(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 7. Shifts of extreme positions due to perturbation. Top view of shift vectors,
indicating the mean shift of extreme positions of the perturbed right front
leg (rFL), the contralateral left front leg (lFL), and the ipsilateral right
middle leg (rML). As reference, mean unperturbed PEPs (filled circles) and
AEPs (open circles) are shown for the three legs. Different walking contexts
are shown: (A), inner leg; (B), straight walking; (C), outer leg. Arrow length
indicates the spatial extent of the shift. Statistical significance was tested
for mean direction of the shift. Significance levels:
***P<0.001; **P<0.01;
*P<0.05. Arcs (solid lines, PEP; dotted lines, AEP)
illustrate tangential components of the shift, i.e. the contribution of the
front leg and middle leg ThC joints. The impact of perturbation was strongest
when the inner front leg was perturbed (A) with significant shifts in all
three legs in the perturbed (red arrows) and subsequent step (blue arrows).
Shifts were less pronounced if perturbation occurred in straight walking (B)
or the outer front leg (C). The mean distance between the prothoracic and
mesothoracic coxae was taken from Cruse
(Cruse, 1976).