QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 14, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 18-25 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01959

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Malmström, T. Articles by Kröger, R. H. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malmström, T. Articles by Kröger, R. H. H.

Pupil shapes and lens optics in the eyes of terrestrial vertebrates

Tim Malmström and Ronald H. H. Kröger^*

Department of Cell and Organism Biology, Lund University, Zoology Building, Helgonavägen 3, 22362 Lund, Sweden

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ronald.kroger{at}cob.lu.se)

Accepted 20 October 2005

	Summary

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
Animal eyes that are primarily used under low-light conditions usually have optical systems of short depth of focus, such that chromatic defocus may lead to considerable blurring of the images. In some vertebrates, the problem is solved by multifocal lenses having concentric zones of different focal lengths, each of which focuses a different relevant spectral range onto the retina. A partially constricted circular pupil would shade the peripheral zones of the lens, leading to the loss of well-focused images at relevant wavelengths. The slit pupil, however, allows for use of the full diameter of the lens even in bright light. We studied species of terrestrial vertebrates from a variety of phylogenetic groups to establish how widespread multifocal lenses are and how pupil shapes are adapted to the optical systems. We found that multifocal lenses are common from amphibians to mammals, including primates. Slit pupils were only present in animals having multifocal optical systems. Among the felids, small species have multifocal lenses and slit pupils, while large species have monofocal lenses and round pupils. The Eurasian lynx, a cat of intermediate size, has an intermediate eye design. The functional significance of the absence of multifocal optical systems in large felids remains mysterious, because such systems are present in other large-eyed terrestrial vertebrates. Multifocal optical systems in nocturnal prosimians suggest that those animals have colour vision despite being described as cone monochromats.

Key words: physiological optics, chromatic aberration, multifocal lens, slit pupil, evolution

	Introduction

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
Many animals use colour vision to detect objects against the background and recognise them by colour (e.g. Maximov, 2000). To be able to distinguish between colours, an animal has to have at least two types of photoreceptor expressing different visual pigments as well as mechanisms to compare the outputs from spectrally different photoreceptors (Sharpe et al., 1999). Depending on the species, vertebrate photopic vision ranges from monochromatic (e.g. in a number of strictly nocturnal species and most aquatic mammals; Peichl et al., 2001) to pentachromatic (in some birds; Pichaud et al., 1999). Most mammals are dichromats (Jacobs, 1993).

The quality of the optical system may limit the amount of information that can be made available to the brain since the retina can only encode information that is present in the image. Blur due to defocus reduces the information content of the retinal image, and exact adjustment of focus is particularly important if an animal has eyes adapted for use under low-light conditions. For maximum light-gathering ability, the eyes of nocturnal and crepuscular vertebrates have pupils that are large relative to the focal lengths of the optical systems, i.e. the f-numbers are small (f-number=focal length/pupil diameter). If the f-number is small, depth of focus is short and even small amounts of defocus lead to considerable blurring of the image (Smith and Atchison, 1996).

Ocular media are colour-dispersive, i.e. their refractive indices increase with decreasing wavelength of light (Sivak and Mandelman, 1982; Kröger, 1992). Consequently, the focal length of the optical system is a function of wavelength [longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA)]. Focal length is shortest for short wavelengths (blue) and longest for long wavelengths (red). If an animal is capable of colour vision and has eyes of small f-number, LCA is a major source of blur (chromatic defocus) that cannot be eliminated by accommodation.

In the African cichlid fish Astatotilapia (formerly Haplochromis) burtoni (Günther 1893), well-focused colour images are formed by the crystalline lens alone since the cornea has negligible refractive power in water (Matthiessen, 1882, 1886). The lens has longitudinal spherical aberration (LSA) of complex shape that leads to several focal lengths (multifocal lens). Each focal length is used to create a well-focused image for one of the spectral types of cone photoreceptor in the retina (Fig. 1). Multifocal lenses have carefully controlled gradients of refractive index, possibly including discontinuities at the borders between zones of different focal lengths (Kröger et al., 1999).

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the function of a colour-corrected multifocal fish lens. The spherical lens has a number of discrete zones, three in this example, of different focal lengths for monochromatic light of intermediate wavelength (green). Because of colour dispersion, the lens refracts light of short wavelength (blue) more strongly than green light, such that the zone of the lens having too long a focal length for green light focuses blue light on the retina. Accordingly, the zone of the lens having too short a focal length for green light focuses light of long wavelength (red) on the retina. By this mechanism, a sharp colour image is created by a single lens. That image, however, is contaminated by defocused light having passed through `wrong' zones of the lens (e.g. the peripheral and intermediate zones for green light).

If an eye has a multifocal optical system, pupil shape is of relevance. In many fishes, the pupil is unresponsive to light. Light flux is regulated in the retina instead (Douglas and Wagner, 1982). By contrast, variable pupil sizes are the rule in terrestrial vertebrates (Walls, 1942). If the lens has concentric zones of different focal lengths, a constricted circular pupil would prevent the peripheral zone(s) of the lens from focusing light on the retina (Fig. 2). The problem can be solved by a slit pupil or other specifically adapted pupil shape that allows the animal to use several refractive zones of its lenses even in bright light (Fig. 2). We therefore also determined pupil shapes to correlate pupillary adaptations with the properties of the optical systems. Furthermore, we searched for transitional forms in order to gain information on how evolution has optimized eye designs to the needs of the animals.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. The functional significance of the slit pupil in combination with a multifocal lens. In the fully dilated state of the pupil (A), all zones of the lens (shown in the colours they are focusing) can be used. A concentrically constricting iris (B) would cover the outer zone of the lens such that a spectral range (blue in this example) could not be focused on the retina. By contrast, all lens zones can be used if the pupil constricts to a slit (C).

	Materials and methods

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
Animals
Wild animals in captivity were used out of preference in order to avoid genetic problems that may be present in domesticated animals. We cooperated with a number of zoological gardens and animal parks in Sweden. Domestic animals were used if no wild animals were available for study in an interesting phylogenetic group. All animals were investigated unrestrained in their usual surroundings.

A total of 20 species from the following phylogenetic groups was investigated: amphibians (subgroup: anurans), reptiles (subgroups: geckos, snakes and crocodiles) and mammals (subgroups: rodents, artiodactyls, carnivores and primates). Except for the crocodiles, which both had slit pupils, at least one species in each subgroup had a circular pupil and at least one other had a different pupil shape. In some additional species, only pupil shapes were determined.

Refractometry
Eccentric slope-based infrared videorefractometry is a method to determine the refractive state of the eye in non-cooperative subjects such as human infants and animals (Schaeffel et al., 1987, 1993). If applied on human eyes, accuracy of measurement is 0.5 dioptres. Multifocal optical systems can be detected because different zones of the eye are focused at different distances if monochromatic light is used. Multiple focal lengths manifest themselves as ring-shaped structures in photorefractive images of the pupil (Kröger et al., 1999). We used a digital infrared-sensitive video camera (DCR-TRV 730E; Sony, Tokyo, Japan) in combination with an infrared photoretinoscope consisting of four rows of infrared light-emitting diodes at eccentricities ranging from 5 to 23 mm (Kröger et al., 1999). The distance between the retinoscope and the studied subject was 2 m maximum. The experiments were performed in dim light, and infrared light was used to prevent pupil constriction. Acquired video sequences were loaded onto a computer and single frames grabbed as still images using Premiere 6.0 software (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA).

Pupil shapes
Pictures of animal eyes were taken using a digital camera (DSC-F707; Sony) under lighting conditions eliciting pupil constriction. Where possible, a flashlight was used to induce eye shine. This was especially useful in animals with dark irises. In one case (Mus musculus), infrared illumination had to be used because of an almost perfectly black iris and small eye size (the camera's flashlight did not illuminate the eye at close distance).

	Results

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
Both multi- and monofocal optical systems were found in all studied groups and subgroups of vertebrates, ranging from amphibians to primates (Fig. 3). All species having distinct slit pupils also had clearly visible rings in videorefractive images of the dilated pupil (Table 1).

View larger version (87K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Multifocal optical systems were found in all studied groups of terrestrial vertebrates, ranging from amphibians (A,B) to primates (C-F). Ring-like structures are visible in the photorefractive images (A,C,E). Because of larger eye size, the rings are more prominent in the primates (C,E) than in the toad (A). All three species have slit pupils; horizontal in the toad (B) and vertical in the primates (D,F). Scale bars are 5 mm. Species: Bufo marinus (A,B), Nycticebus coucang (C,D), Galago senegalensis (E,F).

In prosimians, two nocturnal species described as cone monochromats (Galago senegalensis, lesser bushbaby, and Nycticebus coucang, slow loris) were found to have multifocal optical systems and slit pupils (Fig. 3). Two of the studied species, Orthriophis taeniurus (beauty snake) and Mus musculus (house mouse), have multifocal lenses in combination with circular pupils (Fig. 4).

View larger version (124K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Multifocal optical systems in combination with circular pupils are present in the beauty snake (Orthriophis taeniurus friesi; A,B) and house mouse (Mus musculus; C,D). The partially constricted pupil of the house mouse was visualized using infrared light because in the visual range the iris was as black as the pupil and the flashlight of the camera did not illuminate the eye at close range. Scale bars are 2 mm.

In felids, we detected differences between small- and large-eyed species. The domestic cat (Felis sylvestris domestica) has multifocal optics and slit pupils (Fig. 5A,B). Its large relative, the Siberian tiger (Panthera tigris altaica), has monofocal optics and circular pupils (Fig. 5E,F). The eye of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) is intermediate between those of the domestic cat and the Siberian tiger. In lynx eyes, rings were barely detectable in videorefractive images and pupil shape is oval or rhomboid (Fig. 5C,D). The lynx is also intermediate in body and eye size between cat and tiger.

View larger version (84K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. The eyes of felids. The domestic cat (Felix sylvestris domestica; A,B) has a multifocal optical system (indicated by the ring-like structure in the photorefractive image) and a slit pupil. The Siberian tiger (Panthera tigris altaica; E,F) has a monofocal optical system (the photorefractive reflex has a smooth intensity gradient) and a circular pupil. The pupil appears slightly oval in both images because the tiger did not look at the camera. The photorefractive reflex is appearing sideways because the animal was lying on its side. The Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx; C,D) has an eye of intermediate size and design. A faint ring-like structure is visible in the photorefractive image and the pupil is oval to rhomboid in shape. Scale bars are 5 mm.

View larger version (74K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. The eyes of canines. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has vertical slit pupils and multifocal optical systems (A,B). Grey wolves and dogs (Canis lupus lupus and Canis lupus familiaris, respectively) have circular pupils (D). The status of their optical systems is unclear, because some dogs have smooth photorefractive reflexes (dachshund; C), while others have clear ring-like structures (giant schnauzer; E). All members of a group of four closely related tame wolves had a central region of irregularity in photorefractive images (F). Scale bars are 5 mm.

View larger version (133K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Multifocal optical systems and slit pupils in large-eyed terrestrial vertebrates. Clearly visible ring-like structures were observed in photorefractive images of the eyes of domestic sheeps (Ovis aries domesticus; A) which have horizontal slit pupils (B). Similar pupil shapes were found in other artiodactyls, such as the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus; C). The Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus; D) has a vertical slit pupil in combination with a multifocal optical system. Scale bars are 10 mm.

	Discussion

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

Lens optics and pupil shape
Our results indicate that multifocal optical systems are widespread among terrestrial vertebrates. In an earlier study, it was found that a number of fishes have multifocal lenses (Kröger et al., 1999). Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that correction of chromatic aberration by multifocal optical systems is common in vertebrates.

In our sample of terrestrial vertebrates, there were no species having slit pupils in combination with monofocal optical systems. The slit pupil therefore usually seems to be an adaptation to multifocal optical systems. However, there are exceptions to this general rule. Many cephalopods have horizontal slit (octopuses) or W-shaped pupils (some squids and cuttlefishes), despite the fact that most species are monochromats (Williamson, 1995). Even the firefly squid (Watasenia scintillans Berry 1911), one of a few cephalopod species known to have several visual pigments (Seidou et al., 1990), has a monofocal lens (Kröger and Gislén, 2004) and, interestingly, a circular pupil (Kinya Narita, personal communication). LCA is compensated for by a banked retina (Kröger and Gislén, 2004). In cetaceans, being monochromats (Peichl et al., 2001), the pupil often has a flat U-shape. In very bright light, two distinct pupillary openings remain (Dawson et al., 1979). Complex pupil shapes are present in a number of fishes (Walls, 1942). This indicates that multifocal optical systems are not the only possible reason for the evolution of non-circular pupils. Use as a focus indicator (Murphy and Howland, 1990), camouflage of the eye (Walls, 1942; Douglas et al., 2002) and optimization of the light path through the eye (Kröger and Kirschfeld, 1993) are some of the known reasons for the occurrence of unusual pupil shapes. Clearly, one cannot deduce from pupil shape alone whether or not an eye has a multifocal optical system.

It is also true that the circular pupil is usually correlated with a monofocal optical system. However, two of the species in our sample had multifocal optical systems and circular pupils (Table 1; Fig. 4). Such an eye design can be useful for animals with small eyes of limited spatial resolution or large eyes of intermediate f-numbers. If the pupil is fully dilated, depth of focus may be so short that several focal lengths are necessary. When the pupil constricts in response to increasing light intensity, depth of focus increases, such that a monofocal optical system may be sufficient. To test this hypothesis, one would have to create optical models of the eyes in question and investigate the sampling density of the retina. One would also have to know whether the animals use colour vision when their pupils are fully dilated. Such an investigation was beyond the scope of this study.

In addition to the animal groups examined in this study, there are birds with slit pupils, namely the Rhynchops genus of partially nocturnal, fishing birds (skimmers). Since birds are of the same descent as reptiles and most species have colour vision (Pichaud et al., 1999), the skimmers may also have multifocal lenses. We would very much welcome a study of these animals to which we could not get access. Skimmers have most likely descended from birds that had circular pupils and monofocal optical systems. It would therefore be highly interesting to know whether or not they have multifocal optical systems.

The results obtained from nocturnal prosimians indicate that the animals have multifocal optical systems, which in turn suggests that they are capable of colour vision. However, both studied species, the slow loris (Nycticebus coucang) and lesser bushbaby (Galago senegalensis), seem to have only one spectral type of cone (Wikler and Rakic, 1990; Tan and Li, 1999; Ahnelt and Kolb, 2000). Dichromatism by rod-cone interactions is unlikely, because the photorefractive images suggest the presence of three distinct refractive zones. The animals therefore may have hitherto undiscovered cone types. A more revolutionary idea is that several spectrally different types of rod may have evolved in nocturnal primates.

Evolutionary transitions
The occurrence of mono- and multifocal optical systems as well as circular and slit-shaped pupils in closely related species in a variety of phylogenetic groups indicates that transitions between these eye designs have occurred frequently and in short evolutionary times. This gives rise to the interesting question of whether multifocal optical systems have developed polyphyletically, i.e. independently several times during evolution. If so, one may ask whether the mechanisms controlling the refractive index profiles of the lenses are homologous and similar in all vertebrates or are also of polyphyletic origin and therefore different in various groups of vertebrates. It may be, however, that mono- and multifocal optical systems are manifestations of the same mechanism, i.e. optimization of the optical properties of the eye by feedback of information on image quality from the retina or brain to the lens and perhaps the cornea. This question could be answered by studying genetically manipulated animals that lack a visual pigment present in the wild type of the species.

Small eyes with multifocal optical systems and circular pupils (e.g. in the house mouse and beauty snake; Fig. 4)suggest that evolutionary transitions from multifocal systems combined with slit pupils to monofocal systems combined with round pupils, and vice versa, may have been achieved via small eyes of limited spatial resolution. However, our findings in cats suggest that transitions by gradual decrease of the differences in focal lengths as well as pupil asymmetry are also possible. It remains a puzzle how intermediate eye designs, such as in the Eurasian lynx, are optimally adapted to the needs of the animals.

Conclusions
Multifocal optical systems are common in the eyes of terrestrial vertebrates. In many, but not all cases, the slit pupil seems to be an adaptation to a multifocal optical system. Despite being complex organs, vertebrate eyes have undergone rapid evolutionary changes involving a variety of components. Several paths appear to be possible for evolutionary transitions between mono- and multifocal optical systems.

	Acknowledgments

 
We are deeply indebted to the participating zoos and animal gardens as well as their most helpful staff: Fredriksdals Friluftsmuseum, Högåsens Rävhägn, Kolmården's Research and Education, Ölands Djurpark, Skansen Akvariet, Skånes Djurpark, and Tropikariet in Helsingborg. We also extend our thanks to Kinya Narita (Toyama University, Japan), who shared with us the observation that firefly squids have circular pupils.

	References

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 

Ahnelt, P. K. and Kolb, H. (2000). The mammalian photoreceptor mosaic-adaptive design. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 19,711 -777.[CrossRef][Medline]

Blakeslee, B. and Jacobs, G. H. (1985). Color vision in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). Brain Behav. Evol. 26,154 -166.[Medline]

Campbell, M. C. W., Hughes, A. and Sands, P. J. (1982). Anatomically based refractive index model of the rat eye predicting image quality across the retina. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72,1110 .

Campbell, M. C. W., Bobier, W. R. and Roorda, A. (1995). Effect of monochromatic aberrations on photorefractive patterns. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12,1637 -1646.

Dawson, W. W., Adams, C. K., Barris, M. C. and Litzkow, C. A. (1979). Static and kinetic properties of the dolphin pupil. Am. J. Physiol. 237,301 -305.

Douglas, R. H. and Wagner, H.-J. (1982). Endogenous patterns of photomechanical movements in teleosts and their relation to activity rhythms. Cell Tissue Res. 266,133 -144.

Douglas, R. H., Collin, S. P. and Corrigan, J. (2002). The eyes of suckermouth armoured catfish (Loricariidae, subfamily Hypostomus): pupil response, lenticular longitudinal spherical aberration and retinal topography. J. Exp. Biol. 205,3425 -3433.

Ellingson, J. M., Fleishman, L. J. and Loew, E. R. (1995). Visual pigments and spectral sensitivity of the diurnal gecko Gonatodes albogularis. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177,559 -567.[Medline]

Hanström, B. (1962). Djurens Värld, vol. 7. Malmö: Förlagshuset Norden AB.

Hughes, A. (1979). A schematic eye for the rat. Vision Res. 19,569 -588.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jacobs, G. H. (1993). The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol. Rev. 68,413 -471.[Medline]

Jacobs, G. H., Deegan, J. F. I., Crognale, M. A. and Fenwick, J. A. (1993). Photopigments of dogs and foxes and their implications for canid vision. Vis. Neurosci. 10,173 -180.[Medline]

Jacobs, G. H., Deegan, J. F. I. and Neitz, J. (1998). Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in cows, goats, and sheep. Vis. Neurosci. 15,581 -584.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M. and Osorio, D. (2003). Animal colour vision - behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol. Rev. 78,81 -118.[Medline]

Kröger, R. H. H. (1992). Methods to estimate dispersion in vertebrate ocular media. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9,1486 -1490.[Medline]

Kröger, R. H. H. and Kirschfeld, K. (1993). Optics of the harbor porpoise eye in water. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10,1481 -1489.[Medline]

Kröger, R. H. H. and Gislén, A. (2004). Compensation for longitudinal chromatic aberration in the eye of the firefly squid, Watasenia scintillans. Vision Res. 44,2129 -2134.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kröger, R. H. H., Campbell, M. C. W., Fernald, R. D. and Wagner, H.-J. (1999). Multifocal lenses compensate for chromatic defocus in vertebrate eyes. J. Comp. Physiol. A 184,361 -369.[CrossRef][Medline]

Linberg, K. A., Shaaw, C. L., Rex, T. S., Lewis, G. P. and Fisher, S. K. (1998). The distribution of S- and L-cones in cat retina before and after experimental retinal detachment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39, 1059.

Loew, E. R., Govardovskii, V. I., Röhlich, P. and Szél, Á. (1996). Microspectrophotometric and immunocytochemical identification of ultraviolet photoreceptors in geckos. Vis. Neurosci. 13,247 -256.[Medline]

Martin, G. R. (1983). Schematic eye models in vertebrates. In Progress in Sensory Physiology, vol.4 (ed. D. Ottoson), pp. 43-81. Berlin: Springer.

Matthiessen, L. (1882). Ueber die Beziehungen, welche zwischen dem Brechungsindex des Kerncentrums der Krystalllinse und den Dimensionen des Auges bestehen. Pflügers Arch. 27,510 -523.

Matthiessen, L. (1886). Ueber den physikalisch-optischen Bau des Auges der Cetaceen und der Fische. Pflügers Arch. 38,521 -528.

Mattison, C. (2003). Snakes of the World. New York: Facts On File.

Maximov, V. V. (2000). Environmental factors which may have led to the appearance of colour vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355,1239 -1242.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meyer, A. (1927). Brehms Tierleben, vol. 23. 1st revised edition. Hamburg: Gutenberg Verlag.

Murphy, C. J. and Howland, H. C. (1990). The functional significance of crescent-shaped pupils and multiple pupillary apertures. J. Exp. Zool. 5, 22-28.

Neitz, J. and Jacobs, G. H. (1989). Spectral sensitivity of cones in an ungulate. Vis. Neurosci. 2, 97-100.[Medline]

Nowak, R. M. (1999a). Walker's Mammals of the World, vol. 2. 6th edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Nowak, R. M. (1999b). Walker's Mammals of the World, vol. 1. 6th edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Peichl, L., Behrmann, G. and Kröger, R. H. H. (2001). For whales and seals the ocean is not blue: a visual pigment loss in marine mammals. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13,1520 -1528.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pichaud, F., Briscoe, A. and Desplan, C. (1999). Evolution of color vision. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9,622 -627.[CrossRef][Medline]

Remtulla, S. and Hallett, P. E. (1985). A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat. Vision Res. 25,21 -31.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roorda, A., Campbell, C. W. and Bobier, W. R. (1995). Geometrical theory to predict eccentric photorefraction intensity profiles in the human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12,1647 -1656.

Schaeffel, F., Farkas, L. and Howland, H. C. (1987). Infrared photoretinoscope. Appl. Opt. 26,1505 -1509.

Schaeffel, F., Wilhelm, H. and Zrenner, E. (1993). Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J. Physiol. 461,301 -320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schulz, K.-D. (1996). A Monograph of the Colubrid Snakes of the Genus Elaphe Fitzinger. Havlickuv Brod: Koeltz Scientific Books.

Seidou, M., Sugahara, M., Uchiyama, H., Hiraki, K., Hamnaka, T., Michinomae, M., Yoshihara, K. and Kito, Y. (1990). On the three visual pigments in the retina of the firefly squid, Watasenia scintillans. J. Comp. Physiol. A 166,769 -773.

Sharpe, L. T., Stockman, A., Jägle, H. and Nathans, J. (1999). Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision and color blindness. In Color Vision: from Genes to Perception (ed. K. R. Gegenfurtner and L. T. Sharpe), pp. 3-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sillman, A. J., Ronan, S. J. and Loew, E. R. (1991). Histology and microspectrophotometry of the photoreceptors of the crocodilian Alligator mississippiensis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 243, 93-98.

Sillman, A. J., Carver, J. K. and Loew, E. R. (1999). The photoreceptors and visual pigments in the retina of a boid snake, the ball python (Python regius). J. Exp. Biol. 202,1931 -1938.[Abstract]

Sivak, J. G. and Mandelman, T. (1982). Chromatic dispersion of the ocular media. Vision Res. 22,997 -1003.[CrossRef][Medline]

Smith, G. and Atchison, D. A. (1997). The Eye and Visual Optical Instruments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Szél, Á., Röhlich, P., Caffe, A. R., Juliusson, B., Aguirre, G. and Van Veen, T. (1992). Unique topographic separation of two spectral classes of cones in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 325,327 -342.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tan, Y. and Li, W. H. (1999). Trichromatic vision in prosimians. Nature 402, 36.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vakkur, G. J. and Bishop, P. O. (1963). The schematic eye in the cat. Vision Res. 61,357 -381.[Medline]

von Wettstein, O. (1937). Crocodilia. In Handbuch der Zoologie; Sauropsida. 7 (1,3) (ed. K. R. Kükenthal and T. Krumbach), pp. 236-320. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Walls, G. L. (1942). The Vertebrate Eye and its Adaptive Radiation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Welch, K. R. G. (1994). Lizards of the World - A Checklist. Taunton: R & A Research and Information and KCM Books.

Wikler, K. C. and Rakic, P. (1990). Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates. J. Neurosci. 10,3390 -3401.[Abstract]

Williamson, R. (1995). A sensory basis for orientation in cephalopods. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 75, 83-92.

Related articles in JEB:

WHY SOME CREATURES HAVE SLIT SHAPED PUPILS

JEB 2006 209: 0. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. S. E. Gustafsson, S. P. Collin, and R. H. H. Kroger Early evolution of multifocal optics for well-focused colour vision in vertebrates J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2008; 211(10): 1559 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Pusch, G. von der Emde, M. Hollmann, J. Bacelo, S. Nobel, K. Grant, and J. Engelmann Active sensing in a mormyrid fish: electric images and peripheral modifications of the signal carrier give evidence of dual foveation J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2008; 211(6): 921 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Karpestam, J. Gustafsson, N. Shashar, G. Katzir, and R. H. H. Kroger Multifocal lenses in coral reef fishes J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2007; 210(16): 2923 - 2931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kelber and L. S. V. Roth Nocturnal colour vision - not as rare as we might think J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2006; 209(5): 781 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				WHY SOME CREATURES HAVE SLIT SHAPED PUPILS J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Malmström, T. Articles by Kröger, R. H. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malmström, T. Articles by Kröger, R. H. H.