spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Fig. 1. Effect of OA on the voltage-activated L-type current carried by barium in sea bass ventricular myocytes. (A,B) The current was elicited by a step in membrane potential to 0 mV from a holding potential of –80 mV (insert) during 300 ms (A) at 1/20 Hz. Superimposed traces show responses of a cell in control solution, after 5 min exposure to 30 µmol l–1 OA (A) and 3 µmol l–1 nifedipine (B) (capacitance=40.71 pF). (C) Time course of the inhibitory effect of OA on the peak IBa,L. Peak currents were normalised to their initial peak current recorded at t=0 min of perfusion and are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. Black crosses, control perfusion without OA (N=11); green squares, yellow triangles, red diamonds and blue circles, OA concentrations of 5 (N=3), 10 (N=4), 30 (N=10) and 100 µmol l–1 (N=6), respectively. Significant differences between control and the different OA concentrations are indicated (*P<0.05, **P<0.01). (D) Concentration dependence of inhibition by OA on IBa,L after 5 min of perfusion. The number of cells treated with OA at 5, 10, 30 and 100 µmol l–1 is 3, 4, 10 and 6, respectively. The line was obtained by fitting data to the Hill equation (see Materials and methods), which gave an IC50 of 12.49±0.27 µmol l–1 and a Hill factor of 1.97±0.07. Values are mean ± s.e.m. Dissimilar letters indicated a significant difference (P<0.05) of IBa,L diminution between the different OA concentrations.





Right arrow Return to article