spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 9, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, iii (2005)
Copyright © 2005 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01841
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.

Inside JEB

PIT BULL IS TOP DOG IN A FIGHT

Yfke van Bergen

yfke{at}biologists.com


While watching two dogs risk life and limb during a fight in his kitchen, David Carrier began to ponder how the artificial selection pressures that humans have imposed on dogs have affected the limb bones of different breeds. Carrier suspected that there is a trade-off between properties that make limb bones suitable for fighting and those that make bones suitable for running. Teaming up with Travis Kemp, Kent Bachus and John Nairn, Carrier compared the limb bones of stocky pit bulls, bred for fighting prowess, with those of slim greyhounds, bred for high-speed running (p. 3475).

The team expected greyhounds to have stiff bones that can transmit muscular forces, and pit bulls to have tough bones that resist breaking. To find out how canine limb bones hold up under pressure, Carrier and his team placed greyhound and pit bull bones into a loading machine and measured the forces and deformation exerted on each bone until each bone snapped. The team found that greyhound limb bones were much stiffer and coped with higher stress before deforming than pit bull bones. But pit bull bones were more circular in shape and absorbed more than twice as much energy as greyhound bones before breaking; their limb bones are tougher than those of greyhounds. The team's results suggest that the limb bones of animals specialized for running are shaped differently and composed of bone tissue with different mechanical properties than are the limb bones of animals specialized for fighting. `There appears to be a trade-off between bone requirements for running versus fighting', Carrier concludes.

References

Kemp, T. J., Bachus, K. N., Nairn, J. A. and Carrier, D. R. (2005). Functional trade-offs in the limb bones of dogs selected for running versus fighting. J. Exp. Biol. 208,3475 -3482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in JEB:

Functional trade-offs in the limb bones of dogs selected for running versus fighting
T. J. Kemp, K. N. Bachus, J. A. Nairn, and D. R. Carrier
JEB 2005 208: 3475-3482. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.