spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 8, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, iii (2004)
Copyright © 2004 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00981
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.

Inside JEB

CETACEAN WAKE

Kathryn Phillips

kathryn{at}biologists.com


When Jim Rohr and Frank Fish decided to get to grips with cetacean swimming, heading out into the ocean wasn't a viable option. But heading down to the aquarium was. Most major aquaria house a few of the large mammals, trained to perform and entertain, and the team knew these animals would be ideally prepared for participating in their swimming tests to record the first comprehensive collection of swimming efficiency parameters for a large number of whales and dolphins (p. 1633).

Rohr explains that a cetacean's efficiency can be related to its tail beat amplitude, frequency, and swimming speed. These parameters can be combined to calculate an index known as the Strouhal number, with efficient swimmers recording Strouhal numbers between 0.2 and 0.4. Cetaceans were thought to fall well within this range, with Strouhal numbers between 0.25–0.35, but would this hold up to the test when Rohr and Fish put seven cetacean species through their paces?

The team began videoing animals ranging from bottlenose and spotted dolphins, up to killer whales and pilot whales, swimming over a range of speeds in their aquaria homes. After capturing over 260 swimming sequences, Rohr and Fish calculated Strouhal numbers for each sequence and plotted their distributions. But instead of falling within the predicted range of values, many of the mammals' Strouhal numbers fell below the predicted range, with 74% recording Strouhal numbers from 0.2–0.3 when swimming most efficiently. Also, the distribution of the animal's Strouhal numbers suggested that vorticity control by their tails is important for the animals' swimming performance.

References

Rohr, J. J. and Fish, F. E. (2004). Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans. J. Exp. Biol. 207,1633 -1642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in JEB:

Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans
Jim J. Rohr and Frank E. Fish
JEB 2004 207: 1633-1642. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.