(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 1. Three examples of the effect of call design on ranging errors. (AC)
Spectrograms (FFT size 512, 256 points Hanning window, 240 points overlap).
Two calls (A,C) were emitted at the locations indicated in
Fig. 7B by stars. DOF indicates
the distance at which overall ranging errors were zero. (DF) Ranging
errors calculated for these calls and indicated as lines of identical error.
Labels on lines indicate size of ranging error in centimetres (>0
represents overestimation and <0 represents underestimation of distance).
The thick line labelled `focus' indicates locations where the overall ranging
error is zero. (GI) Ranging errors as in DF but for a smaller
distance range. `Pinheads' indicate perceived positions and `pin tips' the
actual positions of targets.