spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. Experiment 3 was performed in an identical environment as Experiment 2 except the distance between columns was increased to 10 m and r0 to 2 m. (A) The numbers of rewards (hits) per 10 min run increased over the course of 5 days (ANOVA, F4,11=7.3, P<0.0001; post-hoc test, NS, non significant; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; N=12). (B) The numbers of hits per 10 m distance run increased over time (ANOVA, F4,11=5.37, P<0.002; post-hoc test, NS, non significant, *P<0.05; **P<0.01). The maximum achievable number of hits per 10 m was 1, animals reached 0.644. (C) The average trace length per 10 min increased a bit over 5 days, the animals were trained in Experiment 1. (D) The inter-individual variation of the trace length, averaged over all 5 days, versus the animal number.





Right arrow Return to article