spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 7. Positioning the shunting electrodes farther away from the side of the fish reduces the current shunted during an electric organ discharge (EOD) but leaves the distribution of responsiveness across phases constant. (A) Recording of EOD current shunted during prolonged switch closure when the shunt electrodes were placed at three lateral displacements, successively farther away from the fish cage (0, 1 or 2 cm). Each point of the waveforms predicts the magnitude of EOD current that is shunted when the electronic switch is closed during an interval that centers at this point. An example of the head—tail EODs, recorded simultaneously, is shown below as a phase reference. (B) Response probabilities obtained as the switch was closed for 100 µs either during one of the extrema V2, V3 or V4, or 4 ms after onset of the EOD (Control). For each of the three distances, 100 responses were recorded at each of the four stimulus conditions (total of 1200 tests on fish 6). The baseline response probability (due to spontaneous rate fluctuations) is given by the dotted horizontal line (pooled from 100 recordings without switch closure at each distance). There was no significant difference between baseline and controls. At all distances, responsiveness in V4 is significantly higher than in V3 (P<0.001) and higher in V3 than in V2 (P<0.05). All response levels are significantly above baseline except for those at distances 1 and 2 cm in phase V2. Decrease in responsiveness with distance is significant in V4 (0-1 cm: P<0.01) and V3 (0-2 cm: P<0.05).





Right arrow Return to article