(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 8. Comparison of spatial frequency (SF) tuning at two receptive field
locations of HSN cells showing sexually dimorphic contrast sensitivity and
lateral spatial frequency tuning. Estimated contributions from Type 1 and Type
2 EMDs are given as arrow thickness and again as the height of small bars. EMD
contributions and smooth curves were fit to the shown data with a two EMD
model constrained by interommatidial angle data taken from
Fig. 1. Free parameters were
total gain, relative EMD contribution, and saturation. These parameters can be
found in Table 1. Temporal
frequency 5 Hz. Values are means ± s.e.m.; males, N=5 (filled
squares), females, N=6 (open circles).