spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 1767 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00357


Inside JEB

ON A POLLEN HIGH

Kathryn Phillips

kathryn{at}biologists.com


When bees return from successful foraging trips, a well-laden insect can carry as much as 80% of its own body weight. But how much effort the insects put into this daily Herculean task wasn't clear, until Erica Feuerbacher and Jon Harrison began putting hovering bees through their paces. Measuring the labouring insect's metabolic rate and temperature, as well as they way they beat their wings, Feuerbacher compared the insects' metabolism as they hovered carrying loads of pollen, and nectar. Amazingly, the type of cargo that the insects carried had a dramatic effect on their metabolic rate, with pollen carriers working 10% harder then the insects that filled up on nectar (p. 1855). Harrison explains that this could be for a number of physiological reasons, which allow pollen foragers to capitalise on pollen as a rich energy source at any time of day.

Feuerbacher also wondered whether the insects laboured more under heavier loads, so she began increasing the weight that the insect's carried. Surprisingly, their hovering metabolic rate only rose by a small fraction. So how were they able to lift weights that were a significant proportion of their body weight with little extra effort? Feuerbacher and Harrison think that the insects resort to `unsteady power-generating mechanisms' to give them the extra lift they need to keep them, and their load, aloft.

References

Feuerbacher, E., Fewell, J. H., Roberts, S. P., Smith, E. F. and Harrison, J. F. (2003). Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera. J. Exp. Biol. 206,1855 -1865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in JEB:

Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera
Erica Feuerbacher, Jennifer H. Fewell, Stephen P. Roberts, Elizabeth F. Smith, and Jon F. Harrison
JEB 2003 206: 1855-1865. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.