spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)



Fig. 5. Percentage change in search responses to the aversively conditioned odor CS+ (crab odor, CO) and the novel non-conditioned odors (inverse crab odor, ICO; shrimp odor, SO; mullet odor, MO) following an aversive conditioning with generalization testing (protocol of Table 2) in intact lobsters, aesthetasc-ablated lobsters and non-aesthetasc-ablated lobsters. For each group of lobsters, the percentage change in search responses to an odorant following conditioning is the percentage difference between responses of conditioned lobsters and unconditioned lobsters relative to responses of unconditioned lobsters. Data are from Fig. 4.





Right arrow Return to article