spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. Experiment 2. Effect of the bilateral selective removal of the aesthetascs (AE) and the medial guard setae (GS) on the mean wipe rate of the antennules after stimulation with 3 ml of 0.5 mmol l–1 L-glutamate. Wipe rate values are means ± S.E.M. of N=8 experimental animals (Panulirus argus) over the 9 trials of an experimental 3-day block; experimental days are numbered chronologically. Note that selective removal of the aesthetascs (together with the medial GS) does not cause a decrease in the mean wipe rate (Days 06–08) compared to the mean wipe rate measured in the unoperated animals in the initial 3-day block (Days 01–03). Note further that the mean wipe in the re-test blocks following after longer time intervals (Days 15–17, Days 22–24) is substantially higher than in the first two 3-day blocks of the experiment. ANOVA shows an overall statistically significant difference between the columns (P=0.002). Pair-wise comparisons by Newman–Keuls post tests between the means of the 3-day blocks reveal no significant difference between the pre-AE-ablation (Days 01–03) and the post-AE-ablation (Days 06–08) blocks (P>0.05), whereas the retest blocks following after longer time periods differ significantly from the post-AE-ablation block (P<0.01 for Days 15–17, P<0.05 for Days 22–24). The two retest blocks do not differ significantly from each other (P>0.05). Wipe rates of all 3-day blocks (means ± S.E.M.): Days 01–03, 10.0±1.2; Days 06–08, 11.4±1.5; Days 15–17, 20.7±3.9; Days 22–24, 18.4±1.9.





Right arrow Return to article