spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 8


Fig. 8. Removing the ß-peak from the GFRKD visual pigment template optimization allows for a much better fit in both eye types (gray lines; correlations=0.984, lower eye; 0.968, upper eye). With invertebrate levels of self-screening (k=0.0067; A,B, black lines) the curves are indistinguishable from the no screening case (A,B, gray lines). However, these fits can be improved further by adding vertebrate level self-screening to the optimization (C,D, black lines); where k= 0.035 µm-1, and l=50 µm for the lower eye photoreceptors and l=35 µm for the upper eye photoreceptors. Here, self-screening has the effect of broadening the absorption curve. For the lower eye (C) the half-width increases to 112.1 nm with the addition of screening, compared to 82.0 nm without screening. For the upper eye (D) the half-width increases to 111.2 nm from 82.8 nm. Correspondingly the correlation values increase to 0.991 and 0.980 for the lower and upper eyes, respectively.





Right arrow Return to article