spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Spatial and temporal effects of perturbation. The impact of perturbation on the perturbed leg itself was investigated over a walking sequence of three subsequent steps (-1, 0, +1), step 0 being the perturbed step (white). Bars indicate mean values of step parameters ± s.d. (Inner, N=51; Straight, N=64; Outer, N=58). Perturbation affected swing distance (A), swing duration (B), and duty cycle, i.e. the fraction of the step cycle spent in stance (C). Data of the perturbed step 0 and the subsequent unperturbed step +1 (grey) were tested with reference to step -1 (black), prior to perturbation (Wilcoxon test). Perturbation caused a reduction of swing distance and duty cycle and a prolongation of the swing duration, the only exception being swing distance of inner legs, which remained unchanged (A, left). Step parameters in unperturbed walking depend on the behavioural context and differ between straight and curve walking (Mann-Whitney U-test). Significance levels: ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05.





Right arrow Return to article