spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. Loading had no effect on the initial velocity of movement. (A) Over the first 200 ms of movement, the median velocity was between 8.7 and 10.3 cm s–1 for all movements to the anterior stimulus site (horizontal lines in open boxes) and between 10.2 and 11.1 cm s–1 for movements to the posterior site (horizontal lines in grey boxes), irrespective of load condition. The variances were large so the interquartile ranges overlapped almost completely (boxes). The whiskers indicate the range containing 90% of values. (B) Movement velocity during the cyclic part of each scratch (`Loop velocity') was similarly unaffected by load on the proximal femur (8.7–9.6 cm s–1), but was faster when the leg was loaded on the distal femur or tibia, at least for movements to the posterior stimulus site (12.9–13.3 cm s–1; medians fall outside the interquartile range for unloaded movements). Numbers indicate the number of trials at each site and load condition.





Right arrow Return to article