spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 5. Substrate-induced currents. (A) Inward currents induced by 100 µmol l-1 D-aspartate onto Xenopus oocytes expressing AeaEAAT for the duration indicated by the black bar. A holding potential of -60 mV was used. Similar inward currents were produced by application of L-Glu, L-Asp and L-Cys (data not shown). (B) Reversal of current upon exposing AeaEAAT-expressing oocytes to a sodium-free buffer containing a high potassium concentration (98 mmol l-1), at a holding potential of -60 mV. This represents the transport of endogenous excitatory amino acids out of the oocyte, and was not observed in water-injected oocytes (data not shown). (C) AeaEAAT-mediated substrate-activated currents. These current–voltage relationships are the difference between substrate-activated currents and currents in the buffer alone, obtained by off-line subtraction of the steady state portion of voltage-jump curves. Reversal potentials for the four amino acids (L-Glu, L-and D-Asp and L-Cys) applied at 100 µmol l-1 each are approximately +37 mV. (D) Sodium dependence of substrate-activated currents. Replacement of extracellular sodium with equimolar choline completely abolishes the D-aspartate (100 µmol l-1)-activated current.





Right arrow Return to article