spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 4. Experiment 3. Direct comparison of the effect of the bilateral selective removal of the asymmetric setae (AS) and the lateral guard setae (left side) vs the bilateral selective removal of the aesthetascs (AE) and the medial guard setae (right side) on the mean wipe rate of the antennules after stimulation with 3 ml of 0.5 mmol l–1 L-glutamate. Wipe rate values are means ± S.E.M. of N=6 experimental animals (Panulirus argus) in each experimental group over the 9 trials of an experimental 3-day block; experimental days are numbered chronologically. Note that selective removal of the AS (Days 08–10, left) is followed by an almost total loss of antennular wiping, whereas selective removal of the AE (Days 08–10, right) causes no decrease in the mean wipe rate compared to the mean wipe rate measured in the unoperated animals in the initial 3-day block (Days 01–03). Pair-wise comparisons by paired t-tests between the means of the 3-day blocks reveal a significant difference between the pre-AS-ablation (Days 01–03, left) and the post-AS-ablation (Days 08–10, left) blocks (P<0.01), but not between the pre-AE-ablation block (Days 01–03, right) and the post-AE-ablation block (Days 08–10, right) (P=0.82). Comparison between the post-AS-ablation and the post-AE-ablation block by an unpaired t-tests reveals a significant difference between them (P<0.0001). Wipe rates of all 3-day blocks (means ± S.E.M.): Days 01-03 AS-ablation, 17.7±4.1; Days 08–10 AS-ablation, 0.7±0.2; Days 01–03 AE-ablation, 16.8±3.0; Days 08-10 AE-ablation, 17.6±2.3.





Right arrow Return to article