spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 25, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, iii (2005)
Copyright © 2005 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01783
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.

Inside JEB

TRAFFIC JAM

Yfke van Bergen

yfke{at}biologists.com


Anyone who has watched ants scurrying purposefully along the ground to deliver food to their nest might have wondered whether the industrious insects ever face traffic control problems. Audrey Dussutour, Jean-Louis Deneubourg and Vincent Fourcassié are fascinated by collective motion in these social insects, and decided to see how black garden ants cope with bottlenecks (p. 2903).

To investigate traffic dynamics in ants, the team set up twelve experimental `ant nests' and lured the insects to a tasty sugar solution a short distance away. Some ants had to cross a wide bridge to get to the food, but others had to cross a bridge with a narrow bottleneck. The team filmed the ants marching to and from the sugar solution and analysed the video frames to calculate how long it took ants to travel from the nest to the food, as well as the number of head-on collisions between the ants. The team was surprised to find that ants somehow maintained the same rate of food delivery to the nest on both bridges, despite the bottleneck.

How did the ants maintain traffic flow on the narrow bridge? The team realised that, rather than battling their way through the crowds, ants patiently wait for their turn; neatly alternating groups of food-bound and nest-bound ants crossed the bottleneck. This reduces the number of head-on collisions on the narrow bridge, enabling ants to cross this bridge as quickly as the wider bridge. The team notes that this behaviour might prevent congestion in ant nest tunnels – and on our streets! When it comes to traffic control, we behave just like ants; next time you're stuck in a pedestrian jam, look out for alternating clusters of people navigating the rush hour.

References

Dussutour, A., Deneubourg, J.-L. and Fourcassié, V. (2005). Temporal organization of bi-directional traffic in the ant Lasius niger (L.) J. Exp. Biol. 208,2903 -2912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in JEB:

Temporal organization of bi-directional traffic in the ant Lasius niger (L.)
Audrey Dussutour, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, and Vincent Fourcassié
JEB 2005 208: 2903-2912. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Bergen, Y.