spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. Copper accumulation by intestinal cells exposed to external [Cu] (Cuo) ranging from 0 (no added Cu) to 800 µmol l–1 for 15 min in normal saline (NaCl=140 mmol l–1 at pH 7.4, filled triangles), compared with the effects of either low external chloride (Clo=6.6 mmol l–1, Clo replaced by sodium gluconate, filled circles), 0.1 mmol l–1 DIDS in normal saline (open squares), or with low external pH (pH 5.5, open circle). Values are means ± S.E.M. of N=5–6 separate experiments using fresh cells from different individual fish. Rapid Cu accumulation in/on cells at time zero was not deducted from the data. Different letters (a, b, c or d) indicate a statistically significant difference between adjacent treatments within Cuo (looking up at adjacent data points between plots at each Cuo, Kruskal–Wallis test, P<0.05). For clarity, statistical differences between treatment effects at 10 µmol l–1 Cuo are not shown, but are identical to those at 50 µmol l–1 Cuo. Cu accumulation within treatment (Cu-dose effects within each experiment) were significantly different from the control with no added Cu at Cuo=50 µmol l–1 or greater for the low Clo and low pH experiments; and at 10 µmol l–1 Cuo or greater for the DIDS experiment (labels not added for clarity, Kruskal–Wallis test, P<0.05). The effect of DIDS reached a plateau at 200 µmol l–1 Cuo because Cu accumulation rates between 200–800 µmol l–1 Cuo were not statistically different from each other within DIDS treatment (from post-hoc box whisker plots following Kruskal–Wallis test). Similarly, the low pH effect reached a plateau at 400 µmol l–1 Cuo because Cu accumulation rates between 400–800 µmol l–1 Cuo were not statistically different from each other within the low pH treatment (from post-hoc box whisker plots following Kruskal–Wallis test). The above statistics for Cu-dose effect within treatment are not shown for clarity.





Right arrow Return to article