains, so the change in internal energy
(
U/
LT,V) accounts for little of the
force of deformation. Instead, the force required to deform a rubber is
primarily due to changes in entropy as chains are rearranged
(
S/
LT,V). Either compression or
extension of a rubber network imposes order on the otherwise randomly arranged
chains, and this decrease in entropy results in an increased force.
The nature of the resistive force in a material can be determined by
measuring the relative contributions of internal energy and entropy. As a
practical matter, changes in these parameters are not measured directly.
Instead, we utilize aspects of the theory of rubber elasticity to formulate a
feasible measurement strategy (Flory,
1953
; Treloar,
1975
; Shadwick and Gosline,
1985
).
First, we note that it is very difficult to measure changes in entropy at
constant volume for biological elastomers in an aqueous environment. As the
material is stretched or compressed, water tends to enter or leave, and volume
changes. However, the change in entropy with change in length in an elastomer
is approximately equal in magnitude (but opposite in sign) to change in force
with change in temperature, provided the swelling of the material is allowed
to come to equilibrium:
![]() | (9) |
Note that the derivative of entropy with respect to length is taken at
constant temperature and volume, whereas the derivative of force with respect
to temperature is taken while maintaining the material at constant pressure,
P, and constant compression ratio,
. Compression ratio is the
ratio of undeformed length to deformed length. Thus, the theory of rubber
elasticity predicts that the force involved in deforming a material
(Shadwick and Gosline, 1985
)
is:
![]() | (10) |
This equation is a recipe for a standard thermoelastic experiment. A sample
is deformed to a given compression ratio, and the force required to maintain
this ratio is measured as a function of temperature. Temperature is changed
slowly to allow the material to maintain swelling equilibrium. The entropic
contribution to force is the slope of the line of force versus
temperature, and the internal energy contribution,
U/
LT,V,eq, is the calculated force at
0 K. For an ideal entropy elastomer,
U/
LT,V,eq
0 and all the force is
due to T(
F/
T,P,eq).
|
|
The abductin sample swelled with increasing temperature, and sufficient time was allowed for swelling to come to equilibrium before tests were conducted. The gape of the shell was measured to the nearest 0.05 mm at 20°C, and this was taken as the reference length when calculating compression ratios. Change in unloaded length as a function of temperature was measured as an integral part of the experiment, allowing the force-deformation curve for each temperature to be converted to a curve of force versus compression ratio.
Applied force was normalized to the size of each resilium by converting
force to stress (
, force per cross-sectional area of abductin) through
a consideration of the geometry of the shell and resilium and the application
of basic materials mechanics (Fig.
4). First, we note that:
![]() | (11) |
where E is the stiffness of the material (its elastic modulus).
Next, we note that MF, the moment applied by the
external force, is equal to the product of applied force, F, and the
lever arm, XF.
![]() | (12) |
|
![]() | (13) |
The infinitesimal moment produced by this force is the product of force
(Eqn 13) and its moment arm, x:
![]() | (14) |
The overall moment generated by the resilium is the integral of this
infinitesimal moment taken across the full length of the resilium,
xmax:
![]() | (15) |
Setting Eqn 12 equal to Eqn 15 and solving for stress, we find that:
![]() | (16) |
Thus, stress in the resilium can be calculated from the known applied force and the dimensions of the sample.
In summary, by applying weight to the pan and measuring the resulting
deflections of the lower valve, a
-
curve was obtained for each
experimental temperature.
From these
-
relationships, stress versus
temperature curves were drawn for each of five constant compression ratios,
and a linear regression was fit to each curve. For each curve, the slope of
the line and y intercept (and their 95% confidence limits) were then
calculated using standard statistics, thereby providing information about the
entropy and internal energy contributions to the total stress at each
compression ratio (Eqn 10).
Rotational stiffness
The apparatus used for the thermoelastic experiments
(Fig. 3) also allowed us to
measure the rotational stiffness of the resilium for the four test shells. As
noted above, imposition of an applied moment, MF, resulted
in a measured displacement of the lower valve. Dividing this displacement by
the moment arm, XF (see
Fig. 4), provides a close
approximation of the angular displacement of the valve. MF
divided by this angular displacement is the rotational stiffness (Nm
rad-1).
Abductin resilience
The resilience, Ra, of A. colbecki abductin
(as distinct from Rs, the resilience of the shell-resilium
system) was measured in a manner similar to that used by Alexander
(Alexander, 1966
). The body was
removed from a shell, leaving the resilium intact, and the lower valve was
glued firmly to a weight and placed in a beaker. Seawater
(salinity=33
) was added to the level of the resilium and the beaker
was then placed in a constant-temperature bath
(Fig. 5). To reduce viscous
losses from the interaction of the shell and air, the upper valve was trimmed
until only a small area surrounding the hinge was left. A light, rigid plastic
beam was then glued to the upper valve, and PlasticineTM was added to the
free end of this beam to adjust the resonant frequency of the sample to 3-4
Hz, the same frequency used for tests on temperate scallops
(Alexander, 1966
;
Bowie et al., 1993
). A small
mirror was then mounted (using PlasticineTM) over the hinge of the shell.
The beam from a laser pointer reflected from this mirror and shone on the
ceiling, providing a measure of the shell's angle. When the plastic beam was
momentarily deflected and then released, the shell oscillated resonantly, and
the amplitude of the oscillations (measured from the location of the image of
the laser beam on the ceiling) was recorded by a rotating camera set for a 2.5
s exposure. This image allowed us to measure the amplitude of shell
deflection, Ai, for consecutive half cycles of deflection
(i=1, 2, 3...), from which the logarithmic decrement and resilience
were calculated as for the overall system (Eqns 4, 6).
|
Amino acid composition
Amino acid composition was determined for abductin from two species of
scallops: A. colbecki (collected in McMurdo Sound) and Pecten
maximus L. (collected at Tjarnö Marine Biological Station on the
west coast of Sweden). The resilium was dissected from three individuals of
each species. Half of each sample was soaked in formic acid at 4°C
overnight and then hydrolyzed in 6 mol l-1 HCl/1% phenol at
110°C for 24 h. The second half of each sample was soaked in performic
acid overnight to oxidize cysteine, cystine and methionine prior to
hydrolysis. All samples were then analyzed on a Hitachi L-8800 analyzer with a
sodium citrate buffer system. Analyses were performed by the Molecular
Structure Facility at the University of California, Davis. Similarity among
scallop species was quantified using the Bray-Curtis similarity coefficient
(Primer; Primer-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Resonant oscillation
Resonant frequencies of oscillation in the two experimental shells were
1.42 Hz (for a shell with a dorsal-ventral length of 79.6 mm) and 1.02 Hz (for
a shell with dorsal-ventral length of 88.4 mm). These correspond to
free-swimming resonant frequencies of 2.00 and 1.45 Hz, respectively. These
free-swimming resonant frequencies are approximately equal to the clapping
frequencies measured both in the holding tanks (1.39 and 1.46 Hz) and in the
field [1.32-2.08 Hz, mean=1.52 Hz (Ansell
et al., 1998
)].
Damping coefficient and system resilience
The mean logarithmic decrement for the whole-shell system was
0.69±0.08 (s.d., N=6), corresponding to a damping coefficient
of
=0.215±0.02 (N=6; Eqn 5) and a resilience
Rs=0.252 (Eqn 6).
Thermoelastic experiments
The results of a representative experiment are shown in
Fig. 6. The internal energy
contribution to stress is statistically indistinguishable from 0, and the
entropy contribution is statistically indistinguishable from the measured
stress, indicating that A. colbecki abductin is an entropy
rubber.
Representative stress-compression ratio curves are shown in Fig. 7. Stiffness decreases slightly with increasing compression ratio. At 1.1°C, the tangent elastic modulus (the slope of the curve) varies from 4.0 MPa at low compression ratios to 1.7 MPa at high compression ratios. At 29.3°C, the material is stiffer, with modulus values that range from 4.6 MPa to 2.3 MPa.
|
Rotational stiffness
At 0.4-1.1°C, the mean rotational stiffness of the four test shells was
0.034±0.019 Nm rad-1.
Resilience
Resilience of A. colbecki abductin is variable among samples and
decreases with decreasing temperature (Fig.
8). The decrease in resilience for the Antarctic species is less
pronounced than that for the temperate species: at low temperatures (0, 5 and
10°C), the resilience of A. colbecki is significantly higher than
that of its temperate relative (Tables
2,
3). For a given temperature,
the Antarctic scallop is approximately 3% more resilient. For a given
resilience, A. colbecki performs as if it were approximately 5°C
warmer.
|
|
|
Amino acid composition
The amino acid composition of A. colbecki abductin is given in
Table 4, and its similarity to
other scallops is shown in Table
5.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By contrast, the morphology, muscle performance and materials mechanics of
the Antarctic scallop differ substantially from those of temperate scallops.
To place our morphological data in context, we compare values for A.
colbecki of length equal to the average of our sample to values for a
tropical scallop (Amusium pleuoronectes) with the same length
[calculated from data given by Morton
(Morton, 1980
)].
Shell mass
In the Antarctic scallop, the ratio of shell mass to wet body mass
(adductor muscle plus other soft tissue) was 0.59, considerably smaller than
the ratio in the tropical scallop, 1.07. As a consequence, for our sample, the
weight of an average A. colbecki in seawater is 61 mN, whereas the
weight in water of a similar size tropical scallop is 110 mN. For a given size
animal, the Antarctic scallop need provide less thrust to propel its body up
from the substratum.
Muscle mass
However, the mass of the adductor muscle is also reduced. The ratio of
adductor muscle mass to the total mass of soft tissue is 0.26 in A.
colbecki, only about half the ratio found in the tropical scallop, 0.53.
As a result, the adductor muscle in A. colbecki forms only 16% of the
total mass of the organism, less than the 26% found in the tropical
scallop.
Power-to-mass ratio
If the mass-specific power output of the muscle were constant, the ratio of
muscle mass to weight in water would be an index of power available for
swimming relative to the weight that must be lifted. This ratio is 0.061
s2 m-1 in the Antarctic scallop, 79% of the
corresponding value for the tropical scallop, 0.077 s2
m-1. However, as noted previously, Bailey et al. showed that both
contraction speed and maximum tension of A. colbecki muscle are half
that of a temperate scallop (Argopecten irradians)
(Bailey et al., 2005
). Because
power is equal to the product of force and velocity, the reduced speed and
tension found in the Antarctic scallop suggest that the mass-specific power
output of A. colbecki muscle is only about 25% that of a temperate
scallop. If this is so, the ratio of power to weight in A. colbecki
is only about 20% that of its temperate and tropical relatives. The resulting
reduction in capability is evident in the slow swimming speed of A.
colbecki (Ansell et al.,
1998
; Bailey et al.,
2005
), a speed apparently just sufficient to keep the animal aloft
(Cheng and DeMont, 1996
). In
summary, A. colbecki has not effectively compensated for the effects
of low temperature on its adductor muscle's power output by increasing the
mass of the muscle relative to that of the shell.
Resonant frequency
The clapping frequency of A. colbecki is indistinguishable from
the shell's resonant frequency, suggesting that, as with temperate scallops
(DeMont, 1990
), the Antarctic
scallop may reduce the cost of locomotion by tuning its swimming to the
oscillatory mechanics of its shell-hinge system.
Rotational stiffness
The rotational stiffness of the specimens measured here (0.034 Nm
rad-1) is less than that measured for temperate scallops 0.16-0.29
Nm rad-1 [Argopecten irradians and Pecten
maximus, respectively (DeMont,
1990
)]. Although this comparison is based on only a few samples of
each species, it does not seem that A. colbecki has increased (or
even maintained) its rotational stiffness. Further evidence is provided by the
resonant frequency of the shell, noted above. If A. colbecki had the
same rotational stiffness as temperate scallops, it would have a higher
resonant frequency of oscillation due to its smaller shell (Eqn 3). Instead,
its resonant frequency (1.45-2.00 Hz) is comparable to that of P.
maximus [1.4-2.7 Hz (DeMont,
1990
)].
Stiffness of abductin
The elastic modulus of A. colbecki is 1.7-4.6 MPa, depending on
temperature and compression ratio. Trueman
(Trueman, 1953
) and Alexander
(Alexander, 1966
) measured
similar moduli (3 and 4 MPa, respectively) for temperate scallops, and moduli
in this range are typical for biological rubbers in general
(Wainwright et al., 1974
).
Thus, A. colbecki has not adjusted to the cold by substantially
increasing the stiffness of its abductin.
Resilience of abductin
At low temperature, A. colbecki abductin is more resilient than
that of temperate scallops, and this resilience contributes to maintaining the
damping coefficient for the shell-hinge system at a practical level. The
damping coefficient for the oscillating shell (0.215) is similar to the value
of 0.2 estimated by DeMont (DeMont,
1990
) for a temperate scallop. In both cases, the damped resonant
frequency (and thereby the power available for thrust) is only about 2% lower
than that in the total absence of damping (Eqn 3).
However, it is difficult to judge the importance of this increase in
resilience. First, as noted previously, most of the energetic loss during
oscillation of a scallop shell is due to hydrodynamics, not to the resilium's
abductin. For example, at 8°C, the resilience of A. colbecki
abductin is about 0.86 (Fig.
8). Thus, 1-0.86=14% of the elastic potential energy stored in a
fully compressed resilium is lost in each cycle of oscillation due to viscous
interactions within the resilium itself. By contrast, the resilience of the
whole-shell system tested at this temperature was 0.252, implying that
75% of the initial elastic potential energy stored in the resilium is
lost when the system oscillates in water. Apparently, in a cycle, 61% (14-75%)
of the initial energy is lost due to hydrodynamics, about 4.4 times the amount
lost to abductin. As a consequence, any change in the resilience of abductin
can cause only a relatively small change in the overall resilience of the
shell-hinge system.
Furthermore, even drastic changes in the resilience of abductin would make
only small changes in the resonant period of the shell-hinge system, and
therefore in the power of thrust. For example, a decrease in the resilience of
abductin from 0.86 to 0.72 would double the fraction of energy lost in the
hinge, from 14% to 28% of the total. When this energy loss is added to the 61%
of energy lost to hydrodynamics, 89% of the initial elastic energy stored in
this hypothetical low-resilience shell would be lost in each cycle
(Rs=0.11), increasing the damping coefficient
from 0.215 to 0.331 (Eqn 7). However, this substantial increase in
results in only a minor decrease in the power available for thrust (Eqn 3):
5.6% less than that of a totally undamped system vs 2.3% for the
system as it exists now. It would thus seem that the resilience of abductin,
even in the cold, plays a small role in scallop locomotion.
However, as we have seen, A. colbecki is underpowered relative to temperate scallops and perhaps on the verge of not being able to swim. As a result, even small changes in overall damping (and therefore in the power available for thrust) might be important. We are forced to speculate that the effects of abductin resilience at low temperatures, small as they might be, have been sufficient to select for the increased resilience seen in this species.
If abductin has evolved in response to a small selective pressure at low
temperature, why the lack of effective adaptation in other parts of the
locomotory system? Definitive answers are not yet available, but speculation
is again possible. Bailey et al. (Bailey et
al., 2005
) suggest that the reduction in shell mass may be a
response to release from predation: crabs, a potent selective factor in many
aspects of shell morphology (Vermeij,
1993
), are absent from the high Antarctic, and other predators
(such as sea stars) may move so slowly that an energetic escape response is
not necessary. Shell reduction resulting from release from predation could be
compounded by the difficulty of maintaining a calcium-carbonate shell in the
cold waters of Antarctica (Vermeij,
1993
): calcium carbonate is substantially more soluble in cold
water than in warm water. Thus, it is possible that the reduction in shell
mass in A. colbecki is not tied to locomotion alone.
If shell mass were reduced at least in part for non-locomotory reasons, it might explain the apparently maladaptive reduction in muscle mass noted here. The shell of A. colbecki is extremely fragile. If the adductor muscle were to pull harder or faster than it does on this fragile shell, the shell might break. We picture a scenario in which shell mass is reduced in response to a variety of selective pressures, requiring in turn a reduction in muscle mass, a reduction abetted by concomitant reduction in metabolic energy demand of the muscle. In turn, reduced muscle mass creates a selection pressure (albeit probably a small one) for increased resilience in the shell's hinge.
Amino acid composition
Regardless of its evolutionary history, the increased resilience of A.
colbecki abductin is intriguing. A rubber that retains its resilience at
low temperature would be of practical value for human technology, and it will
therefore be useful to determine the molecular basis for the increased
resilience in A. colbecki abductin. However, the amino acid
composition of A. colbecki abductin is very similar to that of
temperate scallops (Table 4),
indicating that compositional adjustments to cold temperatures are subtle.
For example, it is possible that the ratio of methionine to methionine sulfoxide is higher in A. colbecki than in temperate scallops: methionine is more hydrophobic than methionine sulfoxide, and the weakening of any hydrophobic interactions at low temperature would help maintain the mobility of protein chains. However, the analysis performed here does not distinguish between methionine and methionine sulfoxide: both are converted to methionine sulfone before hydrolysis.
One other protein rubber, elastin, is known to maintain high resilience at
low temperature (Gosline and French,
1979
). As temperature decreases, hydrophobic bonds within the
elastin rubber network weaken and the rubber swells drastically, thereby
reducing viscous interactions among chains. However, if this mechanism is
present in A. colbecki abductin, its action must be relatively
subdued: unlike elastin, A. colbecki abductin volume decreases at low
temperatures.
Conclusion
A variety of strategies have been available to A. colbecki to
maintain its swimming ability in the cold waters of Antarctica. However, its
abductin is no stiffer than that of temperate and tropical scallops, and a
substantial reduction in shell mass is more than offset by a drastic reduction
in adductor-muscle mass. This appears to leave an increase in abductin
resilience as the operative adaptation. This conclusion is less than
satisfying, though, because the beneficial effects of increased resilience are
so small. Regardless of its evolutionary history, the increased resilience of
A. colbecki abductin may be of interest to materials engineers.
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() | (A1) |
![]() | (A2) |
![]() | (A3) |
Here,
n is the natural radian frequency of the system,
d is its damped frequency,
e is the
full-cycle logarithmic decrement, td is the damped period,
and
is the damping coefficient. Inserting Eqn A2 into Eqn A1, we see
that:
![]() | (A4) |
Inserting Eqn A4 into Eqn A3, and noting that
e=2
,
we arrive at the conclusion that:
![]() | (A5) |
Solving for
leads us to the final result:
![]() | (A6) |
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alexander, R. McN. (1966). Rubber-like
properties of the inner hingeligament of Pectinidae. J. Exp.
Biol. 44,119
-130.
Alexander, R. McN. (2003). Functions of elastomeric proteins in animals. In Elastomeric Proteins: Structures, Biomechanical Properties, and Biological Roles (ed. P. R. Shewry, A. S. Tatham and A. J. Bailey), pp.1 -14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ansell, A. D., Cattaneo-Vietti, R. and Chiantore, M. (1998). Swimming in the Antarctic scallop Adamussium colbecki: analysis of in situ video recordings. Antarct. Sci. 10,369 -375.
Bailey, D. M., Johnston, I. A. and Peck, L. S. (2005). Invertebrate muscle performance at high latitude: swimming activity in the Antarctic scallop, Adamussium colbecki.Polar Biol. 28,464 -469.[CrossRef]
Batchelor, G. K. (1967). An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowie, M. A., Layes, J. D. and DeMont, M. E. (1993). Damping in the hinge of the scallop Placopecten magellanicus. J. Exp. Biol. 175,311 -315.[Abstract]
Cheng, J.-Y. and DeMont, M. E. (1996). Jet-propelled swimming in scallops: swimming mechanics and ontogenic scaling. Can. J. Zool. 74,1734 -1748.
Dadswell, M. J. and Weihs, D. (1990). Size-related hydrodynamic characteristics of the gient scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Bivalvis: Pectinidae). Can. J. Zool. 68,778 -785.
DeMont, M. E. (1990). Tuned oscillations in the swimming scallop Pecten maximus. Can. J. Zool. 68,786 -791.
Denny, M. W. (1993). Air and Water. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Donovan, D. H., Elias, J. P. and Baldwin, J. (2004). Swimming behavior and morphometry of the file shell Limaria fragilis. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 37, 7-16.[CrossRef]
Flory, P. J. (1953). Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gosline, J. M. and French, C. J. (1979). Dynamic properties of elastin. Biopolymers 18,2091 -2103.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gould, S. J. (1971). Muscular mechanics and the ontogeny of swimming scallops. Paleontology 14, 61-94.
Kahler, G. A., Fisher, F. M. and Sass, R. L.
(1976). The chemical composition and mechanical properties of the
hinge ligament in bivalve molluscs. Biol. Bull.
151,161
-181.
Marsh, R. L. and Olson, J. M. (1994). Power output of scallop adductor muscle during contractions replicating the in vivo mechanical cycle. J. Exp. Biol. 193,136 -156.
Marsh, R. L., Olson, J. M. and Quzik, S. K. (1992). Mechanical performance of scallop adductor muscle during swimming. Nature 357,411 -413.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morton, B. (1980). Swimming in Amusium pleuronectes (Bivalvia: Pectinidae). J. Zool. Lond. 190,375 -404.
Rall, J. A. (1981). Mechanics and energetics of contraction in striated muscle of the sea scallop. Placopecten magellanicus. J. Physiol. Lond. 321,287 -295.
Shadwick, R. E. and Gosline, J. M. (1985).
Physical and chemical properties of rubber-like elastic fibres from octopus
aorta. J. Exp. Biol.
114,239
-257.
Thomson, W. T. (1986). Theory of Vibration With Applications (2nd edn). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Treloar, L. R. G. (1975). Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Trueman, E. R. (1953). Observations on certain mechanical properties of the ligament of Pecten. J. Exp. Biol. 30,453 -467.[Abstract]
Vermeij, G. (1993). A Natural History of Shells. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wainwright, S. A., Biggs, W. D., Currey, J. D. and Gosline, J. M. (1974). Mechanical Design in Organisms. London: Edward Arnold.
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Clare COLD SCALLOPS RELY ON RUBBER J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||