Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 7. Kinematics of the line of widest extent. (A) The line of widest extent is
measured on the moving isolated odontophore as the line of dark shadow
produced from a light source directly above the odontophore (shadow line). In
addition, the line joining the tip of the prow and the top of the radula is
measured (top line). The angles of the lines are measured relative to the line
of the pin, which is the line connecting the tip of the prow with the bottom
of the prow. (B) Comparison of the angle of the line of widest extent (shadow
line) with the line connecting the tip of the prow and the top of the radula
(top line) (measured in the side view). The two lines consistently differ by
44±5° (mean ± S.D., N=15). The left and right parts
show data measured from an isolated odontophore induced to perform movements
by application of dopamine or carbachol crystals (respectively) to the
cerebral ganglion. Event 1, rest, closed radula; event 2, widest radular
opening; event 3, immediately prior to radular closure; event 4, radular
closure; event 5, odontophore elongation; event 6, maximum elongation; event
7, elongation relaxed. (C) Averaged and normalized changes in angle of the
line connecting the top of the radula and the tip of the prow during four
in vivo swallows. The feeding cycle was normalized on the basis of
definitions of the components of the swallowing cycle from our previous work
(Drushel et al., 1997,
1998;
Neustadter et al., 2002). The
time intervals for this and all subsequent figures are defined as follows,
using the nomenclature adopted in our original papers for consistency:
t4, start of anterior buccal mass movement to peak protraction;
t1, peak protraction to peak retraction; t2, peak retraction
to the loss of the
shape, i.e. the shape in which the base of the
elongated radula/odontophore extends ventral to the long axis of the buccal
mass (see fig. 3A of
Drushel et al., 1997). Cycle
times are normalized to the sum of the times
t4+t1+t2. Lengths l were normalized to
100(llmin)/(lmaxlmin),
so that lengths range from 0 at lmin to 100 at
lmax. After normalization and averaging, the data were
smoothed using an interpolation function that fitted cubic polynomials between
successive data points. The average function is displayed as a solid line. A
function representing ± 1 S.D. was calculated from the individual
functions of the data and is displayed using dashed lines. The overall pattern
of angular changes is similar to that observed in vitro.