(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 3. (A) Forelimb and (B) hindlimb effective mechanical advantage (EMA) scaling
for all mammalian species (original data reported in
Biewener, 1989). Rodents are
distinguished from other mammals by black squares. The lines are the least
squares regressions for all species, except for the human data shown in (B).
Human EMA during walking (`W') falls within the 95% confidence interval for
all other mammals (not shown), but during running (`R') falls below
(Biewener et al., 2004). (C,D)
Forelimb and hindlimb EMA scaling of rodent species compared with the line for
all mammals. No significant difference in scaling is observed for either limb;
however, this is limited by the fact that the majority of mammalian species
studied to date are rodents. Body mass (Mb; kg); Fore- and
hind-limb EMAs (r/R); mean EMA =
M0.25.